Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Bulk storage of hydrogen”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Bulk Storage of Hydrogen

The technical aspects and economics of bulk hydrogen storage in underground pipes, lined rock caverns (LRC) and salt caverns are analyzed. Hydrogen storage in underground pipes is more economical than in geological caverns for useable amounts <20-t-H2. However, because the pipe material is a major cost factor, the capital and operating costs for this storage method do not decrease appreciably with an increase in the amount of stored H2. Unlike underground pipes, the installed capital cost of salt caverns decreases appreciably from ~$95/kg-H2 at 100 t-H2 stored to <$19/kg-H2 at 3000 t-H2 stored. Over the same scale, the annual storage cost decreases from ~$17/kg-H2 to ~$3/kg-H2. Like salt caverns, the installed capital cost of lined rock caverns decreases from ~$160/kg-H2 at 100 t-H2 stored to <$44/kg-H2 at 3000 t-H2 stored. Storing >750-t useable H2 requires multiple caverns. The cost of salt caverns scales more favorably with size because the salt caverns are larger than lined rock caverns and need to be added at a slower rate as the storage capacity is increased.

Bulk storage of hydrogen↗
DOE OSTI2024

Material analysis of metal hydrides for bulk hydrogen storage

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE), 2009–2014, was established to evaluate the viability of material-based hydrogen storage for light duty vehicles. The HSECoE concluded that there were no metal hydrides that simultaneously met the DOE targets for gravimetric and volumetric capacity, and rate of onboard refueling. However, it was noted by the DOE that potential applications existed for stationary hydrogen storage systems. An application of particular interest is using a metal-hydride to store a hydrogen supply for fuel cell backup power to a 5 MWe data center. A generalized numerical model that coupled mass and energy conservation, chemical kinetics and thermodynamics was developed to simulate the discharge process for a given metal-hydride. The model was applied to an interstitial and a complex metal-hydride. In conclusion, it was found that the interstitial metal-hydride, which is discharged by a pressure swing is preferrable in a practical sense to the complex metal-hydride, which requires a temperature swing discharge process.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

Durable Low-Cost Pressure Vessels for Bulk Hydrogen Storage

Long-duration energy storage (LDES) in the form of gaseous hydrogen is vital for fossil fuel power plants to reduce frequent shutdowns and rapid start-ups. It's also crucial in renewable energy power plants for grid stabilization. WireTough Cylinders (WTC) has developed a Type II-S pressure vessel that uses steel liners that are hoop-wrapped with multiple layers of high-strength, cost-effective, and readily available steel wires. This design enables the vessel to withstand significantly higher pressures. It addresses hydrogen embrittlement issues and cyclic loading from repeated pressurization and depressurization during service. The WireTough design is cost-efficient, robust, and fatigue-resistant (with a 30-year design life) and is ASME certified for ground storage of hydrogen at a maximum operating pressure (MOP) of 350 bar and a design pressure of 500 bar. The cylinder has a 645 mm outside diameter and a water capacity of 1,715 liters, capable of storing 40.7 KG of hydrogen at MOP. Two prototypes were successfully produced to showcase the manufacturing technologies, with one being certified under ASME Section VIII Division 3 rules. Preliminary design work for a similar Type II-S vessel with a 500 bar MOP was also completed. The 350 bar and 500 bar Type II-S vessels were shown respectively to be 47.5% to 60% more cost-effective and 55% and 62.5% lighter based on per KG of hydrogen stored, when compared with their Type 1 counterparts.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2021

A Review on Advanced Manufacturing for Hydrogen Storage Applications

Hydrogen is a notoriously difficult substance to store yet has endless energy applications. Thus, the study of long-term hydrogen storage, and high-pressure bulk hydrogen storage have been the subject of much research in the last several years. To create a research path forward, it is important to know what research has already been done, and what is already known about hydrogen storage. In this review, several approaches to hydrogen storage are addressed, including high-pressure storage, cryogenic liquid hydrogen storage, and metal hydride absorption. Challenges and advantages are offered based on reported research findings. Since the project looks closely at advanced manufacturing, techniques for the same are outlined as well. There are seven main categories into which most rapid prototyping styles fall. Each is briefly explained and illustrated as well as some generally accepted advantages and drawbacks to each style. An overview of hydrogen adsorption on metal hydrides, carbon fibers, and carbon nanotubes are presented. The hydrogen storage capacities of these materials are discussed as well as the differing conditions in which the adsorption was performed under. Concepts regarding storage shape and materials accompanied by smaller-scale advanced manufacturing options for hydrogen storage are also presented.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Technical Justifications for Outdoor Bulk Gaseous Hydrogen Storage Setback Distances

