Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “FUELS, SAFETY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Review of ECCS Acceptance Criteria and Experimental Basis Evolution Toward Fuel Fragmentation, Relocation, and Dispersal Studies

The U.S. nuclear industry is pursuing extensions of light water reactor (LWR) fuel burnup and enrichment limits to approximately 75 GWd/t and 10 wt.% 235 U to achieve economic and operational benefits. A central safety consideration in this effort is the behavior of high burnup (HBu) fuel during loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs), particularly fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal (FFRD). Here, this work provides a historical and technical review of U.S. LOCA regulation and experimentation, clarifying how the evolution of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) acceptance criteria in 10 CFR 50.46 has shaped both testing approaches and interpretations of fuel safety. The study revisits the original intent of the ECCS criteria, showing that the peak cladding temperature and equivalent cladding reacted limits were developed as surrogates to preserve a coolable geometry. The explicit inclusion of the coolable geometry criterion in the regulation was intended to emphasize the underlying safety philosophy and as a safeguard against unforeseen failure modes, an intent that remains directly relevant to modern concerns regarding FFRD. The review traces the lineage of HBu LOCA experiments to the Argonne National Laboratory furnace tests, from which subsequent programs at Studsvik, Halden, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory were derived. These tests employed a 5 °C/s heating rate inherited from early embrittlement studies, a stylized temperature history that does not represent actual LWR LOCA thermal-hydraulics. Comparison of these test conditions to pressurized water reactor large break LOCAs and separate effects data indicates that the existing HBu LOCA database may not be fully applicable to all LWR LOCA scenarios, from which a qualitative framework for applicability is proposed.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS1979

Comparison of alternate fuels for aircraft

A comparison of candidate alternate fuels for aircraft is presented. The fuels discussed include liquid hydrogen, liquid methane, and synthetic aviation kerosene. Each fuel is evaluated from the standpoint of production, transmission, airport storage and distribution facilities, and use in aircraft. Technology deficient areas for cryogenic fuels, which should be advanced prior to the introduction of the fuels into the aviation industry, are identified, as are the cost and energy penalties associated with not achieving those advances. Environmental emissions and safety aspects of fuel selection are discussed. A detailed description of the various fuel production and liquefaction processes and their efficiencies and economics is given.

Witcofski, R. D.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Documenting Development of Processing Parameters for Fabrication of Doped and Undoped Fuel Pellets (Summary Report)

Early FY20 restructuring of the TREAT work package FT-20LA02020608 Enriched Fuel Fabrication for Safety Testing, and associated deliverables necessitated the rescoping of existing LANL deliverables. This rescoped carryover report summarizes work to date on doped and undpoped fuel pellet fabrication development of proceeding parameters. This summary also includes a status update of intended research activities that fall under the activity associated with this work package.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Thermochemically-informed mass transport model for interdiffusion of U and Zr in irradiated U-Pu-Zr fuel with fission products

A new formulation for redistribution of constituents in metallic U-Pu-Zr nuclear fuel is presented that can incorporate the contributions from fission products. The formulation is based on the thermodynamic driving forces derived from the generalized chemical potential that includes effects of composition and temperature. As a result, the redistribution model can readily account for the composition changes due to the generation of fission products while using only a limited set of transport coefficients. The thermodynamic model for the metallic fuel and thermochemistry solver Thermochimica were coupled with the nuclear fuel performance code BISON to implement the redistribution model. The simulations reproduce an experimentally observed Zr-depletion zone in the mid-radius region of an irradiated fuel slug. The generation of fission products during burnup is shown to have a stabilizing effect on the fuel chemistry, slowing the rate of U-Zr interdiffusion and reducing the size of the Zr-depleted zone. Here, the overall objective of the work is to advance predictive capabilities of fission product behaviour in U-Zr metallic fuel in the context of fuel performance and safety.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hydrogen Refueling Reference Station Lot Size Analysis for Urban Sites

