Results for “xenon thrusters” — Page 8

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The NEXT-C Power Processing Unit: Lessons Learned from the Design, Build, and Test of the NEXT-C PPU for APL's DART Mission

NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) will be the first-ever planetary defense mission to demonstrate asteroid deflection using kinetic impactor technology. The DART spacecraft will utilize the NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT), which is a successor to the NSTAR ion propulsion system that successfully propelled NASA’s Deep Space 1 and Dawn spacecraft. In 2015, NASA partnered with Aerojet Rocketdyne and ZIN Technologies on the NEXT-Commercial (NEXT-C) effort to manufacture a Flight-Qualified (TRL 8) power processing unit (PPU). The NEXT-C PPU was based on the heritage gridded ion thruster PPU from NSTAR and NEXT, but with significant improvements in performance and manufacturability. The design goals of the NEXT-C PPU were to achieve the technical performance goals of the PPU in size, mass, and efficiency over a wide range of input voltage and output power. This paper discusses the lessons learned from the design, build, and test of the NEXT-C PPU, and how challenges were overcome to deliver a Flight PPU.

NEXT-C↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The NEXT-C Power Processing Unit: Lessons Learned from the Design, Build, and Test of the NEXT-C PPU for APL's DART Mission

NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) will be the first-ever planetary defense mission to demonstrate asteroid deflection using kinetic impactor technology. The DART spacecraft will utilize the NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT), which is a successor to the NSTAR ion propulsion system that successfully propelled NASA’s Deep Space 1 and Dawn spacecraft. In 2015, NASA partnered with Aerojet Rocketdyne and ZIN Technologies on the NEXT-Commercial (NEXT-C) effort to manufacture a Flight-Qualified (TRL 8) power processing unit (PPU). The NEXT-C PPU was based on the heritage gridded ion thruster PPU from NSTAR and NEXT, but with significant improvements in performance and manufacturability. The design goals of the NEXT-C PPU were to achieve the technical performance goals of the PPU in size, mass, and efficiency over a wide range of input voltage and output power. This paper discusses the lessons learned from the design, build, and test of the NEXT-C PPU, and how challenges were overcome to deliver a Flight PPU.

NEXT-C↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Challenges Associated with In-Situ Calibration of Load Cells in Force Limited Vibration Testing

The difference in mounting configuration between flight and test can significantly impact the effectiveness of the test in environmental vibration testing. Many tests are performed with large electrodynamic shakers, which utilize interfaces that seek to replicate a fixed base, such as slip tables and head expanders. This fixed base configuration is rarely seen in flight configurations; rather a more realistic configuration would include a flexible mounting structure with its own compliance and dynamics. This causes significant over and under tests in various frequency bands depending on the differences between the test article and fixture dynamics. The traditional way of avoiding these high loads is to limit the acceleration responses at multiple locations on the test article. However, the effectiveness of this approach is highly dependent upon the validity of the test article’s analytical in order to derive accurate acceleration response limit specifications. Also this technique requires limiting the acceleration responses at many locations throughout the test article, which may not be implementable due to such things as access and cleanliness issues An improved environmental vibration testing technique known as force limiting incorporates measurements of the forces between the test article and shaker system interface and limiting them to a specification that more accurately replicates the interface impedance of the structure the test article will be mounted to in flight. In effect this transforms the high mechanical impedance at the test article to shaker interface to more closely match the mechanical impedance of the flight interface, which avoids producing the unrealistically high interface loads. Typically force gauges or load cells are used to measure these interface forces. However, utilizing load cells can present a multitude of challenges depending upon such things as their installation method, geometric layout, and test fixture setup. Regardless, it is extremely important to perform an in-situ calibration of the load cells prior to vibration testing at any significant levels. This paper will discuss the challenges associated with utilizing load cells during the NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster – Commercial (NEXT-C) gridded ion thruster proto-flight vibration test performed at the NASA Glenn Research Center’s Structural Dynamics Laboratory.

Kenneth J Pederson↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Challenges Associated with In-Situ Calibration of Load Cells in Force Limited Vibration Testing

