Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “GNC”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Hazard Boresight Relative Navigation for Safe Lunar Landing

In the area of planetary landing, hazard detection and avoidance is the act of driving a vehicle to a safe landing area using onboard resources. A hazard detection sensor is used to scan the terrain and these measurements are evaluated to determine where the safe landing sites are located. The selected site is generally not the same as the nominal target, so the vehicle must divert to the new site. This activity involves the interaction between several components, including a suite of onboard GNC algorithms that work together to efficiently choose and divert to a new site. This paper presents the Hazard Boresight Relative Navigation concept, which is a method that provides a common interface between the hazard scan, safe-site selection algorithm, size of the target-relative landing ellipse, divert offset distance and guidance targeting algorithm. After the safe-site is selected from the hazard scan, the original inertial target is replaced with a vehicle-relative target, which is initialized by a measurement from the hazard scan. The new target-relative position state is estimated over time in the navigation filter, and is fed to the guidance algorithm to perform the divert maneuver. In addition to detailing the Hazard Boresight Relative Navigation concept, this paper also presents some general landing terms that can be used in the greater discussion, as well as analysis on how to estimate and predict the vehicle footprint dispersion ellipse during flight, which is used in the safe-site selection algorithm.

Stephen Steffes↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Analysis of Exploration Capability Gaps for Future Habitation Systems to Inform Risk Assessment and Development Priorities

Within NASA, exploration capability gaps are defined as the difference between the current state-of-the-art in capabilities and the anticipated needs of future human spaceflight architectures. As NASA and its partners’ capabilities for human exploration of deep space continue to mature, it is necessary to understand the capability gaps that require closure to support future habitation systems, such as the Lunar Surface Habitat (SH) and Mars Transit Habitat (TH) currently in concept development. This paper will identify high-priority capability gaps for exploration habitation and show potential options for gap closure through investment in technology, development, and testing. High-priority capability gaps are divided into the following general taxonomy areas: human health/life support/habitation systems, flight computing and avionics, power and energy storage, communications and navigation, thermal management systems, human exploration destination systems, autonomous systems, sensors and instruments, GNC (guidance, navigation, and control), robotic systems, ground and uncrewed surface systems, and materials/structures/mechanical systems/manufacturing. In the gap identification process, teams of discipline experts from across NASA reviewed the latest habitation architecture needs against current capabilities to understand where gaps may exist. The results of the assessment established a basis for the current state-of-the-art within each gap and identified the capability needs of the proposed exploration missions the gap links to. An assessment of how each test platform (e.g., Ground, International Space Station (ISS), Commercial Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Destinations, Gateway) may be leveraged to mature capabilities and potentially provide a route to gap closure will be discussed. The notional timeline for gap closure to support reference missions and impacts to overall schedule are also assessed where appropriate. Based on the capability gap analysis described above, the paper summarizes important technology maturation considerations for human exploration architectures, with a focus on the Mars TH. The previously published NASA habitation ground rules and assumptions document is used as the basis to classify gaps as enabling, enhancing, or “push” opportunities for a particular architecture. Stepwise technology maturation plans/considerations are presented for some selected critical gaps. Overall, the analysis in this paper is intended to help influence development priorities for habitation systems, where high-priority, critical gaps are those currently assessed as having a low probability of closure by the anticipated need date. Capability gap analysis also informs the risk register for exploration habitation systems and mitigation strategies to ensure readiness of key technologies to support future mission timelines. Linkage between capability gaps for Moon and Mars is noted, as closure of a gap at a Lunar destination may subsequently enable or enhance Mars TH architectures.

technology development↗
NASA NTRS2021

Mars 2020 Perseverance Entry Controller Design and Flight Reconstruction

On February 18th, 2021, NASA landed Perseverance on the Jezero crater (on Mars). An entry Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) system delivered the vehicle to the desired landing ellipse. The navigation filter propagated position and attitude states initialized from cruise using Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) measurements. The entry guidance modulated the lift vector through bank commands to reach the parachute deploy conditions. The entry controller commanded the propulsive Reaction Control System (RCS) to track the bank commands while doing rate damping on angle-of-attack and sideslip. This paper describes the design and the as-flown performance of the entry controller.

