Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Aluminum Alloy 7050”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Process-Structure-Property Relations for As-Deposited Solid-State Additively Manufactured High-Strength Aluminum Alloy

Solid-state additive manufacturing methods provide innovative solutions to circumvent problems associated with materials susceptible to hot cracking by avoiding liquid solid phase transformations. In this work, the process parameter influence on microstructural evolution and mechanical response of a fully dense aluminum alloy 7050 (AA7050) component manufactured via a rapid, solid-state additive manufacturing process known as Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFS-D) was quantified for the first time. Three sections (starting dwell, transient, crossover of roads) of the deposition that exhibit differing thermomechanical processing histories were evaluated for the resulting microstructure and mechanical response. The microstructural characterization was performed on the as-deposited AA7050 via Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD), TEM, optical microscopy, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The microstructural characterization revealed refined constituent particles and grains throughout the as-deposited AA7050 microstructure. Furthermore, quasi-static tensile experiments were conducted in both the build and transverse directions, in order to quantify the orientation influence on tensile properties of the as-deposited AA7050 build. Spatially dependent tensile properties were observed in the material due to heat input variation coarsening of secondary phases towards the initial layers of the AFS-D build. Post-mortem analysis revealed that voids nucleated and coalesced from the overgrowth of the strengthening precipitates present in the material, resulting in fracture.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Effects of Aluminum Plate Initial Residual Stress on Machined-Part Distortion

Dimensional tolerances for high-speed-machined aluminum products continue to tighten due to the demand for automated assembly of complex monolithic parts in aerospace and other industries. Understanding the contribution of inherent residual stress in wrought Al 7050-T7451 plate, common in aircraft manufacture, to distortion of high-aspect-ratio machined parts is critical but remains problematic due to the alloy's low residual stress magnitude over large geometries. Prior investigations into residual stress effects on machined part distortion suffer inadequate characterizations of the wrought material stress field, either because of low fidelity due to “slitting” methods, confounding effects in machined-layer removal methods, or small sample size when using neutron diffraction (ND). In this work, inherent residual stress is measured via ND at 860 locations in a 90.5 mm thick Al 7050-T7451 plate having dimensions 399 mm in the rolling direction and 335 mm in the transverse direction. Unlike prior studies, the ND residual stress is reconstructed using an iterative algorithm to ensure fully compatible, equilibrated 3D field prior to examining its effect on distortion. Further, the findings from simulations and experiments show that inherent residual stress alone could distort a high-aspect-ratio part beyond aerospace industry requirements, that slitting measurements may not sufficiently characterize residual stress for predicted distortion, and that parts machined from different plate thickness locations could exhibit reversed distortion patterns. Thus, research into distortion prediction that considers machining should carefully characterize and reconstruct inherent residual stress so that the coupled machining effects are accurately modeled.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Interlaboratory Reproducibility of Contour Method Data in a High Strength Aluminum Alloy

The contour method for residual stress measurement has seen significant development, but an experimental reproducibility study utilizing physical samples has not been published. A double-blind reproducibly study is reported, having scope beginning with EDM cutting and ending with residual stress calculation. A reinforced I-beam sample geometry is identified for its unique residual stress profile when extracted from residual stress bearing quenched aluminum bar (7050-T74). Contour measurements are prescribed on a midplane of symmetry with dimensions 24.0 mm by 50.0 mm. Fourteen identically prepared samples are fabricated from a single long bar with well characterized and uniform residual stress. Five samples throughout the bar are identified for planning measurements to validate sample uniformity and overall suitability of the residual stress field. The planning measurements employ a range of techniques: contour method, neutron diffraction, and hole-drilling. Eight samples are distributed to an international group of participants to execute their standard measurement practice. A double-blind process is followed to provide anonymity. Results are provided by eight participants: six being self-similar and two being quite different, the latter set aside as outliers. An average residual stress field is established from non-outlying results and the spatial distribution of reproducibility standard deviation is determined. The average stress field ranges from -60 to 70 MPa and the reproducibility standard deviation averages 8.1 MPa on the measurement plane. The average reproducibility standard deviation is about 3 × larger for points within 1.0 mm of plane boundaries (17.6 MPa) than for the remaining points (6.1 MPa). Reproducibility standard deviation (among different labs) for contour method residual stress measurement is found to be very similar to repeatability standard deviation (in a single lab) reported in prior work. The reproducibility observed here, for the entire measurement process, is also similar to that found in a prior reproducibility study limited to contour method data analysis.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