Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CSG”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

16 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

A Novel Algorithm for CAD to CSG Conversion in McCAD

Modeling and simulation lie at the heart of the design process of any nuclear application. An accurate representation of the radiation environment ensures not only the feasibility of new technologies, but it also aids in operation, maintenance, and even decommissioning. With increasingly complex designs, high-fidelity models have become a necessity for design maturity. McCAD has been under development for many years at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) to facilitate the process of generating suitable models for nuclear analyses. In this paper, an overview of the major advances in the new version of the code is presented. A novel conversion algorithm has proven to be robust in significantly reducing the processing time to generate radiation transport models, making it easier to iterate on design details. A first-of-a-kind capability to generate hierarchical void cells is also discussed with preliminary analysis showing performance gains for particle tracking.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Layered CAD/CSG geometry for spatially complex radiation transport scenarios

Many spatially complex fission, fusion, and national security Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport scenarios involve combining computer-aided design (CAD) models with constructive solid geometry (CSG) models. A layered geometry method has been implemented in the Shift MC code to address this need. With layered geometry, multiple CAD and/or CSG models can be clipped, translated, rotated, and placed in overlapping layers to form transport-ready geometries. Here, the utility of this method is demonstrated with two problems: (1) a fixed-source simulation with a layered geometry consisting of a LiDAR-generated CAD model of the Combined Arms Collective Training Facility urban environment overlaid with CSG models of a mock hotel and a detector apparatus, and (2) a k-eigenvalue calculation using a layered geometry model of the Transformational Challenge Reactor consisting of CAD fuel elements placed in a CSG core. Tallied particle flux distributions match expectations, but tracking robustness must be improved prior to general-purpose use.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Point containment algorithms for constructive solid geometry with unbounded primitives

Here, we present several algorithms for evaluating point containment in constructive solid geometry (CSG) trees with unbounded primitives. Three algorithms are presented based on postfix, prefix, and infix notations of the CSG binary expression tree. We show that prefix and infix notations enable short-circuiting logic, which reduces the number of primitives that must be checked during point containment. To evaluate the performance of the algorithms, each algorithm was implemented in the OpenMC Monte Carlo particle transport code, which relies on CSG to represent solid bodies through which subatomic particles travel. Two sets of tests were carried out. First, the execution time to generate a rasterized image of a 2D slice of three CSG models of varying complexity was measured. Use of both prefix and infix notations offered significant speedup over the postfix notation that has traditionally been used in particle transport codes, with infix resulting in a 6 x reduction in execution time relative to postfix for a model of a tokamak fusion device. We then measured the execution time of neutron transport simulations of the same three models using each of the algorithms. The results and performance improvements reveal the same trends as for the rasterization test, with a 5.52 x overall speedup using the infix notation relative to the original postfix notation in OpenMC for the tokamak model.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2022

MCNP6.3 Unstructured Mesh Verification: GodivR and CANDU Models

A geometric cell of the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP)1 transport code is traditionally created by using Boolean operators on defined surfaces. This constructive solid geometry (CSG) capability has been available in the MCNP code since its beginning. However, a CSG model approach is limited when it comes to constructing a representative geometry for a complex model in its ability to capture a correct model representation. Starting with the version 6.0, the MCNP code has the ability of embedding an unstructured mesh (UM) model into a CSG cell to create a hybrid geometry [1]. The MCNP UM feature provides the flexibility of defining very complex geometries because computer aided design (CAD) and mesh generation software packages can be utilized to construct UM models for MCNP simulations.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Using CUBIT to Create Unstructured Mesh Models for MCNP Simulations

The Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code version 6 (also known as MCNP6) has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models embedded into constructive solid geometry (CSG) cells. This feature has been developed for performing calculations of complex geometry models because creating CSG models is a time-consuming and error-prone process as the complexities of geometries increase. An MCNP UM calculation requires UM geometry input files. The UM capability was originally designed to work with UM models created with the Abaqus/CAE software and ASCII input files that it generates. The Abaqus-formatted input files needed for MCNP UM calculations must have the correct Abaqus syntax and meet the additional MCNP requirements. Several software packages can generate a UM model formatted as an Abaqus input file. Cubit, the Sandia National Laboratory automated mesh generation toolkit, can generate a UM model formatted as an Abaqus input file. However, the Abaqus input files created by Cubit cannot be used for MCNP simulations. A Python script has been developed to convert an Abaqus file created by Cubit to an Abaqus file that the MCNP code can process. This report describes the process of using Cubit to create UM models for MCNP calculations.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Athena-I CUBIT Journal Files

The Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP)1 transport code version 6 (also known as MCNP6) has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models embedded into con structive solid geometry (CSG) cells. This feature has been developed for performing calculations of complex geometry models because manually creating CSG models is a time-consuming and error prone process as the complexities of geometries increase. The UM capability was originally designed to work with UM models created with the Abaqus software and ASCII input files that it generates. The MCNP code version 6.0 and later can process UM models formatted as Abaqus input files. Starting with version 6.3, MCNP can also process HDF5 mesh input files. External codes must be used to generate Abaqus input files for MCNP UM calculations. CUBIT, the Sandia National Laboratory automated mesh generation toolkit, can generate a UM model formatted as an Abaqus input file. However, the Abaqus input files exported from CUBIT cannot be used for MCNP simulations because it lacks the proper syntax. A Python script was developed to convert an Abaqus file created by CUBIT to an Abaqus file format that MCNP can process. Creating UM models for complex geometries is not an easy task. The process of creating UM models in CUBIT for MCNP simulations is detailed in. CUBIT provides several user interface options including a graphical user interface (GUI) and a command line interface. A GUI provides an easy way to use CUBIT without learning the CUBIT command syntax. When using CUBIT with either interface option, command lines are written into an ASCII file known as a journal file; this journal file can be edited and archived so that it can be played back in CUBIT to automatically generate a UM model. This report describes the CUBIT journal files of the UM models developed for Athena-I. The Athena platform, an energy-tuning assembly, was developed to spectrally shape the National Ignition Facility (NIF) deuterium-tritium fusion neutron source to a thermonuclear (fusion) plus prompt fission neutron spectrum with capability to act as a short-pulse neutron source. MCNP6 was used for the Athena experiment design analysis.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Generating MCNP Input Files for Unstructured Mesh Geometries

The Los Alamos National Laboratory’s (LANL) Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP)1 transport code version 6.3 (also known as MCNP6.3) has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models embedded into constructive solid geometry (CSG) cells. This feature has been developed for performing calculations of complex geometry models because manually creating CSG models is time-consuming and error-prone as the complexities of geometries increase. A UM geometry model is a collection of finite elements representing a solid geometry. The first step of the MCNP UM calculation is using other software packages to create a finite element mesh representation of a solid 3D geometry because the MCNP code cannot be used to generate a UM model. Computer-aided design (CAD) software is typically used to create a solid geometry model, which is later imported into mesh generation software to create a UM model. Some mesh generation software packages may also be used to create solid geometries and thus CAD files are not needed. The MCNP UM feature was originally designed for models generated by the Abaqus/CAE software suite. The MCNP code version 6.0 and later can process UM models formatted as Abaqus input files. Starting with a 6.3 version, the MCNP code can process HDF5 mesh input files. We only focus on the UM models formatted as Abaqus input files in this report since currently no external software can be used to generate HDF5 mesh input files for MCNP UM calculations. The MCNP code version 6.3 can be used to convert the Abaqus mesh input files into the HDF5 mesh input files, but this option is typically used by the MCNP code development team to test the HDF5 mesh input file feature. Several software packages (such as Abaqus, Attila4MC, or Cubit) can be used to create the Abaqus input files for MCNP UM calculations. An MCNP UM calculation using an Abaqus model requires two input file types: MCNP and Abaqus input files. The Abaqus input files needed for MCNP UM calcu lations must have the correct Abaqus syntax and meet the additional requirements by the MCNP code. The MCNP code can process only Abaqus input files that make use of part and assembly definitions, where elements in each part must be grouped into one or more element sets (i.e., elset) using *Elset keyword lines with specified naming formats. The MCNP and Abaqus input files required for MCNP UM simulations must be related; pseudo-cells in an MCNP input file must be constructed from mesh model data from an Abaqus input file. For large complex UM models, it is tedious to manually create MCNP UM input files. The um pre op (unstructured mesh pre operations) program with the -m option can be used to create a skeleton MCNP input file from an Abaqus input file [6]. Since the um pre op program was written in Fortran and was not written for optimized performance, this program is a deprecated feature in the MCNP code version 6.3 and may be removed in the next release of the code. To improve calculation flow of multiphysics calculations, a Python3 code called write mcnp um input has been developed to generate an MCNP input file instead of using the um_pre_op -m option. This Python code was initially released to the public in 2020. We have updated this Python code for MCNP6.3 and it was used to generate the MCNP input files used to verify the MCNP6.3 code. The write_mcnp_um_input code is included with the MCNP6.3 code package which will be released to the public through the Radiation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This report is a revision of LA-UR-20-27139 report.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

