Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Propulsion Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2007

Infrared Camera Characterization of Bi-Propellant Reaction Control Engines during Auxiliary Propulsion Systems Tests at NASA's White Sands Test Facility in Las Cruces, New Mexico

This paper describes the application of a FUR Systems A40M infrared (IR) digital camera for thermal monitoring of a Liquid Oxygen (LOX) and Ethanol bi-propellant Reaction Control Engine (RCE) during Auxiliary Propulsion System (APS) testing at the National Aeronautics & Space Administration's (NASA) White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) near Las Cruces, New Mexico. Typically, NASA has relied mostly on the use of ThermoCouples (TC) for this type of thermal monitoring due to the variability of constraints required to accurately map rapidly changing temperatures from ambient to glowing hot chamber material. Obtaining accurate real-time temperatures in the JR spectrum is made even more elusive by the changing emissivity of the chamber material as it begins to glow. The parameters evaluated prior to APS testing included: (1) remote operation of the A40M camera using fiber optic Firewire signal sender and receiver units; (2) operation of the camera inside a Pelco explosion proof enclosure with a germanium window; (3) remote analog signal display for real-time monitoring; (4) remote digital data acquisition of the A40M's sensor information using FUR's ThermaCAM Researcher Pro 2.8 software; and (5) overall reliability of the system. An initial characterization report was prepared after the A40M characterization tests at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) to document controlled heat source comparisons to calibrated TCs. Summary IR digital data recorded from WSTF's APS testing is included within this document along with findings, lessons learned, and recommendations for further usage as a monitoring tool for the development of rocket engines.

Holleman, Elizabeth↗
NASA NTRS2008

Developments in Test Facility and Data Networking for the Altitude Test Stand at the John C. Stennis Space Center: A General Overview

NASA/SSC's Mission in Rocket Propulsion Testing Is to Acquire Test Performance Data for Verification, Validation and Qualification of Propulsion Systems Hardware: Accurate, Reliable, Comprehensive, and Timely. Data Acquisition in a Rocket Propulsion Test Environment Is Challenging: a) Severe Temporal Transient Dynamic Environments; b) Large Thermal Gradients; c) Vacuum to high pressure regimes. A-3 Test Stand Development is equally challenging with respect to accommodating vacuum environment, operation of a CSG system, and a large quantity of data system and control channels to determine proper engine performance as well as Test Stand operation. SSC is currently in the process of providing modernized DAS, Control Systems, Video, and network systems for the A-3 Test Stand to overcome these challenges.

Hebert, Phillip W.↗
NASA NTRS1980

A laboratory facility for electric vehicle propulsion system testing

The road load simulator facility located at the NASA Lewis Research Center enables a propulsion system or any of its components to be evaluated under a realistic vehicle inertia and road loads. The load is applied to the system under test according to the road load equation: F(net)=K1F1+K2F2V+K3 sq V+K4(dv/dt)+K5 sin theta. The coefficient of each term in the equation can be varied over a wide range with vehicle inertial representative of vehicles up to 7500 pounds simulated by means of flywheels. The required torque is applied by the flywheels, a hydroviscous absorber and clutch, and a drive motor integrated by a closed loop control system to produce a smooth, continuous load up to 150 horsepower.

Sargent, N. B.↗
NASA NTRS2001

Lessons Learned (3 Years of H2O2 Propulsion System Testing Efforts at NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center)

John C. Stennis Space Center continues to support the Propulsion community in an effort to validate High-Test Peroxide as an alternative to existing/future oxidizers. This continued volume of peroxide test/handling activity at Stennis Space Center (SSC) provides numerous opportunities for the SSC team to build upon previously documented 'lessons learned'. SSC shall continue to strive to document their experience and findings as H2O2 issues surface. This paper is intended to capture all significant peroxide issues that we have learned over the last three years. This data (lessons learned) has been formulated from practical handling, usage, storage, operations, and initial development/design of our systems/facility viewpoint. The paper is intended to be an information type tool and limited in technical rational; therefore, presenting the peroxide community with some issues to think about as the continued interest in peroxide evolves and more facilities/hardware are built. These lessons learned are intended to assist industry in mitigating problems and identifying potential pitfalls when dealing with the requirements for handling high-test peroxide.

