Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “low radioactivity”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

PNNL Sequim Campus Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2020

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest Site Office has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sequim Campus. Some research projects have the potential to emit low levels of radioactive materials. This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 246-247, "Radiation Protection–Air Emissions." Compliance is indicated by comparing the estimated effective dose equivalent (EDE) to the maximally exposed individual (MEI) member of the public with the 10 millirem per year (mrem/yr) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard. The PNNL Sequim Campus has only fugitive emissions sources. Despite the fact that the regulations are intended for application to point source emissions, fugitive emissions are included with regard to complying with the EPA standard. The EDE to the Campus MEI due to routine operations in 2020 was 3.5E-05 mrem (3.5E-07 mSv). No non-routine emissions occurred in 2020. The Sequim Campus is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard.

40 CFR 61 Subpart H↗
DOE OSTI2022

PNNL Sequim Campus Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2021

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest Site Office has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sequim Campus. Some research projects have the potential to emit low levels of radioactive materials. This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 246-247, "Radiation Protection–Air Emissions." Compliance is indicated by comparing the estimated effective dose equivalent (EDE) to the maximally exposed individual (MEI) member of the public with the 10 millirem per year (mrem/yr) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard. The PNNL Sequim Campus has only fugitive emissions sources. Despite the fact that the regulations are intended for application to point source emissions, fugitive emissions are included with regard to complying with the EPA standard. The EDE to the Campus MEI due to routine operations in 2021 was 5.4E-05 mrem (5.4E-07 mSv). No non-routine emissions occurred in 2021. The Sequim Campus is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard.

40 CFR 61 Subpart H↗
DOE OSTI2023

PNNL-Sequim Campus Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2022

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest Site Office has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sequim Campus. Some research projects have the potential to emit low levels of radioactive materials. This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 246-247, "Radiation Protection–Air Emissions." Compliance is indicated by comparing the estimated effective dose equivalent (EDE) to the maximally exposed individual (MEI) member of the public with the 10 millirem per year (mrem/yr) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard. The PNNL-Sequim Campus has only fugitive emissions sources. Despite the fact that the regulations are intended for application to point source emissions, fugitive emissions are included with regard to complying with the EPA standard. The EDE to the Campus MEI due to routine operations in 2022 was 7.5E-07 mrem (7.5E-09 mSv). No non-routine emissions occurred in 2022. The PNNL-Sequim Campus is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard.

40 CFR 61 Subpart H↗
DOE OSTI2024

PNNL-Sequim Campus Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2023

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC) Pacific Northwest Site Office has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sequim campus. Some research projects have the potential to emit low levels of radioactive materials. This report is prepared to document compliance with the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40, Protection of the Environment, Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities” and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 246-247, "Radiation Protection–Air Emissions." Compliance is indicated by comparing the estimated effective dose equivalent (EDE) to the maximally exposed individual (MEI) member of the public with the 10 millirem per year (mrem/yr) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard. The PNNL-Sequim campus has only fugitive emissions sources.

40 CFR 61 Subpart H↗
DOE OSTI2025

PNNL-Sequim Campus Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2024

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science’s Pacific Northwest Site Office has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Sequim campus. Facility operations include radiological operations with the potential to emit low levels of radioactive materials.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2026

PNNL Sequim Campus Radionuclide Air Emissions Report for Calendar Year 2025 : Department of Energy – Office of Science Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science’s Pacific Northwest Site Office has oversight and stewardship duties associated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Sequim Campus. Facility operations include radiological operations with the potential-to-emit low levels of radioactive materials. This report is prepared to document compliance with the 40 CFR Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart H, “National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other than Radon from Department of Energy Facilities,” and Washington Administrative Code Chapter 246-247, Radiation Protection–Air Emissions. The PNNL Sequim Campus is in compliance with the federal and state 10 mrem/yr standard for 2025 operations.

40 CFR 61 Subpart H↗
NASA NTRS1978

Detection techniques for tenuous planetary atmospheres

The application of detectors developed for analysis of planetary atmospheres under partial vacuum conditions, and data obtained during dust charging studies to various industrial problems is summarized. A specialized apparatus for dust measurements on a planetary lander was designed with the capability of measuring ambient dust density as a function of particle size, as well as for observing the charge of the collected dust. the optical system operates on an intermittent basis and requires only low power. No radioactive source or delicate detection equipment is required. Advances in monitoring catalyst operation by means of exoelection emission are also reported.