FY25 MOOSE Usability Improvements: 3D Meshing Capabilities, Initiation of Geometry Support for Monte Carlo Tools, and Enhancement of MOOSE/Workbench User Input Interactions

Usability improvements have been made to MOOSE and Workbench in FY25 to enhance usability and user workflows. Assorted enhancement have been made to MOOSE’s intrinsic meshing capabilities in order to enable more flexible and complex meshing of nuclear reactor systems, in particular for 3D applications. Mesh generators have been added to perform operations such as batch mesh generation, surface mesh generation, and creation of 3D transition layers. These mesh generation capabilities make it much easier to generate high quality non-extruded 3D meshes. Additionally, work to integrate Monte Carlo reactor physics simulations into MOOSE-based multi-physics workflows has reached another milestone with the implementation of the Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) base framework. This framework lays the foundation for mesh generators to offer the user a generic CSG output option (as opposed to a finite element mesh). To support users, workshop on the MOOSE Reactor Module was delivered which featured hands-on examples using the NEAMS Workbench on INL’s High Performance Computing system. Recent updates to the NEAMS Workbench, WASP, and the MOOSE language server have introduced several improvements aimed at making MOOSE-based simulation setup and input management faster, more accurate, and easier to use. Key capabilities that have been added include multi-tab-stop autocompletion, visual input diagnostics, developer-directed data visualizations, upgraded ParaView integration, and Workspace-level file tracking. Together, these changes make it easier for users to build, validate, and manage complex MOOSE-based simulation models — especially those involving reusable components, included files, and datasets. The improvements are designed to save time, reduce input errors, and help users get to a successful simulation run faster, with more confidence in the results.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

An unstructured mesh based neutronics optimization workflow

We have developed a fully automated workflow to optimize the neutronics performance of the Second Target Station (STS) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Spallation Neutron Source. The optimization workflow starts with the parametrized solid CAD engineering models and converts them into the unstructured mesh (UM) models for the neutronics calculations with MCNP6.2. Calculations are executed and their results are loaded into the Dakota optimization toolkit. Dakota analyzes the results and proposes new geometry parameters for the next design iteration. The cycle repeats until the optimal parameters are found. The automated CAD to MCNP conversion, the use of high-fidelity UM models, and the use of modern optimizer are the key elements that advance the entire optimization workflow in comparison with the original workflow. The original workflow was based on a simplified constructive solid geometry (CSG) modeling with MCNPX, mcnp_pstudy tool, and an in-house optimizer. Herein to demonstrate the new workflow, we present a case of neutronics optimization of the moderator–reflector assembly (MRA). Apart from the MRA, the workflow can optimize other major STS components, such as the spallation target, neutron beamlines, radiation shielding, and various accelerator components. Importantly, the new workflow opens the door to the advanced multi-physics multi-parameter optimization and has the potential for use in other nuclear physics and accelerator applications.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2024

Testing the Activation Analysis for Fusion in OpenMC

OpenMC is a community-developed Monte Carlo neutron and photon transport simulation code. It can perform fission simulations such as fixed-source, k-eigenvalue, and subcritical multiplication calculations on models built using either a constructive solid geometry or CAD representation. To explore the use of OpenMC for fusion activation analysis, a detailed model of the Fusion Neutronics Science Facility (FNSF) was first developed for comparisons against an existing SERPENT model. A 90-degree model of FNSF in Standard-Triangle-Language (STL) CAD format was converted to Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) using each code's built-in functions, and the geometries were validated by ensuring no cells overlapped and no particles were lost during simulations. The neutron fluxes were calculated and compared for multiple components close to the plasma. The results show differences mostly below 1% in fluxes and averaged 8% for activity and decay heat. Here, the work described in this study tests the CAD-based geometry using the DagMC toolkit in OpenMC and compares the activation analysis of OpenMC to SERPENT code.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

VOTCA: multiscale frameworks for quantum and classical simulations in soft matter

Many physical phenomena in liquids and soft matter are multiscale by nature and can involve processes with quantum and classical degrees of freedom occurring over a vast range of length- and timescales. Examples range from structure formation processes of complex polymers or even polymer blends (Svaneborg & Everaers, 2023) on the classical side to charge and energy transport and conversion processes (Lee et al., 2019) involving explicit electronic and, therefore, quantum information. The Versatile Object-oriented Toolkit for Coarse-graining Applications (VOTCA) provides multiscale frameworks built on a comprehensive set of methods for the development of classical coarse-grained potentials (VOTCA-CSG) as well as state-of-the art excited state electronic structure methods based on density-functional and many-body Green’s function theories, coupled in mixed quantum-classical models and used in kinetic network models (VOTCA-XTP).

