Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “AlphaFold”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

The Phenix‐AlphaFold webservice: Enabling AlphaFold predictions for use in Phenix

Abstract Advances in machine learning have enabled sufficiently accurate predictions of protein structure to be used in macromolecular structure determination with crystallography and cryo‐electron microscopy data. The Phenix software suite has AlphaFold predictions integrated into an automated pipeline that can start with an amino acid sequence and data, and automatically perform model‐building and refinement to return a protein model fitted into the data. Due to the steep technical requirements of running AlphaFold efficiently, we have implemented a Phenix‐AlphaFold webservice that enables all Phenix users to run AlphaFold predictions remotely from the Phenix GUI starting with the official 1.21 release. This webservice will be improved based on how it is used by the research community and the future research directions for Phenix.

Poon, Billy K.↗
DOE OSTI2023

AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination

Abstract Artificial intelligence-based protein structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold have revolutionized structural biology. The accuracies of these predictions vary, however, and they do not take into account ligands, covalent modifications or other environmental factors. Here, we evaluate how well AlphaFold predictions can be expected to describe the structure of a protein by comparing predictions directly with experimental crystallographic maps. In many cases, AlphaFold predictions matched experimental maps remarkably closely. In other cases, even very high-confidence predictions differed from experimental maps on a global scale through distortion and domain orientation, and on a local scale in backbone and side-chain conformation. We suggest considering AlphaFold predictions as exceptionally useful hypotheses. We further suggest that it is important to consider the confidence in prediction when interpreting AlphaFold predictions and to carry out experimental structure determination to verify structural details, particularly those that involve interactions not included in the prediction.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Enhancing alphafold-multimer-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15

To enhance the AlphaFold-Multimer-based protein complex structure prediction, we developed a quaternary structure prediction system (MULTICOM) to improve the input fed to AlphaFold-Multimer and evaluate and refine its outputs. MULTICOM samples diverse multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and templates for AlphaFold-Multimer to generate structural predictions by using both traditional sequence alignments and Foldseek-based structure alignments, ranks structural predictions through multiple complementary metrics, and refines the structural predictions via a Foldseek structure alignment-based refinement method. The MULTICOM system with different implementations was blindly tested in the assembly structure prediction in the 15th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP15) in 2022 as both server and human predictors. MULTICOM_qa ranked 3 rd among 26 CASP15 server predictors and MULTICOM_human ranked 7 th among 87 CASP15 server and human predictors. The average TM-score of the first predictions submitted by MULTICOM_qa for CASP15 assembly targets is ~0.76, 5.3% higher than ~0.72 of the standard AlphaFold-Multimer. The average TM-score of the best of top 5 predictions submitted by MULTICOM_qa is ~0.80, about 8% higher than ~0.74 of the standard AlphaFold-Multimer. Moreover, the Foldseek Structure Alignment-based Multimer structure Generation (FSAMG) method outperforms the widely used sequence alignment-based multimer structure generation.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Integrating AlphaFold and deep learning for atomistic interpretation of cryo-EM maps

Abstract Interpretation of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps requires building and fitting 3D atomic models of biological molecules. AlphaFold-predicted models generate initial 3D coordinates; however, model inaccuracy and conformational heterogeneity often necessitate labor-intensive manual model building and fitting into cryo-EM maps. In this work, we designed a protein model-building workflow, which combines a deep-learning cryo-EM map feature enhancement tool, CryoFEM (Cryo-EM Feature Enhancement Model) and AlphaFold. A benchmark test using 36 cryo-EM maps shows that CryoFEM achieves state-of-the-art performance in optimizing the Fourier Shell Correlations between the maps and the ground truth models. Furthermore, in a subset of 17 datasets where the initial AlphaFold predictions are less accurate, the workflow significantly improves their model accuracy. Our work demonstrates that the integration of modern deep learning image enhancement and AlphaFold may lead to automated model building and fitting for the atomistic interpretation of cryo-EM maps.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Accelerating crystal structure determination with iterative AlphaFold prediction

