Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,711 records · Page 95

Why accredit ISO/CEI 17025 a nuclear waste management laboratory? - 15112

When there is no storage, nor repository, available on a site, the entity in charge of nuclear waste management should find outlets in order to evacuate outside the site. Each outlet has his rules and waste acceptance criteria (packaging rules, physical/chemical/radiological criteria for example). Before you are able to evacuate your waste, an acceptance's process (or contract review) takes place. This process scans the entire measures implemented by the site in order to satisfy outlet's criteria. When the acceptance is obtained, shipments could be organized, and the process gets into an observation's phase. During this phase, the outlet could choose to inspect a finished nuclear waste package or to audit regularly the waste management process. In this last case, the outlet re-scans the entire documents and implemented measures. This audit lasts from one to several days. A way to tackle/approach the audit is to acknowledge, by a trusted third party (i.e. independent from the outlet), all or part of waste management system, in order to base one's reputation on this organism and win outlet's trust. For this purpose, the entity could choose certification or accreditation. Certification (ISO 9001 as often as not) aims at evaluating a system for managing the quality of one product or service. Accreditation (ISO 17025, for example) provides formal recognition for technical skills within a quality management system (clauses 5 and 4 of the ISO 17025 standard). In 2006, the LDM laboratory is the first French laboratory accredited, in accordance with ISO 17025 standard, for the characterization by gamma spectrometry on 100 L- and 200 L- radioactive waste drums (accreditation No 1-1712 - scope available on www.cofrac.fr). This accreditation allows the lab: - to update the quality management system, - to compile the entire technical file of the gamma-ray assay (description, evaluation of the uncertainties, calibration, proficiency testing programs, measurement procedures,...), - to pass previous identified constraints on to producers and nuclear waste package production, - to maintain permanent quality improvement loop, - to lighten the programs of outlets audits, through the acknowledgement of the technical competence of the laboratory to evaluate by gamma spectrometry the activity contained in our nuclear waste drums. On the other hand, the lab is re-evaluated periodically to ensure its continued compliance with requirements: within a 12 month's interval for an internal audit, with a 18 month's period for COFRAC (French sole official national accreditation body). Since 2006, the lab is accredited. His accreditation renewed in 2010. A new entire renewal audit is planned in 2015. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

In-Can Incineration and Vitrification Process for the Treatment of Transuranic Wastes - 20035

Technological alpha contaminated wastes are produced by the nuclear fuel cycle management industry, essentially from MOX fuel production units. These Plutonium Contaminated Materials (PCM) contain a mixture of organic, metal and mineral materials, contaminated with uranium, plutonium and americium. One treatment scenario under study is to incinerate the organic materials, melt the metallic fraction and incorporate the mineral fraction (including ashes from organics incineration) into a glass matrix without sorting or pretreatment (grinding for instance). A scale 1 pilot of this PIVIC process (Process for Incineration and Vitrification In Can) has been commissioned in 2018 at the CEA R and D vitrification facility in Marcoule site. A R and D program aiming to demonstrate the feasibility of this process is currently on going. This paper starts with a description of PIVIC process with explanation of the technologies involved. Then, main results of the first year of operation with the technological demonstration goal are presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Selection of Glasses to Confirm the 0.65 Weight Percent Sulfate Solubility Limit for Sludge Batch 10

In preparation for Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) processing, projections of sulfate (SO 4 2- ) in glass at 36% waste loading (WL) were calculated in May 2020 for Tank 40 blend projections representing 0.7M and 0.85M Na wash endpoints. The projected SO 4 2- ) concentrations for either sludge-only (SO) or coupled processing with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) were either near or exceeded the current Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) limit of 0.65 weight percent (wt.%). Four nominal glass compositions were selected based on SO and coupled processing for the 0.85M Na wash endpoint Tank 40 blend projection to conduct an initial evaluation of the SB10 sulfate solubility behavior. A sulfate salt phase was absent from each of the prepared glasses, which provided preliminary results that supported the 0.65 wt.% SO 4 2- ) limit for SB10.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Development of Magnesium Oxysulfate Formulation for SRPPF Aqueous Recovery Liquid Solidification

