Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Wave function”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1991

Ab initio study of the electrostatic multipole nature of torsional potentials in CH3SSCH3, CH3SSH, and HOOH

The origin of torsional potentials in H3CSSCH3, H3CSSH, and HOOH and the anisotropy of the local charge distribution has been analyzed in terms of atomic multipoles calculated from the ab initio LCAO-MO-SCF wave function in the 6-31G* basis set. The results indicate that for longer -S-S-bonds the major contribution to these torsional barriers are electrostatic interactions of the atomic multipoles located on two atoms forming the rotated bond. This finding demonstrates the important role of electrostatic 1-2 interatomic interactions, usually neglected in conformational studies. It also opens the possibility to derive directly from accurate ab initio wave functions a simple nonempirical torsional potential involving atomic multipoles of two bonded atoms defining the torsional angle. For shorter -O-O- bonds, use of more precise models and inclusion of 1-3 interactions seems to be necessary.

NASA Program Exobiology↗
NASA NTRS1989

A diagnostic for determining the quality of single-reference electron correlation methods

It was recently proposed that the Euclidian norm of the t sub 1 vector of the coupled cluster wave function (normalized by the number of electrons included in the correlation procedure) could be used to determine whether a single-reference-based electron correlation procedure is appropriate. This diagnostic, T sub 1, is defined for use with self consistent field molecular orbitals and is invariant to the same orbital rotations as the coupled cluster energy. T sub 1 is investigated for several different chemical systems which exhibit a range of multireference behavior, and is shown to be an excellent measure of the importance of nondynamical electron correlation and is far superior to C sub 0 from a singles and doubles configuration interaction wave function. It is further suggested that when the aim is to recover a large fraction of the dynamical electron correlation energy, a large T sub 1 (i.e., greater than 0.02) probably indicates the need for a multireference electron correlation procedure.

Lee, Timothy J.↗
NASA NTRS1989

A diagnostic for determining the quality of single-reference electron correlation methods

It was recently proposed that the Euclidian norm of the t(sub 1) vector of the coupled cluster wave function (normalized by the number of electrons included in the correlation procedure) could be used to determine whether a single-reference-based electron correlation procedure is appopriate. This diagnostic, T(sub 1) is defined for use with self-consistent-field molecular orbitals and is invariant to the same orbital rotations as the coupled cluster energy. T(sub 1) is investigated for several different chemical systems which exhibit a range of multireference behavior, and is shown to be an excellent measure of the importance of non-dynamical electron correlation and is far superior to C(sub 0) from a singles and doubles configuration interaction wave function. It is further suggested that when the aim is to recover a large fraction of the dynamical electron correlation energy, a large T(sub 1) (i.e., greater than 0.02) probably indicates the need for a multireference electron correlation procedure.

Lee, Timothy J.↗
NASA NTRS2002

Mass Polarization Effect in He-like Systems

Eigenvalues for the ground state S and excited S and P states have been calculated for He-like systems, He, Li(+), Be(+2), and Ne(+8), using Hylleraas-type wave functions. These calculations have been carried out for a number of mass ratios R=mu/M=m(sub e)/(m(sub e)+M), where m(sub e) is the mass of the electron and M is the arbitrary mass of the nucleus. The eigenvalues are fitted to a 5th degree polynomial in R giving the mass polarization term (Delta (sub 1) x Delta (sub 2) and higher order corrections. The mass polarization term obtained from the fitting procedure agrees very well with the first-order result obtained directly. For example, in He we find E=E(sub 0)+Sigma(sup 5)(sub n=1)R(sup n)C(sub n), where E(sub 0)=-5.807448754 Ry and C(sub 1)=0.318138927 which agrees very well with the directly obtained first-order value 0.318138966083 and the result 0.318372 obtained by Yamanaka, using wave functions of the configuration-interaction form. We have carried out a similar calculation for the bound state of H(-).

Bhatia, A. K.↗
NASA NTRS1987

On the bond distance in methane

The equilibrium bond distance in methane was optimized using coupled-pair functional and contracted CI wave functions, and a Gaussian basis that includes g-type functions on carbon and d-type functions on hydrogen. The resulting bond distance, when corrected for core-valence correlation effects, agrees with the experimental value of 2.052 a(0) to within the experimental uncertainty of 0.002 a(0). The main source of error in the best previous studies, which showed discrepancies with experiment of 0.007 a(0) is shown to be basis set incompleteness. In particular, it is important that the basis set be close to saturation, at least for the lower angular quantum numbers.

Bowen-Jenkins, Philippa↗
NASA NTRS1988

On the bond distance in methane

The equilibrium bond distance in methane has been optimized using coupled-pair functional and contracted CI wave functions, and a Gaussian basis that includes g-type functions on carbon and d-type functions on hydrogen. The resulting bond distance, when corrected for core-valance correlation effects, agrees with the experimental value of 2.052 a(0) to within the experimental uncertainty of 0.002 a(0). The main source of error in the best previous studies, which showed discrepancies with experiment of 0.007 a(0) is shown to be basis set incompleteness. In particular, it is important that the basis set be close to saturation, at least for the lower angular quantum numbers.

Bowen-Jenkins, Philippa↗
NASA NTRS1967

Spin-projected and extended SCF calculations.

Spin restricted, unrestricted, projected unrestricted and extended SCF wave functions energies compared, discussing calculation method for spin extended SCF functions

WAVE FUNCTION↗