Experimental structure determination can be accelerated with artificial intelligence (AI)-based structure-prediction methods such as AlphaFold . Here, an automatic procedure requiring only sequence information and crystallographic data is presented that uses AlphaFold predictions to produce an electron-density map and a structural model. Iterating through cycles of structure prediction is a key element of this procedure: a predicted model rebuilt in one cycle is used as a template for prediction in the next cycle. This procedure was applied to X-ray data for 215 structures released by the Protein Data Bank in a recent six-month period. In 87% of cases our procedure yielded a model with at least 50% of C α atoms matching those in the deposited models within 2 Å. Predictions from the iterative template-guided prediction procedure were more accurate than those obtained without templates. It is concluded that AlphaFold predictions obtained based on sequence information alone are usually accurate enough to solve the crystallographic phase problem with molecular replacement, and a general strategy for macromolecular structure determination that includes AI-based prediction both as a starting point and as a method of model optimization is suggested.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

AlphaFold -assisted structure determination of a bacterial protein of unknown function using X-ray and electron crystallography

Macromolecular crystallography generally requires the recovery of missing phase information from diffraction data to reconstruct an electron-density map of the crystallized molecule. Most recent structures have been solved using molecular replacement as a phasing method, requiring an a priori structure that is closely related to the target protein to serve as a search model; when no such search model exists, molecular replacement is not possible. New advances in computational machine-learning methods, however, have resulted in major advances in protein structure predictions from sequence information. Methods that generate predicted structural models of sufficient accuracy provide a powerful approach to molecular replacement. Taking advantage of these advances, AlphaFold predictions were applied to enable structure determination of a bacterial protein of unknown function (UniProtKB Q63NT7, NCBI locus BPSS0212) based on diffraction data that had evaded phasing attempts using MIR and anomalous scattering methods. Using both X-ray and micro-electron (microED) diffraction data, it was possible to solve the structure of the main fragment of the protein using a predicted model of that domain as a starting point. The use of predicted structural models importantly expands the promise of electron diffraction, where structure determination relies critically on molecular replacement.

molecular replacement↗
DOE OSTI2023

Allosteric autoregulation of DNA binding via a DNA-mimicking protein domain: a biophysical study of ZNF410–DNA interaction using small angle X-ray scattering

ZNF410 is a highly-conserved transcription factor, remarkable in that it recognizes a 15-base pair DNA element but has just a single responsive target gene in mammalian erythroid cells. ZNF410 includes a tandem array of five zinc-fingers (ZFs), surrounded by uncharacterized N- and C-terminal regions. Unexpectedly, full-length ZNF410 has reduced DNA binding affinity, compared to that of the isolated DNA binding ZF array, both in vitro and in cells. AlphaFold predicts a partially-folded N-terminal subdomain that includes a 30-residue long helix, preceded by a hairpin loop rich in acidic (aspartate/glutamate) and serine/threonine residues. This hairpin loop is predicted by AlphaFold to lie against the DNA binding interface of the ZF array. In solution, ZNF410 is a monomer and binds to DNA with 1:1 stoichiometry. Surprisingly, the single best-fit model for the experimental small angle X-ray scattering profile, in the absence of DNA, is the original AlphaFold model with the N-terminal long-helix and the hairpin loop occupying the ZF DNA binding surface. For DNA binding, the hairpin loop presumably must be displaced. After combining biophysical, biochemical, bioinformatic and artificial intelligence-based AlphaFold analyses, we suggest that the hairpin loop mimics the structure and electrostatics of DNA, and provides an additional mechanism, supplementary to sequence specificity, of regulating ZNF410 DNA binding.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Structural Models and Sequence Alignment Results of the Rhodospirillum rubrum Proteome

