Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Additive Manufacturing (AM)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Freeform thermoelectrics in single-step manufacturing: additive manufacturing of bismuth-telluride thermoelectrics

The project succeeded in producing crack-free Bismuth Telluride thermoelectric parts with density exceeding 98% through laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing (AM). This greatly exceeded the highest previously reported density of 88% and is the highest among all semiconducting materials processed by LPBF. The additively manufactured material shows comparable Seebeck coefficient as conventional form and can be made into complex geometries with reduced material loss. On the other hand, measured properties are dramatically sensitive to the AM process parameters used, such that with identical composition, the Seebeck coefficient can be controllably tuned from +120 µV/K to -207 µV/K, which means the material switches between an n-type to a p-type semiconductor depending on processing. These changes are accompanied by significant differences in the as-processed microstructure due to rapid solidification. A machine learning protocol was developed and greatly reduced the experimental burden of the project, reducing the typical process optimization period of 2 years to 6 months. The project was fully successful in the objective of producing defect-free, complex geometry of bismuth-telluride parts through LPBF, but only partially successful in achieving performance goals. First, cost reduction of manufacturing, as measured by material waste, was successfully reduced by up to 70% compared to conventional manufacturing methods. This exceeded the proposed 30% reduction in materials waste needed to reach the 20% cost reduction goal of the project. On the other hand, the device performance, as measured by Seebeck coefficient, failed to reach the 40% improvement in efficiency. Rather, we observe comparable Seebeck coefficient between AM samples and conventionally processed counterparts. The device-level efficiency improvement does exceed 40% for complex geometry samples due to shape-induced increase in temperature gradients, but this was not the originally proposed metric. The machine learning approach developed in this project greatly accelerated the process optimization and can be adopted for fast development of AM processing parameters for other brittle and otherwise difficult-to-print materials. For the public, we deliver an efficient and widely adoptable process for incorporating waste-heat harvesting thermoelectric devices in both industrial and commercial heat exchangers. The geometric flexibility allows the capturing device to conform to the shape of the heat source to improve the system-level conversion efficiency. The technique can be deployed on any commercial LBPF systems with zero modifications, thus poses minimal adoption barrier for any manufacturer that already employed AM technology. Beyond bismuth-telluride, the machine-learning guided optimization protocol can be used in the future to reduce both the time and cost of process development for AM of other energy conversion and harvesting materials.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Monitoring system for the quality assessment in additive manufacturing

