Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Aircraft system identification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Advances in Aircraft System Identification at NASA Langley Research Center

Aircraft system identification involves the determination of dynamic models from measured flight data. Recently, the Journal of Aircraft published a special issue in which authors summarized advances in aircraft system identification made at their institutions over the last 20 years. This talk discusses some of those advances made at NASA Langley Research Center. Examples include X-planes, hypersonic and launch vehicles, aeroelastic aircraft and wind tunnel test articles, and subscale demonstrators.

Aircraft System Identification↗
NASA NTRS2023

Advances in Aircraft System Identification at NASA Langley Research Center

Advances in aircraft system identification at NASA Langley Research Center are discussed. The relevant time period includes the years since the last summary paper of this kind, which was published in the Journal of Aircraft in 2005. Research advances were achieved in flight test experiment design, frequency-domain modeling, real-time autonomous global modeling, rapid simulation development and updating, dynamic modeling in turbulence, flight data corrections, model uncertainty characterization, and aeroelastic modeling using distributed sensing. Possible future developments in the field are identified.

Aircraft system identification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Practical Aspects of Multiple-Input Design for Aircraft System Identification Flight Tests

Practical aspects of multiple-input design methods for aircraft system identification flight tests are discussed. The orthogonal optimized multisine multiple-input design technique is explained and demonstrated, along with useful variations. Practical implementation and application issues associated with applying orthogonal optimized multisine inputs in flight are explained, and solutions are demonstrated using flight data from full-scale and subscale aircraft, as well as simulated flight data from an F-16 nonlinear simulation. Topics include truncated and extended excitation inputs, variations for control effectors with limited movement capabilities, aircraft dynamic response to excitation inputs, pilot implementation, statistical uncertainty quantification, multiple-input efficiency and effectiveness, flight testing with active feedback control, frequency-response estimation, control actuator modeling, and control interaction effects. Examples demonstrate that the orthogonal optimized multisine input design method is a practical, versatile, and effective approach for designing multiple excitation inputs for aircraft system identification flight tests.

Multiple-Input Design↗
NASA NTRS2018

Practical Aspects of the Frequency Domain Approach for Aircraft System Identification

Practical aspects of the frequency-domain approach for aircraft system identification are explained and demonstrated. Topics related to experiment design, flight data analysis, and dynamic modeling are included. For demonstration purposes, simulated time series data and simulated flight data from an F-16 nonlinear simulation with realistic noise are used. This approach enables detailed evaluations of the techniques and results, because the true characteristics of the data and aircraft dynamics are known for the simulated data. Analytical techniques and practical considerations are examined for the finite Fourier transform, nonparametric frequency response estimation, parametric modeling in the frequency domain, experiment design for frequency-domain modeling, data analysis and modeling in the frequency domain, and real-time calculations. Flight data from a subscale jet transport aircraft are used to demonstrate some of the techniques and technical issues.

Morelli, Eugene A.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Aircraft System Identification from Multisine Inputs and Frequency Responses

The identification of aircraft flight dynamics is often performed using frequency responses, which are nonparametric models that quantify the steady-state magnitude and phase of a dynamic system response to sinusoidal inputs, as a function of frequency. Frequency responses are computed from measured input and output data, and then model parameters, such as stability and control derivatives, are estimated to best fit a parametric model to the empirical frequency response data. The utility of this approach is due to the familiarity of engineers with frequency responses, a number of theoretical and practical advantages under specific conditions, the availability of software packages, and many other reasons.

System identification↗
NASA NTRS2008

Transport Aircraft System Identification from Wind Tunnel Data

Recent studies have been undertaken to investigate and develop aerodynamic models that predict aircraft response in nonlinear unsteady flight regimes for transport configurations. The models retain conventional static and rotary dynamic terms but replace conventional acceleration terms with more general indicial functions. In the Integrated Resilient Aircraft Controls project of the NASA Aviation Safety Program one aspect of the research is to apply these current developments to transport configurations to facilitate development of advanced controls technology. This paper describes initial application of a more general modeling methodology to the NASA Langley Generic Transport Model, a sub-scale flight test vehicle.