This dataset contains the structural models for the primary transcripts of the Rhodospirillum rubrum proteome as well as sequence alignment results for a subset of the encoded proteins. For each protein, the five models inferred from AlphaFold 2 are provided. The largest pTM-scoring model for each protein was energy minimized; this minimized structure as well as its AlphaFold pickle output file are also provided. This set of structures represent an alternate source of models for the R. rubrum proteome to those available in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. For proteins that have been annotated as hypothetical, sequence alignment results from the HHblits and SAdLSA alignment methods are provided. These methods are often more capable to resolve sequence homology than other methods. Therefore, the results from both HHblits and SAdLSA are provided to identify possible homologs for these challenging proteins. Numerous sequence databases are utilized for these alignments. References AlphaFold v2 Multimer: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034. References HHBlits: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7. References SAdLSA: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2021.689960.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Structural Models and Sequence Alignment Results of the Desulfovibrio vulgaris Proteome

This dataset contains the structural models for the primary transcripts of the Desulfovibrio vulgaris proteome as well as sequence alignment results for a subset of the encoded proteins. For each protein, the five models inferred from AlphaFold 2 are provided. The largest pTM-scoring model for each protein was energy minimized; this minimized structure as well as its AlphaFold pickle output file are also provided. This set of structures represent an alternate source of models for the D. vulgaris proteome to those available in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AFDB). This is a bit more complicated since the proteins reporting in the AFDB originate from an outdated form of the D. vulgaris sequence. The different versions of the D. vulgaris gene annotation are collected in the Chronology subdirectory; further consideration of these changes on the structural space of the proteome are currently underway. For proteins that have been annotated as hypothetical, sequence alignment results from the HHblits and SAdLSA alignment methods are provided. These methods are often more capable to resolve sequence homology than other methods. Therefore, the results from both HHblits and SAdLSA are provided to identify possible homologs for these challenging proteins. Numerous sequence databases are utilized for these alignments. References AlphaFold v2 Multimer: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034. References HHblits: hhtps://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7. References SAdLSA: hhtps://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2021.689960.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Deep Green Unannotated Protein Structures

The Deep Green list is based on the identification and curation of conserved unannotated proteins in three green lineage (Viridiplantae) model organisms; Arabidopsis thaliana, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and Setaria viridis. Preliminary characterization of Deep Green proteins and genes was done using various informatics tools and published data sets and is presented in Knoshaug, Sun, et al., 2023, submitted. The structures of these unannotated proteins were also predicted using AlphaFold (Jumper et al., 2021). The data deposited here are the AlphaFold structural predictions having the highest pLDDT score and thus identified as the best folded structure (ranked_0). These data enable others to do in-depth structural characterizations to aid in functional characterization leading to deeper understanding of plant biology. References: Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S. A. A., Ballard, A. J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., Back, T., Petersen, S., Reiman, D., Clancy, E., Zielinski, M., Steinegger, M., Pacholska, M., Berghammer, T., Bodenstein, S., Silver, D., Vinyals, O., Senior, A. W., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kohli, P. and Hassabis, D. (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596:583-589. Knoshaug, E. P., Sun, P., Nag, A., Nguyen, H., Mattoon, E. M., Zhang, N., Liu, J., Chen, C., Cheng, J., Zhang, R., St. John, P., and Umen, J. (submitted) Identification and preliminary characterization of conserved uncharacterized proteins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Setaria viridis.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Comparative Analysis of TCR and TCR-pMHC Complex Structure Prediction Tools

