Results for “Qualification & Certification” — Page 8

NASA NTRS2000

NASA Master Teacher Re-Certification Program

Edward Waters College is submitting a final report covering the grant period from January 1999 - April 30, 2000. The Teacher re-certification program at Edward Waters College created a high quality professional development opportunity for middle and high school science teachers which will contribute to the improvement of science education and the use of innovation technologies in the classroom for years to come. The following goals and objectives were met and exceeded during the grant period. 1) A focused and relevant educational technology curriculum based on National Science Education Standard and state-of-the art educational resources that are accepted as one of the qualifications for re-certification in the scientific discipline in Duval County, Florida. 2) The program goal was to recertify 40 middle and high school science teachers over a two- year period. This goal was met and exceeded the projected number by recertifying over 80 middle and high school science and math teachers over a two-year period. 3) Teachers that were recertified were given an opportunity to public information that they developed on EWC's Web page or develop a web page of their own. Area schools were made aware of this information through various forms of communication with the teachers in Duval County School District, i.e., flyers sent from EWC to participants, school newspapers, word of mouth, etc. 4) A multimedia technology resource lab is available at EWC for use as a "Learning Lab" for class field trips by Duval County teachers.

Okari-Brooks, Emma↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development, Build and Certification of the Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) Hardware for the NASA Exploration Toilet

On longer range exploration missions, the mass and volume of critical hardware and consumables that will be needed to support crew will pose a big stowage challenge. This includes the hardware needed for the collection and storage of human metabolic waste. The amount of stowage needed for this hardware both before (empty) and after (full) use will be a significant burden on the overall spacecraft habitable volume, layout, and design. To help with this challenge, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a collapsible canister for the collection and containment of fecal deposits. The Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) is an alternative to the exploration toilet hard-sided fecal canister. The AFC is collapsible in its empty state which is a volume benefit to smaller vehicles on longer missions. In addition, the use of lighter-weight materials provides a reduction in mass of the overall container. This paper will provide a summary of the AFC design including final flight design and build, acceptance and qualification testing completed, final certification and delivery and forward plans for a technology demonstration with the exploration toilet on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition, a summary of issues and final resolution encountered during flight build and testing will also be provided. As part of the acceptance and certification process for AFC, the hardware was also put into several rounds of odor testing with the support of the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The details, planning and anomalies identified during odor testing will also be summarized in this paper. Finally, a brief overview of potential future design upgrades including changes to address any crew feedback from the ISS demonstration will be discussed.

Fecal Canister↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development, Build and Certification of the Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) Hardware for the NASA Exploration Toilet

On longer range exploration missions, the mass and volume of critical hardware and consumables that will be needed to support crew will pose a big stowage challenge. This includes the hardware needed for the collection and storage of human metabolic waste. The amount of stowage needed for this hardware both before (empty) and after (full) use will be a significant burden on the overall spacecraft habitable volume, layout, and design. To help with this challenge, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a collapsible canister for the collection and containment of fecal deposits. The Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) is an alternative to the exploration toilet hard-sided fecal canister. The AFC is collapsible in its empty state which is a volume benefit to smaller vehicles on longer missions. In addition, the use of lighter-weight materials provides a reduction in mass of the overall container. This paper will provide a summary of the AFC design including final flight design and build, acceptance and qualification testing completed, final certification and delivery and forward plans for a technology demonstration with the exploration toilet on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition, a summary of issues and final resolution encountered during flight build and testing will also be provided. As part of the acceptance and certification process for AFC, the hardware was also put into several rounds of odor testing with the support of the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The details, planning and anomalies identified during odor testing will also be summarized in this paper. Finally, a brief overview of potential future design upgrades including changes to address any crew feedback from the ISS demonstration will be discussed.

