Search NASASearch

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “AgZ-PAN”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

INL Intern Poster Session

Characterization of off-gas constituents from nuclear fuel reprocessing can be measured using a residual gas analyzer. Characterization of this off-gas is important in a closed fuel cycle, where gasses such as Nox, Kr, I, and C-14 need to be removed from reprocessing plants to meet regulatory requirements. Both Kr and Xe have low chemical reactivity, making capture and separation difficult. Solid sorbents can be used to capture these gases as an alternative to cryogenic distillation, which is energy intensive and hazardous. AgZ-PAN and HZ-PAN are two solid sorbents that have demonstrated selective capture of Xe and Kr. A residual gas analyzer can be used to obtain breakthrough curves that demonstrate how well this adsorption and separation occur. The breakthrough curve is dependent on packing density, column size, and flow rate. Data obtained from the RGA was verified with a gas chromatographer.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS

Solid Sorbent Cost Sensitivity Analysis: A Framework for UNF Reprocessing Sorbent Cost Comparison

Solid sorbents have been the subject of research and development across the U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory complex for many years. They are generally accepted as a safer alternative to cryogenic distillation for noble gas capture, and they present an easier pathway in development of long-term waste forms after iodine capture. As more types of sorbents have been proposed for capture of volatile radionuclides, it has become necessary to compare them based on performance and cost criteria. This report details cost and performance information for three promising sorbents and provides a cost sensitivity analysis. The goal of this analysis is to establish a framework which can be utilized to directly compare future sorbents, with differing properties, to the sorbents discussed in this report. Direct comparison is instrumental to making informed decisions to efficiently guide research and minimize laborious detours. In all cases, sorbent capacity is a major cost driver as it influences the mass of sorbent, operational footprint, and disposal cost requirements., However, sorbent price can greatly increase the cost of a capture technology. For sorbents used in krypton capture, the purity of krypton released to storage is the highest cost driver.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS