Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CO2 Capture”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Computational Study of Mixing Solid Materials for CO2 Capture Technology

CO2 is one of the major combustion products that, once released into the air, can contribute to global climate change. Solid sorbents have been reported as promising candidates for CO2 sorbent applications due to their high CO2 absorption capacities at moderate working temperatures. By combining thermodynamic database mining with first-principles density functional theory and phonon lattice dynamics calculations, the National Energy Technology Laboratory has proposed and validated a theoretical screening methodology to identify the most promising CO2 sorbent candidates from a vast array of possible solid materials. The advantage of this method is that it identifies the thermodynamic properties of the CO2 capture reaction as a function of temperature and gas pressure without any experimental input beyond crystallographic structural information of the solid phases involved. The calculated thermodynamic properties of solid materials versus temperature and pressure changes were further used to evaluate the equilibrium properties for the CO2 adsorption/desorption cycles. The selected CO2 sorbent candidates were further considered for experimental validations. In this presentation, the results of M2O/Al2O3 (M=Li, Na, K) mixtures (MAlO2 and M5AlO4) capturing CO2 will be demonstrated in detail.

Duan, Yuhua↗
DOE OSTI2023

Techno-economic Analysis of CO2 Capture From Pulp/Paper Plants

This poster presentation evaluates the cost of capturing CO2 from a 400,000 air dried tonne (adt)/year pulp production plant, using Shell’s CANSOLV post-combustion capture process. There are five steps in a pulp/paper process: wood preparation, pulping, chemical recovery, bleaching and papermaking. There are three sources of CO2: combustion of waste wood in the wood-preparation step; combustion of black liquor, a product of pulping; and combustion of natural gas coupled with CO2 generated from calcination of limestone in the lime kiln used in chemical recovery. Standalone (pulp only) and integrated (pulp + paper) mills are modeled. The base case results and sensitivity analyses are displayed.

Mantripragada, Hari↗
DOE OSTI2024

Assessing Ground State Energy of Molecules and Energy Profile of the NH3 Capturing CO2 System Using the Quantum Computing Algorithms

Molecule size correlates with the number of electrons on electronic energies and strength of anharmonicity on vibrational properties, however, it is challenging to address using classical computing. In this study, variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm was implemented on a quantum simulator to quantify electronic and vibrational energies and reaction pathways of CO2 + NH3 = NH2COOH. The VQE-based Hartree-Fock-Embedding algorithm was adopted to benchmark electronic energies for a series of molecules (doi.org/10.1063/5.0188249) and quantify the reaction energy profile of the CO2 capture reaction (doi.org/10.1116/5.0137750). The generated reaction profile is in good agreement with the classical high-level Coupled-Cluster-Singles-and-Doubles (CCSD) results. The quantum computing algorithm also helps enhance the calculation of vibrational ground-state energies by considering the many-body coupling using the Vibrational Self-Consistent Field method, providing results for CO2 and NH3 molecules with accuracy comparable to the direct diagonalization method. Our approach indicates quantum computing can be applied to solve practical problems.

Lee, Yueh-Lin↗
DOE OSTI2022

User Guide for the Public Industrial CO2 Capture Retrofit Database Models

OBSOLETE CCRD – SUPERSEDED<p>The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) user manual accompanies the carbon capture retrofit database (CCRD) model that allows users to evaluate the cost of carbon capture on industrial sources (ammonia, cement, ethanol, hydrogen, and natural gas processing). The model was created by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) based on the technical report titled &quot;Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources&quot; (NETL/DOE-2022/3319). Revised 12/21/22.</p>

Hughes, Sydney↗
DOE OSTI2022

Industrial CO2 Capture Retrofit Database (IND CCRD)

OBSOLETE CCRD - SUPERSEDED<p>This carbon capture retrofit database (CCRD) model allows users to evaluate the cost of carbon capture on industrial sources (ammonia, cement, ethanol, hydrogen, and natural gas processing). The model was created by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) based on the technical report titled Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources (NETL/DOE-2022/3319). Revised 12/21/22.</p>

Hughes, Sydney↗
DOE OSTI2024

Enzymes Under Confinement: Materials Interactions and Functionality for CO2 Capture and Conversion

CO2 capture membranes are of interest in industries where large amounts of CO2 waste is produced. Captured CO2 can be electrochemically reduced to CO and recycled for other uses. These capture membranes consist of an alumina substrate with a silicon layer. Enzymes have been used to lower reaction energies on nanoporous silica enabling better CO2 capture, however eliminating the silicon layer would improve manufacturability. We have proposed the use of nanoporous alumina alone, as an alternative.