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

GEOMWRITER - A Workflow for Automatically Generating MCNP Geometry for Neutron Guide Simulations

This report describes the functionality of the geomwriter.py script, which is a python script for producing complex MCNP CSG geometries from the IGES CAD format. It is specifically written to handle neutron supermirror guides, but can handle more complex objects through utilizing a convex hull algorithm. This work flow reduces the amount of time spent on generating the surface definitions for a complex neutron guide system with hundreds of segments such that changes to the neutron guide system design in McStas can be rapidly incorporated into an MCNP model and integrated with the shielding geometry present in that model.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Two MCNP Models for Computational Performance Benchmarking

The purpose of this report is to describe two non-trivial MCNP models and execution configurations that are suitable to characterizing computational performance. To that end, this report uses a constructive solid geometry (CSG) representation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Pool Critical Assembly (PCA) [1–3] to perform a k-eigenvalue calculation and an unstructured mesh (UM) representation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 145 (ICRP145) male human phantom [4, 5] to perform a fixed-source calculation assuming that a 1 MeV photon source is distributed throughout the phantom’s liver.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Processing MCNP Elemental Edit Outputs

The Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code version 6 (also known as MCNP6) has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models embedded into constructive solid geometry (CSG) cells. A UM geometry is a collection of elements representing a solid geometry. The first step of MCNP UM modeling is using other software packages to create a finite element mesh representation of a solid 3D geometry. Computer-aided design (CAD) or computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software is typically used to create a solid geometry model, which is later imported into mesh generation software to create a UM model. The MCNP UM feature was originally designed for models generated by the Abaqus/CAE software. The MCNP code version 6.0 and later can process UM models formatted as Abaqus input files. MCNP can process a UM model consisting of several different element types including linear tetrahedral or hexahedral elements and calculate quantities of interest such as flux and energy deposition at elements. An MCNP UM simulation provides high-fidelity elemental edit (i.e., tally) outputs, which can be further used in multiphysics calculations. The MCNP UM feature was used for multiphysics simulations where quantities of interest calculated by MCNP are used as inputs for heat transfer calculations in Abaqus. MCNP6.3 can produce two types of elemental edit output (EEOUT) file formats: ASCII and HDF5. An EEOUT file type must be requested on an EMBED card while output type (flux or energy deposition) must be requested on an EMBEE card. We wrote Python3 scripts to extract energy deposition values in an ASCII or HDF5 EEOUT file and compute a heat flux profile for an Abaqus heat transfer calculation.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Neutronics Analysis of Heating and DPA of the Proton Beam Window and Core Vessel Nozzle Neutronics Heating Analysis for the Second Target Station

This reports details the analysis of the heating rates, dpa values and He production in the Proton Beam Window (PBW) assembly and the Core Vessel (CV) nozzle for the preliminary design for the Second Target Station (STS). This analysis focuses on the heating rates in the cooled beltline component of the CV. Neutronics calculations use a detailed unstructured mesh (UM) converted from a CAD model in SpaceClaim of the PBW and CV design of February 2024. The rest of the geometry is taken from the STS master model in constructive solid geometry (CSG). Heating is evaluated for four beam profiles, which are chosen as the most likely to produce the highest heating in the beltline component. The maximum energy deposition values in the beltline are 0.02-0.08 J/cc/pulse, depending on the beam profile. Detailed point cloud data of the full UM geometry is made available for mechanical analysis. The maximum dpa rate in the beltline steel is approximately 0.02 dpa/year, which corresponds to a lifetime of 3,000 years. These results are in good agreement with previous results for the CV. For the PBW itself, maximal heating, dpa, and He production rates are very similar to the previous analysis.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Using AMReX's Embedded Boundaries to Support MFIX-Exa’s Geometry Capabilities

MFIX-Exa is an AMReX-based application used for the simulation of chemically reacting multiphase flows inside reactors. The reactor geometry is mostly a combination of primitive shapes such as cylinders, cubes and spheres of varying dimensions connected together with potentially a lot of dead space between them. Additionally, the reactors may have particle-laden jets introduced at different parts of their geometry to enhance reactant mixing. This talk presents how MFIX-Exa uses OpenSCAD’s csg format to allow users to define the embedded boundary (EB) geometry and how it supports specifying inflow through certain sections of the EB. The talk will describe how MFIX-Exa leverages the EB features of grid-pruning, restart files and redistribution. Finally, the talk goes over some capabilities which are currently not available in MFIX-Exa but planned for the future, such as moving parts of the reactor geometry.

embedded boundaries↗