Taylor, Gary O.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Controls Hardware Testing

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP) systems hold potential for the reduction of aircraft fuel burn and emissions. To realize this potential for single-aisle aircraft, control technology challenges associated with EAP designs are increasing the demand for Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) studies that address the tightly coupled electrical powertrain and turbofan propulsion systems. Reconfigurable HIL testbeds enable the study of integrated supervisory control and control approaches that augment engine shaft torques to improve performance. This paper presents an overview of conceptual EAP controls architecture testing in two HIL testbeds. The NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed provides the ability for megawatt class electric powertrain testing for technology maturation. A 100 kilowatt testbed, the Hybrid Propulsion Emulation Rig, allows for rapid controls technology trade studies. In both testbeds, controls testing is performed by implementing the electrical power system in hardware while turbomachinery is emulated via electric machines that are commanded by a real-time model and controls. A novel scaling algorithm is applied to emulate the inertial loads of the turbomachinery that causes the electric machines to respond in a fashion similar to that of the full-scale propulsion system they represent. Results demonstrate desired control performance at both testbed scales for the conceptual EAP architecture.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Controls Hardware Testing

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion (EAP) systems hold potential for the reduction of aircraft fuel burn and emissions. To realize this potential for single-aisle aircraft, control technology challenges associated with EAP designs are increasing the demand for Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) studies that address the tightly coupled electrical powertrain and turbofan propulsion systems. Reconfigurable HIL testbeds enable the study of integrated supervisory control and control approaches that augment engine shaft torques to improve performance. This paper presents an overview of conceptual EAP controls architecture testing in two HIL testbeds. The NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed provides the ability for megawatt class electric powertrain testing for technology maturation. A 100 kilowatt testbed, the Hybrid Propulsion Emulation Rig, allows for rapid controls technology trade studies. In both testbeds, controls testing is performed by implementing the electrical power system in hardware while turbomachinery is emulated via electric machines that are commanded by a real-time model and controls. A novel scaling algorithm is applied to emulate the inertial loads of the turbomachinery that causes the electric machines to respond in a fashion similar to that of the full-scale propulsion system they represent. Results demonstrate desired control performance at both testbed scales for the conceptual EAP architecture.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2006

Overview of Propellant Delivery Systems at the NASA John C. Stennis Space Center

A wide range of rocket propulsion test work occurs at he NASA John C. Stennis Space Center (SSC) including full-scale engine test activities at test facilities A-1, A-2, B-1 and B-2 as well as combustion device research and development activities at the E-Complex (E-1, E-2. E-3 and E-4) test facilities. One of the greatest challenges associated with operating a test facility is maintaining the health of the primary propellant system and test-critical support systems. The challenge emerges due to the fact that the operating conditions of the various system components are extreme (e.g., low temperatures, high pressures) and due to the fact that many of the components and systems are unique. The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe the experience and modeling techniques that are used to operate the unique test facilities at NASA SSC that continue to support successful propulsion testing.

Haselmaier, L. Haynes↗
NASA NTRS1997

Piloted Simulation Tests of Propulsion Control as Backup to Loss of Primary Flight Controls for a B747-400 Jet Transport

Partial failures of aircraft primary flight control systems and structural damages to aircraft during flight have led to catastrophic accidents with subsequent loss of lives (e.g. DC-10, B-747, C-5, B-52, and others). Following the DC-10 accident at Sioux City, Iowa in 1989, the National Transportation Safety Board recommended 'Encourage research and development of backup flight control systems for newly certified wide-body airplanes that utilize an alternate source of motive power separate from that source used for the conventional control system.' This report describes the concept of a propulsion controlled aircraft (PCA), discusses pilot controls, displays, and procedures; and presents the results of a PCA piloted simulation test and evaluation of the B747-400 airplane conducted at NASA Ames Research Center in December, 1996. The purpose of the test was to develop and evaluate propulsion control throughout the full flight envelope of the B747-400 including worst case scenarios of engine failures and out of trim moments. Pilot ratings of PCA performance ranged from adequate to satisfactory. PCA performed well in unusual attitude recoveries at 35,000 ft altitude, performed well in fully coupled ILS approaches, performed well in single engine failures, and performed well at aft cg. PCA performance was primarily limited by out-of-trim moments.