Peretti, Amanda Sheree↗
DOE OSTI2024

Techno-economic Analysis and Optimization of Point Source Solvent-Based Carbon Capture Systems at High CO2 Capture Levels for NGCC Power Plants

This poster was presented at the 2024 FECM / NETL Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting held during Aug 5-9, 2024. It summarizes the research done as a part of CCSI2 for determining the optimal design and operating conditions of an MEA solvent-based carbon capture system connected to a commercial scale NGCC plant, operating at CO2 capture levels beyond 90%. The techno-economic optimization approach is outlined, along with the trends of key cost and performance indicators across high capture levels.

Deshpande, Anuja↗
DOE OSTI2020

Effect of Power Plant Capacity on the CAPEX, OPEX, and LCOC of the CO2 Capture Process in Pre-Combustion Applications - Abstract

Aspen Plus v8.8 was used to simulate the pre-combustion CO2 capture process from a typical fuel gas stream at different power plant capacities ranging from 54.3 to 543 MW. Polyethylene glycol polydimethyl siloxane (PEGPDMS-1) was used as a physical solvent to capture CO2 in a countercurrent packed-bed absorber containing a structured packing (Mellapak 250Y). The process pressure was 51.4 bar and the solvent temperature was varied from 10 to 40 <sup>o</sup>C. The internal diameter of the absorber ranged from 1.9 to 7 m and the packing height from 13.9 to 45.5 m. The physico-chemical properties were obtained and modeled using the Perturbed Chain-Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (PC-SAFT) Equation-of-State (EOS).<p> Four process constraints were imposed in Aspen Plus: (1) no flooding in the absorber, (2) the absorber height to diameter ratio (H/D) is greater than or equal 6, (3) at least 90 mol% of the CO2 capture from the fuel gas stream, and (4) the CO2 stream destined to sequestration sites should contain less than 600 ppm water concentration and less than or equal 0.5 mol% of fuel gases (H2, CO, CH4). The plant lifetime was assumed to be 30 years with an annual discount rate of 10% and an annual maintenance cost of 4% of the total capital expenses.</p><p> Seven power plants with different capacities were used and for each plant, the corresponding CO2 capture process was simulated. The absorber flooding was checked using the generalized pressure drop correlation (GPDC) by Leva [1] and the capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX), and levelized costs per ton of CO2 captured (LCOC) were calculated [2-5]. Normalized by the largest power plant capacity (543 MW) used in the simulation, the results indicated that the capital and operating expenditures increased, however, the LCOC decreased with increasing plant capacity. This behavior was due to the increased annual tonnage of the CO2 captured with plant capacity as shown in Figure 1. The calculated CAPEX, OPEX, LCOC and the tonnage of CO2 captured for the 543 MW power plant were about 52 MM$, 22 MM$/year, 7.46 $/ton and 4 MM ton/year.</p>

Ashkanani, Husain↗
DOE OSTI2022

Methods and systems for emissions control in solvent-based CO2 capture processes using CO2

A method with corresponding systems for reducing emission of amines to the atmosphere. The method includes a a) introducing a gas containing CO 2 into an absorber; b) flowing the flue gas through an absorber having an absorbent with a water-lean solution having less than 50% water and one or more amines, with the absorbent capturing the CO 2 and forming a reduced CO 2 content gas having a baseline CO 2 content; and c) washing the reduced CO 2 content gas in a wash column with a wash solution comprising carbonic acid formed by addition of gaseous CO 2 into the wash solution. In this method, the washing removes the amines from the reduced CO 2 content gas and produces a reduced amine content gas exiting from the wash column.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

High CO2 Capture Rate Cost and Performance for F- and H-Class Natural Gas Combined Cycles (NGCC)

The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) is updating its study titled “Cost and Performance Baselines for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity.” Revision 4 was published in 2019. Pulverized coal (PC) and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) cases with carbon capture in that study capture carbon dioxide (CO2) at 90% efficiency. Field-testing of post-combustion CO2 capture technology as well as vendor and industry feedback on projects currently in the planning stages (including FEED projects sponsored by DOE) indicate that capture rates as high as 95% are feasible for both coal- and natural gas-fueled electricity generating units. Technology suppliers (as reflected in vendor-supplied information provided to DOE for this study that included cost and performance estimates for both NGCC (97%) and PC (99%) study cases) as well as subject matter experts acknowledge and support that solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture technologies are capable of achieving CO2 removal rates beyond 95% on low-purity streams representative of fossil-fueled combustion; however, the relatively limited experience with design and operation of capture systems that can routinely, reliably, and economically achieve very high removal rates (e.g., 97% for NGCC flue gas) requires further study. This presentation will address performance and cost estimates for 90%, 95%, and 97% capture for F- and H-class NGCC plants. This presentation was given at the 2022 Pittsburgh Coal Conference.