Setback distances define a prescribed distance between a potentially hazardous system and different types of other systems, people, buildings, or materials that may be exposed to that hazard. Riskinformed separation distances are not meant to completely eliminate risk, but rather to limit the risk to an acceptable level. A sensitivity study of risk suggested that a leak size of 3% of the pipe cross-sectional area would be a conservative but reasonable basis. Calculation of the setback distances for gaseous hydrogen was done in a deterministic manner, using a selected leak size and harm criteria for each group of exposures. Harm criteria have been updated to better reflect the exposure types under consideration, and to be consistent with setback distances for liquid hydrogen. The resulting setback distance values are primarily driven by radiative heat flux values for all exposure groups. For the typical pipe sizes, the setback distances slightly increase compared to the previous version of NFPA 2.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2021

The influence of LiH and TiH 2 on hydrogen storage in MgB 2 II. XPS study of surface and near-surface phenomena

We report that Mg(BH 4 ) 2 is a promising solid-state hydrogen storage material, releasing 14.9 wt% hydrogen upon conversion to MgB 2 . The rehydrogenation of MgB 2 is particularly challenging, requiring prolonged exposure to high pressures of hydrogen at high temperature. Here we report an XPS study probing the influence of LiH and TiH 2 on the hydrogen storage properties of MgB 2 in the surface and near-surface regions, as a complementary investigation to a preceding study of the bulk properties. Surface and near-surface properties are important considerations for nanoscale and bulk hydrogen storage materials. If there are reactions occurring at the surface that modify the chemical composition in the near-surface region, species diffusion can alter the chemical composition even deep into the bulk of the material. For LiH/MgB 2 , metastable LiH–B and LiH–Mg species are produced that are more reactive than Bulk MgB 2 . With prolonged glovebox storage, the LiH/MgB 2 material shows increased reactivity towards O and C and enriched levels of Li and B in the near-surface region. In addition, Li induces the growth of Li 2 CO 3 in the surface and near surface regions. Exposing LiH/MgB 2 to hydrogen at 700 bar and 280 °C for 24 h produces borohydride at a temperature 100 °C below the threshold for bulk MgB 2 hydrogenation. In a specifically surface process with macroscopic implications, the hydrogenation conditions also cause Li 2 CO 3 to react with boron hydroxide in the sample to form a Li-deficient glassy lithium borate melt at the interfaces of the particles, bonding them together. Subsequent heating to 380 °C dehydrogenates the borohydride and eliminates the Li-deficient glassy lithium borate. The LiH/MgB 2 material is not reversible because desorption does not lead back to LiH/MgB 2 , but rather to elemental B and Mg metal in the near-surface region. In contrast to LiH, TiH 2 does not react with MgB 2 , despite the favorable thermodynamics for destabilization via TiB 2 formation. Furthermore, high pressure hydrogenation yields only unreacted TiH 2 and MgB 2 in the surface and near-surface regions. Thus, added TiH 2 provides no benefit to MgB 2 hydrogenation, in agreement with the findings of the preceding bulk study.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

Review AMR 2023 Presentation

Provide a an overall outline of the project for durable low-cost pressure vessels for bulk hydrogen storage. Includes project objectives, benefits, task, results and concluding remarks.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

The influence of LiH and TiH 2 on hydrogen storage in MgB 2 I: Promotion of bulk hydrogenation at reduced temperature

Mg(BH 4 ) 2 is an attractive hydrogen storage material, owing to its high gravimetric capacity of 14.9 wt %. However, the dehydrogenated material MgB 2 is very difficult to rehydrogenate, requiring excessive pressures and temperatures. Here we report the influence of LiH and TiH 2 on hydrogen storage reactions involving Bulk MgB 2 using XRD, XAS, FTIR and NMR. In ball-milled mixtures of LiH/MgB 2 , the LiH loses crystallinity but remains undissociated, forming a weakly bound complex with MgB 2 . The weak interactions produce minor variations in the local electronic structure at B and Mg, but do not markedly affect the underlying MgB 2 hexagonal crystal structure. No evidence is found for a mixed-metal boride Mg 1-x Li x B 2 in the as-prepared LiH/MgB 2 materials. The presence of LiH dramatically improves the hydrogenation of MgB 2 at 700 bar, forming borohydride 100 °C below the minimum hydrogenation temperature of pure MgB 2 and without the formation of undesirable intermediates such as [B 3 H 8 ] - , [B 10 H 10 ] 2- or [B 12 H 12 ] 2- . Evidence is reported for a mixed-metal borohydride of the type Mg (3-x)/2 Li x (BH 4 ) 3 produced by the hydrogenation. Subsequent desorption is also improved compared to pure Mg(BH 4 ) 2 and LiBH 4 , showing single-step hydrogen release up to ~8 wt% by 380 °C, whereas Mg(BH 4 ) 2 and LiBH 4 still retain significant amounts of hydrogen at this temperature. The material produced by desorption contains both MgB 2 and Mg metal, revealing the original LiH/MgB 2 system is not fully reversible. In contrast to LiH, TiH 2 is essentially inert when ball-milled with MgB 2 , and high-pressure hydrogenation leaves only unreacted TiH 2 and MgB 2 . Thus, added TiH 2 provides no benefit to MgB 2 hydrogenation.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2024