Bull, John↗
NASA NTRS1992

National Launch System Advanced Development - Propulsion

The propulsion area Advanced Development Program (ADP) activities of the National Launch System (NLS) are presented and an overview of recent accomplishments are discussed. The ADP is organized into five areas: propulsion, structures/materials/manufacturing, avionics/software, aerothermodynamics/recovery, and operations/subsystems. Information is given for the liquid propulsion tasks supporting the development of the Space Transportation Main Engine (STME), the liquid propulsion test facilities that support STME subsystem and component testing, and solid propulsion tasks that maintain the option to utilize strap-on solid boosters for the smaller vehicles in the NLS family.

Richards, Steve↗
NASA NTRS2008

Integrated System Test Approaches for the NASA Ares I Crew Launch Vehicle

NASA is maturing test and evaluation plans leading to flight readiness of the Ares I crew launch vehicle. Key development, qualification, and verification tests are planned . Upper stage engine sea-level and altitude testing. First stage development and qualification motors. Upper stage structural and thermal development and qualification test articles. Main Propulsion Test Article (MPTA). Upper stage green run testing. Integrated Vehicle Ground Vibration Testing (IVGVT). Aerodynamic characterization testing. Test and evaluation supports initial validation flights (Ares I-Y and Orion 1) and design certification.

Cockrell, Charles↗
NASA NTRS2003

Software Estimates Costs of Testing Rocket Engines

Simulation-Based Cost Model (SiCM), a discrete event simulation developed in Extend , simulates pertinent aspects of the testing of rocket propulsion test articles for the purpose of estimating the costs of such testing during time intervals specified by its users. A user enters input data for control of simulations; information on the nature of, and activity in, a given testing project; and information on resources. Simulation objects are created on the basis of this input. Costs of the engineering-design, construction, and testing phases of a given project are estimated from numbers and labor rates of engineers and technicians employed in each phase, the duration of each phase; costs of materials used in each phase; and, for the testing phase, the rate of maintenance of the testing facility. The three main outputs of SiCM are (1) a curve, updated at each iteration of the simulation, that shows overall expenditures vs. time during the interval specified by the user; (2) a histogram of the total costs from all iterations of the simulation; and (3) table displaying means and variances of cumulative costs for each phase from all iterations. Other outputs include spending curves for each phase.

Smith, C. L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Enhancing Testing Capability in the V7012 Chamber

The NASA Marshal Space Flight Center (MSFC) is involved in developing a variety of propulsion technologies, including small thrusters using green propellant, for in-space propulsion. Better understanding of these propulsion technologies for space applications is vital to NASA’s mission to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. This project focuses on developing a three-dimensional diagnostic positioning system for use in propulsion testing in the 4205/101 9-foot diameter vacuum chamber at the Marshal Space Flight Center. It will permit rapid and precise positioning of plasma diagnostics (e.g. Faraday probe, Langmuir probe) for measuring properties in a thruster’s plume. This system will be computer controlled and will use either proprietary software (based on acquired hardware) or other available programs such as LABVIEW (National Instruments, Inc.). The pressure inside the 9-ft chamber during testing ranges from 10-3 to 10-6 Torr. The expected outcome of this effort will be an enhanced capability for propulsion testing. The results of this project will provide insight into the understanding of automated motion, control systems, and the principles of aerospace mechanical design.