Way, David W.↗
NASA NTRS2020

A Generalized Guidance Approach to In-Space Solid-Propellant Vehicle Maneuvers

Exploration-class vehicles that require fully autonomous ascent and descent must employ robust, explicit path-adaptive guidance algorithms that can operate in a wide range of physical environments. Vehicle designs that employ solid-propellant rocket motors (SRMs) for maneuvers are attractive from a system engineering perspective because of their simplicity and reliability but may cause complications for both mission designers and GNC engineers when dealing with total impulse uncertainty, as well as proper energy management of a motor with an uncontrolled cutoff time. This paper presents a simplified guidance algorithm, named Simple Cross-Product Steering (SxS), that was derived during early studies of NASA’s Mars Sample Return mission’s Mars Ascent Vehicle. The algorithm takes roots in a flight-proven guidance algorithm commonly referred to as Cross-Product Steering. This algorithm has been shown to provide sufficient guidance accuracy for in-space SRM burns in a simulated Martian environment, and preliminary studies have been conducted to test the algorithm in a solid-propellant lunar braking scenario. A method for predicting proper motor ignition time during execution of the Cross-Product Steering algorithm is the primary contribution of this paper. Mechanization notes are also provided that were realized in early phases of MAV. Results are shown for an example ascent vehicle a simulated Mars environment.

Jason M Everett↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Gateway Refueling Architecture and Concept of Operation

The Lunar Gateway is a deep space orbiting outpost being developed by NASA in partnership with ESA and other domestic and international partners. It is a critical component of NASA’s Artemis program supporting long-term human exploration of the moon and is designed to be refueled, requiring the on-orbit transfer of propellants. The first two modules of Gateway to be launched will be the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and the Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO). The PPE contains the bipropellant chemical and electrical propulsion systems that will provide attitude control and orbit raising capability for Gateway. The reaction control system (RCS) utilizes monomethylhydrazine (MMH) and mixed oxides of nitrogen-3 (MON-3) as the fuel and oxidizer, respectively. Helium is used as a pressurant. The Advanced Electric Propulsion Systems (AEPS) and Busek hall thrusters that comprise the solar electric propulsion (SEP) system use xenon as the propellent. The ESPRIT Refueling Module, provided by ESA, will supply the propellant refueling function to Gateway’s propulsion systems. On-orbit refueling is a complex, technically challenging operation that is key to enabling sustainable crewed Lunar and Martian exploration. Numerous systems may be involved in the refueling operation. Also numerous systems are required to enable the successful ability for Gateway to refuel such as, SEP, RCS, Structure & Mechanisms (S&M), Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC), Thermal, Software, Vehicle System Manager (VSM), Flight Ops, Extra Vehicular Robotics (EVR), Communication and Tracking (C&T), Avionics, and more. This paper will detail the design architecture, concept of operations, and challenges associated with the Gateway refueling system. The methodologies used in Gateway will be compared to those implemented in OSAM-1 and the best practices documented by AIAA and CONFERS (Consortium For Execution Of Rendezvous And Servicing Operations).

Brandie L. Rhodes↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancements in Frequency Domain Analysis of Dual Centerline Propellant Tanks for Space Vehicle Stability and Design

This paper presents advancements in the frequency domain stability analysis for landing and ascent vehicle configurations with dual centerline propellant tanks, developed in support of Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) insight activities for the Human Landing System project. The study focuses on the impact of axial thrust on the dual tank slosh danger zone solution. The frequency domain stability analysis tool is developed within the GeneraLized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink® (GLASS) framework at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The frequency domain stability analysis tool is used to determine slosh damping and control systems design requirements. The accuracy of the tool’s instability predictions is validated against time-domain outcomes within the GLASS simulation environment, showing consistent and anticipated results. Additionally, the method is validated by comparing its results with Frequency Domain Analysis and Comparison Tool Assuming Linearity (FRACTAL), a frequency domain analysis tool with extensive heritage and rigorous verification and validation using NASA Ares I-X and SLS flight data. The findings of this paper contribute to a better understanding of dual-tank slosh instability and support improved design and operation margins of space vehicles.

Han Woong (Brian) Bae↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring Cryogenic Propellant Behavior in Low-Gravity Environments, Insights from the Saturn AS-203 Vent Experiments and CFD Analysis

In the 1960s, NASA embarked on a series of groundbreaking flight tests on the Saturn AS-203, aiming to understand the complex dynamics of propellants in the distinctive low-gravity lunar environment. These tests centered on venting experiments, subjecting cryogenic liquid hydrogen to conditions beneath its saturation pressure while accelerating the vehicle to manage the propellant's positioning. During these experiments, NASA meticulously scrutinized the propellant tank using a suite of instruments, including temperature and pressure sensors, as well as a camera placed internal to the liquid hydrogen tank. The outcomes provided anecdotal evidence revealing the phenomenon of boiling along the tank's walls and the intriguing formation of liquid globules and droplets in the ullage during the venting process. Notably, the substantial drop in liquid temperature during these tests suggests adiabatic cooling as liquid hydrogen evaporates. This evaporation leads to a cooling of the remaining hydrogen due to the heat it releases. This paper presents the outcomes of our initial analysis, wherein CFD models were used to simulate the observed boiling phenomena and the bulk movement of the liquid hydrogen propellant, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The implications of these findings may extend to mission and vehicle designers, providing invaluable insights for crafting more efficient and effective in-space propulsion systems utilizing cryogenic propellant including impacts to vehicle control systems. Understanding propellant behavior under these conditions may better inform GNC teams, ensuring more stable vehicle operations when utilizing cryogenic propellants. This includes essential considerations for cryogenic propellant transfer and storage systems, integral to NASA's forthcoming Artemis missions. While we recognize the challenges tied to CFD models, this study represents a step forward, highlighting current progress and signaling the potential for refining our predictive understanding in the future.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring Cryogenic Propellant Behavior in Low-Gravity Environments, Insights from the Saturn AS-203 Vent Experiments and CFD Analysis

In the 1960s, NASA embarked on a series of groundbreaking flight tests on the Saturn AS-203, aiming to understand the complex dynamics of propellants in the distinctive low-gravity lunar environment. These tests centered on venting experiments, subjecting cryogenic liquid hydrogen to conditions beneath its saturation pressure while accelerating the vehicle to manage the propellant's positioning. During these experiments, NASA meticulously scrutinized the propellant tank using a suite of instruments, including temperature and pressure sensors, as well as a camera placed internal to the liquid hydrogen tank. The outcomes provided anecdotal evidence revealing the phenomenon of boiling along the tank's walls and the intriguing formation of liquid globules and droplets in the ullage during the venting process. Notably, the substantial drop in liquid temperature during these tests suggests adiabatic cooling as liquid hydrogen evaporates. This evaporation leads to a cooling of the remaining hydrogen due to the heat it releases. This paper presents the outcomes of our initial analysis, wherein CFD models were used to simulate the observed boiling phenomena and the bulk movement of the liquid hydrogen propellant, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The implications of these findings may extend to mission and vehicle designers, providing invaluable insights for crafting more efficient and effective in-space propulsion systems utilizing cryogenic propellant including impacts to vehicle control systems. Understanding propellant behavior under these conditions may better inform GNC teams, ensuring more stable vehicle operations when utilizing cryogenic propellants. This includes essential considerations for cryogenic propellant transfer and storage systems, integral to NASA's forthcoming Artemis missions. While we recognize the challenges tied to CFD models, this study represents a step forward, highlighting current progress and signaling the potential for refining our predictive understanding in the future.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advancements in Frequency Domain Analysis of Dual Centerline Propellant Tanks for Space Vehicle Stability and Design