Hydrogen Fueling Infrastructure Research and Station Technology (H2FIRST) is a project initiated by the DOE in 2015 and executed by Sandia National Laboratories and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to address R&D barriers to the deployment of hydrogen fueling infrastructure. One key barrier to the deployment of fueling stations is the land area they require (i.e. "footprint"). Space is particularly a constraint in dense urban areas where hydrogen demand is high but space for fueling stations is limited. This work presents current fire code requirements that inform station footprint, then identifies and quantifies opportunities to reduce footprint without altering the safety profile of fueling stations. Opportunities analyzed include potential new methods of hydrogen delivery, as well as alternative placements of station technologies (i.e. rooftop/underground fuel storage). As interest in heavy-duty fueling stations and other markets for hydrogen grows, this study can inform techniques to reduce the footprint of heavy-duty stations as well. This work characterizes generic designs for stations with a capacity of 600 kg/day hydrogen dispensed and 4 dispenser hoses. Three base case designs (delivered gas, delivered liquid, and on-site electrolysis production) have been modified in 5 different ways to study the impacts of recently released fire code changes, colocation with gasoline refueling, alternate delivery assumptions, underground storage of hydrogen, and rooftop storage of hydrogen, resulting in a total of 32 different station designs. The footprints of the base case stations range from 13,000 to 21,000 ft 2 . A significant focus of this study is the NFPA 2 requirements, especially the prescribed setback distances for bulk gaseous or liquid hydrogen storage. While the prescribed distances are large in some cases, these setback distances are found to have a nuanced impact on station lot size; considerations of the delivery truck path, traffic flow, parking, and convenience store location are also important. Station designs that utilize underground and rooftop storage can reduce footprint but may not be practical or economical. For example, burying hydrogen storage tanks underground can reduce footprint, but the cost savings they enable depend on the cost of burial and the cost land. Siting and economic analysis of station lot sizes illustrate the benefit of smaller station footprints in the flexibility and cost savings they can provide. This study can be used as a reference that provides examples of the key design differences that fueling stations can incorporate, the approximate sizes of generic station lots, and considerations that might be unique to particular designs.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Understanding Fission Gas Bubble Distribution and Zirconium Redistribution in Neutron-irradiated U-Zr Metallic Fuel Using Machine Learning

U-10wt.% Zr (U-10Zr) based metallic fuel is the leading candidate for next-generation sodium cooled fast reactor in United States. Currently, Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been the leading national laboratory for research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) on metallic fuel. Advanced post-irradiation characterization will help to understand fuel microstructure and property change during irradiation, benefiting fuel qualification for commercial application. Characterization capabilities ranging from sub-nanometer to micrometer, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), focused ion beam (FIB) sampling, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization, and local thermal conductivity microscopy (TCM), have been utilized recently on irradiated U-10Zr fuel samples to gain a better understanding of nuclear fuel microstructure and property evolution inside a reactor. The FIB/SEM coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) can capture the essential information to achieve better understanding of fuel behaviors. Inside a nuclear reactor, the phase and microstructure of U-10Zr is constantly changing under neutron bombardment. For example, the gaseous fission product atoms have a limited solubility inside fuel matrix and tend to precipitate out in bubble form, which not only contribute to fuel thermal conductivity degradation but also provide a shortcut for movement of fission products, i.e. lanthanides. The resultant deposition of lanthanides at the cladding inner surface will potentially trigger a chemical reaction/interaction between nuclear fuel and cladding at reactor operational conditions, threatening fuel integrity and safety. FIB/SEM coupled with EDS can provide the fission bubble information as well as probe into phase separation or Zr redistribution, which is fundamental to predict the fuel performance. With high velocity image data generating method, such as FIB/SEM, an automatic way to extract the microstructural information quantitively can better serve the needs from post irradiation characterization. A trained machine learning model, named Decision Tree, is employed to generate a bubble classifier and to categorize bubbles into three categories: isolated bubble, connected without lanthanides, and connected with lanthanides bubbles[3]. This work presents a showcase of this approach on six regions of a fuel cross-section along the radial temperature gradient. We obtained distributions of bubble categories and porosity rates along the six regions. Moreover, a secondary phase U-Zr2 was determined and found on regions 5 and 6. The secondary phase fraction was increasing from 15.61% in region 5 to 34.79% in region 6 based on this approach . This quantitative data offers insights into the lanthanide migration and potentially thermal conductivity degradation. This information from machine learning will be fed into fuel design code for better prediction of fuel performance.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2026