The liquid effluent from the Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility (SRPPF) Aqueous Recovery Processes will be solidified into a stable form that is acceptable by Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) for disposal. The current Aqueous Recovery flow sheet proposes to solidify the liquid effluent using a grout formula that was developed and tested for the former Waste Solidification Building process. This Portland cement based mixture results in a high pH (~13) leachate from the solidified waste form which is not acceptable to WIPP in the large quantities expected from production at SRPPF. Various cementitious materials were previously evaluated as alternative grout formulations to Portland cement and a MgO-based mix was identified as a promising alternative. A magnesium oxysulfate (MOS) cement formulation comprised of reactive magnesium oxide (MgO), anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO 4 ), and sand, as a non-reactive heat sink provided good mixability, similar density to the original Portland-cement based mix, and a leachate pH of 9.4, within the assumed WIPP brine pH range. However, the MOS formulation exhibited an appreciable amount of heat generation, which resulted in premature setting of a large-scale test.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Sulfonamide and Sulfonamido-phenol Ligands for Extraction of f-Elements from Alkaline High-Level Waste

Alkaline High Level Waste (HLW) has been accumulated at Hanford and Savannah River Sites as a result of reprocessing for nuclear weapons production during the cold war. A large volume (∼100 MGal) has been accumulated in carbon steel tanks at Savannah River (SRS) and Hanford. The tank waste contains three separate phases generated when NaOH was added to previously acidic Purex raffinates: 1-2 Supernatant liquid, salt-cake, and sludge. The sludge consists mainly of insoluble hydroxides of transition metals while the supernate and salt-cake contain caustic-soluble materials, including salts of highly radioactive fission products Cs(I) and Sr(II). Current treatment of alkaline HLW in SRS includes: i) The Actinide Removal Process (ARP), which is based on sorption of {sup 90}Sr and Actinides (An) on monosodium titanate (MST), also known as 'alpha-strike' process, followed by ii) Caustic Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX),4 which is used for the extraction of {sup 137}Cs by modified calixarenes in a hydrocarbon diluent. Residual actinides in some tanks are removed after CSSX by an additional ARP process commonly referred to as 'alpha-finishing'. Despite the success of ARP for Sr and An removal, as it is a sorption process, it represents the kinetic bottleneck of integrated salt waste processing. Hence potential introduction of additional organic ligands for actinide extraction (in a modified CSSX process) could simplify the overall integrated process, making it more efficient and economical, with less titanate needed and shorter sorption time, as some of the actinide component would be removed during CSSX. In this study tri-sulfonamide and o-sulfonamido-phenol (mono-sulfonamide) ligands have been studied as extractants for Sm(III), which is being used as an Am(III) surrogate. Our prior studies in the group using a tri-sulfonamide (iPr-tsa-B) showed favorable extraction for Sm(III) nitrate salts from alkaline solutions. Mono-sulfonamides possess similar orientation of binding sites to pyrocatechols, which have been found to be good ligands for Am(III) binding and extraction from alkaline media. Tri-sulfonamide of the type iPr-tsa-B6 (1 mM in CH{sub 2}Cl{sub 2} solution) was studied for Ln{sup 3+} extraction using Sm(NO{sub 3}){sub 3}.6H{sub 2}0 (10 and 25 μM) in alkaline solution of NaOH (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mM) / 0.1 M NaNO{sub 3}. Stripping of the organic phase was done using 0.1 M HNO{sub 3} and quantification of Sm{sup 3+} was done using ICP-OES at 359.3 nm. The need to improve stability of the complex led to synthesis of compounds with N-donor site closer to the central benzene ring to facilitate cation-π interactions. Synthesis of tri-sulfonamide type A: a) Chloromethyl methyl ether, SnCl{sub 4}, CH{sub 2}Cl{sub 2}, 0 deg. C, N{sub 2}, 4 h, 57%; b) NaN{sub 3}, reflux in H{sub 2}O/acetone for 22 h, 80%; c) PPh{sub 3}, THF/H{sub 2}O, 22 h, 79%; d) p-toluene sulfonyl chloride, Et{sub 3}N, 1,2-DCE, 22 h. Extraction: Sm(NO{sub 3}){sub 3}.6H{sub 2}O (2 mM) in 5 ml of aqueous NaOH (pH 10.5 - 14) + 6 ml of CH{sub 2}Cl{sub 2} solution of msa (20 mole equiv.) were rotated on a wheel (60 rpm; 20 h). Stripping: 5 ml of 0.1 M HNO{sub 3} + CH{sub 2}Cl{sub 2} solution of msa (after extraction, centrifugation and filtration) was rotated on the wheel (60 rpm; 20 h). Sm{sup 3+} was quantified using UV-Visible spectrophotometry.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Low Activity Waste Tuning Feed Material Testing VSL-18R4350-1 (Final Report)

