Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Transonic wind tunnel”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1993

Transonic wind tunnel wall interference analysis for the Space Shuttle Launch Vehicle

The AEDC perforated-wall boundary condition has been incorporated into the NASA Ames OVERFLOW code and has been used to calculate the tunnel flow field in the AEDC Aerodynamic Wind Tunnel (16T) over a three-percent model of the Space Shuttle Launch Vehicle. Tunnel flow-field calculations have been performed for two supersonic flow-field conditions, including one near sonic condition. Wall interference assessments and analyses have been performed by making detailed comparisons of the tunnel flow-field calculations with corresponding free-air flow-field calculations and with tunnel data from different scale models. A capability to assess wall interference at low supersonic conditions and to improve data correlations with CFD results by adding the tunnel wall boundary condition is demonstrated.

Martin, F. W., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Flow Quality Survey of the NASA Ames 11-by 11-Ft Transonic Wind Tunnel

New baseline turbulence levels have been measured using a new CTA and new hot-wire sensors. Levels remain the same as measured in 1999. Data and methodology documented (almost). New baseline acoustics levels have been measured up to Mach 1.35. -Levels are higher than reported in 1999. -Data and methodology documented (almost). Application of fairings to the strut trailing edge showed up to a 10% reduction in the tunnel background noise. Data analysis and documentation for publishing is ongoing.

Amaya, Max A.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Comparison of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Similar Models in Two Size Wind Tunnels at Transonic Speeds

The aerodynamic characteristics of two similar models of a lifting body configuration were run in two transonic wind tunnels, one a 16 foot the other a 14-inch and are compared. The 16 foot test used a 2% model while the 14-inch test used a 0.7% scale model. The wind tunnel model configurations varied only in vertical tail size and an aft sting shroud. The results from these two tests compare the effect of tunnel size, Reynolds number, dynamic pressure and blockage on the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicle. The data accuracy and uncertainty are also presented. It was concluded from these tests that the data resultant from a small wind tunnel compares very well to that of a much larger wind tunnel in relation to total vehicle aerodynamic characteristics.

Springer, Anthony M.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Computational optimization and wind tunnel test of transonic wing designs

A practical procedure for the optimum design of transonic wings is demonstrated. The procedure uses an optimization program based on the method of feasible directions coupled with an aerodynamic analysis program which solves the three-dimensional potential equation for subsonic through transonic flow. Two new wings for the A-7 aircraft were designed by using the optimization procedure to achieve specified surface pressure distributions. The new wings, along with the existing A-7 wing, were tested in the Ames 11-foot transonic wind tunnel. The experimental data show that all of the performance goals were met.

Haney, H. P.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Integration Time Required to Extract Accurate Data from Transonic Wind-Tunnel Tests

Because the forces and pressures on wind-tunnel models tested at transonic speeds are not steady, even for static aerodynamic tests, integration time is required to obtain data of acceptable accuracy. The integration time required for both static and dynamic tests is evaluated analytically and confirmed by experimental measurements. It is shown that, for static and dynamic tests, the accuracy obtained is a function of integration time, frequency of the signal, and the ratio of the dynamic amplitude to the full signal of interest. In addition, for the dynamic case, the frequency bandwidth used in analysis is important. Results of this study indicate that, for typical data accuracy desired from models in a large transonic wind tunnel (11- by 11-ft), up to the following integration times are required: static force and moment tests, 0.5 s; static pressure tests, 1 s; flutter tests, 30 to 60 s; and random-dynamic tests, 10 s.

Muhlstein, Lado, Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Integration time required to extract accurate static and dynamic data from transonic wind-tunnel tests

Because the forces and pressures on wind-tunnel models tested at transonic speeds are not steady, even for 'static' aerodynamic tests, integration time is required to obtain data of acceptable accuracy. The integration time required for both static and dynamic tests is evaluated analytically and confirmed by experimental measurements. It is shown that, for static and dynamic tests, the accuracy obtained is a function of integration time, frequency content of the signal, and the ratio of the dynamic amplitude to the full signal of interest. In addition, for the dynamic case, the frequency band width used in analysis is important. Results of this study indicate that, for typical data accuracy desired from models in a large transonic wind tunnel (11- by 11-ft), up to the following integration times are required: static force and moment tests, 0.5 sec; static pressure tests, 0.1 sec; flutter tests, 30 to 60 sec; and random-dynamic tests, 10 sec.

Muhlstein, L., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Transonic Wind-Tunnel Test Of An Oblique Wing

Report describes transonic wind-tunnel tests of oblique, pivotable wing fitted to 0.087-scale model of F-8 airplane. Purpose of tests to study performance and stability characteristics. Conducted to determine whether placement of pivot at higher position above fuselage than previously results in less side force and yawing moment than observed in previous tests at low speeds.

Kennelly, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS1965

Research Facilities Summary: Wind Tunnels: Subsonic, Transonic and Supersonic - Volume 2

This volume describes subsonic, transonic, and supersonic facilities called wind tunnels in the classical sense; that is, facilities which provide essentially continuous steady streams of gas which are cool enough so there is no significant dissociation, and in which test models are generally stationary translationally. Ames facilities for gasdynamic tests in which model translation provides a significant portion of the test speed are described in Volume I, "Guns and Ranges." For quick reference, this volume includes a tabular summary of Ames subsonic, transonic, and supersonic wind tunnels. The table is followed by more detailed descriptions. Tabulated information on most major wind tunnels in the United States can be found in Reference 1.

Source record↗