Murphy, Patrick C.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Transport Aircraft System Identification Using Roll and Yaw Oscillatory Wind Tunnel Data

Continued studies have been undertaken to investigate and develop aerodynamic models that predict aircraft response in nonlinear unsteady flight regimes for transport configurations. The models retain conventional static and dynamic terms but replace conventional acceleration terms with indicial functions. In the Subsonic Fixed Wing Project of the NASA Fundamental Aeronautics Program and the Integrated Resilient Aircraft Controls project of the NASA Aviation Safety Program one aspect of the research is to apply these current developments to transport configurations to facilitate development of advanced simulation and control design technology. This paper continues development and application of a more general modeling methodology to the NASA Langley Generic Transport Model, a sub-scale flight test vehicle. In the present study models for the lateral-directional aerodynamics are developed.

Murphy, Patrick C.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Neural networks for aircraft system identification

Artificial neural networks offer some interesting possibilities for use in control. Our current research is on the use of neural networks on an aircraft model. The model can then be used in a nonlinear control scheme. The effectiveness of network training is demonstrated.

Linse, Dennis J.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Aircraft System Identification from Multisine Inputs and Frequency Responses

A frequency-domain approach is described for estimating parameters, such as stability and control derivatives, in aircraft flight dynamic models from measured input and output data. The approach uses orthogonal phase-optimized multisines for moving the aircraft control effectors, Fourier analysis for computing multiple-input multiple-output frequency responses, and a maximum likelihood estimator called frequency response error (FRE) for determining values and uncertainties for the model parameters. The approach is demonstrated using flight test data for two subscale airplanes: the T-2 generic transport model and the X-56A aeroelastic demonstrator. Results and comparisons with the output-error method indicated that the approach produced accurate estimates of stability and control derivatives and their uncertainties from flight test data.

Grauer, Jared A.↗
NASA NTRS2024

Comparison of Multisine Peak Factor Minimization Algorithms for Aircraft System Identification

Two phase-optimized multisine peak factor minimization algorithms are presented and evaluated. The first algorithm minimizes peak factor by iteratively clipping the peaks of generated multisine signals. The second algorithm optimizes peak factor indirectly through minimization of an approximation of the infinity norm of the multisine. Algorithm performance was evaluated as a function of different signal properties, including the number of harmonics, harmonic spacing, and number of snow harmonics (extra harmonics included for further reduction of the peak factor). The two algorithms are compared against results obtained by minimizing peak factor directly using a simplex algorithm, which has been a common approach when designing phase-optimized multisines for system identification flight tests. Sample results show that the clipping and infinity norm algorithms produced multisine signals with comparable peak factors that were lower than that of the simplex algorithm. However, the clipping algorithm runs an order of magnitude faster than the other two algorithms, which also makes it practical to repeat the algorithm multiple times to achieve even lower peak factors.

system identification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparison of Multisine Peak Factor Minimization Algorithms for Aircraft System Identification(Presentation)

Two phase-optimized multisine peak factor minimization algorithms are presented and evaluated. The first algorithm minimizes peak factor by iteratively clipping the peaks of generated multisine signals. The second algorithm optimizes peak factor indirectly through minimization of an approximation of the infinity norm of the multisine. Algorithm performance was evaluated as a function of different signal properties, including the number of harmonics, harmonic spacing, and number of snow harmonics (extra harmonics included for further reduction of the peak factor). The two algorithms are compared against results obtained by minimizing peak factor directly using a simplex algorithm, which has been a common approach when designing phase-optimized multisines for system identification flight tests. Sample results show that the clipping and infinity norm algorithms produced multisine signals with comparable peak factors that were lower than that of the simplex algorithm. However, the clipping algorithm runs an order of magnitude faster than the other two algorithms, which also makes it practical to repeat the algorithm multiple times to achieve even lower peak factors.