The difference in mounting configuration between flight and test can significantly impact the effectiveness of the test in environmental vibration testing. Many tests are performed with large electrodynamic shakers, which utilize interfaces that seek to replicate a fixed base, such as slip tables and head expanders. This fixed base configuration is rarely seen in flight configurations; rather a more realistic configuration would include a flexible mounting structure with its own compliance and dynamics. This causes significant over and under tests in various frequency bands depending on the differences between the test article and fixture dynamics. The traditional way of avoiding these high loads is to limit the acceleration responses at multiple locations on the test article. However, the effectiveness of this approach is highly dependent upon the validity of the test article’s analytical in order to derive accurate acceleration response limit specifications. Also this technique requires limiting the acceleration responses at many locations throughout the test article, which may not be implementable due to such things as access and cleanliness issues An improved environmental vibration testing technique known as force limiting incorporates measurements of the forces between the test article and shaker system interface and limiting them to a specification that more accurately replicates the interface impedance of the structure the test article will be mounted to in flight. In effect this transforms the high mechanical impedance at the test article to shaker interface to more closely match the mechanical impedance of the flight interface, which avoids producing the unrealistically high interface loads. Typically force gauges or load cells are used to measure these interface forces. However, utilizing load cells can present a multitude of challenges depending upon such things as their installation method, geometric layout, and test fixture setup. Regardless, it is extremely important to perform an in-situ calibration of the load cells prior to vibration testing at any significant levels. This paper will discuss the challenges associated with utilizing load cells during the NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster – Commercial (NEXT-C) gridded ion thruster proto-flight vibration test performed at the NASA Glenn Research Center’s Structural Dynamics Laboratory.

K. J. Pederson↗

NASA NTRS1993

Performance of the NASA 30 cm Ion Thruster

A 30 cm diameter xenon ion thruster is under development at NASA to provide an ion propulsion option for missions of national interest, and is being proposed for use on the USAF/TRW Space Surveillance, Tracking and Autonomous Repositioning (SSTAR) platform to validate ion propulsion. The thruster incorporates innovations in design, materials, and fabrication techniques compared to those employed in conventional ion thrusters. Specific development efforts include thruster design optimizations, component life testing and validation, vibration testing, and performance characterizations. Under this test program, the ion thruster will be brought to engineering model development status. This paper discusses the performance and power throttling test data for the NASA 30 cm diameter xenon ion thruster over an input power envelope of 0.7 to 4.9 kW, and corresponding thruster lifetime expectations.

Patterson, Michael J.↗

NASA NTRS2003

The Influence of Current Density and Magnetic Field Topography in Optimizing the Performance, Divergence, and Plasma Oscillations of High Specific Impulse Hall Thrusters

Recent studies of xenon Hall thrusters have shown peak efficiencies at specific impulses of less than 3000 s. This was a consequence of modern Hall thruster magnetic field topographies, which have been optimized for 300 V discharges. On-going research at the NASA Glenn Research Center is investigating this behavior and methods to enhance thruster performance. To conduct these studies, a laboratory model Hall thruster that uses a pair of trim coils to tailor the magnetic field topography for high specific impulse operation has been developed. The thruster-the NASA-173Mv2 was tested to determine how current density and magnetic field topography affect performance, divergence, and plasma oscillations at voltages up to 1000 V. Test results showed there was a minimum current density and optimum magnetic field topography at which efficiency monotonically increased with voltage. At 1000 V, 10 milligrams per second the total specific impulse was 3390 s and the total efficiency was 60.8%. Plume divergence decreased at 400-1000 V, but increased at 300-400 V as the result of plasma oscillations. The dominant oscillation frequency steadily increased with voltage, from 14.5 kHz at 300 V, to 22 kHz at 1000 V. An additional oscillatory mode in the 80-90 kHz frequency range began to appear above 500 V. The use of trim coils to modify the magnetic field improved performance while decreasing plume divergence and the frequency and magnitude of plasma oscillations.

Hofer, Richard R.↗

NASA NTRS2004

Ion Thruster Power Levels Extended by a Factor of 10

In response to two NASA Office of Space Science initiatives, the NASA Glenn Research Center is now developing a 7-kW-class xenon ion thruster system for near-term solar-powered spacecraft and a 25-kW ion engine for nuclear-electric spacecraft. The 7-kW ion thruster and power processor can be throttled down to 1 kW and are applicable to 25-kW flagship missions to the outer planets, asteroids, and comets. This propulsion system was scaled up from the 2.5-kW ion thruster and power processor that was developed successfully by Glenn, Boeing, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Spectrum Astro for the Deep Space 1 spacecraft. The 7-kW ion thruster system is being developed under NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) project, which includes partners from JPL, Aerojet, Boeing, the University of Michigan, and Colorado State University.

Patterson, Michael J.↗

NASA NTRS1995

Development of optical diagnostics for performance evaluation of arcjet thrusters

Laser and optical emission-based measurements have been developed and implemented for use on low-power hydrogen arcjet thrusters and xenon-propelled electric thrusters. In the case of low power hydrogen arcjets, these laser induce fluorescence measurements constitute the first complete set of data that characterize the velocity and temperature field of such a device. The research performed under the auspices of this NASA grant includes laser-based measurements of atomic hydrogen velocity and translational temperature, ultraviolet absorption measurements of ground state atomic hydrogen, Raman scattering measurements of the electronic ground state of molecular hydrogen, and optical emission based measurements of electronically excited atomic hydrogen, electron number density, and electron temperature. In addition, we have developed a collisional-radiative model of atomic hydrogen for use in conjunction with magnetohydrodynamic models to predict the plasma radiative spectrum, and near-electrode plasma models to better understand current transfer from the electrodes to the plasma. In the final year of the grant, a new program aimed at developing diagnostics for xenon plasma thrusters was initiated, and results on the use of diode lasers for interrogating Hall accelerator plasmas has been presented at recent conferences.

