Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “orbital operations”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8

Establishing the infrastructure - Orbital operational requirements and options

Manned missions currently under consideration for exploration of the moon and Mars entail supporting activities in LEO. Attention is presently given to the significance of NASA's Space Station Freedom for both the support of lunar base-building efforts and the gathering of expertise for such ambitious undertakings. The lunar base infrastructure is expected to in turn play a similar technology-validating and operations-supporting role for manned exploration of Mars. Attention is given to the incorporation of aerobrake construction facilities by Space Station Freedom.

Pritchard, E. B.↗

Manned Mars mission on-orbit operations FTS capabilities assessment

This document presents an overview of the characteristics and capabilities of the flight telerobotic servicer (FTS), under development at GSFC at the time the report was prepared; the project has since been cancelled. The assessment was directed toward developing the FTS to enable assembly and servicing of the Mars vehicle at the space station; facilitate rendezvous, docking, and fluid transfer operations involving the Mars vehicle fuel tank; to perform strip-mining operations on the lunar/martian surfaces; and to construct a three-story shelter on the martian surface. The report considers the FTS' mechanical, electrical, thermal, and operational subsystems, as well as its proposed manipulator capabilities.

Gallo, Frank G.↗

Climate Suite Study for the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System Internal Concepts Study: Ozone Sensors - Part A

Our recommendations to NPOESS for the sensors it should adopt to meet threshold requirements for global monitoring of ozone and, to some extent, of aerosols and of atmospheric temperature, pressure, and water vapor content are summarized in this report. The degree to which these sensors fulfill other NPOESS requirements than ozone is also summarized. The number of sensors that should be in the constellation is discussed in terms of desired reliability, continuity of coverage, and the ability to cross-calibrate successive sensors. Our recommendations for specific ozone measurement requirements, IORD item 4.1.6.2.28, are given. We make the case that the monitoring of three minor constituents in the upper atmosphere (N20, ClO or ClONO2, and HNO3) should be added to the list of NPOESS requirements because of their importance to long-term ozone studies and the small additional cost required (ozone sensors are already designed to measure them). Specific measurement requirements, which should be regarded as supplementary to the ozone requirement, are given here. The necessity of using two types of sensors, nadir-viewers and limb-scanners, for atmospheric studies is discussed.

Lucke, R. L.↗

Overview of International Space Station Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly On-Orbit Operations and Performance

Controlling Carbon Dioxide (CO2) partial pressure in the habitable vehicle environment is a critical part of operations on the International Space Station (ISS). On the United States segment of ISS, CO2 levels are primarily controlled by the Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA). There are two CDRAs on ISS; one in the United States Laboratory module, and one in the Node3 module. CDRA has been through several significant operational issues, performance issues and subsequent re-design of various components, primarily involving the Desiccant Adsorbent Bed (DAB) assembly and Air Selector Valves (ASV). This paper will focus on significant operational and performance issues experienced by the CDRA team from 2008-2012.

Matty, Christopher M.↗

MOPITT Mechanisms 16 Years In-Orbit Operation on TERRA

The 16th anniversary of the launch of NASA's Terra Spacecraft was marked on December 18, 2015, with the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument being a successful contributor to the NASA EOS flagship. MOPITT has been enabled by a large suite of mechanisms, allowing the instrument to perform long-duration monitoring of atmospheric carbon monoxide, providing global measurements of this important greenhouse gas for 16 years. Mechanisms have been successfully employed for scanning, cooling of detectors, and to optically modulate the gas path length within the instrument by means of pressure and gas cell length variation. The instrument utilizes these devices to perform correlation spectroscopy, enabling measurements with vertical resolution from the nadir view, and has thereby furthered understanding of source and global transport effects of carbon monoxide. Given the design requirement for a 5.25-year lifetime, the stability and performance of the majority of mechanisms have far surpassed design goals. With 16 continuously operating mechanisms in service on MOPITT, including 12 rotating mechanisms and 4 with linear drive elements, the instrument was an ambitious undertaking. The long life requirements combined with demands for cleanliness and optical stability made for difficult design choices including that of the selection of new lubrication processes. Observations and lessons learned with regards to many aspects of the mechanisms and associated monitoring devices are discussed here. Mechanism behaviors are described, including anomalies, long-term drive current/power, fill pressure, vibration and cold-tip temperature trends. The effectiveness of particular lubrication formulations and the screening method implemented is discussed in relation to continuous rotating mechanisms and stepper motors, which have exceeded 15 billon rotations and 2.5 billion steps respectively. Aspects of gas cell hermeticity, optical cleanliness, heater problems and SEU effects on accelerometers are also discussed.

