Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Graphite”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,693 records · Page 94
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Porphene and porphite as porphyrin analogs of graphene and graphite

Two-dimensional materials have unusual properties and promise applications in nanoelectronics, spintronics, photonics, (electro)catalysis, separations, and elsewhere. Most are inorganic and their properties are difficult to tune. Here we report the preparation of Zn porphene, a member of the previously only hypothetical organic metalloporphene family. Similar to graphene, these also are fully conjugated two-dimensional polymers, but are composed of fused metalloporphyrin rings. Zn porphene is synthesized on water surface by two-dimensional oxidative polymerization of a Langmuir layer of Zn porphyrin with K 2 IrCl 6 , reminiscent of known one-dimensional polymerization of pyrroles. It is transferable to other substrates and bridges μm-sized pits. Contrary to previous theoretical predictions of metallic conductivity, it is a p-type semiconductor due to a predicted Peierls distortion of its unit cell from square to rectangular, analogous to the appearance of bond-length alternation in antiaromatic molecules. The observed reversible insertion of various metal ions, possibly carrying a fifth or sixth ligand, promises tunability and even patterning of circuits on an atomic canvas without removing any π centers from conjugation.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Phase evolution and structural modulation during in situ lithiation of MoS 2 , WS 2 and graphite in TEM

Li-ion batteries function by Li intercalating into and through the layered electrode materials. Intercalation is a solid-state interaction resulting in the formation of new phases. The new observations presented here reveal that at the nanoscale the intercalation mechanism is fundamentally different from the existing models and is actually driven by nonuniform phase distributions rather than the localized Li concentration: the lithiation process is a ‘distribution-dependent’ phenomena. Direct structure imaging of 2H and 1T dual-phase microstructures in lithiated MoS 2 and WS 2 along with the localized chemical segregation has been demonstrated in the current study. Li, a perennial challenge for the TEM, is detected and imaged using a low-dose, direct-electron detection camera on an aberration-corrected TEM and confirmed by image simulation. This study shows the presence of fully lithiated nanoscale domains of 2D host matrix in the vicinity of Li-lean regions. This confirms the nanoscale phase formation followed by Oswald ripening, where the less-stable smaller domains dissolves at the expense of the larger and more stable phases.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Estimating the Diffusion Coefficient of Lithium in Graphite: Extremely Fast Charging and a Comparison of Data Analysis Techniques

Galvanostatic intermittent titration experiments were performed in three-electrode cells to characterize the effect of C/2, 2-C and 4-C charge rates on the observed lithium diffusion coefficient. As part of the data analysis process, we compared the classic Weppner-Huggins analysis of polarization data with a newer (Wang et al.) analysis method for depolarization data. At low values of x in Li x C 6 , both analysis methods showed the same general trend in the apparent lithium diffusion coefficient, 4-C > 2-C > C/2. The two techniques differed in the magnitude of the estimated diffusion coefficient by about a factor of 100. The observed increase in diffusion coefficient does not last over a large compositional range. Since the estimates from the method of Weppner and Huggins may contain artifacts due to the use of particulate electrodes and high charge rates, the method of Wang et al. may produce better values.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Use of Ethylene Carbonate Free Ester Solvent Systems with Alternative Lithium Salts for Improved Low-Temperature Performance in NCM622∣∣ Graphite Li-ion Batteries

An investigation of alternative lithium salts, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4 ), lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) and lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF 6 ), in novel ester-based (methyl acetate/fluoroethylene carbonate- MA/FEC or methyl propionate/fluoroethylene carbonate- MP/FEC) electrolyte formulations has been conducted in LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 (NCM622)/graphite cells to improve low temperature cycling performance of lithium ion batteries at −20 °C. Improved low temperature performance was observed with all the lithium salts in MA/FEC electrolyte while comparable room temperature (25 °C) capacities were observed with LiPF 6 salt only. Detailed ex-situ analysis of surface films generated with LiBF 4 , LiDFOB and LiPF 6 in ester-based electrolytes reveals that the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is predominately composed of lithium salt decompaction products and addition of 10% FEC (by volume%) may not be sufficient at forming a protective SEI.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Computational Analysis of Anode and Cathode Structuring Effects on Charge and Discharge in Graphite|LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 Batteries

Structured electrodes (SEs) improve the rate capability of Lithium-ion batteries by engineering micrometer-scale electrolyte regions into the electrode, promoting rapid ionic transport. Prior research has focused on structuring one electrode (anode or cathode) with an analysis on either the charge or discharge performance. We present a holistic study using three-dimensional models to investigate the isolated effects of structuring either electrode and the combined effects of structuring both electrodes on the charge and discharge capacity of single-layer cells at 4 C and 6 C. Volumetric and gravimetric discharge energy density (Wh/L stack and Wh/kg stack ) and charge capacity (Ah/kg stack and Ah/L stack ) are evaluated for multi-layer pouch cell stacks. Pairing SE anodes with SE cathodes demonstrated improvements up to 15% in discharge Wh/kg stack and up to 33% in charge Ah/kg stack over a conventional cell; Energy required to charge per Ah/kg stack was improved by 13%–14%. SE cathodes paired with a conventional anode exhibited improvements of 0.3%–22% across all performance metrics evaluated. Conversely, pairing a SE anode with a conventional cathode demonstrated improved charge capacity up to 13% but showed a 2%–23% lower discharge energy density. The importance of aligning SEs in a cell from a performance and manufacturing perspective is also analyzed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