Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “THRUST CONTROL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Qualification of a Pulsed, Millinewton Class Metal Plasma Thruster for Broad Mission Applications

In the field of low power (<100W) electric propulsion, all thruster options demand significant trade-offs between operating parameters, reliability and scalable cost. With many systems on the market there are concerns with reliability, the need for extra considerations such as electron neutralizers for pure ion plumes, and the cost or craft compatibility of propellants. The Metal Plasma Thruster (MPT) is a new type of electric propulsion technology intended for low power applications. The system imparts momentum using inert, solid metal pucks as a propellant by using pulsed power to convert the metal into high velocity (~17km/s for Mo) jets of quasi-neutral plasma. The MPT technology does not require gas or liquid propellants, neutralizers, standby heaters, high voltage electronics, high electric or magnetic fields to operate. This comparatively simple pulsed operation is amenable to closed loop control, which provides for fine thrust control and S/C directed impulse on demand. Furthermore, the technology can use any metal as propellant, opening up unique opportunities for In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) as well as customizability of performance for meeting specific mission needs. This paper describes implementation and direct measurement of this closed loop control mode as well as impulse measurement of multiple metals consistent with the aim of ISRU at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC).

Electric Propulsion↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Qualification of a Pulsed, Millinewton Class Metal Plasma Thruster for Broad Mission Applications

In the field of low power (<100W) electric propulsion, all thruster options demand significant trade-offs between operating parameters, reliability and scalable cost. With many systems on the market there are concerns with reliability, the need for extra considerations such as electron neutralizers for pure ion plumes, and the cost or craft compatibility of propellants. The Metal Plasma Thruster (MPT) is a new type of electric propulsion technology intended for low power applications. The system imparts momentum using inert, solid metal pucks as a propellant by using pulsed power to convert the metal into high velocity (~17km/s for Mo) jets of quasi-neutral plasma. The MPT technology does not require gas or liquid propellants, neutralizers, standby heaters, high voltage electronics, high electric or magnetic fields to operate. This comparatively simple pulsed operation is amenable to closed loop control, which provides for fine thrust control and S/C directed impulse on demand. Furthermore, the technology can use any metal as propellant, opening up unique opportunities for In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) as well as customizability of performance for meeting specific mission needs. This paper describes implementation and direct measurement of this closed loop control mode as well as impulse measurement of multiple metals consistent with the aim of ISRU at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC).

Electric Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS1978

Design development of the Apollo command and service module thrust vector attitude control systems

Development of the Apollo thrust vector control digital autopilot (TVC DAP) was summarized. This is the control system that provided pitch and yaw attitude control during velocity change maneuvers using the main rocket engine on the Apollo service module. A list of ten primary functional requirements for this control system are presented, each being subordinate to a more general requirement appearing earlier on the list. Development process functions were then identified and the essential information flow paths were explored. This provided some visibility into the particular NASA/contractor interface, as well as relationships between the many individual activities.

William H. Peters↗
NASA NTRS2004

Solar Sail GN and C Model Comparisons

The Solar Sail Propulsion project is engaged in an ambitious program to raise the Technology Readiness Level of solar sails and prepare for a validation flight via a series of hardware ground demonstrations and development of a number of high fidelity simulations and models. Guidance, navigation, and control of solar sails is a key part of this effort. The large flexible structure and optical nature of solar sails create a considerable challenge for attitude control, thrust modeling, and navigation. In this paper, we present an overview and comparison of two recently delivered prototype solar sail guidance, navigation, and control software tools currently funded by the Solar Sail Propulsion project. The results of some key test cases are presented. Where possible, we also make comparisons to other software tools. We discuss the implications of the results of these comparative studies to the future direction and scope of development efforts for guidance, navigation and control software for solar sails, including the relationship to hardware test efforts such as the Thrust Vector Control Authority Demonstration.

Heaton, Andrew F.↗
NASA NTRS2001

Design of a LQR Controller of Reduced Inputs for Multiple Spacecraft Formation Flying

Regarding multiple spacecraft formation flying, the observation is made that control thrust need only be applied coplanar to the local horizon to achieve complete controllability of a two-satellite formation. Without the need for zenith-nadir (radial) thrust, simplifications and reduction of the weight of the propulsion system may be accomplished. This work focuses on the validation of this radial-excluding control system on its own merits, and in comparison to a related system which does provide thrust parallel to the orbital radius. Simulations are performed using commercial ODE solvers to propagate the Keplerian dynamics of a controlled satellite relative to an uncontrolled, leader satellite. The conclusion is drawn that, despite the exclusion of the radial thrust axis, the remaining control thrust available still provides enough control to design a gain matrix of adequate performance using linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) techniques.

Starin, Scott R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Controls Algorithms, Models, and Stability Assessments of the RCS and TVC systems on Mars Ascent Vehicle

This paper presents a control systems overview of the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) control design and stability analysis with two separate control methods: Thrust Vector Control (TVC) based control using main engine thrust and Reaction Control System (RCS) via thrusters. A pole-placement TVC controller is proposed to address quickly peaking thrust produced by the MAV solid propulsion engine. The controllerutilizes real-time parameter estimation to calculate control gains using an online pole-placement method. The pole-placement technique allows the controller to maintain constant stability margins throughout the flight under changing parameters and rapidly peaking thrust. A mathematical stability proof via Lyapunov inequality and Nichols method is demonstrated to support the stability of the method. In addition to the TVC control, a phase-plane based RCS control logic is applied to the vehicle for roll control during ascent and all axes during coast phases of flight. The logic implemented is an on-off type logic that applies pre-determined thrusters firings in reference to boundary parameters of pointing and rate error chosen to balance desired pointing with stability. A describing function methodology is applied to the non-linear phase plane loop response to determine linear stability across all flight phases. The controller additionally applies command alteration logic to output signals to account for RCS hardware limitations. The following paper will provide the methodology for controller implementation of the TVC and RCS, and provide a summary of results of the MAV performance applying the aforementioned control design.