The rapid development of computational approaches for predicting the structures of T cell receptors (TCRs) and TCR-peptide-major histocompatibility (TCR-pMHC) complexes, accelerated by AI breakthroughs such as AlphaFold, has made it feasible to calculate these structures with increasing accuracy. Although these tools show great potential, their relative accuracy and limitations remain unclear due to the lack of standardized benchmarks. Here, we systematically evaluate seven tools for predicting isolated TCR structures together with six tools for predicting TCR-pMHC complex structures. The methods include homology-based approaches, general prediction tools using AlphaFold, TCR-specific tools derived from AlphaFold2, and the newly developed tFold-TCR model. The evaluation uses a post-training data set comprising 40 αβ TCRs and 27 TCR-pMHC complexes (21 Class I and 6 Class II). Model accuracy is assessed at global, local, and interface levels using a variety of metrics. We find that each tool offers distinct advantages in various aspects of its predictions. AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, and tFold-TCR excel in overall accuracy of TCR structure prediction, and TCRmodel2 and AlphaFold2 perform well in overall accuracy of TCR-pMHC structure prediction. However, TCR-specific tools derived from AlphaFold2 show lower accuracy in the framework region than both homology-based methods and general-purpose tools such as AlphaFold, and challenges remain for all in modeling CDR3 loops, docking orientations, TCR-peptide interfaces, and Class II MHC-peptide interfaces. Furthermore, these findings will guide researchers in selecting appropriate tools, emphasize the importance of using multiple evaluation metrics to assess model performance, and offer suggestions for improving TCR and TCR-pMHC structure prediction tools.

Chemical structure↗
DOE OSTI2023

Structural Models of the Rhodopseudomonas palustris Proteome

This dataset contains the structural models for the primary transcripts of the Rhodopseudomonas palustris proteome. For each protein, the five models inferred from AlphaFold 2 are provided. The largest pTM-scoring model for each protein was energy minimized; this minimized structure as well as its AlphaFold pickle output file are also provided. This set of structures represent an alternate source of models for the R. palustris proteome to those available in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Atomic protein structure refinement using all-atom graph representations and SE(3)-equivariant graph transformer

Abstract Motivation The state-of-art protein structure prediction methods such as AlphaFold are being widely used to predict structures of uncharacterized proteins in biomedical research. There is a significant need to further improve the quality and nativeness of the predicted structures to enhance their usability. In this work, we develop ATOMRefine, a deep learning-based, end-to-end, all-atom protein structural model refinement method. It uses a SE(3)-equivariant graph transformer network to directly refine protein atomic coordinates in a predicted tertiary structure represented as a molecular graph. Results The method is first trained and tested on the structural models in AlphaFoldDB whose experimental structures are known, and then blindly tested on 69 CASP14 regular targets and 7 CASP14 refinement targets. ATOMRefine improves the quality of both backbone atoms and all-atom conformation of the initial structural models generated by AlphaFold. It also performs better than two state-of-the-art refinement methods in multiple evaluation metrics including an all-atom model quality score—the MolProbity score based on the analysis of all-atom contacts, bond length, atom clashes, torsion angles, and side-chain rotamers. As ATOMRefine can refine a protein structure quickly, it provides a viable, fast solution for improving protein geometry and fixing structural errors of predicted structures through direct coordinate refinement. Availability and implementation The source code of ATOMRefine is available in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/BioinfoMachineLearning/ATOMRefine). All the required data for training and testing are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6944368.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Predicted structural proteome of Sphagnum divinum and proteome-scale annotation

Sphagnum-dominated peatlands store a substantial amount of terrestrial carbon. The genus is undersampled and under-studied. No experimental crystal structure from any Sphagnum species exists in the Protein Data Bank and fewer than 200 Sphagnum-related genes have structural models available in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. Tools and resources are needed to help bridge these gaps, and to enable the analysis of other structural proteomes now made possible by accurate structure prediction. We present the predicted structural proteome (25,134 primary transcripts) of Sphagnum divinum computed using AlphaFold, structural alignment results of all high-confidence models against an annotated nonredundant crystallographic database of over 90,000 structures, a structure-based classification of putative Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers across this proteome, and the computational method to perform this proteome-scale structure-based annotation.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2024

