Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “POWER REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9

Chemical Modeling of the Capture of Radioiodine Species

Iodine is a common fission product resulting from the transmutation of uranium fuel in nuclear power reactors. The short-lived radioactive isotope, 131 I, with a half-life of around eight days, would be a particular health concern if released into the environment. Capture materials, such as activated carbon, are used routinely in nuclear power plants and medical isotope production facilities to remove this hazard during normal operations to reduce emissions to acceptable levels. Iodine, unlike other common fission products such as noble gases, is challenging because of the wide range of molecular forms and oxidation states (from +VII in IF 7 to -I in iodide) that it displays, which can interconvert both in the gas phase and in the solution phase for example. The work in this project is focused on three computational tasks. In the first, we consider the binding of iodine-containing molecules of varying oxidation states to the major component of activated carbon – pristine graphene-like sheets. The second task focused on molecular binding and possible chemical transformations resulting from the reaction of molecular iodine with chemical functional groups on the edge of the graphene sheets or surface defects in the sheet itself. The final task was associated with radiolytic breakdown of 131 I to 131 Xe in iodine containing molecules and investigated the resulting molecular fragmentation process both in the gas phase and on the graphene-like surface. For each of the tasks, the intent was to learn about the thermodynamics and kinetics of the chemical transformations and use the calculations to provide parameters for input into kinetic models describing these processes for interpretation of experimental data in future work.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutrons Fluence Rates for ATF-1 Holders During ATR Cycle 166B

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>lMeV) neutron fluence rate data for the ATF-1 holders located in core for ATR Cycle 166B which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains measurements of the fluence rates corresponding to the particular elevations relative to the 80-ft. core elevation. The data in this report consist of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a hard copy listing of all thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. All "BR" holder monitor wires for this cycle are 56.375 inches long. This length allows measurements from 31.17 inches above core midplane to 19.81 inches below core midplane. The distance from the end of the wires to the first count position was 4.25 inches for all wires counted from this cycle. The monitors were located in an outward small I-holes,1-22 and 1-23. Thermal neutron fluence was determined based on the activation of the CoAl wires and resonance corrections determined in the irradiation of Cycle 152A when the RML measured cadmium-covered as well as bare neutron monitors in the Southwest, Southeast, and H positions at the Center lobe to determine the division in neutron energy between epithermal and thermal neutrons. For more information please refer to letter “Radiation Measurements Laboratory measurements of in core ATR physics testing during cycle 152A. The measured values documented in RML procedure, “ACMM-3600, Flux Monitoring,” will be used indefinitely until further measurements supersede the current values. Fast neutron fluence was determined using the activation of nickel wires. Typically, a fission spectrum averaged cross section (E>1 MeV) is used as determined in detailed measurements described in “ATR Neutron Spectral Characterization,” which gives an effective cross section of 97 mb for the small I-holes. However, those measurements were performed with unfueled experiments. The fast fluence values reported here use a perturbed 114 mb effective>1 MeV spectrum averaged cross section for the small I-holes based on MCNP simulations for a previous fueled experiment in the1-24 position. Refer to “LWR- ATR Irradiation Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR CYCLE 133A 04/19/04 thru 05/17/04” for more information.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates for aLEU Holders During Cycle 169A

This report contains the thermal (2200 mis) and fast (E> IMeV) neutron fluence rate data for the aLEU holders located in core for ATR Cycle 169A which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains measurements of the fluence rates corresponding to the particular elevations relative to the 80-ft. core elevation. The data in this report consist of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a hard copy listing of all thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. All "BR" holder monitor wires for this cycle are 56.375 inches long. This length allows measurements from 31.17 inches above core midplane to 19.81 inches below core midplane. The distance from the end of the wires to the first count position was 4.25 inches for all wires counted from this cycle.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fact Neutron Fluence Rates for AFC Holders During Cycle 169A

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for the AFC holders located in core for ATR Cycle 169A which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains measurements of the fluence rates corresponding to the particular elevations relative to the 80-ft. core elevation. The data in this report consist of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a hard copy listing of all thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. All "BR" holder monitor wires for this cycle are 56.375 inches long. This length allows measurements from 31.17 inches above core midplane to 19.81 inches below core midplane. The distance from the end of the wires to the first count position was 4.25 inches for all wires counted from this cycle.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR Cycles 171A ATF (Rev. 1)

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for ATR Cycle 171A ATF which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains fluence rate values corresponding to the particular elevations (relative to the 80-ft. core elevation) where the measurements were taken. The data in this report consists of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a listing of the calculated thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of calculated both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. The fluence rates reported are for the average power levels given in the table of power history and distribution. During the irradiation of Cycle 152A, the RML performed additional flux measurements to assess core reconfiguration issues. Measurements using cadmium covered as well as bare neutron monitors in the Southwest, Southeast, and H positions of the Center lobe were performed to determine the division in neutron energy between epithermal and thermal neutrons. This is defined as the resonance correction defined in this report. It is used to quantify both thermal and fast neutron flux. For more information please refer to letter, “RADIATION MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF IN CORE ATR PHYSICS TESTING DURING CYCLE 152A” dated January 24, 2013, to Casey Stengel from C. C. Jensen. The measured values documented in RML Procedure, “ACMM-3600, Flux Monitoring,” will be used indefinitely until further measurements supersede the current values.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR Cycles 171A IR TMIST 3B

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for ATR Cycle 171A which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains fluence rate values corresponding to the particular elevations (relative to the 80-ft. core elevation) where the measurements were taken. The data in this report consists of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a listing of the calculated thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (3) plots of calculated both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates. The fluence rates reported are for the average power levels given in the table of power history and distribution. During the irradiation of Cycle 152A, the RML performed additional flux measurements to assess core reconfiguration issues. Measurements using cadmium covered as well as bare neutron monitors in the Southwest, Southeast, and H positions of the Center lobe were performed to determine the division in neutron energy between epithermal and thermal neutrons. This is defined as the resonance correction defined in this report. It is used to quantify both thermal and fast neutron flux. For more information please refer to letter, “RADIATION MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF IN CORE ATR PHYSICS TESTING DURING CYCLE 152A” dated January 24, 2013, to Casey Stengel from C. C. Jensen. The measured values documented in RML Procedure, “ACMM-3600, Flux Monitoring,” will be used indefinitely until further measurements supersede the current values.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Autonomous Anomaly Detection For Continuous Streams

The code implements the Isolation Forest (IFML) algorithm within the digital twin (DT) of the AGN-201 nuclear reactor. The DT captures real-time operational data including control rod positions, reactor power, and temperature. The IFML model isolates anomalies by detecting patterns that deviate from expected operational behavior. The algorithm recursively partitions the data and assigns anomaly scores based on the isolation of rare and different events. By tuning parameters specific to the reactor’s operational data, the IFML identifies deviations such as unauthorized material insertions or reactor reactivity shifts. The system streams data using LabView and integrates with the DeepLynx data warehouse for anomaly processing.

Trevino, Eduardo↗

Conceptual Design of a Water Tank Critical Facility for SPARC

Critical experiments, sometimes referred to zero-power reactors, are crucial tools in developing and validating nuclear physics predictions and thus an indispensable capability to ensure criticality safety during all parts of the nuclear fuel cycle and in reducing uncertainties in reactor physics predictions toward optimizing nuclear energy production. The System Physics Advanced Reactor Facility (SPARC) project was recently initiated to enable large-scale criticality experiments using a horizontal split table machine well suited toward solid core materials systems (fuel, moderator, reflector). The facility selected for this mission was a former pool-type research reactor building and thus also well suited toward a second critical experiment capability able to house full-size light-water reactor (LWR) fuel bundles. A conceptual design study was undertaken to review past water tank critical experiments used for LWR physics experiments and to develop an early engineering design for a new critical assembly tank (CAT). The work described here shows that a relatively simple CAT concept can be constructed and deployed in the SPARC facility to meet the urgent demands for new critical experiments on advanced LWR fuel bundles designs. The SPARC facility layout is conducive to the receipt and upending of LWR fuel bundles using existing containers and equipment from the LWR industry. The facility’s overhead crane can then be used to handle fuel bundles and place them in a vertical storage rack or in the CAT for critical experiments, both of which fit within the building’s “open basement” alongside other equipment planned for SPARC and the horizontal split table. A slightly lower area in the basement can serve as a large drain tank so that fail-safe valves drain the CAT reactor tank for safe shutdown. Neutronic configurations were determined where a 3 × 3 array of fuel bundles can be surrounded by full-length “loose rods” to adjust reactivity so that critical is achieved when the bundles are fully submerged. Viable configurations were determined for both pressurized- and boiling-water-reactor-type fuel bundles. This design concept was used to develop an early planning basis for establishing the CAT capability alongside the otherwise planned SPARC project in order to help streamline the process. Recent presidential executive orders have highlighted the need to achieve power uprates in LWR plants and the CAT capability will be a crucial element of these initiatives. Based on the work described herein, it is recommended that an earnest and timely project begin in order to establish this urgently needed capability.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Measured Thermal and Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR Cycles 167A

