Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Fuel Cycle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9

Undercooling minimization in ultrasound coupled DTA measurements of molten salts

Molten salts are ionic liquids that are used for the electrolytic pyroprocessing of metals and as heat transfer fluids in very high temperature processes. Recently, halide-based molten salt reactors (MSR) have gained momentum for high density and environmentally responsible electricity generation. The function of these reactors and their fuel cycle depend on a knowledge of the halide salt’s thermodynamic properties [1]. Therefore, high accuracy phase equilibria of MSR relevant base halide and actinide containing salts are needed. Modern thermal analysis of the phase transitions of halide salts is usually done during heating at relatively high scan rates with commercial devices. Normally such measurements are adequate for pure or pseudo-binary salts. However, as the number of components in the mixture increases, accurately resolving the liquidus becomes increasingly difficult. Reversing the scanning mode greatly increases the sensitivity of phase transition measurements but can decrease accuracy due to undercooling [2] — a common occurrence in molten halide systems [3]. This work presents the development of a differential thermal analysis (DTA) cell intended for use in radiological gloveboxes. Non-contact ultrasonic agitation of the halide salt is implemented to limit kinetic limitations on crystallization during cooling to minimize undercooling [4]. Measurements on halide salts are also presented to elucidate the effect of non-contact mixing on undercooling. Reference [1] S. Boyd and C. Taylor, “3 - Chemical fundamentals and applications of molten salts,” in Molten Salt Reactors and Thorium Energy, T. J. Dolan, Ed., Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 29–91. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-101126-3.00003-8. [2] K. Nitsch, A. Cihlár, and M. Rodová, “Molten state and supercooling of lead halides,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 492–498, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.01.011. [3] L. Rycerz, “Practical remarks concerning phase diagrams determination on the basis of differential scanning calorimetry measurements,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 231–238, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10973-013-3097-0. [4] Md. H. Zahir, S. A. Mohamed, R. Saidur, and F. A. Al-Sulaiman, “Supercooling of phase-change materials and the techniques used to mitigate the phenomenon,” Appl. Energy, vol. 240, pp. 793–817, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.045.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

A Framework to Assess Advanced Reactor Spent Fuel Management Facility Deployment

Advanced nuclear reactors offer various operational advantages over existing light water reactors but could produce types of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) with a wide variety of forms and characteristics depending on how many different concepts are deployed. Each advanced reactor SNF type potentially poses unique management challenges. New planning efforts will be necessary to anticipate how the management requirements of advanced reactor SNF will affect the deployment of an integrated waste management system. This paper applies a framework of high-level facility deployment milestones to a generic SNF management system, reviewing them together with the advanced reactor SNF characteristics and management requirements. This allows for the investigation of factors that influence facility and system deployment, and ultimately, the identification of challenges facing the deployment of different kinds of SNF management facilities. Here, the back end of the once-through fuel cycle is examined for four advanced reactor system technology types: sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, liquid-fuel molten salt reactors, and lead-cooled fast reactors. It is observed that milestones earlier in the facility deployment process (e.g., siting and facility design) are more impacted by the uniqueness of advanced reactor SNF characteristics than others (e.g., construction and testing). Ultimately, none of the differences are seen as fundamentally disqualifying in a technical sense; however, they should be considered early, potentially as part of reactor design, to avoid issues in the future.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Bayesian Analysis of TRISO Fuel: Quantifying Model Inadequacy, Incorporating Lower-Length-Scale Effects, and Developing Parallel Active Learning Capabilities