Fecal Canister↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development, Build and Certification of the Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) Hardware for the NASA Exploration Toilet

On longer range exploration missions, the mass and volume of critical hardware and consumables that will be needed to support crew will pose a big stowage challenge. This includes the hardware needed for the collection and storage of human metabolic waste. The amount of stowage needed for this hardware both before (empty) and after (full) use will be a significant burden on the overall spacecraft habitable volume, layout, and design. To help with this challenge, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a collapsible canister for the collection and containment of fecal deposits. The Alternate Fecal Canister (AFC) is an alternative to the exploration toilet hard-sided fecal canister. The AFC is collapsible in its empty state which is a volume benefit to smaller vehicles on longer missions. In addition, the use of lighter-weight materials provides a reduction in mass of the overall container. This paper will provide a summary of the AFC design including final flight design and build, acceptance and qualification testing completed, final certification and delivery and forward plans for a technology demonstration with the exploration toilet on the International Space Station (ISS). In addition, a summary of issues and final resolution encountered during flight build and testing will also be provided. As part of the acceptance and certification process for AFC, the hardware was also put into several rounds of odor testing with the support of the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The details, planning and anomalies identified during odor testing will also be summarized in this paper. Finally, a brief overview of potential future design upgrades including changes to address any crew feedback from the ISS demonstration will be discussed.

Fecal Canister↗

NASA NTRS2006

Certification Testing Approach for Propulsion System Design

The Certification of Propulsion Systems is costly and complex, involving development and qualification testing. The desire of the certification process is to assure all requirements can be demonstrated to be compliant. The purpose of this paper is to address the technical design concerns of certifying a propulsion system for flight. Presented are Pressurization, Tankage, Feed System and Combustion Instability concerns. Propulsion System Engineers are challenged with the dilemma for testing new systems to specific levels to reduce risk yet maintain budgetary targets. A methodical approach is presented to define the types of test suitable to address the technical issues for qualifying systems for retiring the risk levels. Experience of the lessons learned from supporting the Shuttle Program for Main Propulsion and On Orbit Propulsions Systems as well as previous collaborations on design concerns for certifying propulsion systems are utilized to address design concerns and verification approaches.

Rodriguez, Henry↗

NASA NTRS2000

Results of the HESSI Test Mishap Investigation

On March 21, 2000, the High-Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (HESSI) spacecraft was subjected to a series of vibration tests at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) as a part of its flight certification program. The structural qualification test, denoted as the sineburst test, subjected the spacecraft to a major overtest that resulted in significant structural damage to the spacecraft. The HESSI Test Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) was formed on March 24, 2000, in response to a NASA headquarters request. Board membership included experts from NASA and the University of California at Berkeley. This paper will present the investigation methods, findings, and lessons learned from the HESSI mishap.

Worth, Daniel B.↗

NASA NTRS2005

Certification Testing Approach for Propulsion System Design

The Certification of Propulsion Systems is costly and complex which involves development and qualification testing. The desire of the certification process is to assure all requirements can be demonstrated to be compliant. The purpose of this paper is to address the technical design concerns of certifying a system for flight. The authors of this paper have experience the lessons learned from supporting the Shuttle Program for Main Propulsion and On Orbit Propulsions Systems. They have collaborated design concerns for certifying propulsion systems. Presented are Pressurization, Tankage, Feed System and Combustion Instability concerns. Propulsion System Engineers are challenged with the dilemma for testing new systems to specific levels to reduce risk yet maintain budgetary targets. A methodical approach is presented to define the types of test suitable to address the technical issues for qualifying systems for retiring the risk levels.

Rodriguez, Henry↗

NASA NTRS2012

Certification of Safety-Critical Software Under DO-178C and DO-278A

The RTCA has recently released DO-178C and DO-278A as new certification guidance for the production of airborne and ground-based air traffic management software, respectively. Additionally, RTCA special committee SC-205 has also produced, at the same time, five other companion documents. These documents are RTCA DO-248C, DO-330, DO-331, DO- 332, and DO-333. These supplements address frequently asked questions about software certification, provide guidance on tool qualification requirements, and illustrate the modifications recommended to DO-178C when using model-based software design, object oriented programming, and formal methods. The objective of this paper is to first explain the relationship of DO-178C to the former DO-178B in order to give those familiar with DO- 178B an indication of what has been changed and what has not been changed. With this background, the relationship of DO-178C and DO-278 to the new DO-278A document for ground-based software development is shown. Last, an overview of the new guidance contained in the tool qualification document and the three new supplements to DO-178C and DO-278A is presented. For those unfamiliar with DO-178B, this paper serves to provide an entry point to this new certification guidance for airborne and ground-based CNS/ATM software certification.