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for ATR Cycle 167A which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. The report contains fluence rate values corresponding to the particular elevations (relative to the 80-ft. core elevation) where the measurements were taken. The data in this report consists of (1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a hard copy listing of all thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, (3) plots of both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Measured Thermal And Fast Neutron Fluence Rates ATR Cycle 169A

This report contains the thermal (2200 m/s) and fast (E>1MeV) neutron fluence rate data for ATR Cycle 169A which were measured by the Radiation Measurements Laboratory (RML) as requested by the Power Reactor Programs (ATR Experiments) Radiation Measurements Work Order. This report contains fluence rate values corresponding to the particular elevations (relative to the 80-ft. core elevation) where the measurements were taken. The data in this report consists of ( 1) a table of the ATR power history and distribution, (2) a hard copy listing of all thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, (3) plots of both the thermal and fast neutron fluence rates, and (4) an optical record (compact disk) containing a listing of the thermal and the fast neutron fluence rates, their assigned elevations and proper header identification of all monitor positions contained herein. The fluence rates reported are for the average power levels given in the table of power history and distribution. No neutron monitors were located in the N-2 position during this cycle. All "SR" holder monitor wires for this cycle are 55 inches long. This length allows measurements from 24.73 inches above core midplane to 25.25 inches below core midplane. The distance from the end of the wires to the first count position was 4.25 inches for all wires counted from this cycle.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 36, No. 2, July-December 1995]

Nuclear Safety is a journal that covers significant issues in the field of nuclear safety. Its primary scope is safety in the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power reactors worldwide and the research and analysis activities that promote this goal, but it also encompasses the safety aspects of the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing and handling, and nuclear waste disposal, the handling of fissionable materials and radioisotopes, and the environmental effects of all these activities. Table of Contents for this issue follows. THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT: 195 The Chornobyl Accident Revisited, Part III: Chernobyl Source Term Release Dynamics and Reconstruction of Events During the Active Phase, A. R. Sich; GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 218 Second ANS Workshop on the Safety of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants, R. A. Bari; 234 Elements of a Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, C. M. Hopper; 243 Rickover, Excellence, and Criticality Safety Programs, R. E. Wilson; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 249 Transient Analysis of the PIUS Advanced Reactor Design with the TRAC-PF1/MOD2 Code, B. E. Boyack, J. L Steiner, S. C. Harmony, H. J. Stumpf, and J. F. Lime; 278 The Hierarchy-By-Interval Approach to Identifying Important Models that Need Improvement in Severe-Accident Simulation Codes, T. J. Heames, M. Khatib-Rahbar, J. E. Kelly, R. P. Jenks-Johnson, and Y.-S. Chen; 290 RELAP5/MOD3 Code Coupling Model, R. P. Martin; 299 Missiles Caused by Severe Pressurized-Water Reactor Accidents, R. Krieg; DESIGN FEATURES: 310 Validation of COMMIX with Westinghouse AP-600 PCCS Test Data, J. G. Sun, T. H. Chien, J. Ding, and W T. Sha; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: 321 Spent Nuclear Fuel Characterization for a Bounding Reference Assembly for the Receiving Basin for Off-Site Fuel, S. D. Kahook, R. L. Garrett, L. R. Canas, and M J. Beckum; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 332 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION AND ANALYSES: 335 Reactor Coolant System Blowdown at Wolf Creek on September 17, 1994, J. V. Kauffman and S. L. Israel; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 344 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Oueener; 349 Proposed Rule Changes as of June 30, 1995; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 320 Symposium on Acceptability of Risk From Radiation—Application to Manned Space Flight; 320 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference; 361 Radiation Biology and Radiation Protection— Modern Developments and Tendencies in Radiation Biology; 362 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants; 354 The Authors; 360 Reviewers of Nuclear Safety, Vol. 36.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Reactor rate modulation oscillation analysis with two detectors in Double Chooz