Han Woong Bae↗
NASA NTRS1980

LSS/propulsion interactions studies

Interactions between the LSS and the propulsion system are large, significant, interrelated, and complex. Issues and problems in interfacing include the effects on the structure from static, dynamic, and launch loads, control, thrust distribution, throttling, and the environment. Control interaction, the disposal of debris/obsolete spacecraft, and the constraints of launch to low Earth orbit must also be considered.

Spurlock, O. F.↗
NASA NTRS1996

Development and Flight Test of an Augmented Thrust-Only Flight Control System on an MD-11 Transport Airplane

An emergency flight control system using only engine thrust, called Propulsion-Controlled Aircraft (PCA), has been developed and flight tested on an MD-11 airplane. In this thrust-only control system, pilot flight path and track commands and aircraft feedback parameters are used to control the throttles. The PCA system was installed on the MD-11 airplane using software modifications to existing computers. Flight test results show that the PCA system can be used to fly to an airport and safely land a transport airplane with an inoperative flight control system. In up-and-away operation, the PCA system served as an acceptable autopilot capable of extended flight over a range of speeds and altitudes. The PCA approaches, go-arounds, and three landings without the use of any non-nal flight controls have been demonstrated, including instrument landing system-coupled hands-off landings. The PCA operation was used to recover from an upset condition. In addition, PCA was tested at altitude with all three hydraulic systems turned off. This paper reviews the principles of throttles-only flight control; describes the MD-11 airplane and systems; and discusses PCA system development, operation, flight testing, and pilot comments.

Burcham, Frank W., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Using Engine Thrust for Emergency Flight Control: MD-11 and B-747 Results

With modern digital control systems, using engine thrust for emergency flight control to supplement or replace failed aircraft normal flight controls has become a practical consideration. The NASA Dryden Flight Research Center has developed a propulsion-controlled aircraft (PCA) system in which computer-controlled engine thrust provides emergency flight control. An F-15 and an MD-11 airplane have been landed without using any flight control surfaces. Preliminary studies have also been conducted that show that engines on only one wing can provide some flight control capability if the lateral center of gravity can be shifted toward the side of the airplane that has the operating engine(s). Simulator tests of several airplanes with no flight control surfaces operating and all engines out on the left wing have all shown positive control capability within the available range of lateral center-of-gravity offset. Propulsion-controlled aircraft systems that can operate without modifications to engine control systems, thus allowing PCA technology to be installed on less capable airplanes or at low cost, are also desirable. Further studies have examined simplified 'PCA Lite' and 'PCA Ultralite' concepts in which thrust control is provided by existing systems such as auto-throttles or a combination of existing systems and manual pilot control.

Burcham, Frank W., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Dynamic Control System Mode Performance of the Space Technology-7 Disturbance Reduction System

The Space Technology-7 (ST-7) Disturbance Reduction System (DRS) is an experiment package aboard the European Space Agency (ESA) LISA Pathfinder spacecraft, launched on December 3, 2015. DRS consists of three primary components: Colloidal MicroNewton Thrusters (CMNTs), an Integrated Avionics Unit (IAU), and flight-software implementing the Command and Data Handling (C&DH) and Dynamic Control System (DCS) algorithms. The CMNTs were designed to provide thrust from 5 to 30 micro Newton, with thrust controllability and resolution of 0.1 micro Newton and thrust noise of 0.1 micro Newton/(square root of (Hz)) in the measurement band from 1-30 mHz. The IAU hosts the C&DH and DCS flight software, as well as interfaces with both the CMNT electronics and the LISA Pathfinder spacecraft. When in control, the DCS uses star tracker attitude data and capacitive or optically-measured position and attitude information from LISA Pathfinder and the LISA Technology Package (LTP) to control the attitude and position of the spacecraft and the two test masses inside the LTP. After completion of the nominal ESA LISA Pathfinder mission, the DRS experiment was commissioned followed by its nominal mission. DRS operations extended over the next five months, interspersed with station keeping, anomaly resolution, and periods where control was handed back to LISA Pathfinder for them to conduct further experiments. The primary DRS mission ended on December 6, 2016, with the experiment meeting all of its Level 1 requirements. The DCS, developed at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, consists of five spacecraft control modes and six test mass control modes, combined into six 'DRS Mission Modes'. Attitude Control and Zero-G were primarily used to control the spacecraft during initial handover and during many of the CMNT characterization experiments. The other Mission Modes, Drag Free Low Force, 18-DOF Transitional, and 18-DOF, were used to provide drag-free control of the spacecraft about the test masses. This paper will discuss the performance of these DCS spacecraft and test mass control modes. Flight data will be shown from each mode throughout the mission, both from nominal operations and during various flight experiments. The DCS team also made some changes to controller, filter, and limit parameters during operations; the motivation and results of these changes will be shown and discussed.

O'Donnell, James R., Jr.↗