High level waste (HLW) from the Hanford tank farms will be retrieved and transferred to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The waste will be pretreated to separate the soluble chemical salts (mostly sodium nitrate/nitrite and sodium hydroxide) from the bulk of the radioactive materials. This decontaminated salt solution is the low activity waste (LAW) stream which constitutes most of the total waste volume. The remaining HLW contains most of the radioactive materials but a fraction of the volume. Each of these waste streams is directed to an independent processing facility where the waste is mixed with glass forming chemicals (mostly silica and borax or boric acid) and fed into the melters for stabilization by conversion into glass. The molten glass is poured into stainless steel containers to produce packages for disposal: local shallow burial for the LAW containers and a future geologic repository for the HLW containers. The LAW facility melters produce significant quantities of NOx-laden off-gas that require abatement in accordance with 10 CFR 830 and air emission requirements. The NOx emissions also pose a safety risk. The LAW facility commissioning sequence requires that the melters be operated and process control loops tuned prior to introducing waste or waste feed materials that produce NOx. Therefore, a temporary or permanent system architecture is needed that provides a feed supply to the melters for the purpose of melter testing and off-gas tuning that does not result in the production of significantly hazardous off-gas products.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Road Map for Development of Crystal-Tolerant High Level Waste Glasses

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is building a Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at the Hanford Site in Washington to remediate 55 million gallons of radioactive waste that is being temporarily stored in 177 underground tanks. Efforts are being made to increase the loading of Hanford tank wastes in glass while meeting melter lifetime expectancies and process, regulatory, and product quality requirements. This road map guides the research and development for formulation and processing of crystal-tolerant glasses, identifying near- and long-term activities that need to be completed over the period from 2014 to 2019. The primary objective is to maximize waste loading for Hanford waste glasses without jeopardizing melter operation by crystal accumulation in the melter or melter discharge riser. The potential applicability to the Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) will also be addressed in this road map. The planned research described in this road map is motivated by the potential for substantial economic benefits (significant reductions in glass volumes) that will be realized if the current constraints (T 1% for WTP and T L for DWPF) are approached in an appropriate and technically defensible manner for defense waste and current melter designs. The basis of this alternative approach is an empirical model predicting the crystal accumulation in the WTP glass discharge riser and melter bottom as a function of glass composition, time, and temperature. When coupled with an associated operating limit (e.g., the maximum tolerable thickness of an accumulated layer of crystals), this model could then be integrated into the process control algorithms to formulate crystal-tolerant high-level waste (HLW) glasses targeting high waste loadings while still meeting process related limits and melter lifetime expectancies. The modeling effort will be an iterative process, where model form and a broader range of conditions, e.g., glass composition and temperature, will evolve as additional data on crystal accumulation are gathered. Model validation steps will be included to guide the development process and ensure the value of the effort (i.e., increased waste loading and waste throughput). A summary of the stages of the road map for developing the crystal-tolerant glass approach, their estimated durations, and deliverables is provided.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Dehalogenation reactions between halide salts and phosphate compounds