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program aims to develop predictive capabilities by applying computational methods to the analysis and design of advanced reactor and fuel-cycle systems. This program has been providing engineering-scale support for the continued development of BISON, a high-fidelity, high-resolution fuel performance tool. Fuel behavior in nuclear reactors is governed by a complex network of mechanisms that interact with various other physics aspects in the reactor system. Any model developed to represent fuel behavior will likely be idealized, resulting in uncertainties when comparing their predictions against the observed data. In Fiscal Year (FY)-23, we initiated the Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) work by using Bayesian methods to establish a level of model trustworthiness and further improve it, with a particular emphasis on TRI-Structural isOtropic (TRISO) nuclear fuel. This year, we further expanded on that UQ work by investigating an approach to quantifying model inadequacy and accounting for lower-length scale (LLS) effects in TRISO silver (Ag) release modeling. Furthermore, we are implementing parallel active learning capabilities to reduce the computational cost (i.e., required computational resources and elapsed time) of performing UQ. Specifically, we utilized The Kennedy O’Hagan framework for Bayesian uncertainty quantification (KOH) to account for model inadequacy in TRISO Ag release predictions made by BISON. The KOH framework represents an improvement over the standard Bayesian framework used in FY-23. Explicitly accounting for model inadequacy in the Bayesian framework helps establish the level of experimental noise uncertainty in the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) data. We compared the inverse UQ results obtained from both the standard Bayesian and KOH frameworks in light of the AGR-2/3/4 data, and also compared the predictive UQ results obtained from these two frameworks in light of the AGR-1 data. Next, we investigated the impact of considering LLS effects in the Ag release simulations. We developed an expanded database of LLS simulated effective diffusivities for Ag, covering a wide range of microstructures and temperatures. Using this database, we developed a framework for incorporating LLS effects into the engineering-scale Ag release UQ. We developed both parametric and non-parametric approaches for bridging the length scales. We then investigated the inverse UQ results in light of the AGR-2/3/4 data and the predictive UQ results in light of the AGR-1 data, and compared the LLS-informed approach and the Arrhenius equation, which does not include microstructure information. Finally, we discussed implementing parallel active learning capabilities in the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE)/BISON to reduce the computational cost (i.e., computational resources and elapsed time) of Bayesian UQ. For verification purposes, we first tested these new capabil ities on a species interaction problem. We then demonstrated them on the TRISO Ag release application, showing that parallel active learning capabilities can enhance the accuracy of UQ while also substantially reducing the computational cost in comparison to the reference methods developed in FY-23.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Identify and Assess Technical Challenges in Safeguards Measurements of Spent Advanced Reactor Fuels

Advanced reactor (AR) designs use various nuclear fuel types that can be significantly different than conventional light-water reactor (LWR) fuels, including differences in sizes, compositions, and chemical forms (e.g., oxide, carbide, metal). Nearly all the proposed AR fuels use high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), which will have higher enrichments (5–20 wt% 235 U) than LWR fuels (currently limited to <5 wt% 235 U). In advance of the wide use of these new fuel types around the world, international safeguards organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA]) are working with some of the AR vendors to formulate safeguards approaches for these AR fuel cycles. As part of the overall safeguards approach, it is important to identify the potential technical challenges in performing safeguards verification measurements of these AR fuels (both fresh and spent fuels) in advance of the widespread adoption of these new fuel types, because new safeguards technologies can take several years to develop, test, and approve for use. This report documents work performed in fiscal year 2024 based on modeling and simulation to assess the performance of the existing safeguards measurement technologies for irradiated or spent AR fuel elements or items. This work is a continuation of the work performed in fiscal year 2023 that focused on fresh AR fuels. Spent AR fuels have a distinct difference from their LWR counterparts: unlike the spent LWR fuels typically stored in a water-filled pool, some spent AR fuels—such as tristructural-isotropic (TRISO)-based fuels—will most likely be stored in air-filled hot cells. Because most safeguards measurements on spent fuel performed to date have been conducted under water, the air-filled hot cell environment could present unique challenges to safeguards measurements. Fork detector (FDET) and Cerenkov viewing device (CVD) systems have been the two primary instruments used by the IAEA for several decades to measure spent LWR fuel assemblies stored in pools for safeguards verification purposes. Because the lower refractive index of air causes Cerenkov light to be of lower intensity in air than in water, existing CVDs are likely unable to perform safeguards verification measurements for spent fuel stored in an air-filled hot cell, as is the case for the TRISO-based spent fuel elements (e.g., pebbles, graphite fuel blocks). Unlike FDET measurements, CVD measurements do not require fuel be moved, so they are a simpler and faster to take than FDET measurements. The inability to perform CVD measurements on the TRISO-based AR fuel types presents a major technical challenge in the effort to use existing technology to perform safeguards measurements on spent AR fuels. This study was mainly conducted through the modeling and simulation of an FDET or an FDET-like system on five spent AR fuel types, including one metallic fuel type and four TRISO-based fuel types in both pebble and graphite block forms in their respective storage configurations and environments. Because the various AR fuel types have significantly different dimensions, FDET systems must be adapted to accommodate them. Partial defect tests were also simulated in this study to assess the FDET’s ability to detect potential fuel diversions. The FDET measures the fuel’s total passive neutron and gamma emissions. The simulated FDET results from spent AR fuel items are compared against results from a typical spent pressurized water reactor (PWR) assembly. High-purity germanium (HPGe) gamma detector measurements were also simulated for the spent AR fuel types and the PWR assembly because the signature photopeaks have been used in LWR safeguards verifications, although HPGe is usually not used to detect diversions because of the fuel’s self-attenuation effects on those photopeaks. The results indicate that these detectors have significant challenges in performing safeguards measurements of the spent AR fuel items, including incompatibilities between AR fuel items and existing FDETs, lower neutron count rates, lower sensitivities to fuel diversions in certain AR fuel items, and significantly higher interference from a neighboring fuel item when the measurement is performed in air. These results suggest that an alternative technology or significant and timely technology development is needed to perform adequate safeguards measurements of some of these AR fuel items.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DISCOVARY PROJECT: Material Background Report

