Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “distributed propulsion”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Flow and Noise from Septa Nozzles

Flow and noise fields are explored for the concept of distributed propulsion. A model-scale experiment is performed with an 8:1 aspect ratio rectangular nozzle that is divided into six passages by five septa. The septa geometries are created by placing plastic inserts within the nozzle. It is found that the noise radiation from the septa nozzle can be significantly lower than that from the baseline rectangular nozzle. The reduction of noise is inferred to be due to the introduction of streamwise vortices in the flow. The streamwise vortices are produced by secondary flow within each passage. Thus, the geometry of the internal passages of the septa nozzle can have a large influence. The flow evolution is profoundly affected by slight changes in the geometry. These conclusions are reached by mostly experimental results of the flowfield aided by brief numerical simulations.

septa nozzle↗
NASA NTRS2017

Flow and Noise From Septa Nozzles

This investigation pertains to distributed propulsion system. Basically, the jet exhaust is divided and channeled through multiple compartments or septa. In one version of the concept each septum is to be driven by an electric fan, the power being supplied by engines suitably mounted on the airframe. In the latter hybrid case the need for heavy power trains is eliminated and system studies indicate a net benefit in efficiency. From aeroacoustics point of view, however, there are concerns. An immediate question is whether the noise from the multiple jets would be equal to or greater than that from an equivalent single jet. When multiple jets are placed side by side sometimes they resonate and produce more noise. In order to address these issues a fundamental model-scale experiment is being carried out at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC). Preliminary results from this study have been presented recently. One of the key findings is that the noise from the septa nozzle can actually be less than that from the equivalent single nozzle. Continued studies make it clear that the flow from the septa nozzle may be quite sensitive to upstream passage geometry in each septum. This can have a profound impact on the evolution of the flow downstream as well as noise. These issues are currently being researched. The proposed paper is to summarize the results from the mainly experimental study that is to be aided by limited numerical simulation.

nozzle flow↗
NASA NTRS2017

The Electrifying Future of Air Transportation

This presentation discusses the NASA Aeronautics Advanced Air Transport Technology Project’s perspective on electric, hybrid-electric, and related distributed propulsion technologies for future generations of large transport aircraft. Recent system studies commissioned by NASA and other organizations have identified these technologies as promising approaches to dramatically reduce aircraft fuel consumption, noise, and emissions. These technologies are part of the Project’s overall research portfolio aimed toward developing ultra-efficient commercial aircraft in conjunction with alternative low carbon propulsion and energy systems to enable safe and sustainable future growth in global aviation. It is anticipated that both room temperature and cryogenic electrical technologies will be needed in the future. Room temperature electrical systems are likely to impact aviation in the near term by making their way onto smaller aircraft and by augmenting traditional propulsion systems on larger aircraft, while cryogenic technologies will likely be needed in the far term to deliver the several tens of megawatts of propulsive power needed for large transport aircraft. The presentation outlines the opportunities and challenges for electric propulsion technologies for commercial aviation, and describes some of the related concepts and enabling technologies that are currently being developed.

Future↗
NASA NTRS2016

Electrospray Thruster Performance with Microfabricated Emitter Arrays and Indium Propellant

The feasibility of a microfabricated indium-fueled electrospray thruster with excellent performance was demonstrated. High efficiency electrospray thrusters with microfabricated components are under development for very compact, distributable propulsion systems that can be employed on both very small and large spacecraft with 10X improvement over SOA in mass, volume and specific impulse The critical components of this technology are the microfabricated emitter arrays and the capillary force driven indium feed system. Grey scale electron-beam lithography patterning and reactive ion dry etching provided the required micron-scale etch precision and uniformity across an array of 400 emitters in 1 cm2. Initial tests of single microfabricated silicon emitters demonstrated better performance than industry standard single emitters and the performance required to achieve 200 micronewtons when scaled up to a thruster with 400 emitters in 1 cm2. Arrays of emitters tested in a preliminary prototype Microfluidic Electrospray Propulsion (MEP) thruster assembly demonstrated stable performance at estimated thrust levels of 5, 50, and 120 µN at extraction voltages less than 4 kV. Current stability was within 0.15 % at 120 µN with only 1.5% of the emitter current collected by the extractor electrode. Post-test inspections revealed that more than 99% of the 400 emitters were electrospraying during the test. Specific impulse was estimated to be >3100 s from measurements of total charge and consumed indium mass at an emitter voltage of 1470 V. The results of this investigation suggest that microfabricated indium electrospray thruster technology is both feasible and capable of excellent performance as a highly compact microthruster.

Marrese-Reading, Colleen M.↗
NASA NTRS2019

How Certain Physical Considerations Impact Aerostructural Wing Optimization

Wing design optimization has been studied extensively and is of continued interest as optimization tools are developed and become more accessible. In each of these studies, certain assumptions and simplifications are made to make the design problem tractable. However, it is difficult to find systematic studies in which several considerations are added or removed one at a time to study how much impact they have. In this work, we examine how certain physical considerations (viscous drag, wave drag, thrust loads, and inertial relief from structural, fuel, and engine masses), impact the aerostructural optimization results for three distinct aircraft wings. The goal is to help develop a rough idea of how important these physical considerations are. We do this using gradient-based optimization and a multidisciplinary design optimization framework, OpenMDAO. We use the open-source tool OpenAeroStruct that couples a vortex lattice method to a finite element method. We establish a baseline aerostructural design optimization problem then perform a series of optimizations, each with one physical consideration removed from the baseline case. We find that depending on the size of the aircraft and flight conditions, the importance of some of these physical considerations varies considerably whereas the importance of others do not. Specifically, the optimal designs change radically without proper viscous and wave drag considerations and smaller aircraft with more distributed propulsion are more affected by the inclusion of engine loads.

Aeropropulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design Concepts to Meet EASA SC-VTOL-01 Single Failure Criteria

The objective of the current work is to discuss European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) SC-VTOL-01 single failure criteria, VTOL.2250(c). Prior studies have developed concept distributed propulsion and flight control (DPFC) system architectures and found they comply with EASA SC-VTOL-01 probabilistic failure criteria, VTOL.2510(a). Prior work developed two all-electric DPFC systems utilized in a quadrotor concept aircraft developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); one uses interconnecting shafts and gearboxes to interconnect redundant motors with each rotor system and the other uses gearboxes to connect redundant motors locally, near each rotor. Common between the two electric DPFC systems were rotor shafts, epicyclic systems, and motors. The current work explores Category I failures in drive systems, relevant research to support fail-safe design practices for gear systems, research and adjacent industry trends in motor fail-safety and reliability, and proposed design concepts to comply with VTOL.2250(c). Continued research in fail-safe design concepts and design guidance will benefit eVTOL and conventional rotorcraft, alike. Continued research in these areas will benefit eVTOL certification against SC-VTOL-01, and could optimistically translate to more widespread adoption of similar fail-safe design concepts into new rotorcraft designs certified against CS-29.

Rotorcraft↗
NASA NTRS2023

Exploring Synoptic Display Concepts for Hybrid-Electric Airliner Flightdecks

The advent of hybrid-electric aircraft concepts with distributed propulsion has resulted in relatively complicated powertrain designs. Determining the optimal approach to display information about the hybrid system in the flightdeck has taken on great importance. At NASA Glenn Research Center, the concept SUbsonic Single Aft eNgine (SUSAN) hybrid airliner has been modeled inside a flight simulator where different flight deck displays can be evaluated. This work focused on ways to display information that reduce clutter and information overload without degrading the crew’s ability to operate the aircraft and respond properly to emergencies. The displays’ layout and symbologies were created to be intuitive to the pilots. This paper documents iterations of synoptic displays and discusses the rationale and tradeoffs behind each variation.

Pilot Displays↗
NASA NTRS2026

Introduction to the Special Issue on Advanced Air Mobility Noise: Predictions, Measurements and Perception

This Special Issue focuses on noise associated with Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), an emerging class of predominantly electric distributed-propulsion aircraft designed for urban and regional transportation. As these vehicles move toward certification and deployment, noise has become a central challenge for regulatory approval and public acceptance, particularly due to operations in densely populated areas and at low altitudes. The 24 contributions in this issue address three key aspects of AAM noise: prediction, measurement, and human perception. Prediction studies span a wide range of modeling fidelities, from high-resolution simulations to improved semi-analytical approaches, and examine complex aeroacoustic mechanisms including rotor interactions, turbulence ingestion, and broadband noise generation. Measurement studies, largely at model scale, provide new insights into tonal and broadband noise characteristics across configurations and operating conditions, while supporting model validation. Perception-focused contributions investigate annoyance, sound quality metrics, and auralization, emphasizing the role of context and operational factors in shaping human response. Together, these works highlight the interdisciplinary nature of AAM noise research and the need for integrated approaches to enable quieter vehicle design.

Perception↗
NASA NTRS2017

Structural Configuration Analysis of Advanced Flight Vehicle Concepts with Distributed Hybrid-Electric Propulsion

Structural configuration analysis of two advanced aircraft concepts with distributed hybrid-electric propulsion is presented. These concepts are characterized by multiple wing-mounted electric propulsors, which are powered by turbo-generators. Based on lessons learned from previous structural analysis of unconventional concepts, high-fidelity finite element models of the aircraft wing with embedded electric propulsors are developed. Although a hybrid-electric propulsion system has noise and emission benefits, it also adds electrical power system weights. Hence, efficient structural integration of the wing and propulsors is investigated for design improvement, structural analysis, and weight reduction. Wing structural weights of the two designs are compared with a baseline conventional transport aircraft wing for benefit assessment. In one design, the wing structural weight reduction partially compensates for the additional weight associated with the distributed electric propulsion system.

Mukhopadhyay, Vivek↗
NASA NTRS1979

Computed voltage distribution around Solar Electric Propulsion spacecraft

The paper uses the NASCAP computer code to compute voltage distributions around a Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) spacecraft as it encounters an idealized geomagnetic substorm environment. Consideration is given to both a standard operating voltage and direct-drive voltage configuration. The computations are presented without thruster operations as well as with a simplified, simulated thruster-on representation for direct-drive configuration only. Finally, it is stressed that the computations seeking possible areas of concern in the spacecraft design are exploratory.

Stevens, N. J.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Enabling Electric Propulsion for Flight

Team Seedling project AFRC and LaRC 31ft distributed electric propulsion wing on truck bed up 75 miles per hour for coefficient of lift validation. Convergent Aeronautic Solutions project, sub-project Convergent Electric Propulsion Technologies AFRC, LaRC and GRC, re-winging a 4 passenger Tecnam aircraft with a 31ft distributed electric propulsion wing. Advanced Air Transport Technologies (Fixed Wing), Hybrid Electric Research Theme, developing a series hybrid ironbird and flight sim to study integration and performance challenges in preparation for a 1-2 MW flight project.

flight research↗
NASA NTRS2014

Enabling Electric Propulsion for Flight

Description of current ARMD projects; Team Seedling project AFRC and LaRC 31ft distributed electric propulsion wing on truck bed up 75 miles per hour for coefficient of lift validation. Convergent Aeronautic Solutions project (new ARMD reorg), sub-project Convergent Electric Propulsion Technologies AFRC, LaRC and GRC, re-winging a 4 passenger Tecnam aircraft with a 31ft distributed electric propulsion wing. Advanced Air Transport Technologies (Fixed Wing), Hybrid Electric Research Theme, developing a series hybrid ironbird and flight sim to study integration and performance challenges in preparation for a 1-2 MW flight project.

flight research↗
NASA NTRS1979

Computed voltage distributions around solar electric propulsion spacecraft

The NASA Charging Analyzer Program is used to conduct preliminary computations of the voltage distributions around such large spacecraft in geomagnetic substorm environments at geosynchronous altitudes. Both a standard operating voltage (+ or - 150 volts on solar arrays) and direct-drive (+1200 volts on arrays) configurations are considered. Thruster-off simulations are computed for both operating voltage configurations while the effect of simulated thruster-on conditions are evaluated only for direct-drive configuration. These simulated thruster-on conditions are evaluated only for direct-drive configuration. These simulated thruster operations appear to alleviate surface charging.

Stevens, N. J.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Electrical Propulsive Fuselage Concept for Transonic Transport Aircraft

NASA is broadly engaged in Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP) efforts across air vehicle sizes and electric aircraft propulsion approaches. EAP enables a wide range of propulsion airframe integration options as well as the use of rechargeable energy storage in an aircraft. This paper is limited to a discussion of boundary layer ingestion (BLI) systems which are located on the fuselage of the aircraft and use electrical drive systems. We term that combination an "electrical propulsive fuselage". The benefits, challenges, and design parameters of an electrically driven fuselage BLI system are considered. Five existing types of fuselage BLI implementation approaches which can be implemented using either electrical or mechanical drive systems are reviewed. An overview of boundary layer types, fan response to boundary layer, and electrical system for aircraft propulsion is presented. An idea distributed electric propulsive fuselage is proposed.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2017

Cooling of Electric Motors Used for Propulsion on SCEPTOR

NASA is developing a suite of hybrid-electric propulsion technologies for aircraft. These technologies have the benefit of lower emissions, diminished noise, increased efficiency, and reduced fuel burn. These will provide lower operating costs for aircraft operators. Replacing internal combustion engines with distributed electric propulsion is a keystone of this technology suite, but presents many new problems to aircraft system designers. One of the problems is how to cool these electric motors without adding significant aerodynamic drag, cooling system weight or fan power. This paper discusses the options evaluated for cooling the motors on SCEPTOR (Scalable Convergent Electric Propulsion Technology and Operations Research): a project that will demonstrate Distributed Electric Propulsion technology in flight. Options for external and internal cooling, inlet and exhaust locations, ducting and adjustable cowling, and axial and centrifugal fans were evaluated. The final design was based on a trade between effectiveness, simplicity, robustness, mass and performance over a range of ground and flight operation environments.

Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2022

Computational Analysis of the X-57 Maxwell Airplane at Unpowered Conditions (Preliminary Fuselage)

The X-57 Maxwell is an all-electric airplane that implements a distributed electric propulsion system to demonstrate that high-efficiency electric propulsion can be integrated with aerodynamics to increase the performance of an airplane. To this end, distributed electric fans were installed on the wing to provide increased flow over the wing at the low takeoff and landing speeds of the X-57. The low-speed lift augmentation allows for a reduction in wing area for cruise optimization. The X-57 wing area was reduced to 42 percent of the wing area of the baseline aircraft, a Tecnam P2006T. With this reduced wing area and the electric propulsion system, it is estimated that the X-57 will cruise on less than one-third the total energy compared to the baseline aircraft. To meet the cruise performance goal at a Mach number of 0.233 at an altitude of 8000 feet, the X-57 has a cruise lift coefficient of 0.7516 and needs to have a cruise drag coefficient of 0.05423 or less. The USM3D computational solver was used to investigate the X-57 performance, without the distributed electric propulsion high-lift system operating. The unpowered X-57 performance is of interest to quantify if the X-57 can meet the cruise drag performance goal, and to document the lift performance of the very small wing at takeoff and landing conditions. The primary configurations investigated in this paper include the cruise configuration with no flap deflection, a takeoff configuration with a 10◦ flap deflection, and a landing configuration with a 30◦ flap deflection. The conditions for the cruise configuration were a flight unit Reynolds number of 1.32E+06 per foot, an altitude of 8000 feet, a Mach number of 0.233, and angles of attack from −2° to 24° . At the cruise lift coefficient of 0.7516, the computed drag coefficient is 0.05275. This computed drag is less than the drag coefficient of 0.05423 that is required to meet the X-57 airplane performance goal. However, the computational airplane is a completely smooth geometry and does not account for protuberance drag, nor the drag from steps and gaps in the actual X-57 airplane. Therefore, based upon the CFD drag calculation there is a 10-percent margin to account for some of the differences between the as-built metal fuselage and empennage construction, and the smooth computational geometry. The computed cruise drag also does not account for an induced drag reduction due to the wing-tip propellers and a drag reduction due to laminar flow achieved on the wing. The computed lift to drag ratio is 14.14 at the cruise lift coefficient of 0.7516, and the maximum computed lift to drag ratio is 15.8. The maximum lift coefficient for the cruise configuration was 2.13 at an angle of attack of 15°. The conditions for the takeoff configuration with a 10° flap deflection were a flight unit Reynolds number of 0.986E+06 per foot, an altitude of 2500 feet, a Mach number of 0.149, and angles of attack from −2° to 22°. The maximum lift coefficient for the takeoff configuration was 2.21 at an angle of attack of 16°. The conditions for the landing configuration with a 30° flap deflection were a flight unit Reynolds number of 0.922E+06 per foot, an altitude of 2500 feet, a Mach number of 0.139, and angles of attack from −2° to 24°. The maximum lift coefficient for the landing configuration was 2.58 and occurred at two angles of attack, 10° and 14°. Based on the unpowered maximum lift coefficient of 2.58 for the 30° flap deflection, along with computations of the distributed electric propulsion lift augmentation (not shown in this paper), the X-57 Maxwell is estimated to meet its powered landing goal of a maximum lift coefficient of 4.0.

X-57 Maxwell Airplane↗
NASA NTRS2024

Computational Analysis of the X-57 Maxwell Airplane, the Landing Configuration with High-Lift Blowing and Aileron Deflections (Preliminary Fuselage)

The X-57 Maxwell is an all-electric airplane with a distributed electric propulsion system used for a high-lift system at takeoff and landing conditions. The Kestrel and USM3D flow solvers were used at NASA Langley to investigate the performance of the X-57 Maxwell in the development of an aerodynamic database. The configuration investigated in this paper had a 30° flap deflection, and in addition the pilot’s right aileron were deflected and undeflected in different cases. The solutions were computed at an airspeed of 58 KEAS, for an altitude of 6000 feet, and a flight Reynolds number of 0.588e+06 per foot. To evaluate the high-lift distributed electric propulsion system without aileron deflections, the solutions were computed for an angle-of-attack sweep from −2° to 20°, with the high-lift propellers blowing and the cruise propellers excluded from the simulation. To investigate the aileron effectiveness, the solutions were computed at angles of attack of −2° and 14°, for aileron deflections from −25° to 18° with the high-lift propellers blowing and the cruise propellers windmilling at idle-power. The high-lift propellers and the idle-power cruise propellers were modeled with an actuator disk. Results show negligible differences in lift, drag and pitching moment whether the idle-powered cruise propellers were included or excluded from the simulation. In general, the Kestrel and USM3D codes compared well for lift, drag and pitching moment for the landing configuration with no aileron control. The Kestrel code, using the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model with the rotation corrections terms, predicted an increasing lift coefficient up to maximum lift coefficient of 4.65 at a 15° angle of attack. The USM3D code, using the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model turbulence model with the Quadratic Constitutive Relation predicted an increasing lift coefficient up to maximum lift coefficient of 4.5 at a 12° angle of attack, with the lift remaining constant through a 14◦ angle of attack. A possible difference in lift coefficient between the codes for high angles of attack may result from the different available options used with the standard Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The Kestrel code predicted more drag across the range of angle of attack than the USM3D code. The codes compared well for pitching moment coefficient across the range of angle of attack. The Kestrel and USM3D codes compared well for aileron effectiveness at a 2° angle of attack. The Kestrel code predicts better aileron effectiveness than USM3D at a 14° angle of attack. There is more flow separation in the region outboard of the last high-lift nacelle for the USM3D solutions at a 14° angle of attack, which diminishes the ability of the aileron to be effective.

X-57 Maxwell Airplane↗