Reactions between phosphoric acid [H 3 PO 4 ] or ammonium hydrogen phosphates [i.e., NH 4 H 2 PO 4 , (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 ] and halide salts can be used to dehalogenate (remove halides from) salt-based waste streams, where the process of removing halides yields products that have more efficient disposal pathways for repository storage. In this context, the term efficiency is defined as higher waste loadings and simplified immobilization processes with potential for recycle of certain salt components (e.g., 37 Cl as H 37 Cl or NH 4 37 Cl). The main streams identified for these processes are nuclear wastes generated during electrochemical reprocessing of used nuclear fuel as well as used halide salts from molten salt reactor operation. The potential byproducts of these reactions are fairly consistent across the range of halide species (i.e., F, Cl, Br, I) where the most common are hydrogen halides [e.g., HCl (g) ] or ammonium halides (e.g., NH 4 Cl). However, trihalide compounds (e.g., NCl 3 ), nitrogen triiodide ammine adducts [NI 3 ·(NH 3 ) x ], and ammonium triiodide (NH 4 I 3 ) are also possible. Several of these byproducts (i.e., NCl 3 , NBr 3 , NI 3 , and NH 4 I 3 ) are shock-sensitive contact explosives so their production in these processes must be tracked and carefully controlled, which includes methods of immediate neutralization upon production such as direct transport to a caustic scrubber for dissolution. Several benefits arise from utilizing H 3 PO 4 as the phosphate additive during dehalogenation reactions for making iron phosphate waste forms including more oxidized iron (higher Fe 3+ :Fe 2+ ratios), higher chemical durabilities, and the avoidance of trihalides, but the byproducts are hydrogen halides, which are corrosive and require special handling.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Innovative Process for Comprehensive Treatment of Liquid Radioactive Waste - 12551

