SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CFD Validation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2014

Validation of CFD Codes for Parawing Geometries in Subsonic to Supersonic Flows

Computational Fluid Dynamic studies of a rigid parawing at Mach numbers from 0.8 to 4.65 were carried out using three established inviscid, viscous and independent panel method codes. Pressure distributions along four chordwise sections of the wing were compared to experimental wind tunnel data gathered from NASA technical reports. Results show good prediction of the overall trends and magnitudes of the pressure distributions for the inviscid and viscous solvers. Pressure results for the panel method code diverge from test data at large angles of attack due to shock interaction phenomena. Trends in the flow behavior and their effect on the integrated force and moments on this type of wing are examined in detail using the inviscid CFD code results.

Direct Entry Trajectory↗

NASA NTRS2024

Validation & Verification of CFD Models for Cryogenic Fluid Management of Propellant Tanks in Space

This article describes the need and the strategy for CFD model development, validation, and verification for Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) of Propellant Tanks in Space. It describes the type of CFD models that must be developed to address the future needs of Space CFM. It also discusses the two classes of experiments currently used to validate the fidelity of the CFD models. These two experiment classes are: (a) the small-scale simulant fluid science experiments that are equipped with scientific diagnostics to elucidate the underlying two-phase fluid physics of the CFM processes; and (b) the large-scale cryogenic experiments that assess the engineering performance of the propellant tank for storage and transfer. The current status of the CFD model development and validation is briefly assessed by presenting examples of segregated two-phase flow problems that have been successfully modeled. The future model development directions for CFM situations involving more complex interpenetrating phases are also defined.

Cryogenic Fluid Management↗

NASA NTRS1990

The aerospace plane design challenge - Credible computational fluid dynamics results

In order to establish the credibility of CFD results utilized in aerospace plane design, the following topics are discussed: CFD validation in relation to 'measureable' fluid dynamics (MFD) validation, credibility requirements, responsibility for credibility, and a guide for establishing credibility. What is of paramount concern for fluid dynamic design is not CFD code validation but qualification of CFD unknowns so that their magnitude is greatly reduced and that these uncertainties are employed for designing with margin. The designers must be trained to properly use CFD if they are to produce good designs. In approximately 70 percent of the flight envelopes of SSTO aerospace planes with supersonic combustion, CFD will be necessary to determine dynamics performance and specifications.

Mehta, Unmeel B.↗

NASA NTRS2011

Continuing Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Supersonic Retropropulsion

A large step in the validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for Supersonic Retropropulsion (SRP) is shown through the comparison of three Navier-Stokes solvers (DPLR, FUN3D, and OVERFLOW) and wind tunnel test results. The test was designed specifically for CFD validation and was conducted in the Langley supersonic 4 x4 Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel and includes variations in the number of nozzles, Mach and Reynolds numbers, thrust coefficient, and angles of orientation. Code-to-code and code-to-test comparisons are encouraging and possible error sources are discussed.

Schauerhamer, Daniel Guy↗

NASA NTRS2016

Experimental Investigation of Subsonic Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow Over a Wall-Mounted Axisymmetric Hill

An important goal for modern fluid mechanics experiments is to provide datasets which present a challenge for Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations to reproduce. Such "CFD validation experiments" should be well-characterized and well-documented, and should investigate flows which are difficult for CFD to calculate. It is also often convenient for the experiment to be challenging for CFD in some aspects while simple in others. This report is part of the continuing documentation of a series of experiments conducted to characterize the flow around an axisymmetric, modified-cosine-shaped, wall-mounted hill named "FAITH" (Fundamental Aero Investigates The Hill). Computation of this flow is easy in some ways - subsonic flow over a simple shape - while being complex in others - separated flow and boundary layer interactions. The primary set of experiments were performed on a 15.2 cm high, 45.7 cm base diameter machined aluminum model that was tested at mean speeds of 50 m/s (Reynolds Number based on height = 500,000). The ratio of model height to boundary later height was approximately 3. The flow was characterized using surface oil flow visualization, Cobra probe to determine point-wise steady and unsteady 3D velocities, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) to determine 3D velocities and turbulence statistics along specified planes, Pressure Sensitive Paint (PSP) to determine mean surface pressures, and Fringe Imaging Skin Friction (FISF) to determine surface skin friction magnitude and direction. A set of pathfinder experiments were also performed in a water channel on a smaller scale (5.1 cm high, 15.2 cm base diameter) sintered nylon model. The water channel test was conducted at a mean test section speed of 3 cm/s (Reynolds Number of 1500), but at the same ratio of model height to boundary layer thickness. Dye injection from both the model and an upstream rake was used to visualize the flow. This report summarizes the experimental set-up, techniques used, and data acquired. It also describes some details of the dataset that is being constructed for use by other researchers, especially the CFD community.