Cappelli, Mark A.↗

NASA NTRS1993

Erosion rate diagnostics in ion thrusters using laser-induced fluorescence

We have used laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) to monitor the charge-exchange ion erosion of the molybdenum accelerator electrode in ion thrusters. This real-time, nonintrusive method was implemented by operating a 30cm-diam ring-cusp thruster using xenon propellant. With the thruster operating at a total power of 5 kW, laser radiation at a wavelength of 390 nm (corresponding to a ground state atomic transition of molybdenum) was directed through the extracted ion beam adjacent to the downstream surface of the molybdenum accelerator electrode. Molybdenum atoms, sputtered from this surface as a result of charge-exchange ion erosion, were excited by the laser radiation. The intensity of the laser-induced fluorescence radiation, which is proportional to the sputter rate of the molybdenum atoms, was measured and correlated with variations in thruster operating conditions such as accelerator electrode voltage, accelerator electrode current, and test facility background pressure. We also demonstrated that the LIF technique has sufficient sensitivity and spatial resolution to evaluate accelerator electrode lifetime in ground-based test facilities.

Gaeta, C. J.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Diagnostic for Verifying the Thrust Vector Requirement of the AEPS Hall-Effect Thruster and Comparison to the NEXT-C Thrust Vector Diagnostic

A diagnostic has been designed and fabricated to verify the thrust vector requirement for the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) thruster. This diagnostic will be used to verify that the propulsion system thrust vector offset from the mounting surface normal vector does not exceed 1.5 degrees over the entire throttling range and over the course of 23,000 hours of thruster testing. The diagnostic will also not violate the thruster's required voltage standoff capability in the presence of carbon backsputter by being minimally intrusive and not significantly adding to the facility backsputtered rate. Based on these requirements, an appropriate diagnostic design was determined to comprise of an array of 23 Faraday probes swept through the plume in an arc 1m from the thruster to map the beam current density. The beam current density centroid of the plume is assumed to track the thrust vector within an acceptable level of uncertainty. Additionally, a reference system, including optical alignment to the mounting surface normal vector and tilt sensors, was devised to periodically calibrate the probe position and motion throughout the long duration wear test campaign. Initial measurements of the thruster plume have been acquired to demonstrate the diagnostics functionality, verify procedures, and assess any necessary improvements prior to implementation of the diagnostic during the AEPS Engineering Development Unit (EDU) long duration wear test. To illustrate the merits of differing approaches to thrust vector determination for different classes of electric propulsion thrusters, NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster-Commercial (NEXT-C) thrust vector diagnostic design details and recent data are also discussed (Appendix A).

Benavides, Gabriel F.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Diagnostic for Verifying the Thrust Vector Requirement of the AEPS Hall-Effect Thruster and Comparison to the NEXT-C Thrust Vector Diagnostic

A diagnostic has been designed and fabricated to verify the thrust vector requirement for the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) thruster. This diagnostic will be used to verify that the propulsion system thrust vector offset from the mounting surface normal vector does not exceed 1.5 degrees over the entire throttling range and over the course of 23,000 hours of thruster testing. The diagnostic will also not violate the thruster's required voltage standoff capability in the presence of carbon backsputter by being minimally intrusive and not significantly adding to the facility backsputtered rate. Based on these requirements, an appropriate diagnostic design was determined to comprise of an array of 23 Faraday probes swept through the plume in an arc 1m from the thruster to map the beam current density. The beam current density centroid of the plume is assumed to track the thrust vector within an acceptable level of uncertainty. Additionally, a reference system, including optical alignment to the mounting surface normal vector and tilt sensors, was devised to periodically calibrate the probe position and motion throughout the long duration wear test campaign. Initial measurements of the thruster plume have been acquired to demonstrate the diagnostics functionality, verify procedures, and assess any necessary improvements prior to implementation of the diagnostic during the AEPS Engineering Development Unit (EDU) long duration wear test. To illustrate the merits of differing approaches to thrust vector determination for different classes of electric propulsion thrusters, NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster-Commercial (NEXT-C) thrust vector diagnostic design details and recent data are also discussed (Appendix A).

