Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Accident Analysis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Preliminary Design of Engineering-Scale Salt Accident Analysis Facility to Support Molten Salt Reactor Licensing

Systems-level nuclear accident analysis codes for reactor licensing must be validated using experimental data that represent behaviors expected during actual full-scale accidents. Some behaviors may arise from coupled processes and only manifest at large scales. This report presents the preliminary design of the Salt Accident Analysis Facility (SAAF, pronounced “safe”), which is an experimental test facility to be constructed at Argonne that can be used to conduct integrated salt accident tests at an engineering scale. The measurement capabilities of the SAAF are based on previously developed methods and will provide the representative datasets that are needed to support molten salt reactor (MSR) licensing. Details of the design, the processes to be quantified, the measurement techniques for quantifying the processes, the variables that can be adjusted to simulate different accident scenarios, and operational considerations are presented herein. This report provides stakeholders the opportunity to give feedback on the test facility capabilities and planned analyses before it is constructed.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor: Accident Analysis

Types of Potential Accidents and Reactor Response Codes and Tools Experimental Validation Safety Analysis Approach Licensing Modernization Project Use of PRA in LMP, ASME/ANS, Non-LWR PRA Standard Methods for Incorporating Passive System Reliability into a PRA

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

LANL Accident Analysis and Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling [Slides]

After completion of this course, the analyst will: 1) Understand the differences between an unmitigated analysis and a mitigated analysis; 2) Know the key receptors that a radiological and hazardous chemical accident analysis must consider; 3) Understand how to calculate a radiological release source term and a toxic chemical release source term for various phenomenology; 4) Understand how to calculate a radiological and toxic chemical health insult to key receptors and compare to consequence thresholds; 5) understand the role of atmospheric dispersion in radiological and toxic consequence calculations; 6) understand atmospheric dispersion modeling and the inputs to and outputs from the MACCS/POSTMAX codes.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

LANL Accident Analysis and Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling [Slides]

After completion of this course, the analyst will understand the differences between an unmitigated analysis and a mitigated analysis. After completion of this course, the analyst will know the key receptors that a radiological and hazardous chemical accident analysis must consider. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand how to calculate a radiological release source term and a toxic chemical release source term for various phenomenology. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand how to calculate a radiological and toxic chemical health insult to key receptors and compare to consequence thresholds. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand the role of atmospheric dispersion in radiological and toxic consequence calculations. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand atmospheric dispersion modeling and the inputs to and outputs from the MACCS/POSTMAX codes.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
DOE OSTI2022

SCALE Analysis of a Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor in Support of Severe Accident Analysis

As part of a US Nuclear Regulatory Commission–sponsored project to assess the modeling and simulation capabilities for accident progression, source term, and consequence analysis for advanced reactor technologies with SCALE and MELCOR, SCALE was used for the modeling and simulation of a fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR). Based on the preconceptual design for a small modular 236 MWth FHR developed by the University of California, Berkeley (PB-FHR-Mk1), a SCALE model of the PB-FHR-Mk1 reactor core was developed. The reactor was modeled at equilibrium state with different fuel compositions in different regions of the reactor. An iterative approach was used to interpolate and mix the burnup-dependent fuel compositions obtained through the depletion calculation of a core slice model. After demonstrating the applicability of SCALE’s multigroup (MG) approach for the simulation of the PB-FHR-Mk1, the resulting equilibrium core was studied in terms of the power profile, the flux profile, temperature reactivity coefficients, and the xenon reactivity. Furthermore, the tritium production rate in the salt coolant was determined, and the dependence of the one-group cross sections on the burnup and location in the reactor core was studied. The results obtained with SCALE were post-processed to provide the MELCOR team with the core inventory and decay heat of the equilibrium core, a zone-wise power profile, temperature feedback coefficients, the tritium production rate, and the xenon worth.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2020

KRUSTY Experiment: Reactivity Insertion Accident Analysis

The centerpiece of the Kilopower Project, i.e., the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY) test, consists of the development and testing of a ground technology demonstration of a small fission power system based on a 1-kW(electric) space science power requirement. The KRUSTY test was authorized by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office. Authorization was obtained by adding an amendment to the existing regulatory documents for the National Criticality Experiments Research Center to cover the KRUSTY experiment. This amendment was reviewed and approved by the DOE. The most important safety question for the experiment was the addition of over 2 $ of excess reactivity to the reactor system. This amount of excess reactivity meant that the analyst could postulate accidents where the reactor went prompt critical, leading to physical shock or melting of the fuel. This paper analyzes these accidents using computer calculations and examines the controls used to mitigate them. The estimation of the impacts both on accident progression and consequences of reactivity insertion events was a significant part of obtaining approval for the KRUSTY experiment. The regulatory approval of KRUSTY was one of the first to be obtained for a completely new reactor concept in many decades.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Temperature sensitivity of the equilibrium neutronics and accident analysis of the HTR-10