fluid machanics cfd validation wind tunnel↗

NASA NTRS2007

Synthetic Jets in Quiescent Air

An oscillatory jet with zero net mass flow is generated by a cavity-pumping actuator. Among the three test cases selected for the Langley CFD validation workshop to assess the current CFD capabilities to predict unsteady flow fields, this basic oscillating jet flow field is the least complex and is selected as the first test case. Increasing in complexity, two more cases studied include jet in cross flow boundary layer and unsteady flow induced by suction and oscillatory blowing with separation control geometries. In this experiment, velocity measurements from three different techniques, hot-wire anemometry, Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV) and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), documented the synthetic jet flow field. To provide boundary conditions for computations, the experiment also monitored the actuator operating parameters including diaphragm displacement, internal cavity pressure, and internal cavity temperature.

Yao, C. S.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CFD Comparisons with Updated NASA Juncture Flow Data

The purpose of the NASA Juncture Flow experiment is to acquire high-quality flowfield details deep in the corner of a wing-body junction specifically for the purpose of CFD validation. A second phase of testing was recently completed, which includes both laser doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry measurements. This paper describes the recent experiment and its results. It also makes detailed comparisons between the experimental data and a new version of a widely-used CFD turbulence model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes, which was recently developed to improve separated corner flow predictions. The CFD results generally produce very good qualitative agreement with the experiment, although they are less accurate inside of the separation region, as expected.

Experimental Data↗

NASA NTRS2023

Measurements and Computations of the Turbulent Corner Flow on the NASA Juncture-Flow Model with a Symmetric Wing

The NASA Juncture Flow experiment is designed to acquire high-quality flowfield data deep in the corner of a wing-fuselage junction specifically for the purpose of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation and turbulence model improvement. This paper will present and discuss the results of a recent experiment with the juncture-flow model in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. The main objective of that test was to expand the existing juncture-flow dataset with a symmetric wing case that displays fully attached, incipient separation, and separated flow in the corner of the wing-fuselage junction, depending on the model pitch angle. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) measurements were made at three model pitch angles (0 deg: fully attached, 1 deg: incipient separation, and 5 deg: separated flow) and for each one, mean-flow and Reynolds-stress data was obtained on the fuselage and at several streamwise locations along the corner of the wing-fuselage junction. Supporting measurements were made during the test campaign and included model and tunnel wall static pressures, tunnel wall and ceiling boundary-layer rake data, oil-flow visualizations, and laser-based measurements of the as-built model geometry and model position in the test section. Comparisons between the experimental data and Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes CFD results will also be presented and discussed.

Juncture Flow↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Measurements and Computations of the Turbulent Corner Flow on the NASA Juncture-Flow Model with a Symmetric Wing

Juncture Flow↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Measurements and Computations of the Turbulent Corner Flow on the NASA Juncture-Flow Model with a Symmetric Wing

The NASA Juncture Flow experiment is designed to acquire high-quality flowfield data deep in the corner of a wing-fuselage junction specifically for the purpose of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation and turbulence model improvement. This paper presents and discusses the results of a recent experiment with the juncture-flow model in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. The main objective of the test was to expand the existing juncture-flow dataset with a symmetric wing case that displays fully attached, incipient separation, and separated flow in the corner of the wing-fuselage junction, depending on the model angle of incidence. Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) measurements were made at three model angles of incidence (0 deg: fully attached, 1 deg: incipient separation, and 5 deg: separated flow) and for each one, mean-flow and Reynolds-stress data were obtained on the fuselage and at several streamwise locations along the corner of the wing-fuselage junction. Supporting measurements were made during the test campaign and included model and tunnel wall static pressures, tunnel wall and ceiling boundary-layer rake data, oil-flow visualizations, and laser-based measurements of the as-built model geometry and model position in the test section. Comparisons between the experimental data on the test article and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes CFD results are presented and discussed.

Juncture Flow↗

DOE OSTI2024

A Dataset of CFD Simulated Industrial Furnace Images for Conditional Automatic Generation with GANs

The steel industry is constantly looking for ways to automate processes and improve efficiency. A standard practice in industry is to simulate how complex systems will operate before they are actually used. Some complex systems, including steel industry processes such as blast furnaces, require complex physics-based simulations utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD). These CFD physics-based simulations are very accurate but can take significant time and computational resources to process, resulting in challenges for the implementation of the models in real-world operational environments. In recent years, deep learning (DL) has been considered as a substitute for these CFD models. DL models can be trained on validated CFD simulation data and then used for industrial process inference. Previous DL-based solutions have made great contributions for industrial automation but are currently missing the additional visualization component that CFD simulations also provide. In this paper, we propose a dataset for simple DL generative approaches that can help to address this issue. The dataset and methodology under development to approach this prediction are discussed in this work.

Calix, Ricardo↗

NASA NTRS1995

NASA Wingtip Code Validation Grid

I have been contacted by Alan Celic to request the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) grid file for the NASA Wingtip CFD validation case. Alan is currently a Ph.D. student at the University of Stuttgard in Germany and spent a year here at Ames Research Center (ARC) as an Ames Associate. This case is a standard validation case studied by many within the U.S. The case is of the flow around a rectangular wing with a rounded wing tip. The airfoil is a NACA 0012. There is nothing special or unusual about the geometry or the grid file. The grid file is a single-zone grid with 2.5 million points. This geometry is generic and is not similar to any currently flying vehicle. All of the results published by NASA, as part of this study, (completed in 1995) are currently in the public domain.

Zilliac, Greg↗

NASA NTRS1993

A method for the modelling of porous and solid wind tunnel walls in computational fluid dynamics codes

Porous wall wind tunnels have been used for several decades and have proven effective in reducing wall interference effects in both low speed and transonic testing. They allow for testing through Mach 1, reduce blockage effects and reduce shock wave reflections in the test section. Their usefulness in developing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes has been limited, however, by the difficulties associated with modelling the effect of a porous wall in CFD codes. Previous approaches to modelling porous wall effects have depended either upon a simplified linear boundary condition, which has proven inadequate, or upon detailed measurements of the normal velocity near the wall, which require extensive wind tunnel time. The current work was initiated in an effort to find a simple, accurate method of modelling a porous wall boundary condition in CFD codes. The development of such a method would allow data from porous wall wind tunnels to be used more readily in validating CFD codes. This would be beneficial when transonic validations are desired, or when large models are used to achieve high Reynolds numbers in testing. A computational and experimental study was undertaken to investigate a new method of modelling solid and porous wall boundary conditions in CFD codes. The method utilized experimental measurements at the walls to develop a flow field solution based on the method of singularities. This flow field solution was then imposed as a pressure boundary condition in a CFD simulation of the internal flow field. The effectiveness of this method in describing the effect of porosity changes on the wall was investigated. Also, the effectiveness of this method when only sparse experimental measurements were available has been investigated. The current work demonstrated this approach for low speed flows and compared the results with experimental data obtained from a heavily instrumented variable porosity test section. The approach developed was simple, computationally inexpensive, and did not require extensive or intrusive measurements of the boundary conditions during the wind tunnel test. It may be applied to both solid and porous wall wind tunnel tests.