Hoenig, S. A.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Development of online pulse-finding algorithms for the Mu2e Stopping Target Monitor and an evaluation of the signal to background ratio for the Mu2e stopped-muon rate determination

This thesis presents a determination of the acceptance of the Mu2e Stopping Target Monitor (STM) detector for both signal and background events. The rate of X-rays of a specific energy in the STM is used to determine the rate of stopped muons in the aluminium stopping target, which is used as the normalisation for all Mu2e measurements, particularly the branching ratio for a charged lepton flavour violating (cLFV) process. The acceptance for the 347\,keV $2p-1s$ aluminium signal X-ray is determined to be $(8.03 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-10}$\,cm$^{-2}$ and the acceptance for the background photons (at 347\,keV) to be $(3.19 \pm 0.21) \times 10^{-8}$\,cm$^{-2}$. This results in a signal-to-background ratio of approximately two which is significantly higher than had previously been estimated. These signal-to-background rates are used to determine the time required to achieve a statistical uncertainty of 10\% on the number of 347\,keV X-rays as a function of the detector resolution and back ground rate. For a resolution of 2\,keV, and the background rate determined in this thesis, approximately one minute of data is required. The three corrections needed to be applied to the measured 347\,keV rate to determine the rate of stopped muons are also determined and potential sources of bias arising from the background shape, background fit range and energy calibration are investigated and found to be insignificant. The raw energy of the particles in the STM detector comes from a 16-bit ADC digitising at $\sim 300$\,MHz. It is not possible to store all the raw digitisations and online algorithms have been developed to rapidly select pulses in the detector and reconstruct their energy. The performance of these algorithms has been characterised with simulated data as a function of detector rate and resolution and optimum operating points for the algorithms have been defined. The integrity of the algorithms has also been demonstrated and characterised on test-beam data at high r ates and with radioactive sources at low rates.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
NASA NTRS1973

Apollo orbital geochemistry: Gamma rays

Lunar gamma ray spectra obtained during Apollo-15 and -16 flights show a natural radioactivity due to potassium, thorium, and uranium as well as a cosmic ray induced activity in the lunar surface due to high neutron interactions produced by (p,n) reaction in the lunar surface. The radioactivity is at a low in the highlands on the backside of the moon; most of the radioactivity is confined to the Oceanus Procellarum/Mare Imbrium region and to the Van de Graff area on the lunar backside.

Trombka, J. I.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Ab initio study of tungsten-based alloys under fusion power-plant conditions

Tungsten (W) is considered a leading candidate for structural and functional materials in future fusion energy devices. The most attractive properties of tungsten for magnetic and inertial fusion energy reactors are its high melting point, high thermal conductivity, low sputtering yield, and low long-term disposal radioactive footprint. However, tungsten also presents a very low fracture toughness, primarily associated with intergranular failure and bulk plasticity, limiting its applications. In recent years, several families of tungsten-based alloys have been explored to overcome the aforementioned limitations of pure tungsten. These include tungsten-based high-entropy alloys (W-HEAs) and tungsten-based Self-passivating Metal Alloys with Reduced Thermo-oxidation or “SMART alloys” (W-SAs). Given their proximity to the plasma, it is crucial to understand how the exposure of these candidate plasma-facing materials (PFMs) to the neutron fluxes expected in fusion reactors impacts their material behavior over time. In this work, we present a computational approach that combines inventory codes and first-principles DFT electronic structure calculations to understand the behavior of transmuting tungsten-based PFMs. In particular, we calculate the changes in the chemical composition, production uncertainties, the elastic and ductility properties, and the density of states for five tungsten-based PFMs when exposed to EU-DEMO fusion first wall conditions for ten years.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 99: Commercial LLW Management: Global Perspective

This panel focused on opportunities and challenges in providing commercial nuclear waste management services in a global context. The panelists commented on their approach to establishing new businesses, overcoming communication barriers acquiring / maintaining skills and capabilities and delivering commercial nuclear waste management projects in a range of regulatory and socio-economic environments. The panel discussion was followed by a Q and A session with audience participation. Panelist with presentations: BGE Technology (Thilo von Berlepsch)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Durability testing of actual Hanford waste glasses and their non-radioactive simulant glasses

The low-activity waste (LAW) fraction of Hanford tank waste will be converted to glass at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) and disposed on the Hanford site. The chemical durability of LAW glasses has been researched for decades to satisfy contract requirements. Most LAW glass durability data has been generated on non-radioactive simulant glasses fabricated via crucible melts. These non-radioactive glasses were chosen due to safety and cost reasons with confidence that radioactive waste glasses would exhibit similar behavior. To reduce the risk of significant differences in laboratory test response data between WTP melter waste glass and simulant glass, Product Consistency Tests (PCT, i.e., ASTM C1285-21) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1313 durability tests were performed on actual and simulant LAW glasses fabricated using laboratory-scaled melters. Actual and simulant glass durability test results are presented and statistically compared. Finally, differences in test responses were found to be within experimental uncertainty.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Ablation loading of barium ions into a surface-electrode trap

Trapped-ion quantum information processing may benefit from qubits encoded in isotopes that are practically available in only small quantities, e.g., due to low natural abundance or radioactivity. Laser ablation provides a method of controllably liberating neutral atoms or ions from low-volume targets, but energetic ablation products can be difficult to confine in the small ion-electrode distance, micron-scale microfabricated traps amenable to high-speed, high-fidelity manipulation of ion arrays. Here, we investigate ablation-based ion loading into surface-electrode traps of different sizes to test a model describing ion loading probability as a function of effective trap volume and other trap parameters. We characterize loading of ablated barium from a metallic source in two cryogenic surface-electrode traps with 730 and 50 μm ion-electrode distances. Furthermore, our loading rate agrees with a predictive analytical model, providing insight for the confinement of limited-quantity species of interest for quantum computing, simulation, and sensing.

