SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “COMPASS DETECTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2016

The reaction π{sup −}p → π{sup −}π{sup −}π{sup +}p: Development of the analysis methods and selected results

We present the description of the analysis methods and results of applying them to the exclusive diffractive reaction π{sup −}p → π{sup −}π{sup −}π{sup +}p of 50 · 10{sup 6} events measured with COMPASS detector. The large statistics of π{sup −}π{sup −}π{sup +} events enables the two-dimensional partial-wave analysis independently in 100 bins of m(3π) with 0.5 < m(3π) < 2.5 GeV/c{sup 2} and in 11 intervals of squared momentum transfer with 0.1 < t′ < 1 GeV{sup 2}/c{sup 2}. The partial-wave analysis sub-density matrix is the subject to further mass-dependent fits describing the data in terms of resonances in 3π system and coherent background contributions. The novel approach of extracting J{sup PC} = 0{sup ++}(π{sup +}π{sup −}){sub S} isobar amplitudes as model-free functions, different for several J{sup PC} 3π states, is used. It demonstrates the presence of processes π(1800) → f{sub 0}(980)π and π(1800) → f{sub 0}(1500)π as well as π{sub 2}(1880) → f{sub 0}(980)π and new narrow signal a{sub 1}(1420) → f{sub 0}(980)π, without any established shapes used for (π{sup +}π{sup −}){sub S} isobars. The presented analysis is subject to further development and refinements which currently take place.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

DOE OSTI2016

Profile measurements of the electron temperature on the ASDEX Upgrade, COMPASS, and ISTTOK tokamak using Thomson scattering, triple, and ball-pen probes

The ball-pen probe (BPP) technique is used successfully to make profile measurements of the electron temperature on the ASDEX Upgrade (Axially Symmetric Divertor Experiment), COMPASS (COMPact ASSembly), and ISTTOK (Instituto Superior Tecnico TOKamak) tokamak. The electron temperature is provided by a combination of the BPP potential (Φ{sub BPP}) and the floating potential (V{sub fl}) of the Langmuir probe (LP), which is compared with the Thomson scattering diagnostic on ASDEX Upgrade and COMPASS. Excellent agreement between the two diagnostics is obtained for circular and diverted plasmas and different heating mechanisms (Ohmic, NBI, ECRH) in deuterium discharges with the same formula T{sub e} = (Φ{sub BPP} − V{sub fl})/2.2. The comparative measurements of the electron temperature using BPP/LP and triple probe (TP) techniques on the ISTTOK tokamak show good agreement of averaged values only inside the separatrix. It was also found that the TP provides the electron temperature with significantly higher standard deviation than BPP/LP. However, the resulting values of both techniques are well in the phase with the maximum of cross-correlation function being 0.8.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2016

Fitting of the Thomson scattering density and temperature profiles on the COMPASS tokamak

A new technique for fitting the full radial profiles of electron density and temperature obtained by the Thomson scattering diagnostic in H-mode discharges on the COMPASS tokamak is described. The technique combines the conventionally used modified hyperbolic tangent function for the edge transport barrier (pedestal) fitting and a modification of a Gaussian function for fitting the core plasma. Low number of parameters of this combined function and their straightforward interpretability and controllability provide a robust method for obtaining physically reasonable profile fits. Deconvolution with the diagnostic instrument function is applied on the profile fit, taking into account the dependence on the actual magnetic configuration.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2019

Calculating Dose Release Factors to Obtain the Worst-Case Maximally Exposed Location by Sector