flight test↗
NASA NTRS2002

System IDentification Programs for AirCraft (SIDPAC)

A collection of computer programs for aircraft system identification is described and demonstrated. The programs, collectively called System IDentification Programs for AirCraft, or SIDPAC, were developed in MATLAB as m-file functions. SIDPAC has been used successfully at NASA Langley Research Center with data from many different flight test programs and wind tunnel experiments. SIDPAC includes routines for experiment design, data conditioning, data compatibility analysis, model structure determination, equation-error and output-error parameter estimation in both the time and frequency domains, real-time and recursive parameter estimation, low order equivalent system identification, estimated parameter error calculation, linear and nonlinear simulation, plotting, and 3-D visualization. An overview of SIDPAC capabilities is provided, along with a demonstration of the use of SIDPAC with real flight test data from the NASA Glenn Twin Otter aircraft. The SIDPAC software is available without charge to U.S. citizens by request to the author, contingent on the requestor completing a NASA software usage agreement.

Morelli, Eugene A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

System Identification for eVTOL Aircraft Using Simulated Flight Data

This paper describes a system identification method for electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. The approach merges fixed-wing and rotary-wing modeling techniques with new strategies to develop a modeling method for eVTOL vehicles using flight test data. The eVTOL aircraft system identification approach is demonstrated through application to the NASA LA-8 tandem tilt-wing, distributed electric propulsion aircraft using a high-fidelity flight dynamics simulation. Orthogonal phase-optimized multisine inputs are applied to each control surface and propulsor at numerous flight conditions throughout the flight envelope to collect informative flight data. An aero-propulsive model is identified at each flight condition using the equation-error method in the frequency domain. The local model parameters are then blended to create a global model across the nominal flight envelope. Parameter estimation results are shown to provide a good fit to modeling data and have good prediction capability. The methodology is developed with a discussion of unique eVTOL vehicle aerodynamic characteristics and practical strategies intended to inform future flight-based system identification efforts for eVTOL aircraft.

system identification↗
NASA NTRS1999

System Identification for Integrated Aircraft Development and Flight Testing [l'Identification Des Systemes Pour le Developpement Integre des Aeronefs et les Essais en Vol]

Over the last decades flight vehicles such as aircraft and helicopters entering service and requiring increased operational effectiveness have with few exceptions experienced prolonged flight test development to achieve full certification. In many cases the original requirements had later to be reduced to enable release to service. The impact on the customer, and manufacturer has been considerable leading to increased costs and or reduced operational capabilities. These costly experiences are largely a result of the flight vehicle not behaving as modelled and designed. The evaluation of flight test data can be used as a tool for validating windtunnel results and mathematical models describing the flight dynamical behaviour. In this sense the uncertainty of important aerodynamic stability and control parameters can be reduced and the confidence of aircraft mathematical models improved. An additional important factor comes from the implementation of active control systems offering the promise of significantly increased flight vehicle performance and operational capability. This approach extends the traditional trade-offs between aerodynamics, structures and propulsion systems to include full- time, full-authority fly-by-wire/light systems. It is imperative that the aerodynamic stability and control parameters of such integrated flight and propulsion control systems have to turn out inflight as predicted, since inherent stability margins will be lower and the flight control system must correct these deficiencies to provide flight critical redundancy and safety. With the methodology of system identification from flight tests it is possible to sense the control inputs and the flight vehicle reactions Such as accelerations, rates and attitudes. The mathematical model, e.g. the model structure and parameters, has to be determined from the relationship of the measured control inputs and the system's responses. The aim of this symposium was to review the present state of the art of flight vehicle system and parameter identification techniques, and to provide a critical appraisal of current methods developed and applied to flight test data in a number of NATO nations. Particular emphasis was placed on practical aspects and lessons learned in order to generate information useful to the flight test community in industry and government agencies. The technical papers share invaluable experience and emphasize the advances of flight vehicle system identification over the last years to the point where confidence and robustness level is now reasonably high. The symposium covered overviews of identification methodologies, flight test techniques, recent aircraft and helicopter application programs, and a session of short papers covering up-to-the-minute flight test results. A final discussion included prepared comments from experts and concluded with key issues learned in the application of system identification and future research needs. The essential benefits to NATO nations can be condensed as follows: More accurate mathematical models for high bandwidth flight control systems, Improved assessment and evaluation of flying qualities, High fidelity mathematical models for flight vehicle development and mission training simulators, and generally, Reduced flight test time and costs.

Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Developm↗
NASA NTRS1995

System identification methods for aircraft flight control development and validation

System-identification methods compose a mathematical model, or series of models, from measurements of inputs and outputs of dynamic systems. The extracted models allow the characterization of the response of the overall aircraft or component subsystem behavior, such as actuators and on-board signal processing algorithms. This paper discusses the use of frequency-domain system-identification methods for the development and integration of aircraft flight-control systems. The extraction and analysis of models of varying complexity from nonparametric frequency-responses to transfer-functions and high-order state-space representations is illustrated using the Comprehensive Identification from FrEquency Responses (CIFER) system-identification facility. Results are presented for test data of numerous flight and simulation programs at the Ames Research Center including rotorcraft, fixed-wing aircraft, advanced short takeoff and vertical landing (ASTOVL), vertical/short takeoff and landing (V/STOL), tiltrotor aircraft, and rotor experiments in the wind tunnel. Excellent system characterization and dynamic response prediction is achieved for this wide class of systems. Examples illustrate the role of system-identification technology in providing an integrated flow of dynamic response data around the entire life-cycle of aircraft development from initial specifications, through simulation and bench testing, and into flight-test optimization.

Tischler, Mark B.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

System Identification for Propellers at High Incidence Angles

Propellers used for electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft propulsion systems experience a wide range of aerodynamic conditions, including large incidence angles relative to oncoming airflow. In oblique flow, propellers exhibit deviations in thrust and torque oriented along the propeller axis of rotation, as well as significant off-axis forces and moments. Although important for modeling eVTOL aircraft aerodynamics, sparse experimental data or mathematical models exist for propellers at incidence. This paper describes a propulsion system modeling methodology for the Langley Aerodrome No. 8 (LA-8) tandem tilt-wing, eVTOL aircraft. System identification methods are applied to isolated propeller wind tunnel data gathered across the vehicle's flight envelope to develop a mathematical model of the propulsion system, including a static motor model, dynamic motor model, and propeller aerodynamic model. Modeling results validated against data withheld from the modeling process indicate good predictive capability and agree with theoretical expectations. The results are followed by a discussion of model implementation strategies into high-fidelity eVTOL aircraft simulations.

system identification↗
NASA NTRS2021

System Identification for Propellers at High Incidence Angles

Propellers used for electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft propulsion systems experience a wide range of aerodynamic conditions, including large incidence angles relative to oncoming airflow. In oblique flow, propellers exhibit deviations in thrust and torque oriented along the propeller axis of rotation, as well as significant off-axis forces and moments. Although important for modeling eVTOL aircraft aerodynamics, sparse experimental data or mathematical models exist for propellers at incidence. This paper describes a propulsion system modeling methodology for the LA-8 tandem tilt-wing, eVTOL aircraft. System identification methods are applied to isolated propeller wind tunnel data gathered across the vehicle's flight envelope to develop a mathematical model of the propulsion system, including a static motor model, dynamic motor model, and propeller aerodynamic model. Modeling results validated against data withheld from the modeling process indicate good predictive capability and agree with theoretical expectations. The results are followed by a discussion of model implementation strategies into high-fidelity eVTOL aircraft simulations.

system identification↗