Benavides, Gabriel F.↗

NASA NTRS2018

Diagnostic for Verifying the Thrust Vector Requirement of the AEPS Hall-Effect Thruster and Comparison to the NEXT-C Thrust Vector Diagnostic

A diagnostic has been designed and fabricated to verify the thrust vector requirement for the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) thruster. This diagnostic will be used to verify that the propulsion system thrust vector offset from the mounting surface normal vector does not exceed 1.5 degrees over the entire throttling range and over the course of 23,000 hours of thruster testing. The diagnostic will also not violate the thruster's required voltage standoff capability in the presence of carbon backsputter by being minimally intrusive and not significantly adding to the facility backsputtered rate. Based on these requirements, an appropriate diagnostic design was determined to comprise of an array of 23 Faraday probes swept through the plume in an arc 1m from the thruster to map the beam current density. The beam current density centroid of the plume is assumed to track the thrust vector within an acceptable level of uncertainty. Additionally, a reference system, including optical alignment to the mounting surface normal vector and tilt sensors, was devised to periodically calibrate the probe position and motion throughout the long duration wear test campaign. Initial measurements of the thruster plume have been acquired to demonstrate the diagnostics functionality, verify procedures, and assess any necessary improvements prior to implementation of the diagnostic during the AEPS Engineering Development Unit (EDU) long duration wear test. To illustrate the merits of differing approaches to thrust vector determination for different classes of electric propulsion thrusters, NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster-Commercial (NEXT-C) thrust vector diagnostic design details and recent data are also discussed (Appendix A).

Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS)↗

NASA NTRS1996

A 100 Hour Wear Test of the NASA NSTAR Ion Thruster

In a NASA program to validate 30 cm Xenon ion thruster technology for use in planetary missions a combination of analysis and testing is being used to establish engine reliability. Five long duration tests are planned to identify new failure mechanisms and characterize the parameters which drive known damage accumulation failure modes.

ion thruster NSTAR xenon ion propulsion ion propul↗

NASA NTRS1992

Ion Thruster Development at NASA Lewis Research Center

Recent ion propulsion technology efforts at NASA's Lewis Research Center including development of kW-class xenon ion thrusters, high power xenon and krypton ion thrusters, and power processors are reviewed. Thruster physical characteristics, performance data, life projections, and power processor component technology are summarized. The ion propulsion technology program is structured to address a broad set of mission applications from satellite stationkeeping and repositioning to primary propulsion using solar or nuclear power systems.

Sovey, James S.↗

NASA NTRS1993

Derated ion thruster development status

A 30 cm diameter xenon ion thruster is under development at NASA to provide an ion propulsion option for auxiliary and primary propulsion on missions of national interest. Specific efforts include thruster design optimizations, component life testing and validation, vibration testing, and performance characterizations. Under this program, the ion thruster will be brought to engineering model development status. This paper discusses the activities and preliminary test results to develop a 30 cm engineering model thruster.

Patterson, Michael J.↗

NASA NTRS1993

Derated ion thruster development status

A 30 cm diameter xenon ion thruster is under development at NASA to provide an ion propulsion option for auxiliary and primary propulsion on missions of national interest. Specific efforts include thruster design optimizations, component life testing and validation, vibration testing, and performance characterizations. Under this program, the ion thruster will be brought to engineering model development status. The activities and preliminary test results to develop a 30 cm engineering model thruster are discussed.

Patterson, Michael J.↗

NASA NTRS1995

NASA 30 Cm Ion Thruster Development Status

A 30 cm diameter xenon ion thruster is under development at NASA to provide an ion propulsion option for missions of national interest and it is an element of the NASA Solar Electric Propulsion Technology Applications Readiness (NSTAR) program established to validate ion propulsion for space flight applications. The thruster has been developed to an engineering model level and it incorporates innovations in design, materials, and fabrication techniques compared to those employed to conventional ion thrusters. The performance of both functional and engineering model thrusters has been assessed including thrust stand measurements, over an input power range of 0.5-2.3 kW. Attributes of the engineering model thruster include an overall mass of 6.4 kg, and an efficiency of 65 percent and thrust of 93 mN at 2.3 kW input power. This paper discusses the design, performance, and lifetime expectations of the functional and engineering model thrusters under development at NASA.

Patterson, Michael J.↗

NASA NTRS1995

The 2.3 kW Ion Thruster Wear Test

A 30-cm diameter xenon ion thruster is under development at NASA to provide an ion propulsion option for auxiliary and primary propulsion on missions of national interest. Specific efforts include thruster design optimizations, component life testing and validation, and performance characterizations. Under this program, the ion thruster will be brought to engineering model development status. This paper describes the results of a 2.3-kW 2000-hour wear test performed to identify life limiting phenomena, measure the performance and characterize the operation of the thruster, and obtain wear, erosion, and surface contamination data. These data are being using as a data base for proceeding with additional life validation tests, and to provide input to flight thruster design requirements.

Parkes, James↗