Additive Manufacturing (AM) refers to a process by which a set of digital data -representing a certain complex 3dim design - is used to grow the respective 3dim real structure equal to the corresponding design. For the powder-based EOS manufacturing process a variety of plastic and metal materials can be used. Thereby, AM is in many aspects a very powerful tool as it can help to overcome particular limitations in conventional manufacturing. AM enables more freedom of design, complex, hollow and/or lightweight structures as well as product individualisation and functional integration. As such it is a promising approach with respect to the future design and manufacturing of complex 3dim structures. On the other hand, it certainly calls for new methods and standards in view of quality assessment. In particular, when utilizing AM for the design of complex parts used in aviation and aerospace technologies, appropriate monitoring systems are mandatory. In this respect, recently, sustainable progress has been accomplished by joining the common efforts and concerns of a manufacturer Additive Manufacturing systems and respective materials (EOS), along with those of an operator of such systems (MTU Aero Engines) and experienced application engineers (Carl Metrology), using decent know how in the field of optical and infrared methods regarding non-destructive-examination (NDE). The newly developed technology is best described by a high-resolution layer by layer inspection technique, which allows for a 3D tomography-analysis of the complex part at any time during the manufacturing process. Thereby, inspection costs are kept rather low by using smart image-processing methods as well as CMOS sensors instead of infrared detectors. Moreover, results from conventional physical metallurgy may easily be correlated with the predictive results of the monitoring system which not only allows for improvements of the AM monitoring system, but finally leads to an optimisation of the quality and insurance of material security of the complex structure being manufactured. Both, our poster and our oral presentation will explain the data flow between the above mentioned parties involved. A suitable monitoring system for Additive Manufacturing will be introduced, along with a presentation of the respective high resolution data acquisition, as well as the image processing and the data analysis allowing for a precise control of the 3dim growth-process.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Multiscale and Machine Learning Modeling for Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques provide the opportunity to simultaneously design new materials and components with complex structures in less time, enabling faster material developments. Even though compositionally similar, the texture of the materials produced by such techniques is significantly different from conventionally manufactured materials. Additively manufactured materials produces highly heterogeneous microstructure within a single build. Such variations in the microstructure make qualifying AM products challenging for extreme environment applications. Understanding the AM process and its influence on the materials’ microstructures/properties is paramount for evaluating the workability and performance of the manufactured materials. The performance of AM materials for advanced nuclear reactor applications is of interest to the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (AMMT) program under the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy. Hence, considering the microstructural variabilities in the AM products and their impact on the performance of the material, it is important to correlate the process conditions to the final product and establish a process-structure-property- performance (PSPP) correlation for AM materials.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Strong yet ductile nanolamellar high-entropy alloys by additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing produces net-shaped components layer by layer for engineering applications. The additive manufacture of metal alloys by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) involves large temperature gradients and rapid cooling, which enables microstructural refinement at the nanoscale to achieve high strength. However, high-strength nanostructured alloys produced by laser additive manufacturing often have limited ductility. In this work, we use L-PBF to print dual-phase nanolamellar high-entropy alloys (HEAs) of AlCoCrFeNi 2.1 that exhibit a combination of a high yield strength of about 1.3 gigapascals and a large uniform elongation of about 14 percent, which surpasses those of other state-of-the-art additively manufactured metal alloys. The high yield strength stems from the strong strengthening effects of the dual-phase structures that consist of alternating face-centred cubic and body-centred cubic nanolamellae; the body-centred cubic nanolamellae exhibit higher strengths and higher hardening rates than the face-centred cubic nanolamellae. The large tensile ductility arises owing to the high work-hardening capability of the as-printed hierarchical microstructures in the form of dual-phase nanolamellae embedded in microscale eutectic colonies, which have nearly random orientations to promote isotropic mechanical properties. The mechanistic insights into the deformation behaviour of additively manufactured HEAs have broad implications for the development of hierarchical, dual- and multi-phase, nanostructured alloys with exceptional mechanical properties.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Optimization of Rocket Engine Components using Multi-Metallic Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM) is advancing many applications of component design for liquid rocket engines. AM has been demonstrated in various rocket component applications using a variety of monolithic metal alloys, many of which are traditional alloys for extreme environments. NASA and industry partners have focused in recent years to advance processing to create bimetallic and multicomponent AM processes and materials. The role of multi-metallic AM offers advantages since it can further optimize weight, optimize reliability and performance by increasing the strength to weight ratio of a component, and can optimize materials for various engineering requirements. NASA’s Rapid Analysis and Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT) project has designed and manufactured a series of additively manufactured (AM) coupled combustion chambers, nozzles, and other engine components to advance new AM processes and materials with the goal of reducing cost and schedule for engine manufacturing. These designs incorporated multimetallic AM, which further enabled carbon-fiber composite overwrap to reduce overall thrust chamber assembly (TCA) mass. Various AM processes were demonstrated on these components using a copper-based alloy/superalloy bimetallic solution. The AM processes being explored individually and in combination for bimetallic applications include Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF), Laser Powder Directed Energy Deposition (LP-DED), and cold spray. The combination of bimetallic material combinations explored in this research include GRCop-based alloys and superalloys, Inconel 625 or NASA HR-1. One unique development that will be presented is the combustion chamber and nozzle as a single component by using freeform integrated DED to build the nozzle directly onto the aft end of the chamber. The various aspects of the additive manufacturing processes and challenges, materials characterization and mechanical testing, and hot-fire testing of bimetallic components in a relevant rocket engine environment will be discussed.

Additive Manufacturing↗

LDRD 19A42-015, Multi-Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques can efficiently and cost-effectively fabricate components with both geometrical and compositional complexities, where functionally-graded compositions in a component allow multiple service requirements to be simultaneously addressed, such as corrosion and high temperature structural requirements. High cost alloy compositions need only be deposited in local areas where they are needed. A multi-wire arc additive manufacturing (m-WAAM) system was developed to enable functionally-graded, additively manufactured complex structures. The m-WAAM system utilizes multiple filler wire alloys, allowing control of composition and composition gradients in the component during additive fabrication. Ultimately, this project successfully developed a high deposition rate, arc-based, additive manufacturing process with the truly novel capability of enabling spatial composition tailoring during the build of the component. System capabilities and process science will be studied in a follow-on LDRD starting next year.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Process Modeling for Additive Manufacturing

Additive Manufacturing (AM) provides a new avenue to design innovative materials and components that cannot be created using traditional machining operations. With current AM capabilities, complex designs (such as those required in weapon systems) can be readily manufactured with laser powder forming (or Laser-Engineered Net Shaping (LENSTM)) [1] that would be otherwise cost prohibitive or impossible to produce. However, before an AM product can be qualified for weapon applications, the characteristics of the metals produced by additive manufacturing processes need to be well understood. This work focuses on the development of computational simulation tools to model the metal additive manufacturing process. This work extends and integrates existing Sandia National Laboratories tools to accomplish the following: (i) be able to better predict residual stresses in AM product, (ii) extend high-fidelity material models to capture material evolution during the formation process, leading to prediction of end-state material properties, and (iii) provide a basis for engineering tools to propose improvements to additive manufacturing process variables, including those that minimize process variation. While this work in its current state is directly applicable to additive manufacturing processes, the tools developed may also help enable modeling welding processes such as gas tungsten arc (GTA), electron beam, and laser welding.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Attention-based 3D – convolutional neural network model for mechanical property predictions using visible light images in metal additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM), while commonly used for rapid prototyping and creating components with complex geometries, has not been widely adopted for critical applications across the aerospace, automotive, defense, energy, and medical industries. This is, in part, due to the challenges of controlling flaws and uncertainty in the mechanical behavior of additively manufactured components. In recent years, there has been an increase in research aimed at predicting the final mechanical properties of additively manufactured components during the printing process. To address these issues, a 3D-CNN model was trained using low-cost in situ visible-light camera data, anomaly classifications, and the chosen process parameters to predict the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), total elongation (TE), and uniform elongation (UE). The 3D-CNN layers of the model employed attention mechanisms to prioritize features in the data, thereby improving prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the effect of each process parameter and anomaly class is investigated using attention-based dynamic sigmoid weighted gates to interpret the influence each class has on the final prediction. Different combinations of the in situ data were fed into the 3D-CNN, with varying amounts of image layers, to determine the ideal combination for predicting mechanical properties in situ. Here, the 3D-CNN model achieved mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) below 5% for both UTS and YS while using only a single camera input and under half of the available image layers.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

