Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “EDX++”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

151 records · Page 9

Structural and Mechanical Analysis of Individual Mineralized Collagen Fibrils Using In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy

Bone serves as an example of nature’s architectured material with its characteristic blend of strength and toughness, all at a lightweight design. Given the hierarchical nature of these materials, it is essential to understand the governing mechanisms and organization of their constituents across length scales for bioinspired structural design. Despite recent advances in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) that have allowed us to witness the hierarchical arrangement of bone at micro-down to the nanoscale, we are still missing the details about the structural organization and mechanical properties of the main building blocks of bone─mineralized collagen fibrils (MCFs). Here, we present a method to extract individual MCFs from nature’s model material, mineralized turkey leg tendon, using a dropcasting procedure. By isolating the MCFs onto TEM supporting grids, we visualized the arrangement of organic and mineral phases within individual MCFs at the nanoscale. Using a four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) approach, the orientation of individual mineral crystals within the MCFs was examined. Furthermore, we conducted in situ tensile experiments, revealing exceptional tensile strains of at least 8%, demonstrating the intricate relationship between structural organization and the mechanical behavior of MCFs. These insights into the ultrastructure of mineralized tissue building blocks, as well as the proposed sample-extraction method compatible with in situ mechanical testing, provide a strong basis for research into nature-inspired material design.

4D-STEM↗

Effect of a Cr-rich surface layer on D retention in various RAFM steels

In this work, deuterium (D) retention is compared between various reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels, including CLF-1, Eurofer, F82H, and Rusfer, exposed to pure D plasma (ion flux ~1.5–2 × 10 21 m -2 s -1 , fluence, ϕ D , ~1 × 10 25 m -2 , sample temperature ~373 K, and incident ion energy ~100 eV). It is found that there is a large difference (up to ~30x) in the D retention between CLF-1 and F82H even with the same plasma exposure condition and similar nominal composition. The ϕ D dependence of the D retention exhibits a peculiar, counterintuitive feature: the D retention decreases with an increase in ϕ D from 2 × 10 23 m -2 to 1 × 10 25 m -2 . Surface analyses reveal that a Cr-rich surface layer is formed during outgassing at 773 K for 1 h before plasma exposure, and that there exists a clear correlation between the D retention and the Cr content in the surface layer.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A Comparison of Solidification Structures and Submicroscale Cellular Segregation in Rapidly Solidified Stainless Steels Produced via Two-Piston Splat Quenching and Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Fusion-based additive manufacturing techniques leverage rapid solidification (RS) conditions to create parts with complex geometries, unique microscale/nanoscale morphological features, and elemental segregation. Three custom composition stainless steel alloys with varying chromium equivalence to nickel equivalence ratio (Cr eq /Ni eq ) between 1.53 and 1.95 were processed using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and/or two-piston splat quenching (SQ) to produce solidification rates estimated between 0.4 and 0.8 m/s. Both scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were utilized to collect high-resolution images, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) phase identification, and measure cellular segregation. Similar features were observed in both LPBF and SQ samples including phase and microstructure, nanoscale oxide particles, cell size, and segregation behavior. However, dislocation pileup was observed along the cell boundaries only in the LPBF austenite solidified microstructure. Targeted adjustment of the SQ feedstock Cr and Ni concentrations, within the ASTM A240 specification for 316L resulted in no observable impact on the cell size, oxide particle size, or magnitude of segregation. Also, the amount of Ni segregation in the ferrite solidified microstructures did not significantly differ, regardless of Cr/Ni eq or processing technique. Here, SQ is demonstrated as capable of simulating RS rates and microstructures similar to LPBF for use as an alternative screening tool for new RS alloy compositions.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT) Database

The Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT) database consists of a geodatabase and data catalog of geologic, geophysical, structural, hydrologic, and contextual data, based on the data types to support geologic carbon storage activities and other subsurface energy systems resource assessments. The database was aggregated from publicly available data across the USA from state and federal entities. The database is structured by categories including rock unit geology, boundaries, national CS datasets, geophysical data, faults and structural data, infrastructure, surface hydrology, groundwater, and more. The data described in the data catalog is also available in the Mapping Inquiry Tool (https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/mapping-inquiry-tool). Version 3 of the geodatabase and data catalog have been updated as of 5/17/2024. The database was published with a limited number of layers. The Catalog V3 contains many more resources than the geodatabase, documenting all layers that will be included in MapIT, and includes links to the original sources of the data. Within the catalog, in the final column, there is information about if the file is included in the geodatabase or not. Use the links provided in the catalog to download data directly from the original source if not included in the geodatabase. Four resources are included in this submission: 1. Geodatabase 2. ReadMe file 3. Catalog of data layers and additional data resources 4. Web link to a resource describing the motivation and reviewing the content of the geodatabase - DOE NETL Carbon Storage Site Mapping Inquiry Tool Database

carbon storage↗

Subsurface Energy Systems Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT)

The Subsurface Energy Systems Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT) is an online web mapping tool designed to help users discover available public-sourced data to facilitate data exploration for subsurface energy exploration and characterization efforts for resource identification (e.g. critical minerals, hydrocarbons, geothermal) as well as injection of geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide (e.g. enhanced oil recovery, saline storage, etc.). Modules within the tool curate data related to geology, faults, fractures, injection and confining zones, hydrologic information, groundwater, groundwater wells, geomechanical and petrophysical data, and geochemical data. User documentation on how to use the tool is also provided. Data have been collected from authoritative national, state, and local sources and made available in this tool. The data is also available as a data catalog and Esri Geodatabase at: https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/mapit-database Disclaimer: There is no guarantee of completeness or appropriateness for individual user’s requirements. Use of this tool is solely at the discretion of the user. See full Federal Disclaimer for further information (https://netl.doe.gov/home/disclaimer). This project was funded by the United States Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, in part, through a site support contract. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor the support contractor, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. https://www.netl.doe.gov/home/disclaimer

Carbon Sequestration↗