A θ 13 oscillation analysis based on the observed antineutrino rates at the Double Chooz far and near detectors for different reactor power conditions is presented. This approach provides a so far unique simultaneous determination of θ 13 and the total background rates without relying on any assumptions on the specific background contributions. The analysis comprises 865 days of data collected in both detectors with at least one reactor in operation. The oscillation results are enhanced by the use of 24.06 days (12.74 days) of reactor-off data in the far (near) detector. The analysis considers the ${\overline{\nu}}_e$ interactions up to a visible energy of 8.5 MeV, using the events at higher energies to build a cosmogenic background model considering fast-neutrons interactions and 9 Li decays. The background-model-independent determination of the mixing angle yields sin 2 (2 θ 13 ) = 0.094 ± 0.017, being the best-fit total background rates fully consistent with the cosmogenic background model. A second oscillation analysis is also performed constraining the total background rates to the cosmogenic background estimates. While the central value is not significantly modified due to the consistency between the reactor-off data and the background estimates, the addition of the background model reduces the uncertainty on θ 13 to 0.015. Along with the oscillation results, the normalization of the anti-neutrino rate is measured with a precision of 0.86%, reducing the 1.43% uncertainty associated to the expectation.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Design of a prototypical natural circulation water-based reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) for a pebble-bed generic FHR

A prototypical natural circulation water-based reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) for the UC Berkeley Mark-1 pebble-bed gFHR is designed based on one-dimensional thermal hydraulics modeling and optimization implemented in an in-house MATLAB code. The model employs a lumped core consisting of fuel pebble and graphite pebble regions, while the graphite reflector, vessel, and RCCS are represented as separate but energy-coupled regions. The model is derived based on steady state energy balance equations accounting for conductive heat transfer from the lumped core to the vessel and subsequent radiative heat transfer to the RCCS and convective heat transfer in the water. Further, mass flow rate is calculated based on momentum and thermal energy balance in the RCCS. Starting with ANL’s water NSTF as baseline, effects of RCCS design parameters such as size of the plate between pipes, pipe diameter, source-to-sink distance, surface emissivity, and pitch from the core are examined in an integral effects framework which accounts for subsequent variation of the mass flow rate, number of pipes, convection coefficient, mean region and surface temperatures, radiative view factors, and water outlet temperature. The importance of including a prototypical reactor design in RCCS design calculations is emphasized as the calculations show that temperature drops from the core to the RCCS fluid to transfer the heat tend to be the limitation not the heat removal capacity of the fluid. A closed-loop design is obtained with capability to safely remove up to 0.72% of the nominal reactor power at maximum estimated peak conditions and 0.40% at shutdown. The design is based on physics calculations and does not account for economic optimization.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Design of a supervisory control system for autonomous operation of advanced reactors

Advanced reactors to be deployed in the coming decades will face deregulated energy markets, and may adopt flexible operation to boost profitability. To aid in the transition from baseload to flexible operation paradigm, autonomous operation is sought. This work focuses on the control aspect of autonomous operation. Specifically, a hierarchical control system is designed to support constraint enforcement during routine operational transients. Within the system, data-driven modeling, physics-based state observation, and classical control algorithms are integrated to provide an adaptable and robust solution. A 320 MW Fluoride-cooled High-temperature Pebble-bed Reactor is the design basis for demonstrating the proposed control system. The hierarchical control system consists of a supervisory layer and low-level layer. The supervisory layer receives requests to change the system's operating conditions (e.g., the current reactor power to meet a load -follow), and accepts or rejects them based on constraints that have been assigned. Constraints are issued to keep the plant within an optimal operating region. The low-level layer interfaces with the actuators of the system to fulfill requested changes, while maintaining tracking and regulation duties. Further, to accept requests at the supervisory layer, the Reference Governor algorithm was adopted. To model the dynamics of the reactor, a system identification algorithm, Dynamic Mode Decomposition, was utilized. To estimate the evolution of process variables that cannot be directly measured (e.g., the propagation of delayed neutron precursors), the Unscented Kalman Filter, incorporating a nonlinear model of nuclear dynamics, was adopted. The composition of these algorithms led to a numerical demonstration of constraint enforcement during a 40% power drop transient (at a rate of 5 %/min). Uncontrolled secondary-side temperatures were successfully constrained. Adaptability of the proposed system was demonstrated by modifying the constraint values, and enforcing them during the transient. Robustness was also demonstrated by enforcing constraints under noisy environments.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Development of a high fidelity model of the CROCUS experimental reactor

