Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Autospectral density”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Simplified model of statistically stationary spacecraft rotation and associated induced gravity environments

A stochastic model of spacecraft motion was developed based on the assumption that the net torque vector due to crew activity and rocket thruster firings is a statistically stationary Gaussian vector process. The process had zero ensemble mean value, and the components of the torque vector were mutually stochastically independent. The linearized rigid-body equations of motion were used to derive the autospectral density functions of the components of the spacecraft rotation vector. The cross-spectral density functions of the components of the rotation vector vanish for all frequencies so that the components of rotation were mutually stochastically independent. The autospectral and cross-spectral density functions of the induced gravity environment imparted to scientific apparatus rigidly attached to the spacecraft were calculated from the rotation rate spectral density functions via linearized inertial frame to body-fixed principal axis frame transformation formulae. The induced gravity process was a Gaussian one with zero mean value. Transformation formulae were used to rotate the principal axis body-fixed frame to which the rotation rate and induced gravity vector were referred to a body-fixed frame in which the components of the induced gravity vector were stochastically independent. Rice's theory of exceedances was used to calculate expected exceedance rates of the components of the rotation and induced gravity vector processes.

Fichtl, G. H.↗

Semispan Test Results of an Active Flow Control Enabled High-Lift Common Research Model in Landing Configuration

A 10%-scale semispan, Active Flow Control (AFC) enabled, simplified high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-SHL-AFC) was tested in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel at the NASA Langley Research Center. The main objective of the test was to develop an AFC system that can provide the necessary lift recovery on a simple-hinged flap high-lift system while minimizing its pneumatic power requirement. Three new types of AFC approaches were examined: Double-Row Sweeping Jets (DRSWJ), Alternating Pulsed Jets (APJ), and High Efficiency Low Power (HELP) actuators. The DRSWJ and the APJ actuators used two rows of unsteady jets, whereas the HELP actuators used an upstream row of sweeping jets combined with a downstream row of steady jets to overcome strong adverse pressure gradients. The test was conducted mostly at a freestream Mach number of 0.20. For exploration purposes, a limited number of runs were made at lower Mach numbers or using vortex generators (VGs). Minimal sensitivity to Mach number or VGs, for the cases evaluated, were observed. The AFC-induced lift coefficient increment was maintained over the AFC-off case for most flow-control cases examined. The CRM-SHL-AFC configuration equipped with HELP actuation was the only actuator configuration able to match or exceed the targeted lift performance of a reference conventional high-lift configuration. The presented aerodynamic data include lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients as a function of angle of attack, with and without the Transonic Wall Interference Correction System (TWICS) method applied. Lift increments as a function of AFC pneumatic power usage (i.e., nozzle pressure ratio, mass flow, momentum coefficient, and power coefficient) are also presented at a lower angle of attack (α = 8.9°) and at maximum lift (α= 17.1°). At the two angles of attack, the surface pressure distributions and autospectral densities from the unsteady pressure transducers for the AFC-off case and the best HELP actuation case are compared.

high-lift↗

Background Turbulence Characterization of the Curved Duct Test Rig

Interest in applying acoustic treatment to nontraditional locations of turbofan engines has led to recent testing of acoustically treated airfoils in the NASA Langley Curved Duct Test Rig. Current testing focuses only on sound attenuation by the sample when exposed to an incident sound field driven by a loudspeaker array. However, there may be much to gain from an aeroacoustic study of the interaction of turbulence with treated airfoils, especially in the case of acoustically treated outlet guide vane designs. Thus, the intent of this study is to take the first step in assessing the aeroacoustic quality of the NASA Langley Curved Duct Test Rig (typically only used for grazing flow studies) by examining the flow quality. The background turbulence levels are measured using hot-wire anemometry just upstream of the test section. Measurements indicate that the turbulence intensity is less than 0.3% in the core region of the flow. The autospectral densities show cavity tones and weak vortex shedding present in the core. The vortex shedding is determined to be from the upstream total pressure probe used to determine flow speed. The cavity tones are found to be the fundamental and harmonic frequencies of a porous ceramic tubular acoustic liner sample that separates the acoustic drivers from the flow region. Recommendations for improving the aeroacoustic quality of the tunnel are provided, such as removing the upstream probe and redesigning the ceramic tubular liner. Future acoustic characterization of the background levels is also recommended to further understand the feasibility of aeroacoustic studies in CDTR.

Wind Tunnel Characterization↗