On the existence of orthorhombic martensite in a near-α titanium base alloy used for additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing is a state-of-the-art production technology to produce tailor-made and highly complex parts. Among various other alloys, Ti base alloys are frequently used in this manufacturing technique due to their well-balanced properties and their wide range of applications. Allotropic phases and the occurrence of athermal phase transformations are the main reasons why these alloys hold a great development potential and are the basis of extensive use. High cooling rates during manufacturing lead to martensitic phases and the formation of nanometer-sized microstructures resulting in extraordinary strength. Simultaneously, such high cooling rates cause a high amount of lattice defects and the occurrence of residual stresses, which finally may result in delamination effects and cracks. Usually, a common approach to reduce residual stresses during additive manufacturing is to decrease thermal gradients by increasing the heat input or preheating the building platform. Instead of applying the typical approaches to lower thermal gradients, this study deals with the origin of the ‘softer’ orthorhombic martensite by accelerating the solidification process. The implementation of the orthorhombic phase in bulk components was inspired by a new phase transformation herein reported for the first time in the powder material, which also validates the possible occurrence of two martensitic phases in the same alloy. Various sophisticated characterization techniques like high energy and high-temperature X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy as well as atom probe tomography were applied to characterize this softer orthorhombic martensitic phase in detail aiming to highlight the opportunities accompanied by this new approach for additive manufacturing of titanium alloys.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Advancing lightweight mirror design: a paradigm shift in mirror preforms by utilizing design for additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing is a disruptive technology that can be leveraged by the redesign of components in most engineering fields. Fundamental engineering resources for lightweight mirrors were developed more than 30 years ago with a main design limitation, state of the art manufacturing. In this study, we present two design methodologies for the design of lightweight mirrors. The first method utilizes analytical expressions to design a traditional isogrid mirror, which provided the foundation for most lightweight mirrors to date. The second method employs a combination of topology optimization, lattice infill, and analytical estimation to develop an advanced lightweight mirror designed for additive manufacturing. The advanced mirror design outperforms the traditional design for each functional requirement, including a 94% reduction in predicted surface quilting and a higher specific stiffness. The manufacturing of the advanced mirror is only possible with an additive manufacturing process.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Development of Functionally Graded Material Capabilities in Large-scale Extrusion Deposition Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing’s (AM) layer-by-layer nature is well-suited to the production of Functionally Graded Materials (FGM) with discrete material boundaries. Extrusion deposition is especially advantageous since multiple nozzles easily accommodate the inclusion of additional materials. However, discrete interfaces and sudden composition changes can limit the functionality of a printed part through inherently weak bonding. Furthermore, same-layer transitions are not only difficult to execute, but also further amplify structural weaknesses by creating multiple discrete interfaces. Therefore, successfully implementing a blended, continuous gradient will greatly advance the applicability of FGM in additive manufacturing. The pellet-fed nature and integrated screw design of the Big Area Additive Manufacturing system enables material mixing needed for development of this capability. Using constituent content analysis, this study evaluates the transition behavior of a neat ABS/CF-ABS material pair and characterizes the repeatability of the mixing and printing process, which ultimately leads to control of site-specific material deposition and properties.

Brackett, James↗

Designing for Big Area Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM), more commonly referred to as 3D printing, is revolutionizing the manufacturing industry. With any new technology comes new rules and guidelines for the optimal use of said technology. Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM), developed by Cincinnati Incorporated and Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Manufacturing Demonstration Facility, requires a host of new design parameters compared to small-scale 3D printing to create large-scale parts. However, BAAM also creates new possibilities in material testing and various applications in the manufacturing industry. Most of the design constraints of small-scale polymer 3D printers still apply to BAAM. Beyond those constraints, new rules and limitations exist because BAAM’s large-scale system significantly changes the thermal properties associated with small-scale AM. Here, this work details both physical and software-related design considerations for additive manufacturing. After reading this guide, one will have a better understanding of slicing software’s capabilities and limitations, different physical characteristics of design and how to apply them appropriately for AM, and how to take the inherent nature of AM into consideration during the design process.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Breaking Barriers in Polymer Additive Manufacturing

Additive Manufacturing (AM) enables the creation of complex structures directly from a computer-aided design (CAD). There are limitations that prevent the technology from realizing its full potential. AM has been criticized for being slow and expensive with limited build size. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has developed a large scale AM system that improves upon each of these areas by more than an order of magnitude. The Big Area Additive Manufacturing (BAAM) system directly converts low cost pellets into a large, three-dimensional part at a rate exceeding 25 kg/h. By breaking these traditional barriers, it is possible for polymer AM to penetrate new manufacturing markets.