UC/UO 2 composites have been proposed as a next generation fuel for light water reactors (LWRs). Accident tolerant fuels (ATF) have been a focus in the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) to improve the safety and performance of LWRs and includes research and development efforts on the cladding and fuel. The 10 wt.% UC/UO 2 composite fuel was selected as a result of an extensive literature review and was selected due to the improvement of the fuel cycle cost. The inclusion of a UC phase in the composite material improves on the properties of standard UO 2 by increasing the uranium density of the fuel and increasing the thermal conductivity. Significant development has been carried out to refine the processing and sintering parameters and has led to a dense composite without ternary phases present. Characterization of the chemistry and microstructure has been carried out to send ahead of neutron irradiations in the Belgium Research Reactor (BR2) at SCK-CEN.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Techno-Economic Analysis of Gas-Liquid Contactors for Tritium Extraction from Lead-Lithium

To enable a sustainable fuel cycle, any deuterium-tritium fusion reactor must breed its tritium fuel onsite. Lead-lithium (PbLi), a eutectic metal, is a leading liquid breeder material for tritium generation. One challenge with PbLi blanket technology is the extraction of tritium from the molten eutectic. Three technologies are the focus of worldwide research: the vacuum permeator, the vacuum sieve tray, and the gas-liquid contactor (GLC). The present work offers a methodology for designing, sizing, optimizing, and costing a trickle-bed GLC. Here, we analyzed tritium extraction from PbLi using MELODIE experimental data by applying traditional packed bed mass transfer efficiency models along with supplementary models, like film theory. Our analysis revealed that traditional packed bed mass transfer efficiency models do not fit the MELODIE loop experimental data. Moreover, uncertainty in PbLi solubility resulted in a 325-fold increase in required gas flow rates when comparing identical packing heights. The film theory liquid mass transfer coefficient, Delt-Olujic wettability model, and Reiter tritium solubility values fit the MELODIE data best and were used both in the design and to conduct the economic analysis. Techno-economic analysis of the GLC was performed to evaluate three design sizes, all achieving a minimum extraction efficiency of 90 [%] for a total tritium extraction of 31 [kg/yr].

Fusion Fuel Cycle↗

C Modules Enrichment

Module C1 discusses the step in the nuclear fuel cycle where the UF6 solid in cylinders from the conversion plant is processed to enrich the percentage of U-235 from 0.711% to the 3–5% typical of the enrichment used for light-water reactor nuclear fuel fabrication. It involves receipt of UF6 feed stock in 12.5 ton cylinders, enrichment operations, formation of enriched UF6 solid, and shipment of 2.3 ton cylinders to fuel fabricators. In this module, “SWU” is taken as shorthand for kg-SWU, the formal units for enrichment work, assuming that heavy metal mass flows will be gauged in kg.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Gains in operational flexibility, safety margins, and cost efficiencies via integrated Plant Reload Optimization platform

The U.S. Department of Energy Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program Risk-Informed Systems Analysis Pathway Plant Reload Optimization Project aims to develop an integrated, comprehensive framework offering an all-in-one solution for reload evaluations with a special focus on optimizing core design. Optimizing the fuel loading pattern is one of the most important considerations in reducing the amount of new fuel used in the core. Due to thousands of possible core configuration options, finding optimal solutions is an unachievable task for a human. The Plant ReLoad Optimization platform, which supports artificial-intelligence-based reactor core designing, is now fully capable of handling realistic problems. The Plant ReLoad Optimization platform development project aims to build a reactor core design tool that includes reactor safety and fuel performance analyses and uses artificial intelligence to support the optimization of core design solutions. The NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) optimizer was developed and tested within RAVEN (Risk Analysis and Virtual ENvironment) to handle many constraints by using an augmented objectives methodology. The demonstration was performed with constrained multiobjective optimization of a 17 × 17 pressurized-water reactor core loading patterns to minimize fuel cost and maximize fuel cycle length.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Quantitative Voltammetry Measurements of High-Concentration Actinides in Molten Chloride Fuel Salts

