Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Common Research Model”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9

Multi-Objective Optimal Control of High Aspect Ratio Wing Wind Tunnel Model

This paper presents the design of a multi-objective optimal controller for the 13.5 aspect ratio Common Research Model (CRM) wind tunnel model. A Pareto front analysis is performed to provide the optimal tradeoff between the competing objectives - gust load alleviation, maneuver load alleviation, and drag minimization - so that the weighting matrices for the control law are selected optimally. Also presented are two formulations of the controller: a state feedback with Kalman filter design, and an output feedback form where sensors are used directly for feedback control. The controller demonstrates a reduced peak-to-peak strain of 45.78% while also reducing drag and mean bending moment. An output feedback formulation for gust load alleviation is formulated and produces a 53% reduction in the strain response due to a gust input.

Gust Load Alleviation↗

Ice-Accretion Test Results for Three Large-Scale Swept-Wing Models in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel

Icing simulation tools and computational fluid dynamics codes are reaching levels of maturity such that they are being proposed by manufacturers for use in certification of aircraft for flight in icing conditions with increasingly less reliance on natural-icing flight testing and icing-wind-tunnel testing. Sufficient high-quality data to evaluate the performance of these tools is not currently available. The objective of this work was to generate a database of ice-accretion geometry that can be used for development and validation of icing simulation tools as well as for aerodynamic testing. Three large-scale swept wing models were built and tested at the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel (IRT). The models represented the Inboard (20 percent semispan), Midspan (64 percent semispan) and Outboard stations (83 percent semispan) of a wing based upon a 65 percent scale version of the Common Research Model (CRM). The IRT models utilized a hybrid design that maintained the full-scale leading-edge geometry with a truncated afterbody and flap. The models were instrumented with surface pressure taps in order to acquire sufficient aerodynamic data to verify the hybrid model design capability to simulate the full-scale wing section. A series of ice-accretion tests were conducted over a range of total temperatures from -23.8 to -1.4 C with all other conditions held constant. The results showed the changing ice-accretion morphology from rime ice at the colder temperatures to highly 3-D scallop ice in the range of -11.2 to -6.3 C. Warmer temperatures generated highly 3-D ice accretion with glaze ice characteristics. The results indicated that the general scallop ice morphology was similar for all three models. Icing results were documented for limited parametric variations in angle of attack, drop size and cloud liquid-water content (LWC). The effect of velocity on ice accretion was documented for the Midspan and Outboard models for a limited number of test cases. The data suggest that there are morphological characteristics of glaze and scallop ice accretion on these swept-wing models that are dependent upon the velocity. This work has resulted in a large database of ice-accretion geometry on large-scale, swept-wing models.

Wing Aerodynamics↗

FUN3D Mesh Adaptation Simulations of 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop Case 1a

This paper describes in detail the FUN3D Mesh adaptation simulation results for Case 1a of the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-4). The Stabilized Finite Element library with FUN3D is used along with the Negative Spalart-Allmaras One-Equation Model to simulate fully turbulent free-air flow around the High Lift version of the Common Research Model at three flap settings. Meshes are adapted using multi-scale and goal-oriented metrics. The results are presented and the discussion focuses on the predicted differences between the three flap settings. Coefficients of lift, drag, and pitching moment are predicted within 7% of values measured in the QinetiQ 5m Wind Tunnel at each flap setting. Predicted surface pressures and skin friction distributions show inconsistent discrepancies with measurements across the flap settings. Consequently, flap increments for these figures of merit are not well predicted. These predictions are consistent with submissions to the HLPW-4 from other RANS-SA methods. Visualizations of Liutex vortex cores colored by angular velocity are presented as possible new quantitative and qualitative perspective for solution evaluation.