Pebble-Bed High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (PB-HTGR) are moderated by the graphite in the fuel pebbles and the graphite reflector surrounding the pebble-bed. Because graphite is by far the most abundant material in PB-HTGRs and the primary moderator, accurate modeling of the graphite material, including density, impurities, and temperatures, is crucial for accurate computational modeling and simulation of these reactors. While main characteristics of the graphite components are often known, the local temperature is less well known and often averaged over all components. Here, this work studies the impact of considering accurate temperature profiles in the graphite material on the generation of a small PB-HTGR model at the state of equilibrium operation and on short-term accident progression. The fuel compositions for the PB-HTGR were determined using a jump-in equilibrium modeling method, the Axial Radial Zone Equilibrium Modeling (AR-ZEM) method. In contrast to previous work, the AR-ZEM method was used considering thermal-hydraulic feedback from the MELCOR code to determine temperatures of the fuel pebbles and the surrounding graphite reflector. The consideration of an axial and radial temperature profile in the core and reflector, as opposed to uniform material temperatures, had an impact of almost 1,300 pcm on the equilibrium core eigenvalue and caused significant differences in the discharged plutonium fuel inventory with up to 4.9% and 11.0% for Pu-239 and Pu-242, respectively. To assess the impact on short-term accident progression, two Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM (ATWS) events, a Pressurized Loss of Forced Coolant (PLOFC) and a Control Rod Withdrawal (CRW) with loss of flow, were simulated with MELCOR. The use of temperature profiles in the equilibrium core models did not reveal a significant impact on the temperature, power, or reactivity responses during the transients. In conclusion, a need for consideration of accurate temperature profiles, in particular for the graphite reflector, was found for the generation of equilibrium PB-HTGRs core models using jump-in methods, but detailed temperature profiles may not be necessary when performing conservative transient analysis.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis of a High-Burnup Pressurized Water Reactor Core Design Using Gadolinia-Doped UO 2

High-burnup and extended enrichment fuels are of interest for extending the cycle lengths of pressurized water reactors from 18 to 24 months. Changes to the fuel design and core loading scheme have potentially significant safety implications due to power distribution effects, reduced thermal conductivity, and/or increased plenum pressures due to additional burnable poison loadings. Additionally, higher burnups result in increased material degradation and risk of fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal (FFRD). A representative 24-month core design using gadolinia-doped UO 2 was analyzed for performance under large-break (LB) loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) conditions using PARCS, RELAP5-3D, and BISON. Furthermore, all considered acceptance criteria were met, with no cases exceeding the 1477 K maximum cladding temperature or the post-quench ductility oxidation limit of 17% equivalent cladding reacted. Full-core FFRD susceptibility was estimated to be approximately 455 kg, though high uncertainties exist with current approaches for computing susceptibility. Undoped fuel rods are more likely to be limiting due to higher linear heat rates. Relatively high burnup and linear heat rate rods located in second batch assemblies are of greatest safety significance during LB LOCA for this high-burnup core design.

High burnup↗
DOE OSTI2021

Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor: Accident Analysis

Licensing Modernization Project (LMP) Risk Informed Approach Selection of Licensing Basis Events (LBEs) Frequency-Consequence Target LBE Cumulative Risk Targets Structures, Systems, and Components (SSC) Safety Categories Classification Evaluation of Defense in Depth (DID) Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) in LMP Process PRA Policy Statement American Nuclear Society (ANS) Non-Light-Water Reactor (non-LWR) PRA Standard

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Default Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Management (RHWM) Dose Conversion Factors (DCFs) and Weighting Factors and plutonium-239 equivalent Curie (PE-Ci) methodology for acceptance into the Waste Storage Facilities

DOE-STD-5506-2007 (Ref. 1) is the standard that provides the methodology for preparing hazard analysis and accident analysis for transuranic (TRU) waste facilities. The Waste Storage Facilities hazard and accident analysis for the DSA is developed in accordance with DOE-STD- 5506-2007. Two related issues need to be addressed when implementing DOE-STD-5506-2007 regarding the calculation of consequences from TRU waste releases in accident analysis: Consequences determined in accident analysis must be modeled using inhalation Dose Conversion Factors (DCFs) that are consistent with those from the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 72 (ICRP-72, Ref. 2).; The use of a statistical Material at Risk (MAR) representing the distribution of radiological loading of TRU waste containers based on the use of a plutonium-239 equivalent Curie (PE-Ci) methodology. The PE-Ci methodology simplifies accident analysis by allowing one to model releases based on the Curie value of one standard nuclide (e.g., Pu-239) instead of needing to model releases for every potential nuclide of interest. This is accomplished by normalizing the Curie value of all nuclides to a single Curie value of a standard nuclide by using a Weighting Factor that is a ratio of the DCFs associated with the nuclides and that of the standard nuclide. By using the ICRP-72 DCFs to calculate PE-Ci values used in the statistical MAR, the accident analysis that uses that statistical MAR will be consistent with the consequence methodology identified in DOE-STD- 5506-2007.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Cr-coated Accident Tolerant Fuel Concept Source Term Accident Sequence Analysis - High Burnup Fuel Source Term Accident Sequence Analysis Supplement

