Meteoroid Protection Provided by Cassini Thermal Blankets: Testing and Modeling
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cassini Thermal Blankets↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Cassini Thermal Blankets”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Test-Derived Effective Emittance for Cassini MLI Blankets and Heat Loss Characteristics in the Vicinity of Seams
Thermal performance of Cassini MLI blankets was characterized in thermal vacuum tests. Effective emittance was derived for the standard and high-temperature layups, with or without micrometeoroid protection standoffs, and for a high-performance duo-layup with staggered seams. The all-Kapton layup wa shown to have a 19% higher effective emittance than the hybrid Kapton-Mylar layup, and the duo-layup exhibited a dramatic capability of reducing heat dissipation by 2.6 fold. Several different definitions of effective emittance are discussed, and their relations to distinct hardware-MLI configurations and corresponding modeling techniques clarified. Large temperature differences (up to 70 C) were observed between the center and seam of a blanket. Heat losses in the vicinity of seams are qualified, and a major MLI heat loss mechanism elucidated.
Cassini↗
Test-Derived Effective Emittance for Cassini MLI Blankets and Heat Loss Characteristics in the Vicinity of Seams
Multilayer insulation (MLI) blankets on the Cassini spacecraft will experience temperatures in the wide range of -200 to 360°C. Besides reducing heat loss, the MLI blankets will also serve, with standoffs, the purpose of micrometeoroid protection. Four major blanket layup configurations ??will be utilized on Cassini. Since definitive thermal properties for these layups were not available, thermal vacuum tests were conducted for their determination.
multilayer↗
(abstract) Patch Radiator Characterization
Spacecraft engaged in interplanetary exploration often make provisions for micrometeoroid protection. Both Galileo and Cassini utilize Mylar standoffs to secure a 1.5.
radiators multilayer insulation blankets↗
Cassini MLI Blankets High Temperature Exposure Tests
The Saturn-bound Cassini spacecraft will be subjected to a high temperature environment at 0.61 AU. Thermal vacuum tests demonstrated that the hybrid Kapton-Mylar MLI layup can withstand an outer layer temperature of 250 degrees Centigrade without incurring any damage, and the all Kapton layup, 430 degrees Centigrade. The latter will be applied to locales of extremely high temperatures, while the former more than 85 percent of the spacecraft's blanketed surfaces.
Cassini↗
(abstract) Cassini MLI Balnkets High-Temperature Exposure Tests
The trajectory required for the Cassini spacecraft to reach Saturn will subject the spacecraft to a 0.61 AU temperature environment at perihelion. Temperatures on some sunlit blanket surfaces at 0.61 AU can reach levels that are beyond the service capability of the conventional Mylar/Dacron net MLI. The majority of the blanket surfaces, however, will experience temperatures with an upper bound of 250(deg) C. The maximum allowable temperature for Mylar/Dacron net is determined to be 220(deg)C. Kapton can withstand temperatures in excess of 400(deg) C; however, the high cost of embossed Kapton relative to Mylar/Dacron net requires a baseline design which includes a standard layup and a high-temperature layup. The high-temperature layup is utilized at a limited number of locations, while at least 90% of the blankets are of the standard layup. The verification of both layups' capability to meet all temperature requirements has been accomplished by a comprehensive test program which addressed their high-temperature survivability, effective emittance, and optical and electrical properties. This paper focuses on the high-temperature exposure tests which helped define the hybrid standard layup, and which demonstrated the adequacy of both layups in withstanding their respective thermal environments.
temperature control insulation Cassini↗
Thermophysical Property Variations Across Dione and Rhea
Maps of the variation in bolometric Bond albedo and thermal inertia across Rhea and Dione have been produced using various day and nighttime observations, taken by Cassini's Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS). The albedo maps show the same trend that has been previously observed on these satellites from reflected sunlight and thermal observations: a higher albedo on their leading hemispheres. The thermal inertia maps show two previously unknown anomalous high thermal inertia regions: low latitudes on Dione's leading hemisphere and the bright ejecta blanket of Rhea's Inktomi crater. The thermal inertia on Dione increases modestly from a background value of 8 J m(exp -2) K(exp -1) s(exp -1/2) to 11 J m(exp -)2 K(exp -1) s(exp -1/2) in a region preferentially bombarded by high-energy electrons. We believe that this region on Dione is probably analogous to the thermally anomalous regions recently discovered at equivalent locations on Mimas and Tethys, dubbed Pac-Man features. The smaller magnitude of Dione's thermal anomaly, compared to that of Mimas and Tethys, provides additional evidence that surface alteration by high-energy electrons produces these anomalies, as the high-energy electron flux decreases with increasing distance from Saturn. However, unlike on Mimas and Tethys, the thermally anomalous region on Dione does not display a spatially correlated decrease in the IR/UV (0.930 micrometers/0.338 micrometers) color ratio, implying that the minimum electron energy threshold of the IR/UV ice surface darkening mechanism is not met on Dione. The average of the mapped bolometric Bond albedos on the leading and trailing hemispheres of Dione are 0.49 +/- 0.11 and 0.44 +/- 0.13 respectively. On Rhea the thermal inertia increases from a background value of 10 J m(exp -2) K (exp -1) s(exp -1/2) to 19 J m(exp -2) K(exp -1) s(exp -1/2) on the ejecta blanket of Inktomi crater, probably due to a mixture of high and low thermal inertia material in this region, such as a fine- and large-grain ice mixture. This is the first time a thermal inertia anomaly has been associated with an impact crater on an icy saturnian satellite. On Rhea the average of the mapped bolometric Bond albedos on the leading and trailing hemispheres are 0.59 +/- 0.11 and 0.56 +/- 0.13 respectively.