A Bulk versus Nanoscale Hydrogen Storage Paradox Revealed by Material-System Co-Design

Metal hydrides are serious contenders for materials-based hydrogen storage to overcome constraints associated with compressed or liquefied H 2 . Their ultimate performance is usually evaluated using intrinsic material properties without considering a systems design perspective. An illustrative case with startling implications is (LiNH 2 +2LiH). Using models that simulate the storage system and associated fuel cell of a light-duty vehicle (LDV), the performance of the bulk hydrides is compared with a nanoscaled version in porous carbon (PC), (LiNH 2 +2LiH)@(6-nm PC). Using experimental material properties, the simulations show that (LiNH 2 +2LiH)@(6-nm PC) counterintuitively has higher usable gravimetric and volumetric capacities than the bulk counterpart on a system basis despite having lower capacities on a materials-only basis. Nanoscaling increases the thermal conductivity and lowers the desorption enthalpy, which consequently increases heat management efficiency. In a simulated drive cycle for fuel cell-powered LDV, the fuel cell is inoperable using bulk (LiNH 2 +2LiH) as the storage material but completes the drive cycle using the nanoscale material. Further, these results challenge the notion that nanoscaling incurs mass and volume penalties. Instead, the synergistic nanoporous host-hydride interaction can favorably modulate chemical and heat transfer properties. Moreover, a co-design approach considering application-specific tradeoffs is essential to accurately assess a material's potential for real-world hydrogen storage.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2021

Hydrogen carriers: Production, transmission, decomposition, and storage

Recognizing the potential role of liquid hydrogen carriers in overcoming the inherent limitations in transporting and storing gaseous and liquid hydrogen, a complete production and use scenario is postulated and analyzed for perspective one-way and two-way carriers. The carriers, methanol, ammonia and toluene/MCH (methylcyclohexane), are produced at commercially viable scales in a central location, transmitted by rail or pipelines for 2000 miles, and decomposed near city gates to generate fuel-cell quality hydrogen for distribution to refueling stations. In terms of the levelized cost of H 2 distributed to the stations, methanol is less expensive to produce (1.22 dollars per kg-H 2 ) than MCH (1.35 dollars per kg-H 2 ) or ammonia (2.20 dollars per kg-H 2 ). Levelized train transmission cost is smaller for methanol (0.63 dollars per kg-H 2 ) than ammonia (1.29 dollars per kg-H 2 ) or toluene/MCH system (2.07 dollars per kg-H 2 ). Levelized decomposition cost is smaller for ammonia (0.30-1.06 dollars per kg-H 2 ) than MCH (0.54-1.22 dollars per kg-H 2 ) or methanol (0.43-1.12 dollars per kg-H 2 ). Over the complete range of demand investigated, 10-350 tpd-H 2 , the levelized cost of H2 distributed to stations is aligned as methanol « ammonia ~ MCH. With pipelines at much larger scale, 6000 tpd-H 2 , the levelized cost decreases by ~1 dollar per kg-H 2 for ammonia and MCH and much less for methanol. Methanol is a particularly attractive low-risk carrier in the transition phase with lower than 50-tpd H 2 demand.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

Technical Justifications for Liquid Hydrogen Exposure Distances

The previous separation distances in the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Hydrogen Technologies Code (NFPA 2, 2020 Edition) for bulk liquid hydrogen systems lack a well-documented basis and can be onerous. This report describes the technical justifications for revisions of the bulk liquid hydrogen storage setback distances in NFPA 2, 2023 Edition. Distances are calculated based on a leak area that is 5% of the nominal pipe flow area. Models from the open source HyRAM+ toolkit are used to justify the leak size as well as calculate consequence-based separation distances from that leak size. Validation and verification of the numerical models is provided, as well as justification for the harm criteria used for the determination of the setback distances for each exposure type. This report also reviews mitigations that could result in setback distance reduction. The resulting updates to the liquid hydrogen separation distances are well-documented, retrievable, repeatable, revisable, independently verified, and use experimental results to verify the models.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2021