This paper presents the results of research activities aimed at creation of a principally new LRW distilling treatment method. The new process is based on the instantaneous evaporation method widely used in distillation units. The main difference of the proposed process is that the vapor condensation is conducted without using heat exchangers in practically ideal mode by way of direct contacting in a vapor-liquid system. This process is conducted in a specially designed ejector unit in supersonic mode. Further recuperation of excess heat of vaporization is carried out in a standard heat exchanger. Such an arrangement of the process, together with use of the barometric height principle, allows to carry out LRW evaporation under low temperatures, which enables to use excess heat from NPS for heating initial LRW. Thermal calculations and model experiments have revealed that, in this case, the expenditure of energy for LRW treatment by distilling will not exceed 3 kilowatt-hour/m{sup 3}, which is comparable with the reverse-osmosis desalination method. Besides, the proposed devices are 4 to 5 times less metal-intensive than standard evaporation units. These devices are also characterized by versatility. Experiments have revealed that the new method can be used for evaporation of practically any types of LRW, including those containing a considerable amount of oil products. Owing to arrangement of the evaporation process at low temperatures, the new devices are not sensitive to 'scale formation'. This is why, they can be used for concentrating brines of up to 500-600 g/l. New types of such evaporating devices can be required both for LRW treatment processes at nuclear-power plants under design and for treating 'non-standard' LRW with complex physicochemical and radionuclide composition resulting from the disaster at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant.) As a result of accidents at nuclear energy objects, as it has recently happened at NPP 'Fukushima-1', personnel faces the necessity to take emergency measures and to use marine water for cooling of reactor zone in contravention of the technological regulations. In these cases significant amount of liquid radioactive wastes of complex physicochemical composition is being generated, the purification of which by traditional methods is close to impossible. According to the practice of elimination of the accident after-effects at NPP 'Fukushima' there are still no technical means for the efficient purification of liquid radioactive wastes of complex composition like marine water from radionuclides. Therefore development of state-of-the-art highly efficient facilities capable of fast and safe purification of big amounts of liquid radioactive wastes of complex physicochemical composition from radionuclides turns to be utterly topical problem. Cesium radionuclides, being extremely dangerous for the environment, present over 90% of total radioactivity contained in liquid radioactive wastes left as a result of accidents at nuclear power objects. For the purpose of radiation accidents aftereffects liquidation VNIIHT proposes to create a plant for LRW reprocessing, consisting of 4 major technological modules: Module of LRW pretreatment to remove mechanical and organic impurities including oil products; Module of sorption purification of LWR by means of selective inorganic sorbents; Module of reverse osmotic purification and desalination; Module of deep evaporation of LRW concentrates. The first free modules are based on completed technological and designing concepts implemented by VNIIHT in the framework of LLRW Project in the period of 2000-2001 in Russia for comprehensive treatment of LWR of atomic fleet. These industrial plants proved to be highly efficient and secure during their long operation life. Module of deep evaporation is a new technological development. It will ensure conduction of evaporation and purification of LRW of different physicochemical composition, including those containing hardness salts, resulted in generation of LRW concentrate 300-600 g/l. The method is based on utilization of supersonic ejector for intensification of thermal physic processes and performance of evaporation in brine recycling mode. All proposed technological solutions are totally based on patented Russian developments. Proposed work will allow to construct modular plants, which will be totally prepared for efficient purification of any types of liquid radioactive wastes from radionuclides in case of force majeure. According to proposed scheme concentration level of cesium radionuclides in safe-for-storage form will make up not less than 5000. With respect to purification from cesium radionuclides of liquid radioactive wastes stored at NPP 'Fukushima' about 10 t of inorganic sorbents, loaded in 160 protective filter-containers, will be required for solving this problem. The amount of secondary wastes will be reduced approximately in 5 times in comparison with traditional schemes, applied in purification of secondary LRW of Fukushima-1 by Areva (France) and Kurion (USA) companies. All units of modular plants will be constructed and manufactured as totally automated, providing their twenty-four-hour safe operation. Modular design will ensure efficiency and let optimize the costs of secondary LRW treatment. In order to ensure off-line operation in emergency conditions the plant should be equipped with auxiliary modules: energy and ventilation ones. Under normal conditions these modules can be stored in 'mothballed' condition at special warehouses under the authority of federal bodies. It will be reasonable to choose required transport facilities, the most suitable for transportation of modules to target destination beforehand, using vessel classification list.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Improving Efficiency of DWPF Operations via Automating Process Calculations and Vitrifying High-Curie Feed- 24529

The Liquid Waste Organization (LWO) at the Savannah River Site (SRS) uses a “Power As One®” motto to process and dispose of radioactive waste. The Defense Waste and Processing Facility (DWPF) treats the high-level waste through a process of vitrification. The DWPF receives three incoming waste streams that are added to the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT): sludge, Monosodium Titanate/Sludge Solids (MST/SS), and Strip Effluent (SE). The liquid waste is mixed with pre-fabricated frit and treated with high temperatures in the melter prior to being poured into stainless steel canisters. The liquid cools to form solid glass within these canisters that are suitable for long-term storage and disposal. Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC), the SRS liquid waste contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy, has implemented several facility improvements to further enhance the operations to support the Liquid Waste Operation (LWO) mission. Two of these operational enhancements include implementing the electronic Material Tracking Program Calculator (eMTPC)software and increasing the DWPF canister heat rate limit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Low Temperature Waste Form for Supplemental Immobilization of Hanford Low Activity Waste - 17485