Gibson, Andrew S.↗

Galileo System Design for Orbital Operations

In April 1991, Galileo's X-band high gain antenna failed to deploy. An alternate approach which utilizes the spacecraft's S-band low gain antenna was conceived and is in development.

Galileo↗

Integration, Test, and On-Orbit Operation of a Ka-band Parabolic Deployable Antenna (KaPDA) for CubeSats

In the past decade, CubeSats have undergone a revolution, moving from universityresearch projects to enabling industry opportunities and government missions. Six yearsago, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (JPL/Caltech)initiated a research and technology development effort to advance CubeSat communicationcapabilities, with one of the key thrusts being the Ka-band parabolic deployable antenna(KaPDA). This antenna started with the ambitious goal of fitting a 42 dB, 0.5 meter, 35 GHzantenna in a 1.5U canister. At that time, there had been very limited development in the areaof high gain CubeSat antennas which are critical for both high data rate communicationsand remote sensing science. A Ka-band high gain antenna would provide a 10,000 timesincrease in data communication rates over an X-band patch antenna and a 100 timesincrease over state-of-the-art S-band parabolic antennas. This paper discusses the process ofbuilding, integrating, and operating the flight antenna, its final performance and lessonslearned. KaPDA was an enabling technology for RainCube mission, the first Earth ScienceCubeSat to have an active instrument. RainCube was launched in May of 2018, makingKaPDA the second deployable parabolic antenna to fly on a CubeSat and the first of its kindto operate at Ka-band enabling a number of opportunities for high rate, deep space antennacommunications and remote sensing science.

Thomson, Mark W.↗

Skylab Operations Handbook: Orbital Workshop (OWS), Airlock Module (AM), Multiple Docking Adapter (MDA): Systems Descriptions - Volume 1

The Skylab Program consists of three low-earth-orbit missions of the Orbital Assembly (OA) (figure 1.0-1), extending over.an a-month period. The OA consists of the CSM docked to the Saturn Workshop.(SWS). This handbook describes the systems for three of the four major components of the SWS (OWS, AM, and MDA), and also discusses significant interfaces with the Instrument Unit (IU), ATM, and CSM. The other major component of the SWS, the ATM, is treated separately in its own handbook. The OWS, AM, MDA, ATM Deployment Assembly (ATM-DA), Fixed Airlock Shroud (FAS), Payload Shroud (PS), and IU are addressed throughout this document as individual modules from a structural standpoint only. Although normally considered a part of the launch vehicle, the IU is treated in this document as part of the SWS because of its function in preparing the SWS for orbital operation. Section 1.0 describes vehicle and mission configurations of the Skylab program and provides general descriptions of the various systems. Section 2.0 provides detailed systems data covering system interfaces, functional description, subsystems and major components description, component operation, failure modes, performance and design data, operational limitations and restrictions, and instrumentation, and briefly outlines the experiments. Section 3.0 contains illustrations of all panels and identifies the controls and displays, panels, reference designators, nomenclature, functions, circuit breakers, and power sources. The Table of Contents lists in order of appearance all sections, subsections, major paragraphs, illustrations, and tables and provides their respective page locations. Appendix A defines the abbreviations and acronyms employed throughout this handbook, and Appendix B explains the symbols used. Appendix C is a locator index that references component controls contained in Section 3.0. Appendix D is an alphabetical index of paragraph headings, illustrations, and tables, according to the key word, with applicable page numbers. Additional items of significance to the user have been included in the index. The technical level to which this document is written assumes the reader to have general knowledge of engineering terms and principles.

West, W. D.↗