Diagnostics↗
NASA NTRS2015

The Orion Pad Abort 1 (PA-1) Flight Test: A Propulsion Success

This poster provides a concise overview of the highly successful Orion Pad Abort 1 (PA-1) flight test, and the three rocket motors that contributed to this success. The primary purpose of the Orion PA-1 flight was to help certify the Orion Launch Abort System (LAS), which can be utilized in the unlikely event of an emergency on the launchpad or during mission vehicle ascent. The PA-1 test was the first fully integrated flight test of the Orion LAS, one of the primary systems within the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV). The Orion MPCV is part of the architecture within the Space Launch System (SLS), which is being designed to transport astronauts beyond low-Earth orbit for future exploration missions. Had the Orion PA-1 flight abort occurred during launch preparations for a real human spaceflight mission, the PA-1 LAS would have saved the lives of the crew. The PA-1 flight test was largely successful due to the three solid rocket motors of the LAS: the Attitude Control Motor (ACM); the Jettison Motor (JM); and the Abort Motor (AM). All three rocket motors successfully performed their required functions during the Orion PA-1 flight test, flown on May 6, 2010 at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, culminating in a successful demonstration of an abort capability from the launchpad.

JM↗
NASA NTRS1995

Piloted simulation tests of propulsion control as backup to loss of primary flight controls for a mid-size jet transport

Failures of aircraft primary flight-control systems to aircraft during flight have led to catastrophic accidents with subsequent loss of lives (e.g. , DC-1O crash, B-747 crash, C-5 crash, B-52 crash, and others). Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) investigated the use of engine thrust for emergency flight control of several airplanes, including the B-720, Lear 24, F-15, C-402, and B-747. A series of three piloted simulation tests have been conducted at Ames Research Center to investigate propulsion control for safely landing a medium size jet transport which has experienced a total primary flight-control failure. The first series of tests was completed in July 1992 and defined the best interface for the pilot commands to drive the engines. The second series of tests was completed in August 1994 and investigated propulsion controlled aircraft (PCA) display requirements and various command modes. The third series of tests was completed in May 1995 and investigated PCA full-flight envelope capabilities. This report describes the concept of a PCA, discusses pilot controls, displays, and procedures; and presents the results of piloted simulation evaluations of the concept by a cross-section of air transport pilots.

Bull, John↗
NASA NTRS1986

Pretest Report for the Full Span Propulsive Wing/Canard Model Test in the NASA Langley 4 x 7 Meter Low Speed Wind Tunnel Second Series Test

A full span propulsive wing/canard model is to be tested in the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) 4 x 7 meter low speed wind tunnel. These tests are a continuation of the tests conducted in Feb. 1984, NASA test No.290, and are being conducted under NASA Contract NAS1-17171. The purpose of these tests is to obtain extensive lateral-directional data with a revised fuselage concept. The wings, canards, and vertical tail of this second test series model are the same as tested in the previous test period. The fuselage and internal flow path have been modified to better reflect an external configuration suitable for a fighter airplane. Internal ducting and structure were changed as required to provide test efficiency and blowing control. The model fuselage tested during the 1984 tests was fabricated with flat sides to provide multiple wing and canard placement variations. The locations of the wing and canard are important variables in configuration development. With the establishment of the desired relative placement of the lifting surfaces, a typically shaped fuselage has been fabricated for these tests. This report provides the information necessary for the second series tests of the propulsive wing/canard model. The discussion in this report is limited to that affected by the model changes and to the second series test program. The pretest report information for test 290 which is valid for the second series test was published in Rockwell report NR 83H-79. This report is presented as Appendix 1 and the modified fuselage stress report is presented as Appendix 2 to this pretest report.

Stewart, V. R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wear Test of the 12.5-kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit Hall Thruster

This work presents a summary of the first wear test of the 12.5 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System Engineering Test Unit 2 (AEPS ETU-2) thruster produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne. The ETU-2 Wear Test accumulated approximately 730 hours of operation split between the nominal 600 V/12.5 kW condition and the 300 V/6.25 kW condition previously identified as the worst-case erosion condition.

Jason D. Frieman↗