To extend NUREG-1465 and high burnup fuel source term (SAND2023-01313) recommendations, representative radiological releases to containment – patterned after NUREG-1465 – have been evaluated for LWRs utilizing the chromium-coating on major zircaloy structures (cladding and fuel canisters) and high burnup fuel with enrichments of 8% and 10% for PWRs and BWRs, respectively. Representative radionuclide releases are generated for this accident tolerant fuel concept by applying non-parametric bootstrap methods to MELCOR simulation results. Accident scenarios considered in this analysis include principle contributors to historical core damage frequency estimates for a range of nuclear reactor technologies representative of the operating U.S.A. fleet of nuclear reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Iron-Chromium-Aluminum Accident Tolerant Fuel Concept Source Term Accident Sequence Analysis - High Burnup Fuel Source Term Accident Sequence Analysis Supplement

To extend NUREG-1465 and high burnup fuel source term (SAND2023-01313) recommendations, representative radiological releases to containment – patterned after NUREG-1465 – have been evaluated for LWRs utilizing iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) alloys in place of zirconium-based alloys in major core structures (cladding and fuel canisters) and high burnup fuel with enrichments of 8% and 10% for PWRs and BWRs, respectively. Representative radionuclide releases are generated for this accident tolerant fuel concept by applying non-parametric bootstrap methods to MELCOR simulation results. Accident scenarios considered in this analysis include principle contributors to historical core damage frequency estimates for a range of nuclear reactor technologies representative of the operating U.S.A. fleet of nuclear reactors.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Safety Benefits Assessment for Accident Tolerant Fuels in Consideration of Steam Generator Tube Degradation Using Dynamic Event Tree Analysis

Accident tolerant fuel (ATF) is expected to delay or prevent core damage by providing additional coping time under accidents involving loss of core cooling. The effect of extended coping time may vary depending on the plant response to accidents. Age-related component degradation that deteriorates plant performance over time could have an impact on the actual advantages of ATF. The potential safety benefits of two near-term ATF candidates, including Cr-coated Zr cladding and FeCrAl cladding, are assessed for a 2-in. loss-of-coolant accident with failed high-pressure safety injection using the dynamic event tree (DET) approach considering possible stress corrosion cracking of steam generator (SG) tubing under aging. The DET approach allows likelihood quantification of accident sequences leading to core damage, including stochastic variation of system response and human actions during accident mitigation. The safety benefits of the selected ATF claddings in terms of additional coping time and the core damage frequency reduction rate under specified accident situations were quantitatively estimated. The results show that the deployment of the two selected ATF claddings is expected to lead to longer coping times and lower core damage frequency due to the wider safety margin to peak cladding temperature they provide. The safety advantages would be greater as SG tube degradation proceeds. Thus, the two ATF candidates would lead to less severe consequences in terms of likelihood of core damage and susceptibility to the SG tube degradation than UO 2 -Zr fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

MARVEL 90% Final Design Report

This document provides documentation of the Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation Project’s (MARVEL) 90% Final Design, as required by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Standard-1189, “Integration of Safety into the Design Process." Per DOE-STD-1189-2016, the 90% Final Design documentation focuses on design completion, at a level capable of supporting procurement, construction, testing, and operation. At this phase, the design organization finalizes the hazards and accident analyses, Fire Hazard Analysis (FHA), security vulnerability assessments, and other supporting analyses for design completion. The objective of this report is to provide a high-level summary of the design thus far and provide references including, but not limited to, the following design deliverables: • Complete final drawings, specifications and commercial grade dedications that may be released for bid and/or construction. • Clearly defined testing plans for the safety and functionality of all subsystems. • Quality Assurance Program for Design, Testing and Procurement. • Software Quality Assurance Plan. • Code of Record (COR), applicable design requirements including codes and standards. • Final design that meets all the requirements stipulated in the COR. • Final design review, consisting of final validation of comment resolution from previous reviews, and a review of any additional developments since the last review. • Updated Safety Design Strategy. • Hazard Analysis. • Fire Hazard Analysis. • Accident analysis. • Security vulnerability assessment. • Current and detailed cost estimate. • Current construction schedule, and • Risk & Opportunities Assessment.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

High Level Gap Analysis for Accident Tolerant and Advanced Fuels for Storage and Transportation

This initial gap analysis considers proposed accident tolerant fuel (ATF) options currently being irradiated in commercial reactors, since these are most likely for future batch implementation. Also, advanced fuel (AF) options that may be likely for use in advanced reactors are considered. The cladding technologies considered were chromium-coated zirconium-based alloys, FeCrAl, and both monolithic and matrix composite Silicide carbide (SiC). The fuel technologies considered were chromium-doped uranium dioxide fuel, uranium alloys, uranium nitride, and uranium silicide. Numerous national labs, industry, and countries are performing significant testing and modeling on these proposed technologies to establish performance, but at this time none of the prototypes being irradiated have achieved end-of-life (EOL) burnup. There are some testing results after one burnup cycle to verify in-reactor performance, but little data beyond that. As the ATF prototypes acquire more burnup, data will be produced that is relevant to storage and transportation. The DOE:NE Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology (SWFST) Storage and Transportation (ST) Control Account will evaluate the performance data as it becomes available for application to the identified gaps for ST.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