High-Lift Prediction Workshop↗

High-Order Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation of High-Lift Configuration

This paper presents the assessment of several recent enhancements for a high-order wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) approach and demonstrates order independence with a fixed data exchange location in the wall model. The two enhancements include the use of isotropic tetrahedral elements to improve accuracy and an explicit subgrid-scale model, the Vreman model, to improve accuracy and robustness. The [Formula: see text] study focused on the high-lift Common Research Model (HL-CRM) at the angle of attack of 19.57 deg, a benchmark problem from the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. Solution polynomial orders of [Formula: see text], and 5 were used in the study. The study demonstrated [Formula: see text] independence in integrated forces, pitch moment, velocity profile in the wall-normal direction, and surface flow topology. It also showed that a [Formula: see text] order of at least 3 ([Formula: see text]) was needed to correctly predict the external inviscid flow and the surface flow topology. Thereafter, [Formula: see text] simulations over several other angles of attack demonstrated that the high-order WMLES approach can correctly predict the maximum lift and flow separation regions for HL-CRM with about 40 million degrees of freedom (DOF) compared to at least 250 million DOF required by second-order methods.

Engineering↗

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations of a Swept Wing with Leading-Edge Ice

The aerodynamic performance of a swept wing derived from the Common Research Model wing with high-fidelity and smooth leading-edge ice shapes is evaluated using wall-modeled large-eddy simulations. Two mesh paradigms are considered within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics framework: structured hybrid curvilinear body-fitted/immersed-boundary and unstructured Voronoi. The curvilinear approach models the effect of the ice on the flow through penalty terms and the Voronoi strategy includes the ice representation directly in the mesh.Aerodynamic loads, surface pressure profiles, and skin-friction streamlines are compared against experimental results collected at the Wichita State University wind tunnel at a Mach number of 0.18 and a Reynolds number per mean aerodynamic chord of 1.6 million. For the curvilinear simulations with high-fidelity ice, results are sensitive to spanwise mesh resolution near the leading edge, where insufficient spanwise resolution leads to a spanwise running vortexaft of the high-fidelity ice, which is partially removed with increasing spanwise resolution. For the Voronoi simulations with high-fidelity ice, refining the mesh led to good convergence towards the experimental results with the best case demonstrating a maximum discrepancy of three lift counts relative to the experiment across a range of angles of attack from about 5 to 24 degrees, validating the shrink-wrapping procedure used for the ice. For the smooth ice, the curvilinear approach consistently under-predicted the upper surface suction leading to an under-prediction in lift, but did not demonstrate the pronounced over-prediction in upper surface suction near the leading edge observed in the Voronoi simulations.

AATT↗

Automation of Overset Structured Mesh Generation onBoundary Representation Geometries

A scheme is presented for the automatic generation of structured overset meshes ongeometries that are defined by Boundary Representation (BRep) solids. The surface meshsystem consists of face, edge and node meshes corresponding to the three respective basicBRep entity types. A cut-cell method is introduced to improve robustness of the on-geometrydetermination test for a face mesh grid point. A geometric component tagging scheme is utilizedto enhance local grid point distribution on a configuration with a large range of geometricscales. A cap grid topology is automatically utilized around the trailing edge of wing and tailtips to enhance mesh quality and to enable more effective surface coverage. Robustness of thehyperbolic surface marching method is improved by replacing the point projection scheme witha walking scheme. Relaxation of surface grid spacing at concave corners enables automatedhigh quality hyperbolic volume mesh creation. Domain connectivity is automatically performedon the surface mesh system. A variety of test cases are presented including a re-entry capsule,two models of the Juncture Flow Experiment wing-body, five rotorcraft concept vehicles, andvarious components of the High-Lift Common Research Model from the High-Lift PredictionWorkshop 4.

TTT↗

Summary of Data from the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

Results from the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW-V) are presented. As with past workshops, numerical calculations are performed using industry-relevant geometry, methodology, and test cases. This workshop focused on force/moment predictions for the NASA Common Research Model wing-body configuration, including a grid refinement study and an optional buffet study. The grid refinement study used a common grid sequence derived from a multiblock topology structured grid. Six levels of refinement were created resulting in grids ranging from 0.64x10(exp 6) to 138x10(exp 6) hexahedra - a much larger range than is typically seen. The grids were then transformed into structured overset and hexahedral, prismatic, tetrahedral, and hybrid unstructured formats all using the same basic cloud of points. This unique collection of grids was designed to isolate the effects of grid type and solution algorithm by using identical point distributions. This study showed reduced scatter and standard deviation from previous workshops. The second test case studied buffet onset at M=0.85 using the Medium grid (5.1x106 nodes) from the above described sequence. The prescribed alpha sweep used finely spaced intervals through the zone where wing separation was expected to begin. Some solutions exhibited a large side of body separation bubble that was not observed in the wind tunnel results. An optional third case used three sets of geometry, grids, and conditions from the Turbulence Model Resource website prepared by the Turbulence Model Benchmarking Working Group. These simple cases were intended to help identify potential differences in turbulence model implementation. Although a few outliers and issues affecting consistency were identified, the majority of participants produced consistent results.