3D TRISO particle-explicit compact meshing

The TRI-structural ISOtropic (TRISO) layered fuel particle is a robust nuclear fuel form offering enhanced safety and performance for advanced reactor concepts, including high-temperature gas-cooled reactors and other Generation IV designs. These poppy-seed-sized particles are embedded in a graphite matrix to form fuel elements that must withstand elevated temperatures and high burn-up levels. The heterogeneous nature of these fuel elements — comprising thousands of randomly distributed TRISO particles — produces complex stress fields and thermal gradients that one- and two-dimensional models cannot accurately capture. While three-dimensional modeling has improved predictions of dimensional changes, internal pressure buildup, and fission product transport under irradiation, current approaches rely on homogenized material properties that are known to have considerable divergence from experimental observations. This work presents a methodology for optimized random packing of TRISO fuel compacts and full three-dimensional mesh generation within the BISON fuel performance code, with each particle coating layer individually discretized. The resulting mesh was demonstrated through heat conduction simulations under representative in-reactor operating conditions, showing strong agreement with expected behavior. This capability enables detailed analysis of particle-to-particle interactions, matrix cracking mechanisms, and the statistical distribution of coating layer failures — all of which directly govern fuel performance and safety margins.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Contribution of IAEA coordinated research projects to light water reactors advanced technology fuel testing and simulation

The Fukushima-Daiichi accident in 2011 highlighted the pressing need for enhanced design and safety analysis of nuclear fuels, especially under accident conditions in nuclear power plants (NPPs). To address this need, the international nuclear fuel community has developed several concepts of Accident Tolerant and Advanced Technology Fuels (ATFs) for light water reactors. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), at the request of its Member States, has initiated a series of three Coordinated Research Projects (CRPs) to aid in the development and testing of these ATFs. Further, these projects, known as FUMAC, ACTOF, and ATF-TS, focus on the experimentation and simulation of ATFs under various accident conditions, including design basis accidents and design extension conditions. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the main activities, as well as the achieved or anticipated results of these three CRPs. The insights and advancements gained from these projects will enable IAEA Member States to further refine nuclear fission technology, thereby contributing to efforts aimed at mitigating climate change.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Chemical Process Safety at TRISO-Based, Metal-Based, and Salt-Based Fuel Fabrication Facilities: Technical Assessment and Guidance Assessment

As part of efforts to prepare for potential and ongoing safety reviews for licensing of advanced non-light-water reactor fuel cycles, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) tasked Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to prepare an assessment on the state of knowledge of potential chemical processes at fuel cycle facilities supporting the front end of these fuel cycles, and to assess the associated regulatory guidance. This report provides a technical assessment of chemical process safety considerations to support NRC licensing reviews of fabrication processes for tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) based, metallic-based, and salt-based fuels. The assessments involved collecting publicly available information on the fuel fabrication processes to (i) identify the operational process steps, characteristics and chemicals involved, (ii) identify the physical safety considerations and health safety considerations during licensing reviews of the various process steps, and (iii) collect information to support assessments of severity of accidents and potential mitigative measures to be implemented. The assessment provides a foundational basis on chemical process safety considerations for advanced fuel fabrication activities, although it is recognized that licensing reviews may necessitate design-specific considerations. The specific conditions under which chemical hazards emerge will require process-specific considerations, highlighting the importance of process-informed interpretation. The assessment also determined that exposure guidelines and limits to assess the consequences of acute exposures are limited for some chemicals, although alternative limits and supplementary information from databases or safety data sheets provide sufficient information to evaluate consequences of acute exposures. In addition, it was identified that metallic and salt fuel fabrication processes may involve beryllium, which is an exposure hazard. The regulatory framework for the licensing of advanced fuel cycle facilities, per 10 CFR Part 70 Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material, is deemed robust and flexible to address the chemical safety considerations in this report. A review was conducted on various regulatory guidance and technical basis documents. This included reviewing NUREG-1520, Revision 2, Standard Review Plan for Fuel Cycle Facilities License Applications – Final Report and the process descriptions in Appendix A of NUREG/CR-6410, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facility Accident Analysis Handbook, to address advanced fuel types. As new fuels will involve process-specific chemical uses, process-specific considerations are provided in this report. Additionally, it is noted that the U.S. Department of Energy protective action criteria database includes Temporary Emergency Exposure Limits (TEELs) for process-specific chemicals. This report provides technical information to support chemical safety assessments of new advanced fuel cycle facilities and identifies technical and safety information to support licensing reviews. No regulatory barriers were identified for the licensing of advanced fuel cycle facilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Four-Stage Multi-Physics Simulations to Assist Temperature Sensor Design for Industrial-Scale Coal-Fired Boiler

The growth of renewable energy sources presents a pressing challenge to the operation and maintenance of existing fossil fuel power plants, given that fossil fuel remains the predominant fuel source, responsible for over 60% of electricity generation in the United States. One of the main concerns within these fossil fuel power plants is the unpredictable failure of boiler tubes, resulting in emergency maintenance with significant economic and societal consequences. A reliable high-temperature sensor is necessary for in situ monitoring of boiler tubes and the safety of fossil fuel power plants. In this study, a comprehensive four-stage multi-physics computational framework is developed to assist the design, optimization installation, and operation of the high-temperature stainless-steel and quartz coaxial cable sensor (SSQ-CCS) for coal-fired boiler applications. With the consideration of various operation conditions, we predict the distributions of flue gas temperatures within coal-fired boilers, the temperature correlation between the boiler tube and SSQ-CCS, and the safety of SSQ-CCS. With the simulation-guided sensor installation plan, the newly designed SSQ-CCSs have been employed for field testing for more than 430 days. The computational framework developed in this work can guide the future operation of coal-fired plants and other power plants for the safety prediction of boiler operations.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

The quest for safer nuclear fuels

Here, to increase the safety and performance of nuclear reactors, researchers are working on developing ‘accident tolerant’ fuels. Ideally, these fuel pellets will be less susceptible to swelling and be more resistant to extreme heat. This led chemists to develop uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) doped with divalent elements, E 2+ . These dopants can introduce vacancies into the lattice that lead to larger grain sizes, which create longer pathways for fission gasses to migrate out of the grains. In undoped fuel, fission gas build-up at grain boundaries causes the fuel pellet to swell. Therefore, having larger grains that slow fission gas migration into grain boundaries is highly desired. Divalent Cr 2+ ions are a commonly explored dopant for UO 2 fuels. These materials have larger grain sizes while maintaining the dissolution kinetics of undoped UO 2 , making their long-term storage and disposal paths similarly safe. Atomistic models have suggested that Mn 2+ is a conceivable alternative doping material, with the potential to increase the sizes of grains even more than Cr 2+ dopants. As such, experimental studies are required to understand the physical chemistry and reactivity of these potential fuels.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

High Flux Isotope Reactor Low-Enriched Uranium High Density Silicide Fuel Preliminary Design Update: System Transient Analysis

As a part of conversion efforts from highly enriched uranium (HEU) to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel under direction of the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, multiple proposed designs of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) have been created and assessed regarding reactor physics performance metrics, including designs utilizing uranium silicide dispersion fuel (U3Si2-Al). This report updates the previous analyses that evaluated the nuclear safety performance of LEU fuel designs with respect to selected accident events from the HFIR Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Both the Low Density (LD) and High Density (HD) Optimized designs’ reactivity initiated accident fuel performance improved relative to the HEU fuel, attributed to greater 238 U negative Doppler feedback. However, the thermal margins for primary coolant system accidents were reduced with some acceptance criteria unable to be met. The need to resolve reduced thermal margin, open modeling items, and unresolved assumptions was identified.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Computational Risk Analysis of Propane Releases in Maintenance Facilities

Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is a viable, cleaner alternative to traditional diesel fuel used in busses and other heavy-duty vehicles and could play a role in helping the US meet its lower emission goals. While the LPG industry has focused efforts on developing vehicles and fueling infrastructure, we must also establish safe parameters for maintenance facilities which are servicing LPG fueled vehicles. Current safety standards aid in the design of maintenance facilities, but additional quantitative analysis is needed to prove safeguards are adequate and suggest improvements where needed. In this report we aim to quantify the amount of flammable mass associated with propane releases from vehicle mounted fuel vessels within enclosed garages. Furthermore, we seek to qualify harm mitigation with variable ventilations and facility layout. To accomplish this we leverage validated computational resources at Sandia National Laboratories to simulate various release scenarios representative of real world vehicles and maintenance facilities. Flow solvers are used to predict the dynamics of fuel systems as well as the evolution of propane during release events. From our simulated results we observe that both inflow and outflow ventilation locations play a critical role in reducing flammable cloud size and potential overpressure values during a possible combustion event.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Full core LOCA safety analysis for a PWR containing high burnup fuel