The aim of this project was to update the SRS Dose Release Factors (DRF's) for the Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI) for 20 area release points onsite. To update, potential MEIs now include onsite locations and modeled stack heights were updated to match onsite operations. The DRF's and MEI locations are used to ensure DOE and EPA compliance is met for dose standards. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires the use of the computer model CAP88 to estimate doses for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 61, the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). The location of the maximally exposed individual (MEI) by sector and distance is required for execution of CAP88. The worst-case sector is the sector and distance where an offsite individual would receive the highest dose due to a potential release from a designated release location at a facility. The worst-case sector analysis addresses potential ground-level and stack-height releases from 20 areas of Savannah River Site (SRS). Weather patterns were analyzed at each of these areas relative to sixteen compass points. The analysis makes use of recently updated distance data and meteorological data. The computer model, CAP88 is EPA's software system used by the Department of Energy (DOE) to calculate the receptor dose due to routine atmospheric releases via a gaussian plume at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The dose-release factors (DRFs) are used to estimate the offsite and onsite dose from facility-specific releases and represent the dose to a receptor exposed to 1 Ci of a specified radionuclide being released into the atmosphere. The DRFs are simply a ratio of the TED to the release rate and, therefore, are directly scalable. The DRF values listed in the Appendix can be applied to expected release values from each area to estimate the potential dose to an individual adult at each location. NESHAP DRFs have been supplied to Environmental Compliance and Area Closure Projects (EC and ACP) for many years and are periodically updated to include changes in Cap88. estimate the potential dose to an individual adult at each location DRF in mrem Ci{sup -1} are estimated by modeling the total effective dose (TED) in mrem yr{sup -1} assuming an annual atmospheric release rate of 1 Ci yr-1 of the associated radionuclides. TED = Effective Dose (ED) + Committed Effective Dose (CED). TED = DRF/RR. Approach and Methods: Determine possible MEI locations Onsite/Offsite including buildings and farms; Determine the distances from the release area to the possible MEI location and the direction from the release to the MEI location; Using the most recent meteorological data (2007-2011) and parameters, run CAP88 for each release area for each compass sector and previously calculated distances to MEI locations using a 1 Ci release rate for tritium; Use the calculated the air concentration values to determine the MEI for each sector from CAP88. The relationship between air concentration and received dose is directly proportional and can be used to determine which locations to calculate DRF's and a dose for an MEI; The DRFs are found for each compass sector from 20 SRS release areas using CAP88-PC Version 4.0; Each location is calculated with ground level releases evaluated for each area for a list of radionuclides, some with and some without progenies; Compare the DRFs of the potential onsite MEIs to offsite MEIs. Based on the 2018 MEI Report, the Site worst case sector MEI is located 593 mW of B-Area. This MEI location represents a point along the main road that travels through a tract of land leased to the SC National Guard. While this location is estimated to have the highest exposure, minimal radioactivity is released from B-Area. In 2017, SRS requested and was approved by the EPA to change the location for modeling site releases from the Center of Site to H-Area, and to use six stack heights. H-Area emission account for approximately 90% of all radioactive operations onsite. The MEI for H-Area was found to be 11,458 m NNE which locates the Savannah River Ecology Lab Conference Center. Comparisons for 2018 data and 2014 shows the new methods of calculation are more conservative yet still remain well below the DOE 100 mrem limit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

Pion-photon reactions and chiral dynamics in Primakoff processes at COMPASS

With the COMPASS experiment at CERN, pion-photon reactions are investigated via the Primakoff effect, implying that high-energetic pions react with the quasi-real photon field surrounding the target nuclei. The production of a single hard photon in such a pion scattering at lowest momentum transfer to the nucleus is related to pion Compton scattering. From the measured cross-section shape, the pion polarisability is determined. The COMPASS measurement is in contradiction to the earlier dedicated measurements, and rather in agreement with the theoretical expectation from chiral perturbation theory. In the same data taking, reactions with neutral and charged pions in the final state are measured and analyzed. At low energy in the pion-photon centre-of-momentum system, these reactions are governed by chiral dynamics and contain information relevant for chiral perturbation theory. At higher energies, resonances are produced and their radiative coupling is investigated.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

DOE OSTI2015

SU-E-T-793: Validation of COMPASS 3D Dosimetry as Pre Treatment Verification with Commercial TPS Algorithms

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the advent of COMPASS 3D dosimetry as a routine pre treatment verification tool with commercially available CMS Monaco and Oncentra Masterplan planning system. Methods: Twenty esophagus patients were selected for this study. All these patients underwent radical VMAT treatment in Elekta Linac and plans were generated in Monaco v5.0 with MonteCarlo(MC) dose calculation algorithm. COMPASS 3D dosimetry comprises an advanced dose calculation algorithm of collapsed cone convolution(CCC). To validate CCC algorithm in COMPASS, The DICOM RT Plans generated using Monaco MC algorithm were transferred to Oncentra Masterplan v4.3 TPS. Only final dose calculations were performed using CCC algorithm with out optimization in Masterplan planning system. It is proven that MC algorithm is an accurate algorithm and obvious that there will be a difference with MC and CCC algorithms. Hence CCC in COMPASS should be validated with other commercially available CCC algorithm. To use the CCC as pretreatment verification tool with reference to MC generated treatment plans, CCC in OMP and CCC in COMPASS were validated using dose volume based indices such as D98, D95 for target volumes and OAR doses. Results: The point doses for open beams were observed <1% with reference to Monaco MC algorithms. Comparisons of CCC(OMP) Vs CCC(COMPASS) showed a mean difference of 1.82%±1.12SD and 1.65%±0.67SD for D98 and D95 respectively for Target coverage. Maximum point dose of −2.15%±0.60SD difference was observed in target volume. The mean lung dose of −2.68%±1.67SD was noticed between OMP and COMPASS. The maximum point doses for spinal cord were −1.82%±0.287SD. Conclusion: In this study, the accuracy of CCC algorithm in COMPASS 3D dosimetry was validated by compared with CCC algorithm in OMP TPS. Dose calculation in COMPASS is feasible within < 2% in comparison with commercially available TPS algorithms.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2013

Recent results from COMPASS spin program

COMPASS is a fixed target experiment at CERN’s Super-Proton-Synchrotron. Part of its physics program is dedicated to the spin structure of the nucleon, which it studies with a polarized muon beam and polarized targets. An overview of its recent results along this line is given. In particular, the first results of our 2011 longitudinally polarized proton run, a report on our progress towards the extraction of the gluon polarization, ΔG, at NLO and an update on our measurements of transverse spin and k{sub T}-dependent processes, from our 2010 transversely polarized proton data, and of hadron multiplicities.