Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Balancer”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,675 records · Page 93
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Gain balanced nonlinear optical interferometer

A nonlinear fiber interferometer is disclosed suitable for fiber sensor and other applications. A first nonlinear fiber section amplifies probe and conjugate sidebands of a pump through four-wave mixing. A second section introduces a phase shift to be measured, for example from a sensor. A third nonlinear fiber section amplifies with phase-sensitive gain to increase signal-to-noise ratio. Based on phase-sensitive output power of probe and/or conjugate components, the phase shift can be measured. Superior performance can be obtained by balancing gain between the (first and third) nonlinear sections. Non-fiber, for example photonic integrated circuit, embodiments are disclosed. Differential sensing, alternative detection schemes, sensing applications, associated methods, and other variations are disclosed.

Lukens, Joseph M.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Balanced light detector

A system and method with AC coupling that reserves photodiode bandwidth in a biased configuration, allows optimal transimpedance amplifier performance, retains DC signal measurement capability, and does not introduce noise into the balanced detection signal.

Williams, Brian P.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Gain balanced nonlinear optical interferometer

A nonlinear fiber interferometer is disclosed suitable for fiber sensor and other applications. A first nonlinear fiber section amplifies probe and conjugate sidebands of a pump through four-wave mixing. A second section introduces a phase shift to be measured, for example from a sensor. A third nonlinear fiber section amplifies with phase-sensitive gain to increase signal-to-noise ratio. Based on phase-sensitive output power of probe and/or conjugate components, the phase shift can be measured. Superior performance can be obtained by balancing gain between the (first and third) nonlinear sections. Non-fiber, for example photonic integrated circuit, embodiments are disclosed. Differential sensing, alternative detection schemes, sensing applications, associated methods, and other variations are disclosed.

Lukens, Joseph M.↗
DOE OSTI2016

Mass Inventory Balance and Fuel Breeding Analysis on Transuranic Recycling Option of FBR

Maintaining sustainability of nuclear fuel can be maintained by utilizing new fresh fuel resources, utilization of spent fuel resource, and obtaining fuel breeding resource in the reactors. Utilization of used fuel from recycling resource and fuel breeding resource becomes the key issue which affects to the reprocessing and refueling facilities. Some minor actinides (MA) have been developed to be recycled as well as some different compositions of plutonium for some purposes such as converted fuel for extending longer reactor operation, burning and transmutation of MA, fuel breeding of FBR as well as for proliferation resistance purposes. This evaluation intends to investigate the mass inventory balance focused on plutonium (Pu) and minor actinide (MA) inventory and reactor behavior in relation to reactor criticality, excess reactivity and fuel breeding for several fuel types. Time dependence as well as irradiation process during reactor operation gives the significant impact for changing the behavior of fuel composition which affects to the behavior of reactor itself. Reactor operation time effect on this analysis has been analyzed from the beginning of cycle up to the equilibrium condition of each fuel type compositions. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

The Improved Simple Corner Balance Method and Efforts to Enhance its Computational Performance

The diamond difference (DD) spatial discretization has long been a work horse of the neutron transport community. For nearly as long as DD has been used in neutron transport, it has been observed that DD produces undamped, non-physical angular fluxes in spatially under resolved problems and can fail in the thick diffusion limit. A long list of alternative spatial discretizations, all with better physics properties: accuracy, robustness, and/or preservation of the thick diffusion limit, have been proposed as alternatives to DD. Unfortunately, these alternative spatial discretizations also require significantly more floating point operations (FLOPs) per unknown compared to DD. Historically, neutron transport problems of interest have been able to be resolved sufficiently that DD is accurate enough and FLOPs have been the computational performance bottleneck controlling time to solution. Thus, in practice DD has been and remains a preferred spatial discretization for neutron transport simulations. Trends in computing architecture are leading to a new paradigm where data movement, not FLOPs will control time to solution. This presents an opportunity to improve neutron transport physics by reconsidering more FLOP intensive spatial discretization than DD without incurring a time to solution penalty. In this work, we consider the improved simple corner balance (ISCB) spatial discretization, a unique alternative to DD that has the same memory footprint as DD, and detail efforts to improve its computational performance. The ISCB spatial discretization is a more FLOP intensive spatial discretization than DD with the same memory footprint as DD. Though designed to maximize FLOP intensity, third party libraries such as LAPACK are not tuned for the unique, frequent, small linear algebra needs of neutron transport problems. While hand coding a sparse Gauss elimination is likely to be faster than a dense matrix solve (CM vs. HGE), were LAPACK suitable for small linear algebra problems, we would not have seen a performance increase with decreased numbers of LAPACK calls for the Schur complement solve (SC4 vs. SC1). Significant effort has reduced the relative compute time of ISCB to DD, but on current computer architectures DD is still faster than ISCB. Future work comparing the overall efficiency of ISCB to DD may reveal that while ISCB is slower than DD on current computers, ISCB is more accurate than DD by a factor greater than the compute time slowdown. As new computer architectures become available, we will test our hypothesis that neutron transport simulations will be bandwidth limited, ideally rendering the additional FLOPs required by ISCB to be 'free' [in terms of time to solution]. (authors)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Competing Interests and Creating Value - Balancing Durable and Enforceable Institutional Controls with Beneficial Reuse - 20320