This paper presents advancements in the frequency domain stability analysis for landing and ascent vehicle configurations with dual centerline propellant tanks, developed in support of Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) insight activities for the Human Landing System project. The study focuses on the impact of axial thrust on the dual tank slosh danger zone solution. The frequency domain stability analysis tool is developed within the GeneraLized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink® (GLASS) framework at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The frequency domain stability analysis tool is used to determine slosh damping and control systems design requirements. The accuracy of the tool’s instability predictions is validated against time-domain outcomes within the GLASS simulation environment, showing consistent and anticipated results. Additionally, the method is validated by comparing its results with Frequency Domain Analysis and Comparison Tool Assuming Linearity (FRACTAL), a frequency domain analysis tool with extensive heritage and rigorous verification and validation using NASA Ares I-X and SLS flight data. The findings of this paper contribute to a better understanding of dual-tank slosh instability and support improved design and operation margins of space vehicles.

Han Woong (Brian) Bae↗
NASA NTRS2009

Introduction To Space Shuttle Rendezvous Guidance, Navigation, and Control

The Rendezvous Intro continues to be used for training and reference purposes almost 17 years after it was first published. While this document does not address Orion rendezvous, some Orion personnel are using it as a reference for rendezvous GNC and trajectory concepts. This edition contains corrections that have been identified since the 3rd edition was published in 2000. In addition, new material has been added that was developed by the author in the 1990s and early part of the first decade of the 21st century. While some of this material is perhaps too detailed for an introduction, it is of value and the author wanted to make it available to JSC personnel. The sections on Lambert targeting guidance have been significantly expanded.

John L Goodman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Onboard Navigation Error Analysis for Aerocapture at Uranus

Capturing into an orbit around Uranus using aerocapture allows one to design a mission with faster interplanetary trajectories and less propellant requirements. Such an aerocapture mission would rely on the onboard Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) subsystems to successfully capture into an orbit around Uranus. Uncertainty in the state information and the noise in the sensor measurements induce navigation errors in the guidance and control subsystems, which can affect the overall performance of the aerocapture mission at Uranus. Understanding the effect of these navigation errors on mission performance is essential. To this end, this work considers different sensors with varying quality to understand their impact on the overall mission performance. In addition, this paper studies the impact of the uncertainty in the initial states used to initialize the onboard navigation filter and understands their effect on mission performance. This paper also shows the onboard navigation errors obtained from the Linear Covariance (LinCov) analysis and uses them for verification and validation (V&V) of the results from Program to Optimize and Simulate Trajectories-II (POST2).

Pardha Sai Chadalavada↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Onboard Navigation Error Analysis for Aerocapture at Uranus

Capturing into an orbit around Uranus using aerocapture allows one to design a mission with faster interplanetary trajectories and less propellant requirements. Such an aerocapture mission would rely on the onboard Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) subsystems to successfully capture into an orbit around Uranus. Uncertainty in the state information and the noise in the sensor measurements induce navigation errors in the guidance and control subsystems, which can affect the overall performance of the aerocapture mission at Uranus. Understanding the effect of these navigation errors on mission performance is essential. To this end, this work considers different sensors with varying quality to understand their impact on the overall mission performance. In addition, this paper studies the impact of the uncertainty in the initial states used to initialize the onboard navigation filter and understands their effect on mission performance. This paper also shows the onboard navigation errors obtained from the Linear Covariance (LinCov) analysis and uses them for verification and validation (V\&V) of the results from Program to Optimize and Simulate Trajectories-II (POST2).