Molten chloride mixtures containing high concentrations of UCl 3 (i.e., >70 wt%) are candidates for next-generation molten salt reactor (MSR) fuel salts that enable new plant optimization and fuel cycle strategies. MSR licensing, however, is contingent on the development of effective material control and accounting (MC&A) practices for these salts. To close this gap, we have developed an electroanalytical approach that enables accurate in situ measurements of uranium concentrations in these highly loaded fuel salts. This methodology uses a multielectrode array voltammetry sensor combined with digital simulations that account for non-idealities such as uncompensated resistance effects. The theory-based numerical simulations of voltammetry responses yielded correction factors that are agnostic of electrochemical cell geometry and produced consistent voltammetry peak current results when correcting for varying amounts of ohmic resistance. In doing so, we have demonstrated accurate concentration measurements for UCl 3 in LiCl-KCl-UCl 3 across a range of mass fractions between 55 and 72.3 wt% at 550 °C.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Evaluate opportunities for monitoring the oxidation states of technetium in both organic and aqueous phases using Raman spectroscopy

An important isotope in the nuclear fuel cycle, 99 Tc is characterized by its long half-life of 2.1 × 10 5 years and its beta emission. It is generated through the fission of 235 U. As the burnup levels of nuclear waste continue to rise, the concentration of technetium in spent fuel increases, leading to a heightened interest in its quantification during the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. In HNO3 environments, technetium predominantly exists as TcO 4 − ; however, it tends to interfere with reducing agents, decreasing the separation efficiency for actinides. Therefore, accurate quantitative determination of technetium is critical to controlling its distribution and mitigating its negative effect on the reprocessing of spent fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Approach to startup inventory for viable commercial fusion power plant

With the increasing efforts to commercialize fusion power, private and government organizations are investing heavily in the development of technology to support a viable fusion power plant. Deuterium-Tritium (DT) fueled reactors are more prevalent than other proposed designs, requiring tritium processing and handling technology for safe operations and self-sufficiency. Further, each fusion power plant will need a specific-to-design startup inventory of tritium to begin operations. This startup inventory is required prior to breeding and is the minimum tritium inventory required to fill each processing component in the fuel cycle, to offset radioactive decay losses, and to avoid a zero-fuel situation for continuous operation. We present an approach to calculate the startup tritium inventory for a 500 MW th reactor, with considerations for reserve inventory for maintenance and commissioning. A baseline startup inventory was calculated to be approximately 327 gs. This value was obtained using modest assumptions about the technology and operating parameters of a fusion power plant. The required operating reserve inventory or the inventory necessary to keep a fusion power plant operational using only direct internal recycling for 24 h for the same plant design is approximately 642 gs. The approach and findings of this paper will enable fusion energy stakeholders to better utilize the existing scarce global tritium supply.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Multi-cycle reload analysis of a long cycle gas-cooled fast modular reactor

There is currently significant interest in deploying HALEU-fueled fast reactors, including the General Atomics (GA) Fast Modular Reactor (FMR). Such reactors can achieve very long fuel cycles, but with multi-batch loading will take decades to reach equilibrium. This motivates design and analysis of both the initial core and multi-cycle reload, which is typically performed using fast-running, deterministic fast reactor codes such as the Argonne Reactor Computation (ARC) codes. In this paper, multicycle reload of the GA FMR is analyzed using the ARC codes. The GA FMR utilizes 19.75 % enriched fuel in a 16 year cycle with a three-batch strategy, with twice-burned fuel placed on the core periphery. The GA FMR has a softened neutron spectrum due to reflecting elements in the core, so the neutronic solution is first benchmarked against the OpenMC Monte Carlo code. Discrepancy on k eff is 400–600 pcm, likely due to the softened neutron spectrum, heterogeneous fuel assembly design and central reflector. However, the rms discrepancy on the assembly power distribution is only 0.6 %, despite the presence of the central reflector. A reload strategy is devised for the first three cycles of such a reactor, ultimately spanning the first 45–48 years of its operation. The fresh core uses 19.75 %, 19.25 % and 16.75 % enriched fuel in place of fresh, once-burned and twice-burned and is then subsequently refueled with only 19.75 % enriched fuel. The cycle length is varied over 3 cycles of operation to balance fuel utilization and reactor availability, specifically with use of an extended 18-year Cycle 1, followed by a shortened 11-year Cycle 2. Cycle 3 is close to the target 16-year length. Finally, placing twice burned assemblies next to the GA FMR central reflector can reduce power peaking by 3 %, at the expense of slightly reducing the cycle length.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Hypothetical Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Fuel Transport Using the Existing ES-3100