Data requirements for improving the Quantitative Risk Assessment of liquid hydrogen storage systems

Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) supports the development of risk-informed safety codes and standards which are employed to enable the safe deployment of hydrogen technologies essential to decarbonize the transportation sector. System reliability data is a necessary input for rigorous QRA. Here, the lack of reliability data for bulk liquid hydrogen (LH 2 ) storage systems located on site at fueling stations limits the use of QRAs. In turn, this hinders the ability to develop the necessary safety codes and standards that enable worldwide deployment of these stations. Through a QRA-based analysis of a LH 2 storage system, this work focuses on identifying relevant scenario and probability data currently available and ascertaining future data collection requirements regarding risks specific to liquid hydrogen releases. The work developed consists of the analysis of a general bulk LH 2 storage system design located at a hydrogen fueling station. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and traditional QRA modeling tools such as Event Sequence Diagrams (ESD) and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) are employed to identify, rank, and model risk scenarios related to the release of LH 2 . Based on this analysis, scenario and reliability data needs to add LH 2 -related components to QRA are identified with the purpose of improving the future safety and risk assessment of these systems.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2022

Overview of Integrated Pathway Analyses to Meet the Hydrogen Energy Earthshot Goal

This presentation was given at the 2022 Bulk Storage of Gaseous Hydrogen Workshop sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Office (HFTO). The presentation topics cover the current status of an upcoming NETL publication titled &quot;Comparison of Commercial, State-of-the-Art, Fossil-Based Hydrogen Production Technologies.&quot; The study will publicize plant performance, life cycle environmental performance, and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) production from six fossil-based pathways. The presentation provides preliminary results pending finalization of the study. In addition, the presentation provides an overview of NETL analysis efforts to support the DOE Hydrogen Shot targets.

Lewis, Eric↗
DOE OSTI2021

Refueling Infrastructure Scoping and Feasibility Assessment for Hydrogen Rail Applications

The feasibility and component cost of hydrogen rail refueling infrastructure is examined. Example reference stations can inform future studies on components and systems specifically for hydrogen rail refueling facilities. All of the 5 designs considered assumed the bulk storage of liquid hydrogen on-site, from which either gaseous or liquid hydrogen would be dispensed. The first design was estimated to refuel 10 multiple unit trains per day, each train containing 260 kg of gaseous hydrogen at 350 bar on-board. The second base design targeted the refueling of 50 passenger locomotives, each with 400 kg of gaseous hydrogen on-board at 350 bar. Variations from this basic design were made to consider the effect of two different filling times, two different hydrogen compression methods, and two different station design approaches. For each design variation, components were sized, approximate costs were estimated for major components, and physical layouts were created. For both gaseous hydrogen-dispensing base designs, the design of direct-fill using a cryopump design was the lowest cost due to the high cost of the cascade storage system and gas compressor. The last three base designs all assumed that liquid hydrogen was dispensed into tender cars for freight locomotives that required 7,500 kg of liquid hydrogen, and the three different designs assumed that 5, 50, or 200 tender cars were refueled every day. The total component costs are very different for each design, because each design has a very different dispensing capacity. The total component cost for these three designs are driven by the cost of the liquid hydrogen tank; additionally, delivering that much liquid hydrogen to the refueling facility may not be practical. Many of the designs needed the use of multiple evaporators, compressors, and cryopumps operating in parallel to meet required flow rates. In the future, the components identified here can be improved and scaled-up to better fit the needs of heavy-duty refueling facilities. This study provides basic feasibility and first-order design guidance for hydrogen refueling facilities serving emerging rail applications.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

High-rate, high-capacity electrochemical energy storage in hydrogen-bonded fused aromatics

Designing materials for electrochemical energy storage with short charging times and high charge capacities is a longstanding challenge. The fundamental difficulty lies in incorporating a high density of redox couples into a stable material that can efficiently conduct both ions and electrons. We report all-organic, fused aromatic materials that store up to 310 mAh g –1 and charge in as little as 33 s. This performance stems from abundant quinone/imine functionalities that decorate an extended aromatic backbone, act as redox-active sites, engage in hydrogen bonding, and enable a delocalized high-rate energy storage with stability upon cycling. Here, the extended conjugation and hydrogen-bonding-assisted bulk charge storage contrast with the surface-confined or hydration-dependent behavior of traditional inorganic electrodes.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