Levy, David W.↗

Bimodal SLD Ice Accretion on a CRM Midspan Wing Section Model

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a 65 per cent scale version of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Supercooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from equivalent monomodal drop size distributions were obtained and compared. Results indicate that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions had equivalent mass and volume, as expected with this approach. Note: No audio portion for this record, additionally slide 9 has a playable video but must be downed in order to view.

Icing↗

Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions From the Fifth AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop

A graphical framework is used for statistical analysis of the results from an extensive N-version test of a collection of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics codes. The solutions were obtained by code developers and users from North America, Europe, Asia, and South America using a common grid sequence and multiple turbulence models for the June 2012 fifth Drag Prediction Workshop sponsored by the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Technical Committee. The aerodynamic configuration for this workshop was the Common Research Model subsonic transport wing-body previously used for the 4th Drag Prediction Workshop. This work continues the statistical analysis begun in the earlier workshops and compares the results from the grid convergence study of the most recent workshop with previous workshops.

Statistical analysis↗

Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the 6th AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

A graphical framework is used for statistical analysis of the results from an extensive N-version test of a collection of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics codes. The solutions were obtained by code developers and users from North America, Europe, Asia, and South America using both common and custom grid sequences as well as multiple turbulence models for the June 2016 6th AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop sponsored by the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Technical Committee. The aerodynamic configuration for this workshop was the Common Research Model subsonic transport wing-body previously used for both the 4th and 5th Drag Prediction Workshops. This work continues the statistical analysis begun in the earlier workshops and compares the results from the grid convergence study of the most recent workshop with previous workshops.

Statistical analysis↗

Economical Unsteady High-Fidelity Aerodynamics for Structural Optimization with a Flutter Constraint

Structural optimization with a flutter constraint for a vehicle designed to fly in the transonic regime is a particularly difficult task. In this speed range, the flutter boundary is very sensitive to aerodynamic nonlinearities, typically requiring high-fidelity Navier-Stokes simulations. However, the repeated application of unsteady computational fluid dynamics to guide an aeroelastic optimization process is very computationally expensive. This expense has motivated the development of methods that incorporate aspects of the aerodynamic nonlinearity, classical tools of flutter analysis, and more recent methods of optimization. While it is possible to use doublet lattice method aerodynamics, this paper focuses on the use of an unsteady high-fidelity aerodynamic reduced order model combined with successive transformations that allows for an economical way of utilizing high-fidelity aerodynamics in the optimization process. This approach is applied to the common research model wing structural design. As might be expected, the high-fidelity aerodynamics produces a heavier wing than that optimized with doublet lattice aerodynamics. It is found that the optimized lower skin of the wing using high-fidelity aerodynamics differs significantly from that using doublet lattice aerodynamics.

Bartels, Robert E.↗

Transition Prediction for the 30P30N Airfoil and the CRM-HL using FUN3D

The ability to accurately model transition over high-lift configurations can lead to improved agreement between stationary Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations and experimental measurements. In this work, selected transport-equation-based RANS models for transition prediction in the NASA FUN3D flow solver are used to simulate flow over the 30P30N three-element airfoil and the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). The primary RANS-based transition model is the Langtry-Menter (LM) 𝜸-Re𝜽𝒕 model coupled with the Menter shear-stress transport model. Additionally, the existing capability for transition prediction based on linear stability correlations is used to allow the modeling of transition over multiple elements of the 30P30N configuration. This approach pairs an algebraic transition model with the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model that relies on an imposed transition location in FUN3D and the parabolized stability equations as implemented in the LASTRAC code. Predictions based on these different transition prediction approaches and models are compared with each other, experimental data, and previous simulations by evaluating the lift and drag coefficients, the surface-pressure/skin-friction distributions, and the locations of transition onset. Results are presented for multiple angles of attack for the 30P30N airfoil and CRM-HL. For the CRM-HL, a grid resolution study is performed for the LM transition model and the SA turbulence model.