Fout, Timothy↗
DOE OSTI2021

Pilot Unit Testing at NCCC of Sorbent based CO2 Capture

TDA Research, Inc. is developing a new CO2 sorbent (alkalized alumina) technology for post-combustion CO2 capture. In this DOE sponsored project (DE-FE0012870), TDA constructed a pilot-scale skid, which was installed and tested at National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC). It was designed to process coal derived flue gas equivalent to 0.5 MWe of power generation. The pilot test data shows that TDA’s process can achieve 90% capture rate and 95% CO2 purity (the performance target) for both coal and natural gas (NG) flue gases. The techno-economic analysis (TEA) for a 550-MWe supercritical coal fired power plant with CO2 capture shows that the capture cost for TDA’s process is $34.9/tonne CO2 captured, which meets DOE’s goal of $40/tonne and is 17.1% less than the DOE baseline Case 12 (an amine solvent technology).

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Transformational Sorbent-Based Process for a Substantial Reduction in the Cost of CO2 Capture

Adsorption processes have the potential to significantly reduce the CO2 capture cost from power plants and industrial flue gases. InnoSepra has developed several sorbent-based technologies to obtain very high CO2 recovery and high purity CO2 while meeting the EOR/sequestration product specifications. A first-generation process was shown to achieve CO2 recoveries greater than 94% at CO2 purities in the range of 98.5-99.5%. The absolute heat energy required for the process was not only 40% lower than MEA but also was needed at a much lower temperature. This work will present the performance of the second-generation InnoSepra process which is based on a breakthrough sorbent regeneration method. This process has a projected 45% lower capital cost compared to MEA, less than 16% loss in plant output for CO2 capture and compression, and a CO2 capture cost at least 55% lower than MEA. Lab scale testing and the process simulations indicate a CO2 capture performance similar to or better than the first-generation process. Pilot scale drying and breakthrough tests were carried out at the Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM), Norway, and lab-scale cyclic tests were carried out at InnoSepra to confirm the process improvement. During these tests, InnoSepra’s flue gas purification technology was also tested at TCM. It can provide a low-cost option for the removal of NO2 and SOX to sub-ppm levels as well as a significant reduction in aerosol emissions.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

NETL's Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources and Industrial Carbon Capture Retrofit Database

This presentation was given on behalf of NETL's Strategic Systems Analysis and Engineering Directorate, Energy Process Analysis Team at a United States Energy Association webinar on January 24, 2023. The presentation summarizes techno economic analysis results of nine industrial CO2 capture cases, and also gave an overview and brief demonstration of the industrial sources Carbon Capture Retrofit Database, which is a publicly available tool that estimates capture costs for a subset of the industrial sources appearing in the companion systems analysis report.

Hughes, Sydney↗
DOE OSTI2020

Recent Progress in the Engineering of Polymeric Membranes for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas

CO2 capture from coal- or natural gas-derived flue gas has been widely considered as the next opportunity for the large-scale deployment of gas separation membranes. Despite the tremendous progress made in the synthesis of polymeric membranes with high CO2/N2 separation performance, only a few membrane technologies were advanced to the bench-scale study or above from a highly idealized laboratory setting. Therefore, the recent progress in polymeric membranes is reviewed in the perspectives of capture system energetics, process synthesis, membrane scale-up, modular fabrication, and field tests. These engineering considerations can provide a holistic approach to better guide membrane research and accelerate the commercialization of gas separation membranes for post-combustion carbon capture.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

FINAL TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE APPLICATION OF A HEAT INTEGRATED POST-COMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE SYSTEM WITH HITACHI ADVANCED SOLVENT INTO EXISTING COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT

This report contains the results of a techno-economic assessment (TEA) conducted of a heat integrated post-combustion CO2 capture process with Hitachi advanced solvent for retrofit into an existing coal-fired power plant (but treated as greenfield plant on cost analysis). The process has been developed by the University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy (UK CAER). EPRI was chiefly responsible for this analysis, with significant input from WorleyParsons, Hitachi Power Systems America (Hitachi) and UK CAER. The project also involves the design, fabrication, installation, testing, and analyses of a slipstream facility located at L&GE-KU’s E.W. Brown Generating Station to demonstrate the UK CAER carbon capture system that could utilize heat integration with the main power plant. The design, start-up, and baseline of the pilot system was performed with a generic 30 wt% MEA solvent to obtain data for direct comparison with the DOE/NETL Reference Case followed by testing Hitachi’s proprietary solvent H3-1. In this techno-economic analysis, two cases utilizing the UK CAER process are compared, using different approach temperatures and solvent, against the DOE/NETL Reference Case (Case 10). The results are shown comparing the energy demand for post-combustion CO2 capture and the net higher heating value (HHV) efficiency of the power plant integrated with the post-combustion capture (PCC) plant. A levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) assessment was performed showing the costs of the options presented in the study. The key factors contributing to the reduction of LCOE were identified as CO2 partial pressure increase at the flue gas inlet, thermal integration of the process, and performance of the Hitachi H3-1 solvent. Recent UK CAER process pilot-scale testing data and process simualtion data showed that the packing heights of absorber and stripper columns were significantly oversized in the prelimanary TEA (Task 2 of this project) and thus updated in this final TEA for the H3-1 case only. In addition, the solvent make-up cost for H3-1 was updated based on lattest test results. Finally, a heat integration with the main power plant was applied in this final TEA to increase overall energy effciency for both the MEA and H3-1 cases. Additonal reductions in capital and operational costs are expected but not taken into account here. Shorter columns result in reduced pressure drops, smaller blower head and pump hydraulic head requirements. An increase in overall energy efficiency resuls in a decreased size of the power plant, the CCS and a reduced parasitic steam requirement to the CCS. The net efficiency of the UK CAER integrated PC power plant with CO2 capture changes from 26.2% for the Reference Case 10 plant in 2010 revised DOE/NETL baseline report to 27.6% for the MEA options considered, and 29.1% for the options utilizing the Hitachi advanced solvent. The UK CAER Process + Hitachi case also produces an extra 30.9 MW of generation compared to the UK CAER Process + MEA case and total 60.9 MW more than DOE Case 10. LCOE ($/MWh) values are $172.08/MWh for the MEA option and $157.65/MWh for the Hitachi H3-1 solvent cases considered in comparison to $189.59/MWh in January 2012 dollar for the Reference Case 10. The UK CAER CCS process with MEA case lowers energy consumption for CO2 capture to 1340 Btu/lb-CO2 captured as compared to 1540 Btu/lb-CO2 in the Reference Case 10. The UK CAER CCS process with H3-1 case further lowers energy consumption for CO2 capture to 973 Btu/lb-CO2 captured, for an advantage of 36.8% less energy consumption than Case 10. The study also shows 38.1% less heat rejection associated with the carbon capture system from 3398 MBtu/hr (Case 10) to 2104 MBtu/hr for the UK CAER + MEA system. Heat rejection is reduced to 2464 MBtu/hr in the UK CAER + H3-1 case, for a 27.5 % decrease compared to Case 10. Modeling outputs show that in the UK CAER process, the cooling water that is 2-5°C cooler than conventional cooling tower water can be achieved for ambient conditions common to the midwest and other regions. The results from the techno-economic assessment show that the proposed technology can be investigated further as a viable alternative to conventional CO2 capture technology. The evaluation also shows the effect of the critical parameters on the LCOE, with the main variables being the approach temperature and CO2 partial pressure increase at the flue gas inlet. A summary of the key advantages of the UK CAER Process + H3-1 case for LCOE and other economic factors compared to the DOE Case 10 is as follows: • A lower variable operating cost by $1.56/MWh ($1.08MWh less than the UK CAER Process + MEA Case), a 11.7% reduction compared to the DOE Case 10 • A lower COE by $25.32MWh ($13.94/MWh lower than the UK CAER Process + MEA Case), a 16.9% reduction compared to the DOE Case 10 • A lower LCOE by $31.94/MWh ($17.51/MWh lower than the UK CAER Process + MEA Case), a 16.9% reduction compared to the DOE Case 10 • A lower cost of CO2 captured by $18.65/tonne CO2 ($9.44/tonne CO2 lower than the UK CAER Process + MEA Case), a 30.4% reduction compared to the DOE Case 10 • A lower cost of CO2 avoided by $34.95/tonne CO2 ($18.53 tonne CO2 lower than the UK CAER Process + MEA Case), a 38.7% reduction compared to the DOE Case 10

Bhown, Abhoyjit S.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Effect of changes of physical properties on CO2 capture solvents on its absorption rate

Concern over greenhouse gas emissions, such as CO2 from fossil fuel combustion, is leading to new regulations on fossil-fuel fired power generation facilities. Using amine-based solutions for CO2 capture in power plants is the most common method utilized industrially and studied in the laboratory environment. However, a limited number of amines are available for carbon capture research after balancing the capital cost and energy penalty. In the carbon capture process, physical properties such as viscosity, surface tension, wettability, etc. are found to play important roles in solvent performance. In this context, we are exploring an approach to enhance the CO2 capture of amine solvents by tuning the physical properties of the amine solvents by the addition of additives. These additives in the amine solution utilize controlled bubble generation to increase liquid-gas contact surface area. This method can increase mass transfer in the absorber column, specifically at the bottom where the mass transfer is limited. These additives can enhance the CO2 capture efficiency by changing the physical property of the solvent which in turn can lower the capital cost associated with the system. This work can be applied to all common aqueous amine solvent and would be of great interest to those in the CCS community.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