additive manufacturing↗

Dynamic properties of 316l stainless steel repaired using electron beam additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing has the potential to be used for repair of high-value parts, but the strength and integrity of such repaired parts, especially under dynamic loading, in still unknown. This work presents the results of high strain-rate dynamic testing of additively repaired stainless steel samples. The 316L samples were intentionally damaged and subsequently repaired with 308L stainless steel wire using electron beam additive manufacturing. The repaired samples were subjected to gas-gun impact testing to induce incipient damage and determine the role played by the repaired region in dictating damage and failure. The results show the following: 1) the equation of state of the repaired region is comparable to the original material as shown by the unchanged spall plane location, 2) the deformation behavior is similar to the original material as shown by the similar Hugoniot Elastic limit, 3) the spall strength of the repaired region is slightly higher than the original material due to varying grain size, and 4) the damage morphology in the repaired region is different and involves a high rate of void coalescence. In conclusion, despite these minor differences in the spall strength and the damage morphology, the overall dynamic response of the original material and repaired samples is similar suggesting that AM is a promising approach for repairing high-value components.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Effects of digital fringe projection operational parameters on detecting powder bed defects in additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing is a technology transforming traditional production timelines. Specifically, metal additive manufacturing (MAM) has been increasingly adopted by a variety of industries, not only to prototype, but also to fulfill full production scale applications with much lower lead times. Like any maturing manufacturing technology, developments in verifying and validating processes are necessary to support continuous growth. Due to the complex nature of MAM, part quality and repeatability remain integral challenges that inhibit further adoption of MAM for critical component production. In this study, we present data taken from a developing in-process monitoring system designed to measure and detect powder bed defects (PBDs) in powder bed fusion MAM systems using surface height maps created with structured light illumination. We showcase the feasibility of the monitoring technique for in-process implementation by detecting streak PBDs with varying severities (height, width) created in a lab environment. We present results of powder bed measurements for varying experimental parameters of the structured light system such as illumination angle, illumination pattern, and number of illuminations. We also present an expression used to determine experimental height noise based on input parameters for PBD detection based on the instrument transfer function of the structured light monitoring system for arbitrary pixel intensity noise contributions. In conclusion, with the results of PBD detection across multiple experimental measurement parameters, we provide a best practices approach to in-process implementation of the monitoring system in powder bed fusion manufacturing.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing, diverging from traditional manufacturing techniques, such as casting and machining materials, can handle complex shapes with great design flexibility without the typical waste. Although this technique has been mainly used for rapid prototyping, interest is growing in using this method to directly manufacture actual parts of complex shape. To use 3D-printing additive manufacturing in wide spread applications, the technique and the feedstock materials require improvements to meet the mechanical requirements of load-bearing components. Thus, we investigated the short fiber (0.2 mm to 0.4 mm) reinforced acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene composites as a feedstock for 3D-printing in terms of their processibility, microstructure and mechanical performance; and also provided comparison with traditional compression molded composites. The tensile strength and modulus of 3D-printed samples increased ~115% and ~700%, respectively. 3D-printer yielded samples with very high fiber orientation in printing direction (up to 91.5 %), whereas, compression molding process yielded samples with significantly less fiber orientation. Microstructure-mechanical property relationships revealed that although the relatively high porosity is observed in the 3D-printed composites as compared to those produced by the conventional compression molding technique, they both exhibited comparable tensile strength and modulus. Furthermore, this phenomena is explained based on the changes in fiber orientation, dispersion and void formation.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

The Frontiers of Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing, more commonly known as 3-D printing, has become a ubiquitous tool in science for its precise control over mechanical design. For additive manufacturing to work, a 3-D structure is split into thin 2D slices, and then different physical properties, such as photo-polymerization or melting, are used to grow the sequential layers. The level of control allows not only for devices to be made with a variety of materials: e.g. plastics, metals, and quantum dots, but to also have finely controlled structures leading to other novel properties. While 3-D printing is widely used by hobbyists for making models, it also has industrial applications in structural engineering, biological tissue scaffolding, customized electric circuitry, fuel cells, security, and more.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of complex designs that are difficult to create by other means. Metal parts manufactured by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) can incorporate intricate design features and demonstrate desirable mechanical properties. However, printing a part that is qualified for its intended application often involves reprinting and discarding many parts to eliminate defects, improve dimensional accuracy, and increase repeatability. The process of iteratively converging on the appropriate build parameters increases the time and cost of creating functional LPBF manufactured parts. This work describes a fast, scalable method for part-scale process optimization of arbitrary geometries. Additionally, the computational approach uses feature extraction to identify scan vectors in need of parameter adaptation and applies results from simulation-based feed forward control models. This method provides a framework to quickly optimize complex parts through the targeted application of models with a range of fidelity and by automating the transfer of optimization strategies to new part designs. The computational approach and algorithmic framework are described, a software package is implemented, the method is applied to parts with complex features, and parts are printed on a customized open architecture LPBF machine.

3D printing↗