US DOE LM has various real property interests at the 100 sites within its current portfolio, with an anticipated total of 127 sites within the next 5 years. Each site has its own narrative with respect to the real property assets. Since the regulatory time frame for long-term surveillance and maintenance activities at some sites can be in perpetuity, durable and effective instruments and documentation are necessary to support LM's unique mission as a federal land manager and steward. More than half of the sites currently in LM's inventory do not allow unrestricted use, and institutional controls (ICs) are required to limit human and environmental exposures to residual contamination. LM's Asset Management program balances protection of human health and the environment with a goal of optimizing its land portfolio through mitigation of risk, limiting liability, and creating value, whether tangible or intangible, in these types of assets. The IC layering strategy utilizes multiple types, restrictions, and legal authorities to protect human health and the environment. This layering strategy influences the transition of these properties into LM's portfolio to assess potential beneficial reuses. The LM's beneficial reuse program aims to repurpose former contaminated sites to restore the environment, protect the public health, revitalize communities, and spur economic growth. LM strives to create value in a perceived valueless asset and reevaluates and revisits the potential opportunities for these sites as long-term surveillance and maintenance activities are performed and objectives are achieved. Beneficial reuse also promotes protectiveness by ensuring activities are compatible with long-term maintenance and protection of public health and the environment as well as ensuring activities are environmentally sound by retaining good stewardship of natural resources. LM has recently revised both the Institutional Control Program Guidance and its Beneficial Reuse Management Plan to integrate the issues of land use with ICs, creating value in these impaired assets. This paper presents the following topics: (1) a general overview of LM's IC and beneficial reuse programs; (2) the unique aspects of each of these programs as a result of the multiple regulatory requirements and programs that affect LM sites; (3) case studies of LM sites to show examples of how LM created value while complying with the ICs and layering strategies; and (4) the most common challenges to beneficial reuses at LM sites and potential options for value creation in impaired assets. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of cell-based diffusion acceleration for the slice balance approach

In this work, we perform analysis on the use of cell-based diffusion acceleration methodologies to accelerate the convergence of transport solutions discretized with the slice balance approach (SBA) on unstructured polygonal grids.We investigated both linear diffusion synthetic acceleration (DSA) and non linear diffusion acceleration (NDA), including its partial-current variant (pNDA). DSA and NDA were both shown to diverge for intermediate ranges of mesh optical thicknesses. However, pNDA and Krylov methods like GMRES and Broyden stabilized the acceleration schemes, including problems with degenerate cells formed by mesh refinement. (author)

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

The PARADIGM Project: Case Study in Balancing Experiment Uncertainty with Design simplicity

Accurate nuclear data are required for simulations of many applications including nuclear criticality safety. Actinide nuclear data at intermediate energies (from 1 to 100s of keV) are imprecise and inaccurate, because of scarce differential data, and an insufficient theory approach to capture the structures expected in the data to yield evaluated nuclear data, and lack of integral data for proper validation. This is a known deficiency but has proved challenging to address. More specifically, only 5% of integral experiments in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmark suite address intermediate energies (Fig. 1). Associated calculated effective multiplication factor, k eff , values for these experiments are far outside the experimental uncertainties and are 25× further from experiment than for fast energies. These differences could either stem from systematic biases in nuclear data, experiments or both. The goal of the PARADIGM (PARallel Approach of Differential and InteGral Measurements) project is to significantly reduce (by more than tens of percent) the uncertainties of intermediate energy actinide nuclear data. The PARADIGM project designed and intends to execute LANSCE (Los Alamos Neutron Science CEnter) and NCERC (National Criticality Experiments Research Center) intermediate experiments in parallel. They will specifically address a high priority nuclear data need—reducing bias and uncertainty in intermediate plutonium nuclear data. The two experiment will achieve that by informing each other and nuclear theory. By doing all these steps in parallel, the timeline to deliver improved nuclear data to users will significantly be reduced. This work will focus on the integral experiment final design and the balance of design and modeling simplicity while minimizing experiment uncertainty.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