Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “BOUNDARY LAYER REMOVAL - PRESSURE - KATZMAYR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1984

Investigation of sidewall boundary layer removal effects on two different chord airfoil models in the Langley 0.3-meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel

An investigation was carried out on two CAST 10-2 airfoil models with chords of 3 in. and 6 in. To evaluate the extent of sidewall influence on airfoil tests at transonic Mach numbers. The tests were conducted in the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel two-dimensional test section equipped with an upstream sidewall boundary layer removal system which reduces the boundary layer displacement thickness to about 1 percent of model halfspan from an initial 2 percent without boundary layer removal. Test results have shown the changes in the location of the shock on the upper surface of the airfoil to be about the same for both models with and without sidewall boundary layer removal. Even though large differences were noted in the high lift characteristics of the two models, the sidewall boundary layer removal had little effect on the differences. These tests also served to validate the boundary layer removal technique and the associated Mach number correction required with upstream boundary layer removal.

Murthy, A. V.↗
NASA NTRS1993

A feasibility study of using Langley 0.3-m transonic cryogenic tunnel sidewall boundary-layer removal system for heavy gas testing

This report presents the results of a preliminary study for using the 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel sidewall boundary-layer removal system with heavy gas sulfur hexafluoride as the test medium. It is shown that the drive motor speed/power of the existing system and the additional heat load on the tunnel heat exchanger are the major problems limiting the boundary-layer removal system performance. Overcoming these problems can provide the capability to remove about 1.5 percent of the test section mass flow at Mach number M = 0.8 and about 5 percent at M = 0.25. Previous studies have shown that these boundary-layer mass flow removal rates can reduce the boundary-layer thickness by a factor of two at the model station. Also the effect of upstream boundary-layer removal on the airfoil test data is not likely to be significant under high lifting conditions. Near design conditions, corrections to the test Mach number may be necessary to account for sidewall boundary-layer effects.

Murthy, A. V.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Sidewall boundary-layer removal effects on wall adaptation in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel

This paper describes the Langley 0.3-m transonic cryogenic tunnel sidewall boundary-layer removal system and is integrated operation with the adaptive wall adjustment. Empty test section measurements show the sidewall boundary-layer displacement thickness at the model station is reduced from about 1.0 to 0.6 percent of the test section width when the maximum boundary-layer removal conditions are applied. Tests with a supercritical airfoil model show the iterative top and bottom wall adaptation process performs satisfactorily with sidewall boundary-layer removal.

Murthy, A. V.↗
NASA NTRS1927

Removing Boundary Layer by Suction

Through the utilization of the "Magnus effect" on the Flettner rotor ship, the attention of the public has been directed to the underlying physical principle. It has been found that the Prandtl boundary-layer theory furnishes a satisfactory explanation of the observed phenomena. The present article deals with the prevention of this separation or detachment of the flow by drawing the boundary layer into the inside of a body through a slot or slots in its surface.

AERODYNAMICS↗
NASA NTRS1941

Boundary layer removal by suction

Flight-test data and wind-tunnel data on suction profiles are substantially in agreement. The lift values found in the model test can be actually flown and used as a basis for the design. To visualize the action of the suction, the flow conditions with and without suction on the upper surface were photographed; figures 12 to 15 are sections of the film.

Schrenk, O↗