Foldy: An open-source web application for interactive protein structure analysis

Foldy is a cloud-based application that allows non-computational biologists to easily utilize advanced AI-based structural biology tools, including AlphaFold and DiffDock. With many deployment options, it can be employed by individuals, labs, universities, and companies in the cloud without requiring hardware resources, but it can also be configured to utilize locally available computers. Foldy enables scientists to predict the structure of proteins and complexes up to 6000 amino acids with AlphaFold, visualize Pfam annotations, and dock ligands with AutoDock Vina and DiffDock. In our manuscript, we detail Foldy’s interface design, deployment strategies, and optimization for various user scenarios. We demonstrate its application through case studies including rational enzyme design and analyzing proteins with domains of unknown function. Furthermore, we compare Foldy’s interface and management capabilities with other open and closed source tools in the field, illustrating its practicality in managing complex data and computation tasks. Our manuscript underlines the benefits of Foldy as a day-to-day tool for life science researchers, and shows how Foldy can make modern tools more accessible and efficient.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Assembly of JAZ–JAZ and JAZ–NINJA complexes in jasmonate signaling

Jasmonates (JAs) are plant hormones with crucial roles in development and stress resilience. They activate MYC transcription factors by mediating the proteolysis of MYC inhibitors called JAZ proteins. In the absence of JA, JAZ proteins bind and inhibit MYC through the assembly of MYC–JAZ–Novel Interactor of JAZ (NINJA)–TPL repressor complexes. However, JAZ and NINJA are predicted to be largely intrinsically unstructured, which has precluded their experimental structure determination. Through a combination of biochemical, mutational, and biophysical analyses and AlphaFold-derived ColabFold modeling, we characterized JAZ–JAZ and JAZ–NINJA interactions and generated models with detailed, high-confidence domain interfaces. We demonstrate that JAZ, NINJA, and MYC interface domains are dynamic in isolation and become stabilized in a stepwise order upon complex assembly. By contrast, most JAZ and NINJA regions outside of the interfaces remain highly dynamic and cannot be modeled in a single conformation. Our data indicate that the small JAZ Zinc finger expressed in Inflorescence Meristem (ZIM) motif mediates JAZ–JAZ and JAZ–NINJA interactions through separate surfaces, and our data further suggest that NINJA modulates JAZ dimerization. This study advances our understanding of JA signaling by providing insights into the dynamics, interactions, and structure of the JAZ–NINJA core of the JA repressor complex.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cyanobacterial Phycobilisome Allostery as Revealed by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry

Phycobilisomes (PBSs) are the major photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes in cyanobacteria and red algae. PBS, a multisubunit protein complex, has two major interfaces that comprise intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs): rod–core and core-membrane. IDRs do not form regular, three-dimensional structures on their own. Their presence in the photosynthetic pigment–protein complexes portends their structural and functional importance. A recent model suggests that PB-loop, an IDR located on the PBS subunit ApcE and C-terminal extension (CTE) of the PBS subunit ApcG, forms a structural protrusion on the PBS core-membrane side, facing the thylakoid membrane. Here, the structural synergy between the rod–core region and the core-membrane region was investigated using quantitative mass spectrometry (MS). The AlphaFold-predicted CpcG-CTE structure was first modeled onto the PBS rod–core region, guided and justified by the isotopically encoded structural MS data. Quantitative cross-linking MS analysis revealed that the structural proximity of the PB-loop in ApcE and ApcG-CTE is significantly disturbed in the absence of six PBS rods, which are attached to PBS via CpcG-CTE, indicative of drastic conformational changes and decreased structural integrity. Furthermore, these results suggest that CpcG-rod attachment on the PBS rod–core side is essentially required for the PBS core-membrane structural assembly. The hypothesized long-range synergy between the rod–core interface (where the orange carotenoid protein also functions) and the terminal energy emitter of PBS must have important regulatory roles in PBS core assembly, light-harvesting, and excitation energy transmission. These data also lend strategies that genetic truncation of the light-harvesting antennas aimed for improved photosynthetic productivity must rely on an in-depth understanding of their global structural integrity.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