For economic reasons, the US nuclear industry is renewing efforts to build a technical basis to extend peak rod average burnup limits above the current regulatory burnup limit of 62 GWd/MTU. The primary driver of these efforts is to economically increase pressurized water reactor (PWR) cycle lengths to 24 months, reduce the number of fresh fuel assemblies, increase time online, thereby reducing number of outages and their associated cost, higher fuel utilization, and possibly reduce core design constraints. In order for US nuclear utilities to leverage these economic efficiencies, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will likely require nuclear power plants (NPPs) to analyze a number of potential operational occurrences and their potential consequences with each new core design prior to resuming normal operation. Potential operational occurrences can be divided into three primary regimes: (1) normal operation, (2) anticipated operation occurrences (AOOs), and (3) design basis accidents (DBAs). Normal plant operation is an operating regime in which the plant operates within specified operational limits until the end of the cycle, whereas AOOs are events that result in the NPP deviating outside the normal operating regime. A key attribute of an AOO is that the occurrence should be expected. However, by definition, the occurrence of an AOO does not result in significant impact to critical safety functions. The last potential operational occurrence is a DBA. From the fuel performance point-of-view, DBAs can be subdivided into two bounding categories: (1) loss of coolant accidents (LOCAs), and (2) reactivity insertion accidents (RIAs). Unlike AOOs, DBAs may result in fuel rod failure. The NRC imposes fundamental acceptance criteria to minimize radiological consequences to the public and onsite staff. Furthermore, safety criteria are typically linked to the fulfillment of other acceptance criteria related to reactor safety equipment designed to mitigate DBAs.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Isotopic and Fuel Lattice Parameter Trends in Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuel, Volume II: BWR

Commercial light water reactor (LWR) operators and fuel vendors in the United States are pursuing changes to nuclear fuel that include extended enrichment (EE) and accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) designs to further improve reactor safety and plant economics. Extended fuel enrichments above 5% 235 U pin enrichment and up to 10% 235 U are a subset of high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) that may be deployed in commercial US LWRs in the near term. ATF features, such as cladding coatings or alternative cladding materials, are designed to improve fuel system performance under accident conditions. One goal of EE is to improve fuel cycle economy by enabling fuel to be depleted to higher burnup than the typical current limits (62 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium [GWd/MTU]). Adoption of EE, ATF, and high burnup (HBU) fuels in the US commercial fleet requires a clear understanding of the effects on core physics parameters and used fuel isotopic content, as well as confidence in the accuracy of computer code predictions over an expanded range of materials, enrichment, and burnup. A thorough understanding of the applicability and adequacy of benchmark data (e.g., criticality, decay heat, isotopic content) for computer code validation is necessary to ensure that appropriate safety margins are maintained. As part of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) agreement number 31310019N0008, “SCALE Code Development, Assessment and Maintenance,” the effects of EE, ATF, and HBU are being assessed for selected representative LWR fuel designs. The project is divided into phases, and this report summarizes the findings of the Phase 1 work, which focuses on lattice physics parameter and used fuel isotopic changes for a conventional GE14 10 x 10 boiling water reactor (BWR) design with GNF-2 part length rod patterns to model a modern BWR assembly design.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Integrating the Safety Evaluation for a Molten Salt Reactor Operation and Fuel Cycle Facility Application

Molten salt reactor (MSR) sites may include additional elements of the nuclear fuel cycle beyond those of the existing fleet. In the existing fleet, the individual elements of the fuel cycle typically have been located on different sites and licensed separately. Providing robust separation between hazards remains a useful safety practice for MSRs. Although the different elements of the fuel cycle at a nuclear site that includes MSRs may transfer material between processes more frequently than prior practices, providing adequate separation between distinct facilities avoids the potential for adverse interactions. Additionally, some elements of the MSR fuel cycle, such as fuel salt preparation or waste stabilization, may be more efficient to share among multiple nearby reactors, and nuclear sites that include MSRs may also include other reactor classes. Hence, discrete MSR fuel cycle facilities located at a common site could be physically separated with robust barriers—albeit potentially connected by piping—and licensed individually. This report describes the hazards of individual elements of representative MSR fuel cycle facilities, including their relationship to overall site level hazards. The report maps the regulatory compliance aspects of the individual MSR fuel cycle elements (e.g., fuel salt preparation, reactor, waste stabilization) to existing and developing regulations, as well as describes current and developing site-level regulations from an MSR perspective.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