The Hanford site has approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste stored in 177 underground storage tanks. The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is being constructed to treat the waste but will only have sufficient capacity to treat about one-third of the Low Activity Waste (LAW) portion within the anticipated time-frame for completing the waste treatment mission. The LAW vitrification facility will need to be supplemented with additional LAW vitrification capacity or an alternate LAW immobilization technology. The LAW immobilization technologies considered must be capable of treating approximately 65% of Hanford's LAW and will be evaluated with respect to facilities required, quantity of final waste forms and secondary wastes produced, waste form performance data, technical viability, and life cycle cost and schedule estimates. A low temperature (i.e. non-thermal) waste form and treatment process is being evaluated to provide the additional LAW immobilization capacity. Low temperature, cementitious waste forms have been evaluated previously for immobilizing Hanford tank waste but were not further developed for various reasons. Over the past few years the Hanford Tank Operations Contractor has conducted a technology development program to evaluate a low temperature waste form for immobilization of Hanford LAW including formulation development and testing with a range of simulant compositions spiked with radioactive and hazardous contaminants of concern (COCs). The objectives of this program include; developing a low temperature waste form formulation that is robust with respect to both waste form performance and processing properties over a range of LAW compositions, demonstrating waste form performance with real waste, and conducting Engineering Scale testing to advance the technical maturity of the low temperature immobilization process. The purpose of this paper is to report progress toward these objectives, in particular testing with real waste including additives to enhance technetium and iodine retention. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Testing of High S Matrix Glasses to Expand DFHLW Glass Compositional Ranges (Rev.1)

Gaps in glass composition-property data for direct-feed high-level waste (DFHLW) have recently been identified. One such gap is the region of high sulfur solubility since previous, pretreated, high-level wastes contained very little sulfur. Filling this data gap will significantly broaden the range of process flowsheet options including minimal washing and will allow for optimized waste loading in DFHLW glasses. This report summarizes the data collected during the characterization of the DFHLW High S Glass Matrix (HS24). A glass matrix of 50 glass compositions was developed to evenly cover the DFHLW composition region for high sulfur glass. Matrix glasses were designed to expand the composition region outside the current component concentration and property limits so as to reduce uncertainties at the limits. The 50 matrix glasses were fabricated and tested for properties important to the success of DFHLW vitrification including: compositions, canister centerline cooling (CCC) crystallinity and isothermal crystallinity, density, viscosity, electrical conductivity (EC), product consistency test (PCT) response, toxicity, and sulfate solubility. Melter materials corrosion testing is reported elsewhere. These glasses were intentionally designed to have high SO 3 solubilities (0.7 to 2.2 SO 3 wt%) in compositional regions that had not been previously explored. Forty-eight glasses showed the measured SO 3 content retained >80% of the target SO 3 and the densities of all the glasses ranged from 2.49 g·cm -3 to 2.74 g·cm -3 . While the model predicted nepheline formation in 5 glasses, one of the tested 50 CCC glasses formed nepheline, and 35 glasses formed Cr-containing phases such as spinels and eskolaite. Only five glasses were amorphous after CCC treatment where 44 glasses with detectable crystals contained =10 wt% crystals and only one glass had > 10 wt% crystals. None of the glasses exceeded the allowable T 2% for spinel crystal formation at 950 ºC (i.e., no glasses had >2 wt% spinel at 950 ºC) during isothermal crystal fraction tests where 10 glasses showed no crystalline phases at or below 950 ºC. All the glasses (except one which failed being slightly lower than the target) satisfied the SO 3 constraint while 98 glasses did not meet the viscosity constraints and 4 failed the EC constraints. Six quenched (Q) and six CCC glasses failed the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Environmental Assessment (EA) glass PCT threshold and 3 Q and 4 CCC failed the PCT design constraint. One glass exceeded the WTP delisting limits for Cr via EPA Method 1311 (i.e., Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, TCLP). It should be emphasized that some of these glasses were specifically designed to approach or even exceed certain property constraints, as filling data gaps in these regions will provide the greatest benefit for future model development by improving accuracy and reducing uncertainties. These insights will ultimately support the development of more robust glass formulation strategies, enabling higher waste loading, reducing operational risks, and expanding the processing envelope.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Impact of gel concentration on filter fluxes in microfiltration of Hanford tank wastes and simulants

