Insights into determining pore size properties of ultrafiltration membranes
The selectivity of porous membranes is often characterized using solute rejection tests, where membranes are challenged with dilute aqueous solutions of neutral solutes at operating conditions that minimize concentration polarization and fouling. In single solute tests, a membrane is challenged with one molecular weight (MW) solute at a time from low to high MW. Since single solute methods are time-intensive, mixed solute tests have become more common, where a mixture of several MW solutes challenges a membrane at once. However, the presence of large solutes in a mixture increases the rejection of smaller solutes. Furthermore, there are no universally accepted operating conditions or standard methods used by membrane manufacturers or researchers for the experiments, leading to difficulty in pore size and pore characteristic comparisons. In this paper, commercial ultrafiltration membranes were challenged with single and mixed solute polyethylene glycol (PEG) and dextran aqueous solutions. First, rejection values determined using total organic carbon (TOC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) from single solute filtration experiments are compared. Differences in rejection curves obtained by the two techniques are attributed to solute polydispersity. Mixed solute filtration experiments with binary mixtures of solutes showcased co-solute interactions, which increase with both the size and weight percent of large solute in the mixture. Mixed solute filtration experiments at varying operating conditions (i.e., stir speed and flux) were conducted to determine operating conditions that mitigate co-solute interactions. Stir speed had a minimal effect on co-solute interactions. In contrast, low flux conditions can help minimize co-solute interactions, leading to pore size distributions that closely resemble results observed in single solute filtration using narrowly dispersed solutes. Additionally, at low flux conditions, the predicted membrane pore size distributions utilizing mixed solute experiments with PEG and dextran were similar.