Beutner, Thomas John↗

NASA NTRS2004

The Isolated Synthetic Jet in Crossflow: A Benchmark for Flow Control Simulation

An overview of the data acquisition, reduction, and uncertainty of experimental measurements of the flowfield created by the interaction of an isolated synthetic jet and a turbulent boundary layer is presented. The experimental measurements were undertaken to serve as the second of three computational fluid dynamics validation databases for Active Flow Control. The validation databases were presented at the NASA Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control in March, 2004. Detailed measurements were made to document the boundary conditions for the flow and also for the phase-averaged flowfield itself. Three component Laser-Doppler Velocimetry, 2-D Particle Image Velocimetry, and Stereo Particle Image Velocimetry were utilized to document the phase averaged velocity field and the turbulent stresses.

Schaeffler, Norman W.↗

NASA NTRS2006

The Isolated Synthetic Jet in Crossflow: A Benchmark for Flow Control Simulation

An overview of the data acquisition, reduction, and uncertainty of experimental measurements made of the flowfield created by the interaction of an isolated synthetic jet and a turbulent boundary layer is presented. The experimental measurements were undertaken to serve as the second of three computational fluid dynamics validation databases for Active Flow Control. The validation databases were presented at the NASA Langley Research Center Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control in March, 2004. Detailed measurements were made to document the boundary conditions for the flow and also for the phase-averaged flowfield itself. Three component Laser-Doppler Velocimetry, 2-D Particle Image Velocimetry, and Stereo Particle Image Velocimetry were utilized to document the phase-averaged velocity field and the turbulent stresses.

Schaeffler, Norman W.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Low-Speed Testing of the 5.2% Semispan CRM-HL in the DNW-NWB Wind Tunnel

In this paper the wind tunnel test of the 5.2% CRM-HL in the DNW-NWB low speed wind tunnel is described. The tunnel test campaign is settled in the DLR project ADaMant, in which it is of interest to generate qualitative data for CFD validation to improve the predictive accuracy, efficiency, and usability of physical modeling in CFD codes at the borders of the flight envelope. Different configurations of the CRM-HL were tested in a closed as well as in an open test section of the wind tunnel. Several measurement techniques were used to generate validation data including forces and moments, pressures, flow visualization with tufts and oil painting, and infrared thermography for boundary layer transition detection. The evaluation of the results focuses on these techniques in the closed test section. The test comprises Mach numbers from 0.15 to 0.23 and Reynolds numbers from 1.2x10 6 to 1.2x10 6 . Some results are also compared to data from the NASA Langley Research Center 14x22 Foot wind tunnel to assess the repeatability of measurements of the same model in different wind tunnels.

DLR↗

NASA NTRS1987

Yesterday, today and tomorrow: A perspective of CFD at NASA's Ames Research Center

The opportunity to reflect on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) progam at the NASA Ames Research Center (its beginning, its present state, and its direction for the future) is afforded. Essential elements of the research program during each period are reviewed, including people, facilities, and research problems. The burgeoning role that CFD is playing in the aerospace business is discussed, as is the necessity for validated CFD tools. The current aeronautical position of this country is assessed, as are revolutionary goals to help maintain its aeronautical supremacy in the world.

Kutler, Paul↗

NASA NTRS1990

The aerospace plane design challenge: Credible computational fluid dynamics results

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is necessary in the design processes of all current aerospace plane programs. Single-stage-to-orbit (STTO) aerospace planes with air-breathing supersonic combustion are going to be largely designed by means of CFD. The challenge of the aerospace plane design is to provide credible CFD results to work from, to assess the risk associated with the use of those results, and to certify CFD codes that produce credible results. To establish the credibility of CFD results used in design, the following topics are discussed: CFD validation vis-a-vis measurable fluid dynamics (MFD) validation; responsibility for credibility; credibility requirement; and a guide for establishing credibility. Quantification of CFD uncertainties helps to assess success risk and safety risks, and the development of CFD as a design tool requires code certification. This challenge is managed by designing the designers to use CFD effectively, by ensuring quality control, and by balancing the design process. For designing the designers, the following topics are discussed: how CFD design technology is developed; the reasons Japanese companies, by and large, produce goods of higher quality than the U.S. counterparts; teamwork as a new way of doing business; and how ideas, quality, and teaming can be brought together. Quality control for reducing the loss imparted to the society begins with the quality of the CFD results used in the design process, and balancing the design process means using a judicious balance of CFD and MFD.

Mehta, Unmeel B.↗