Abstract Treatment processes have been proposed that will utilize crossflow filtration to concentrate sludge waste streams at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. Challenges associated with solid–liquid separation of the waste streams drive a necessary evaluation of available Hanford high level waste (HLW) filtration data. Limiting flux conditions during crossflow filtration are elucidated with the formation of a cake layer on the membrane surface. A mass transfer coefficient between the gel and bulk concentrations plays a critical role in determining filter flux. A correlation between the gel concentration and mass transfer coefficient is made to assist in determining filter performance of select HLW streams. As a process alternative to crossflow filtration, gravity settling of waste streams may be deployed as a solid–liquid separation technique. However, this results in a contrasting performance with the centrifuged solids concentration. A method was developed to estimate expected filtration and settling performance based on physical characterization data for Hanford tank waste samples. By assessing the estimated processing performance of HLW, technical support can be provided during flowsheet planning.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Connecting particle interactions to agglomerate morphology and rheology of boehmite nanocrystal suspensions

Rheology imposes significant challenges on processing of complex suspensions such as nuclear waste slurries at the Hanford and Savannah River sites. Understanding rheology connecting to microstructures and underlying particle interactions in complex slurries is therefore important for both fundamental knowledge and practical applications. Here, we use suspensions of aluminum oxyhydroxide minerals in the form of boehmite as an analog of the radioactive waste slurry to gain physical insights on the correlation between particle interactions, microstructures, and slurry rheology. Specifically, we use a combination of Couette rheometry and small-angle scattering techniques (independently and simultaneously) to understand how the slurry microstructure changes under flow and how these structural changes manifest themselves in the bulk rheology of the suspensions. Our experiments show that the boehmite slurries are thixotropic, with the rheology and structure of the suspensions changing with increasing exposure to flow. In the slurries, particle aggregates begin as loose, system-spanning clusters, but exposure to moderate shear rates causes the aggregates to irreversibly consolidate into denser clusters of finite size. The microstructural changes directly influence the rheological properties of the slurries such as viscosity and viscoelasticity. More importantly, our study shows that solution pH affects the amount of structural rearrangement and the kinetics of the rearrangement process, with an increase in pH leading to faster and more dramatic changes in the bulk rheology. Such dynamic microstructural changes and resultant rheology are understood via correlations between particle interactions and strength of particle network, coupled with surface chemistry and anisotropic nature of particle interactions. Nearly identical structural changes are also observed in Poiseuille flow geometries, implying that the observed changes are relevant in the pipe flow conditions present during waste processing.

Weston, Javen S.↗

DEM and MELT: A Modular and Compact In-Can Melting Technology Dedicated to D and D and Remediation Waste - 20033

The DEM and MELT In-Can vitrification process is designed to process intermediate and high level waste coming for D and D and remediation operations. It is developed to treat liquid and solid waste, to produce a small amount of secondary waste and to minimize investment and operating costs. This In-Can vitrification process is also developed with a compact and modular design and can be adapted regarding nuclear operators' needs and requirements. Furthermore, this robust and simple process is flexible enough to accommodate most uncertainties on waste composition. The DEM and MELT process is developed through the French consortium coordinated by CEA which gathers Orano, ECM technologies and Andra. In the frame of this project, Orano has designed a compact and modular layout of the process allowing an efficient in situ implementation, close to the waste to be treated. This paper presents the compact and modular design of the DEM and MELT process and the way it can be used for a short duration, as a decommissioning tool aimed to be dismantled just after the treatment operation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Pilot Scale Testing of the Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic Separation Process to Produce Value-Added Products from Waste Coal

The primary objective of this project was to demonstrate the technical and economic feasibility of using the hydrophobic-hydrophilic separation (HHS) process to produce high-purity, value-added clean coal that could serve as feedstock for specialty carbon products from waste coal. An existing one-skid (i.e., the entire unit fits on a single tractor-trailer) HHS pilot-scale facility was used to process bituminous and anthracite waste coals to produce: 1) a clean coal containing less than 5% ash (super-clean) and 2) another containing less than 1.5% ash (ultra-clean), all of which contain single-digit moistures. Sufficient quantities of these products were to be generated to permit detailed evaluations by potential customers producing or developing new, high-value market applications. In addition, the project included the evaluation of several process improvements to reduce the capital and operating costs for a commercial HHS plant. A final objective was to complete an economic analysis, market-penetration analysis, and technology-gap analysis of the HHS technology and its products.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