Aerocapture↗
NASA NTRS2025

Transit Habitat Government-Reference Conceptual Design Reaction Control System Propulsion Concept Design Data Book

The function of Transit Habitat (TH) Reaction Control System (RCS) propulsion is to provide free-flying spacecraft capabilities and to augment Gateway stack control when docked on Gateway. The requirements of multiple propellant replenishments and extensive life operation have significant impacts on selection of the propulsion system concept and components for the RCS. The intent of this document is to provide insight into the government-reference conceptual design of a propulsion system for TH element. A pressure-fed hypergolic bi-propellant system is the assumed propulsion approach for the RCS. Its architectural concept is being traded within the NASA Moon to Mars architecture. A pressure-regulated system is examined. The propellants under consideration are Monomethyl Hydrazine (MMH) and Mixed Oxides of Nitrogen with 3% Nitric Oxide (MON3). A peer review was conducted to assess the flow schematic design and propulsion component selection, compliant with a set of assumed requirements. Redundant components to satisfy one-fault tolerance for function and two-fault tolerance against catastrophic events are incorporated in the propulsion concept design. Instrumentation laid out on the schematic would be used to gather data to monitor the health of the propulsion system and to support quantity gauging of the propulsion system fluids. Venting propellant ullage gas overboard during the refilling operations poses a significant concern to the external surfaces of the TH. A liquid/gas separator would be required to eliminate, or at least reduce, the amount of liquid propellant expelled in the vent gas mixture. The technology readiness level of the phase separator for the TH must be advanced. Metal diaphragm and non-positive-expulsion PMD propellant tank systems were traded against each other, with the PMD architecture being selected. A blowdown concept is also considered for the TH RCS propulsion. Its fluid schematic is derived from the pressure-regulated schematic with removal of assemblies involving the helium pressurization and ullage venting. Its system wet mass is 10% heavier than the pressure-regulated due to thruster performance loss and larger propellant tanks. There is no firm constraint on the propulsion system mass at this phase of the design. The blowdown concept can offer reduction in component count and operation, that would lead to a more reliable propulsion system. The blowdown concept would also benefit avionics, thermal, power, and structures on the TH. Assessing these benefits will be carried as a future work. Drawbacks of thrust and minimum impulse bit (MIB) variations due to the blowdown operation would be acceptable to Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC). Although the blowdown concept has been selected as a current baseline, further evaluation of the concept will be the subject of future work to ensure that the blowdown propulsion operation is appropriate for the HT RCS propulsion. This document also highlights key trade studies and design decisions, including pros and cons of the selected concept. Other appropriate options for components are pointed out for future assessments. Additional background information and documents for further review are referenced in this report.

spacecraft propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2010

Exploiting Expertise and Knowledge Sharing Online for the Benefit of NASA's GN&C Community of Practice

In 2004, NASA faced major knowledge sharing challenges due to geographically isolated field centers that inhibited engineers from sharing their experiences, expertise, ideas, and lessons learned. The necessity to collaborate on complex development projects and the reality of constrained project resources together drove the need for ensuring that personnel at all NASA centers had comparable skill sets and that engineers could find resources in a timely fashion. Mission failures and new directions for the Agency also demanded better collaborative tools for NASA's engineering workforce. In response to these needs, the online NASA Engineering Network (NEN) was formed by the NASA Office of the Chief Engineer to provide a multi-faceted system for overcoming geographic and cultural barriers. NEN integrates communities of practice with a cross-repository search and the Lessons Learned Information System. This paper describes the features of the GN&C engineering discipline CoP site which went live on NEN in May of 2008 as an online means of gathering input and guidance from practitioners. It allows GN&C discipline expertise captured at one field center to be shared in a collaborative way with the larger discipline CoP spread across the entire Agency. The site enables GN&C engineers to find the information they need quickly, to find solutions to questions from experienced engineers, and to connect with other practitioners regardless of geographic location, thus increasing the probability of project success.

control↗