Jacklin, Stephen A.↗

NASA NTRS1979

Performance verification of an air solar collector

Procedures and results of battery of qualification tests performed by independent certification agency on commercial solar collector are presented in report. Reported results were used as basis in judging collector suitable for field installation in residential and commerical buildings.

Miller, D. C.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Protoflight photovoltaic power module system-level tests in the space power facility

Work Package Four, which includes the NASA-Lewis and Rocketdyne, has selected an approach for the Space Station Freedom Photovoltaic (PV) Power Module flight certification that combines system level qualification and acceptance testing in the thermal vacuum environment: The protoflight vehicle approach. This approach maximizes ground test verification to assure system level performance and to minimize risk of on-orbit failures. The preliminary plans for system level thermal vacuum environmental testing of the protoflight PV Power Module in the NASA-Lewis Space Power Facility (SPF), are addressed. Details of the facility modifications to refurbish SPF, after 13 years of downtime, are briefly discussed. The results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of system level environmental testing in screening out incipient part and workmanship defects and unique failure modes are discussed. Preliminary test objectives, test hardware configurations, test support equipment, and operations are presented.

Rivera, Juan C.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Protoflight photovoltaic power module system-level tests in the Space Power Facility

Work Package Four, which includes the NASA-Lewis and Rocketdyne, has selected an approach for the Space Station Freedom Photovoltaic (PV) Power Module flight certification that combines system level qualification and acceptance testing in the thermal vacuum environment: the 'protoflight' vehicle approach. This approach maximizes ground test verification to assure system level performance and to minimize risk of on-orbit failures. The preliminary plans for system level thermal vacuum environmental testing of the protoflight PV Power Module in the NASA-Lewis Space Power Facility (SPF) are addressed. Details of the facility modifications to refurbish SPF, after 13 years of downtime, are briefly discussed. The results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of system level environmental testing in screening out incipient part and workmanship defects and unique failure modes are discussed. Preliminary test objectives, test hardware configurations, test support equipment, and operations, are presented.

Rivera, Juan C.↗

NASA NTRS2004

Classification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems. UAS Classification/Categorization for Certification

Category, class, and type designations are primary means to identify appropriate aircraft certification basis, operating rules/limitations, and pilot qualifications to operate in the National Airspace System (NAS). The question is whether UAS fit into existing aircraft categories or classes, or are unique enough to justify the creation of a new category/class. In addition, the characteristics or capabilities, which define when an UAS becomes a regulated aircraft, must also be decided. This issue focuses on UAS classification for certification purposes. Several approaches have been considered for classifying UAS. They basically group into either using a weight/mass basis, or a safety risk basis, factoring in the performance of the UAS, including where the UAS would operate. Under existing standards, aircraft must have a Type Certificate and Certificate of Airworthiness, in order to be used for "compensation or hire", a major difference from model aircraft. Newer technologies may make it possible for very small UAS to conduct commercial services, but that is left for a future discussion to extend the regulated aircraft to a lower level. The Access 5 position is that UAS are aircraft and should be regulated above the weight threshold differentiating them from model airplanes. The recommended classification grouping is summarized in a chart.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS2006

Crash Certification by Analysis - Are We There Yet?

This paper addresses the issue of crash certification by analysis. This broad topic encompasses many ancillary issues including model validation procedures, uncertainty in test data and analysis models, probabilistic techniques for test-analysis correlation, verification of the mathematical formulation, and establishment of appropriate qualification requirements. This paper will focus on certification requirements for crashworthiness of military helicopters; capabilities of the current analysis codes used for crash modeling and simulation, including some examples of simulations from the literature to illustrate the current approach to model validation; and future directions needed to achieve "crash certification by analysis."