WASTE TREATMENT PLANT (WTP) LIQUID EFFLUENT TREATABILITY EVALUATION (SEPTEMBER 2004)

A forecast of the radioactive, dangerous liquid effluents expected to be produced by the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) was provided by Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI 2004). The forecast represents the liquid effluents generated from the processing of Tank Farm waste through the end-of-mission for the WTP. The WTP forecast is provided in the Appendices. The WTP liquid effluents will be stored, treated, and disposed of in the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) and the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). Both facilities are located in the 200 East Area and are operated by Fluor Hanford, Inc. (FH) for the US. Department of Energy (DOE). The treatability of the WTP liquid effluents in the LERF/ETF was evaluated. The evaluation was conducted by comparing the forecast to the LERF/ETF treatability envelope (Aromi 1997), which provides information on the items which determine if a liquid effluent is acceptable for receipt and treatment at the LERF/ETF. The format of the evaluation corresponds directly to the outline of the treatability envelope document. Except where noted, the maximum annual average concentrations over the range of the 27 year forecast was evaluated against the treatability envelope. This is an acceptable approach because the volume capacity in the LERF Basin will equalize the minimum and maximum peaks. Background information on the LERF/ETF design basis is provided in the treatability envelope document.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Closed Fuel Cycle Waste Treatment Strategy

This study is aimed at evaluating the existing waste management approaches for nuclear fuel cycle facilities in comparison to the objectives of implementing an advanced fuel cycle in the U.S. under current legal, regulatory, and logistical constructs. The study begins with the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Integrated Waste Management Strategy (IWMS) (Gombert et al. 2008) as a general strategy and associated Waste Treatment Baseline Study (WTBS) (Gombert et al. 2007). The tenets of the IWMS are equally valid to the current waste management study. However, the flowsheet details have changed significantly from those considered under GNEP. In addition, significant additional waste management technology development has occurred since the GNEP waste management studies were performed. This study updates the information found in the WTBS, summarizes the results of more recent technology development efforts, and describes waste management approaches as they apply to a representative full recycle reprocessing flowsheet. Many of the waste management technologies discussed also apply to other potential flowsheets that involve reprocessing. These applications are occasionally discussed where the data are more readily available. The report summarizes the waste arising from aqueous reprocessing of a typical light-water reactor (LWR) fuel to separate actinides for use in fabricating metal sodium fast reactor (SFR) fuel and from electrochemical reprocessing of the metal SFR fuel to separate actinides for recycle back into the SFR in the form of metal fuel. The primary streams considered and the recommended waste forms include; Tritium in low-water cement in high integrity containers (HICs); Iodine-129: As a reference case, a glass composite material (GCM) formed by the encapsulation of the silver Mordenite (AgZ) getter material in a low-temperature glass is assumed. A number of alternatives with distinct advantages are also considered including a fused silica waste form with encapsulated nano-sized AgI crystals; Carbon-14 immobilized as a CaCO3 in a cement waste form; Krypton-85 stored as a compressed gas; An aqueous reprocessing high-level waste (HLW) raffinate waste immobilized by the vitrification process; An undissolved solids (UDS) fraction from aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel either included in the borosilicate HLW glass or immobilized in the form of a metal alloy or titanate ceramics; Zirconium-based LWR fuel cladding hulls and stainless steel (SS) fuel assembly hardware super-compacted for disposal or purified for reuse (or disposal as low-level waste, LLW) of Zr by reactive gas separations; Electrochemical process salt HLW incorporated into a glass bonded Sodalite waste form; and Electrochemical process UDS and SS cladding hulls melted into an iron based alloy waste form. Mass and volume estimates for each of the recommended waste forms based on the source terms from a representative flowsheet are reported. In addition to the above listed primary waste streams, a range of secondary process wastes are generated by aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel, metal SFR fuel fabrication, and electrochemical reprocessing of SFR fuel. These secondary wastes have been summarized and volumes estimated by type and classification. The important waste management data gaps and research needs have been summarized for each primary waste stream and selected waste process.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