Saturn↗
Cratering on Titan: A Pre-Cassini Perspective
The NASA-ESA Cassini mission, comprising a formidably instrumented orbiter and parachute-borne probe to be launched this October, promises to reveal a crater population on Titan that has been heretofore hidden by atmospheric haze. This population on the largest remaining unexplored surface in the solar system will be invaluable in comparative planetological studies, since it introduces evidence of the atmospheric effects of cratering on an icy satellite. Here, I highlight some impact features we may hope to find and could devote some modeling effort toward. Titan in a Nutshell: Radius= 2575 km. Density= 1880 kg/cubic m consistent with rock-ice composition. Surface pressure = 1.5 bar. Surface gravity = 1.35 m/square s Atmosphere -94% N2 6% CH, Surface temperature = 94K Tropopause temperature = 70K at 40 km alt. Probable liquid hydrocarbon deposits exist on or near the surface.Titan in a Nutshell: Radius= 2575 km. Density= 1880 kg/cubic m consistent with rock-ice composition. Surface pressure = 1.5 bar. Surface gravity = 1.35 m/square s; Atmosphere about 94% N2 6% CH, Surface temperature = 94K Tropopause temperature = 70K at 40 km alt. Probable liquid hydrocarbon deposits exist on or near the surface. Titan is comparable to Callisto and Ganymede for strength/gravity, Mars/Earth/Venus for atmospheric interaction, and Hyperion, Rhea, and Iapetus for impactor distribution. The leading/trailing asymmetry of crater density from heliocentric impactors is expected to be about 5-6, in the absence of resurfacing. Any Saturnocentric impactor population is likely to alter this. In particular the impact disruption of Hyperion is noted; because of the 3:4 orbital resonance with Titan, fragments from the proto-Hyperion breakup would have rapidly accreted onto Titan. Titan's resurfacing history is of course unknown. The disruption of impactors into fragments that individually create small craters is expected to occur. A crude estimate suggests a maximum separation of about 2 km (compared with 4 km on Venus, or 0.5 km on Earth). Crater chains are unlikely on Titan, since impactors must pass close enough to Saturn to be tidally disrupted; as a result, they would suffer aerodynamic disruption. Crater counting on adjacent satellites gives densities of about 200 per 10 (exp 6) square km for 20-km-diameter craters. However, the presence of a thick atmosphere leads to atmospheric shielding, depleting the relative abundance of small craters. This has been evaluated by models, and the relative abundance of small craters may be due to a diagnostic atmospheric collapse. A number of radar-dark "splotches" have been detected on Venus; these have been attributed to the interaction of the surface with the atmospheric shockwave produced by the Tunguska-like explosion of a bolide in the atmosphere. Simple analogy suggests that similar features might occur on Titan, but the shocked mass density (which controls the momentum coupling between the surface and the shockwave) of Titan's cold N2 atmosphere is about 20x smaller than that of Venus's hot CO2 atmosphere. Unless ice is much more easily turned to rubble than is rock, such features seem less probable on Titan. When the energy deposited by an impact forms a fireball with an equilibrate greater than one scale height, the fireball expands upward and can distribute ejecta. on ballistic exoatmospheric trajectories. On Venus this process is believed to be responsible for the parabolic features; the interaction of various-sized particles falling through the atmosphere with the zonal wind field winnows the particles to form a parabolic deposit. Although such a process is possible on Titan, the large scale height at higher altitudes would make it more difficult. Comparison with craters on other icy satellites suggests that craters on Titan will be fairly shallow (depth/diameter about 0.1) and craters greater than 10 km in diameter will have central peaks or domed bases, perhaps with central pits. The formation of ejecta. blankets may involve the atmosphere in a significant way, both by restraining the expansion of the ejecta cloud and by influencing the thermal history of the ejecta. Compared with Venus, Titan's atmosphere will chill an impact melt somewhat quickly, so the long ejecta flows seen on Venus seem less likely, detailed modeling needs to be performed to determine the impact melt production. Crater topography on Titan may be highlighted by the influence of liquids forming crater lakes. Craters with central peaks will typically form ring-shaped lakes, although horseshoe-shaped takes may be common; domed craters with central pits may even form bullseye lakes with islands with central ponds. If liquids have covered a substantial part of Titan's surface for a substantial period, hydroblemes and tsunami deposits may be common.
Lorenz, R. D.↗