High Lift↗

Comparison of Bimodal Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Hybrid CRM Midspan Models

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models.

Icing↗

Comparison of Bimodal Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Hybrid CRM Midspan Models

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models

Icing , Simulation, Validation↗

Comparison of Bimodal Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Hybrid CRM Midspan Models

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models.

Icing↗

Assessment of Transition Modeling Capability in OVERFLOW with Emphasis on Swept-Wing Configurations

In preparation for comparisons with data obtained from the recently concluded experiments in the National Transonic Facility at the NASA Langley Research Center on the new common research model with natural laminar flow (CRM-NLF), an assessment of the current transition modeling capability in the NASA OVERFLOW 2.2o code has been carried out. A combination of the available experimental data and linear stability analysis is used to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of these models for selected swept-wing type configurations, with significant crossflow. An additional goal for this work involves providing a comparative assessment of the relevant transition models in the context of a single flow solver and identifying model limitations as well as the potential for future improvements that would help strengthen the physical basis of such transition models. Included in this investigation is an assessment of the sensitivities of the underlying transition models to grid resolution (wall-normal, as well as streamwise and spanwise) and the values of extra input parameters such as the level of surface roughness and freestream turbulence variables. The flow configurations targeted in this assessment include the NASA NLF(2)-0415 swept-wing configuration, the sickle-shaped wing introduced by the Technical University of Braunschweig, and the wing-body configuration of the CRM model from the fourth and fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshops.

Freestream velocity↗

Summary of the First AIAA Stability and Control Prediction Workshop

Results from the First AIAA Stability and Control Prediction Workshop are summarized in this paper. The workshop series was developed in support of three primary objectives: (1) to establish best practices for the prediction of stability and control derivatives using industry-standard Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solvers, (2) to provide an impartial forum for evaluating the effectiveness of Reynolds-averaged-Navier-Stokes- and Detached-Eddy-Simulation-based modeling techniques, and (3) to identify areas in need of additional research and development. To address these objectives, the inaugural workshop focused on generating computational aerodynamic predictions for the ONERA version of the NASA/Boeing Common Research Model. The configuration includes the wing, body, horizontal tail, and a vertical tail designed by ONERA. While longitudinal wind tunnel test data for the model had been previously documented, unpublished lateral test data at small sideslip angles provided a unique opportunity for participants to generate blind computational predictions for wind tunnel data comparisons. Additional test cases included assessments of the Mach number effect on static lateral/directional stability and the impact of the wind tunnel sting on longitudinal stability. Participants were invited to generate solutions using two workshop-provided series of structured overset and unstructured grids, in addition to any participant custom grids of interest. Total and component-level breakdowns for the force and moment coefficients for each test case are presented, as well as sectional pressure distribution data on the wing and tail components, to assess the agreement between several different Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes CFD solvers.

CFD↗

Mixed-element USM3D Contributions to the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper discusses results of the mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME) simulations performed for the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The workshop was separated into six Technical Focus Groups to investigate the impact of geometry modeling, grid, and computational methods for predicting high lift flows. This work was performed under the Fixed Grid RANS Technical Focus Group. The primary geometry selected for the workshop was the High-Lift Common Research Model. The performed simulations included a flap deflection study and both a grid refinement study and pitch sweep for the nominal flap deflection configuration. The results show that USM3D-ME RANS solutions, generally, tends to underpredict the lift coefficient and to predict a less negative pitching moment relative to the experimental data. The predicted drag coefficient values agree better with experiment for smaller angles of attack but were observed to be larger than experiment for the largest angle of attack simulated. The results of the grid refinement study demonstrated a lack of grid convergence for the provided grid family. The results of the grid refinement study are consistent with the submissions to the Fixed Grid and Mesh Adaptation Technical Focus Groups. Grid convergence for the provided grid family remains elusive for the international community. A 2D Multielement Airfoil configuration was included to enable a turbulence model verification study, which illustrated favorable agreement between USM3D-ME and the solutions provided by other flow solvers.

CFD↗