Jackson, Karen E.↗

NASA NTRS1992

The Effects of Use of Civil Airworthiness Criteria on U.S. Air Force Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Practices

In response to the initiatives to streamline, not to mention comply with the Public Law for Non-Developmental Item Preference, the Department of Defense (DOD) has increased its use of commercial products. The Air Force has, over the past 15 years, been adapting Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certified aircraft to perform many of its airlift and training missions. Counting the T-1A Jayhawk Trainer (Beechjet 400), in excess of 500 total aircraft, covering 15 different types, will have been procured since 1978. Needless to say, significant reform of the "classical" DOD and Air Force way of doing business has been necessary. Major strides have been made by the Transport Directorate of the Aircraft Program Office in the area of test and evaluation, with integrated qualification and operational testing (QT &E/QOT &E) and airworthiness certification testing by the FAA. As well, significant changes in contracting practices and the use of commercial (vice military) specifications for qualification criteria have been realized. This paper will relate some of these significant strides in "commercializing" and streamlining the DOD acquisition and test and evaluation processes. Additionally, it will review both regulatory changes made and recommended. It concludes with a compilation of lessons learned and recommendations for further streamlining of the DOD processes.

Flight Testing↗

NASA NTRS1984

Shock response spectra variational analysis for pyrotechnic qualification testing of flight hardware

Shock response spectra data from flight certification tests were analyzed to determine envelope variation with respect to mean values in each axis. An overall variation of + or - 8.61 dB or 169 percent exists for the data. This large variation may be attributed to one or more of the following: (1) Instrumentation problems may exist. (2) Variations in the source charge (blasting caps) such as shape or explosive load may exist. (3) Two blasting caps were used to excite the pyrotechnic plate tester. Delay time between charge firings may have varied. The cause or causes of the variations need to be identified and researched to prevent future pyroshock problems.

Smith, J. L.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Observations on Dynamic Qualification Testing of a Component with Nonlinear Deadband Interfaces

Typical flight hardware dynamic qualification tests exhibit nearly linear structural response when exposed to acceleration inputs from low to full qualification levels. Even in these “linear” cases, there is typically a trend of increasing damping with test levels. The nonlinear mechanism behind this increase in energy dissipation well understood – typically stick/slip hysteresis at joint connections. This paper is concerned with a different type of nonlinearity: deadbands at structural interfaces. Deadband nonlinearities can have a significant influence on structural response and modal/spectral characteristics which can present difficulties in test, analysis, and structural certification. This subject nonlinear behaviour is observed during flight qualification testing of the AQUARIUS instrument and discussed here. Simple physical reasoning and analytical model is utilized to explain the behaviour which is consistent with the test findings.

Majed, Arya↗

NASA NTRS2021

Development of an Additive Manufacturing Ecosystem for Qualification of Additive Manufacturing Processes and Materials in Aviation

The major challenges associated with additive manufacturing (AM) are an ability to qualify parts and the costs associated with the technology. Our team will study and mature technologies as detailed below to develop an ecosystem for the qualification of AM machines, which in turn supports the certification of part production. Additive manufacturing offers unique opportunities for the aviation industry in the fabrication of original components and replacement parts. Aggressive use of metals AM has, for example, allowed the rapid development and production of new launch vehicle designs, at substantially reduced costs. Aviation has unique challenges, such as higher production volumes, but the potential value of integrating AM into aviation manufacturing is clear. To implement the ecosystem for AM qualification, the team will run a set of six multi-disciplinary projects. Each of these projects will address a current barrier to AM process qualification, and efficient production.

Koushik Datta↗

NASA NTRS2007

Promoting Robust Design of Diode Lasers for Space: A National Initiative

The Diode-laser Array Working Group (DAWG) is a national-level consumer/provider forum for discussion of engineering and manufacturing issues which influence the reliability and survivability of high-power broad-area laser diode devices in space, with an emphasis on laser diode arrays (LDAs) for optical pumping of solid-state laser media. The goals of the group are to formulate and validate standardized test and qualification protocols, operational control recommendations, and consensus manufacturing and certification standards. The group is using reliability and lifetime data collected by laser diode manufacturers and the user community to develop a set of standardized guidelines for specifying and qualifying laser diodes for long-duration operation in space, the ultimate goal being to promote an informed U.S. Government investment and procurement strategy for assuring the availability and durability of space-qualified LDAs. The group is also working to establish effective implementation of statistical design techniques at the supplier design, development, and manufacturing levels to help reduce product performance variability and improve product reliability for diodes employed in space applications

Tratt, David M.↗