Measurements of scalar flux distributions with fine spatial and energy resolutions are needed to remedy one of the validation shortcomings of the novel neutronics full core solvers, such as MPACT and nTRACER. While a very detailed resolution of the flux can be calculated with such codes, only a limited experimental data set is available to check their accuracy. Such type of measurements are on-going at the zero power reactor CROCUS, operated at the Laboratory for Reactor Physics and System Behaviours of the EPFL, thanks to the development of advanced miniature neutron detection systems. This kind of experimental data would provide the community with a suitable benchmark for the validation of high fidelity neutronics solvers. In parallel, a multi-physics solver for steady-state and transient analysis of nuclear reactors, named GeN-Foam, has been developed. Based on the finite-volume OpenFOAM library, GeN-Foam provides us with enough flexibility to analyze non-conventional reactor geometries such as that of CROCUS. While CROCUS heterogeneities cannot be modeled by MPACT and nTRACER for the moment, GeN-Foam offers a unique opportunity to build a high fidelity model which mimics these codes' method to reach sub-pin simulation resolution. This document aims at describing the work achieved to get from the existing GeN-Foam model of the CROCUS reactor based on a structured mesh and using the neutron diffusion, the first high-fidelity model using discrete ordinates method as an approximation to neutron transport and an unstructured mesh for inter lattice water gap description and sub-pin heterogeneous modeling. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Comparing Control Performance Between Simulation and Experiment using the Microreactor Automated Control System Testbed

In the advanced reactor domain, a flexible and scalable software/hardware infrastructure is crucial for integrating and validating various control technologies. This study used the Microreactor Automated Control System (MACS) hardware platform as a testbed. MACS was originally designed to mirror Idaho National Laboratory (INL)'s Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL), a 85-kW thermal fission microreactor. It features control drums for simulated reactivity control; lights that function as a surrogate reactor core, with the brightness being proportional to the reactor power; and light sensors that emulate neutron detectors. To transform MACS into a physical twin of MARVEL for evaluating control methods, the Control and Optimization Modular Modeling Application for Nuclear Deployment (COMMAND) software was employed. This software integrated the hardware with two models of the MARVEL core, based on Reactor Excursion and Leak Analysis Program (RELAP5-3D) and Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) models. The study aimed to demonstrate the gap between control theory and actual practice—a gap that often necessitates empirical adjustments such as control gain retuning, filters, time discretization, and integrator anti-windup measures. Controllers were developed based on increasingly complex simulations without hardware, starting from the base MARVEL model and then introducing actuator saturation constraints and sensor noise. The final control strategy was then tested using MACS, and a comparative performance analysis was conducted.

46 - INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AN↗

Licensing, Regulations and Developing Guidance for Nuclear Technology Deployment for Embarking countries in Africa

The African region is witnessing an increased number of countries at different stages of implementing or considering the introduction of peaceful nuclear power programs to meet the demand of their rapidly growing economies as well as clean energy needs. Grid size, cost, licensing, and regulations will be some of the challenges to deploying larger power reactors. A key element of the regulatory framework will be the inclusion of nuclear security information and assurance that security is integrated into the license review process.As each country continue to implement and consider different reactor designs from several vendors, the significance of customer knowledge of licensing, Regulations, and guidance document to facilitate the deployment and operational needs for nuclear technology cannot be over-emphasized. This special session will bring together a selected panel of key stakeholders and policymakers from embarking countries in Africa to participate in a panel discussion to share their experience in the licensing, regulations, and development of guidance for power plant deployment. The session will also consider and identify potential gaps that may affect the licensing and regulatory applications for the future nuclear infrastructure. As well, the panel will promote regional networking and communication to increase capacities in readiness for the potential deployment of additional technology, such as Small Modular Reactors.

Dahunsi, Stephen↗

Load Following Analysis of the Holos-Quad 10MWe Micro-Reactor with Plant Dynamics Code

This report presents the load following analysis of the “Holos-Quad” 10MWe micro-reactor design developed by HolosGen LLC. This analysis is focused on the Holos-Quad micro-reactor ability to match the changing grid demand at 10%/min rate. The control mechanisms for the plant are identified, simulated, and compared. Based on the comparison results, control strategy for load following of the Holos-Quad micro-reactor is developed. The control strategy and load following capabilities are demonstrated in a full-range down-and-up reactor power transient from 100% to 0% and back to 100% load at 10%/min rate. All calculations are carried out with Argonne’s Plant Dynamics Code.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