Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Adversarial machine learning (ML)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Combining Data with Physical Knowledge for Uncertainty Quantification in Certification and Reliability Analysis

Unifying empirical data with predictive models can enable engineering cost-savings through certification by analysis and reliability-based design. Both concepts require rigorous uncertainty quantification (UQ) and robust understanding and treatment of relevant physics. Combining sampling-based UQ algorithms with high-fidelity simulations creates a computational bottleneck that is often alleviated through the use of machine learning (ML). ML can be used to create computationally efficient surrogates for simulations of complex or high-dimensional physical interactions (e.g., multi-phase interactions associated with melt pools in laser powder bed fusion or spatially-dependent material properties in functionally graded materials). However, negative side effects of ML may include a lack of interpretability and negative correlation between event rarity and simulation accuracy due to a lack of training data. As such, it is important to infuse ML algorithms with physics-based guardrails to provide confidence in their predictions. This talk will provide a brief review of recent NASA research at this intersection of physics-based simulation, ML, and UQ with a focus on certification and reliability analysis.

uncertainty quantification↗

Developing a Machine-Learning-Based Processing Framework for Twitter and Other Crowdsourced Data

Crowdsourced data streams such as Twitter and other social media are important sources of real-time and historical global information for Earth science applications. At the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), we have been exploring the Twitter data stream for its potential in augmenting the validation program of NASA's Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. To realize this potential, we need to increase the information density and enhance the quality of filtered precipitation tweets. We have implemented various components of a machine learning (ML)-based processing infrastructure for crowdsourced data that outputs, in this instance, useful and usable information derived from precipitation tweets. We have test enriched the Twitter stream with higher quality active tweets from those knowingly contributing to our effort and from existing crowdsourced programs (e.g., mPING, CoCoRaHS). We have experimented with various algorithms for processing tweets, including Naà ve Bayes, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Hierarchical Attention Network (HAN), and semi-supervised learning (with tri-training). Our current work focuses on (1) automated review of Earth science-related publications to determine relationships between discipline research needs and ML algorithms; (2) investigating Sequential Generative Adversarial Network (SeqGAN) for processing precipitation tweets for anomaly detection; and (3) managing crowdsourced data in a way that is compatible with existing NASA satellite data archives and using the data for ML applications. Key results include (1) network visualization of NLP-processed publications in various Earth science disciplines; (2) difference between GPM-linked, generated tweets and collected actual tweets that is small for GPM-determined light to moderate rain cases and high for GPM-determined heavy rain cases; and (3) identification of MongoDB for storing raw tweets and Zarr format for gridded tweets (compatible with GPM data). Our results have taken us a step closer to an operational ML-based tweet processing infrastructure and have already demonstrated that tweet-derived precipitation information is potentially useful for validation of Earth science satellite data.

Teng, William↗

Space Flown Rodent Liver RNA Sequencing Data for Machine Learning in Space Biology Research

High-throughput nucleic acid sequencing (DNA-seq, RNA-seq) has become widespread in biomedical research due to the growing availability and affordability of these assays. Data analysis has been accelerated in recent years by the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques by biomedical researchers. In space biology research, RNAseq datasets from space-flown experimental samples are critical for characterizing the gene expression aberrations associated with exposure to spaceflight stressors. However, space biological experiments tend to be very low sample size, so identifying proper AI/ML algorithms for sequencing data analysis is an ongoing challenge since these algorithms typically require large sample size. The NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) has started the “Benchmark Initiative for AI/ML”, focused on creating datasets meant for three main applications: 1) scientific benchmarking, which finds the best algorithm for a specific problem; 2) application benchmarking, which measures algorithm performance against a set of parameters; and 3) system benchmarking, which evaluates performance of hardware and software architecture. These scientific benchmarks consist of an AI-ready dataset and a reference implementation on a specific scientific question. In this work, we focused on generating standardized datasets to allow the scientific community to benchmark AI/ML algorithms in the domain of space biology. We present here a standardized, AI-ready, publicly available benchmark dataset for space biology RNA-seq data as a collaboration between the NASA AI4LS (Artificial Intelligence for Life Sciences) working group. and NASA’s SMD. This dataset consists of space-flown and ground control mouse liver found in the NASA GeneLab omics database. However, to amplify the small sample number (n=112 samples) for ML purposes, we employ Gaussian noise and a generative adversarial network to extend this dataset to 6,000 synthetic samples, matching the original gene expression characteristics.

James Casaletto↗