74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Non-destructive Material Characterization of Radioactive Waste Packages with QUANTOM{sup R} - 20130

During the last decades, the nuclear and non-nuclear industry has produced a considerable amount of low and intermediate level radioactive wastes. In many countries, it is foreseen to dispose of these waste packages safely in a final repository under strict waste acceptance requirements (e.g. the radiological and material characterization) defined by national licensing and supervisory authorities. The material characterization of waste packages can be performed on the basis of existing documentation or, if the documentation is insufficient, on further destructive or non-destructive analysis. Non-destructive methods are to be preferred to minimize radiation exposures of operating personnel as well as costs. We offer here an innovative non-destructive technology called QUANTOM{sup R} (Quantitative Analysis of Toxic and nontoxic Materials) based on prompt and delayed gamma neutron activation analysis (P and DGNAA). This technology is able to identify, quantify and thus verify the amount of hazardous and non-hazardous substances in 200-l radioactive drums, which is required for a final disposal characterization. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 46: Final Closure of Unlined LLW Disposal Facilities Worldwide (R3.5)

This panel discussed the on-going and emerging issues with the design and construction of final cover system of unlined disposal facilities (e.g., material disposal areas (MDAs), subsurface disposal areas (SDAs), burial grounds, and similar historical waste trenches, pits and vaults). The discussion focused on key technical and regulatory issues as well as lessons learned from years of engineering and construction in US and non-US locations. Panelists with presentations: Closure of Unlined LLW Disposal Sites (Craig Benson); Closure of LLW Facilities (Paul Pointon); Final Closure of Unlined LLW Disposal Facilities - Lessons Learned (Kevin Foye)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Using FLAC{sup R} Modeling Software to Analyze the Stability of a LLRW Disposal Facility - 20031

Waste Control Specialists (WCS) wished to amend its existing LLRW disposal license such that it might use gravel aggregate instead of concrete as backfill around large component (LC) parts from decommissioned nuclear reactors. A classical mechanics evaluation of the strength of the LCs was presented to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), demonstrating that the LCs had adequate capacity to withstand the loads within the facilities, and that concrete was unnecessary for structural support. TCEQ requested that additional analyses of the LCs within the facilities be performed using FLAC{sup R} finite difference modeling software. Because FLAC{sup R} has the capability of modeling the support provided by the lateral earth pressures, the factors of safety against failure for the LCs increased. TCEQ found the FLAC{sup R} analyses presented in this report to be satisfactory, and granted WCS' license amendment request. This work demonstrates that FLAC{sup R} may be used advantageously to more accurately represent the complexities of the physical situation being modeled. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Life cycle Management of 324 Project High-Activity, Mixed/Low-Level Radioactive Waste - 20506

U.S. DOE contractor CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) manages the 324 Building and is preparing to remotely excavate and disposition the radioactive soil beneath the building to allow further deactivation of the building. The 324 Building is a non-reactor Category 2 Nuclear Facility located in the 300 Area of the Hanford Site. Records indicate that in October 1986, approximately 516 liters of a concentrated liquid waste stream containing cesium-137 ({sup 137}Cs) and strontium-90 ({sup 90}Sr) spilled onto the floor of a hot cell, B-Cell, in the 324 Building. The spill contained an estimated 1.3 million curies (Ci) of radioactivity. A breach in the sump of B-Cell was discovered in November 2009 during characterization of the soil under the building. Exposure rates in excess of 10,000 R/hr were detected through a system of access pipes installed under the hot cell, and an estimated 1.557 E+05 Ci of {sup 137}Cs and 6.842 E+04 Ci of {sup 90}Sr are in the soil beneath B-Cell. The magnitude of the soil contamination below B-Cell represents one of the most challenging remediation activities in the DOE complex. The objective of CHPRC's 324 Project is to remotely excavate and disposition the highly contaminated soil under the hot cell so building deactivation and stabilization activities can resume. Depending on the volume and radioactivity of contaminated soil under B-Cell, the material will be dispositioned either at the Hanford Site's Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) or in grout monoliths that will be created in the hot cells (A, C and D) next to B-Cell during future building demolition activities. The current project scope includes installing structural supports under the walls of B-Cell and using remotely operated equipment to remove debris from the hot cell, remove debris mixed with grout on the floor, saw through and remove the cell floor and liner, and excavate contaminated soil under B-Cell to a depth of up to 3.66 meters (12 feet). Addition or removal of debris in A-Cell may be required to support B-Cell cleanout and excavation activities. The base approach is to disposition debris and soil bins in the Radiochemical Engineering Cell (REC) monoliths, and subsequently disposition the monoliths during building demolition. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