Increased industry interest in increased enrichment fuels is associated with a heightened interest in high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU)-based systems, as novel designs look to take root as alternatives to traditional LWRs. Increased enrichment with novel reactors can produce designs that, in theory and in some historical experience, are capable of operation at increased burnups, higher energy density, and other unique features compared to conventional LWRs. As part of a Department of Energy (DOE) initiative to increase the availability of HALEU fuel, initial funding sourced from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R. 5376) [1] resulted in the DOE/NRC Criticality Safety for Commercial-Scale HALEU Fuel Cycle and Transportation (DNCSH) project, part of the HALEU Availability Program. The project aims to support the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in providing data for criticality safety validation of reactor designs that, while perhaps demonstrated in limited capacity, represent more exotic systems than those that regulators are accustomed to reviewing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Summary of Leach-Burn-Leach Round-Robin Test Results

Tristructural isotropic (TRISO) coated particle fuel is of interest to multiple member states associated with the Generation IV International Forum (GIF). Qualification and acceptance testing of TRISO fuel includes the determination of particle defect fractions and impurities in the as-fabricated TRISO fuel particle and/or composited fuel form, which are typically determined using burn-leach (BL) or leach-burn-leach (LBL) analysis methods. A round-robin test focusing on LBL analysis was undertaken by the GIF Very High Temperature Reactor System Fuel and Fuel Cycle Project Management Board. Participating in this LBL round-robin test were research staff from the Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) in the People’s Republic of China, the Korean Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) in the Republic of Korea, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in the United States of America. The motivation of this LBL benchmarking exercise was to explore consistency in results generated by LBL and to elucidate the potential influence of variations in the procedures used by the participating members on the accurate determination of the measured fuel properties.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Update on Parallel Process Execution in the Next Generation System Analysis Model

As of the end of 2021, 88,880 metric tons of heavy metal (MTHM) (44,741 MTHM in dry storage; 44,139 MTHM in wet storage) of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) were stored at various reactor sites across the United States [1]. The Office of Storage and Transportation in the Department of Energy is planning for the transportation, storage, and eventual disposal of SNF and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). To aid in this effort and inform decision-makers about the backend of the spent fuel cycle, systems analysis tools capable of analyzing the various options with respect to SNF and HLW management are being used as well as continuously improved to meet the evolving needs of the program. System analysts typically use these tools to vary underlying assumptions (shipping rates, allocation priority, available facilities, start dates, etc.) and study the implications of these changes on site clearance schedules, campaign costs, transportation infrastructure acquisition, etc.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Update on Parallel Process Execution in the Next Generation System Analysis Model (NGSAM)

As of the end of 2022, it is estimated that over 90,000 metric tons of heavy metal (MTHM) of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) were stored at various commercial nuclear power reactor sites (both operating and shutdown) across the United States [1]. The Office of Storage and Transportation within the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy is planning for the transportation, storage, and eventual disposal of SNF and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). To aid in this effort and inform decision-makers about the backend of the spent fuel cycle, systems analysis tools capable of analyzing the various options with respect to SNF and HLW management are being used as well as continuously improved to meet the evolving needs of the program. System analysts typically use these tools to vary underlying assumptions (shipping rates, available facilities, start dates, interim storage capacity, etc.) and study the associated system implications such as timing for clearing sites of SNF, various cost elements, transportation infrastructure acquisition needs, etc.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Idaho National Laboratory Team Visits NCERC

The DOE/NRC Criticality Safety for Commercial-Scale High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) for Fuel Cycle and Transportation (DNCSH) initiative is a collaboration between the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission focused on criticality safety benchmarking for processing and transportation applications related to HALEU and Advanced Reactors. The project includes design, siting and construction of a horizontal split table (HST), which has long been recognized as a need for validating advanced reactor systems.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Recommendations for a Fundamental Nuclear Material Control (FNMC) Plan for TRISO Fuel Fabrication Facilities Under NRC Regulations

A fundamental nuclear material control (FNMC) plan, which is required for all fuel fabrication facilities that are authorized to possess more than 1 effective kg of special nuclear material, describes how material control and accounting (MC&A) requirements will be met to comply with US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations. Tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel fabrication facilities are likely to have issues in meeting MC&A requirements because of the new processes and fuel types their work involves. This report provides recommendations for an FNMC plan specifically for a TRISO fuel fabrication facility under NRC regulations and includes a draft outline of an FNMC plan. This report was produced for the Materials Protection, Accounting, and Control Technologies (MPACT) program under the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies programs within the US Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