Results for “Cooperative Construction Contracting Agreement”

DOE OSTI2025

Reduced Contracting Time To Accelerate Construction: A Streamlined Approach for Speed and Scale

In the fast-paced construction world, efficiency isn't just an advantage - it's a necessity. By implementing the Cooperative Construction Contracting Agreement (CCCA), we are transforming how we approach major projects, replacing traditional multistep contracting with a streamlined, one-step process. This innovative contracting approach saves valuable time and resources, enabling us to accelerate delivery across our portfolio of projects. Under the old model, each construction phase required separate competitive solicitations for design, build, and other services. With the CCCA, we've consolidated these steps, working with a trusted partner from start to finish. This results in significant time savings that translate into faster project execution without compromising quality or safety.

collaborative partnerships↗

NASA NTRS2002

Louisiana NASA EPSCoR Project

In 1994, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration issued a Cooperative Agreement (CA) to the State of Louisiana, through the Louisiana Board of Regents (BOB), for the performance of scientific research under the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) Project. Originally constructed as a three-year program with an optional two-year follow on, this federal-state partnership culminated on 31 October 2001, including two CA extensions. The total value of the project reached $3.3M in NASA funding, matched by $2.75M in BOB funds, and supplemented by several million dollars in institutional contributions. Three Research Clusters comprised the state-wide research effort coupled with scientific/technical management and a teacher involvement component. The three research clusters addressed the Enterprises of Space Science, Earth Science and Aerospace Technology with research in High Energy Astrophysics, the Global Carbon Cycle, and Propulsion. Ten universities, over two dozen faculty, over 150 students and numerous support personnel were involved. All of the scientific and technical objectives were met or exceeded. In aggregate, the clusters generated about $18M in outside support, better than a 2:1 return on investment (better than 5:1 considering only the NASA investment). Moreover, two of the clusters have advanced to the level of applying for major NSF research center designation. This project was a trial of the model of building research infrastructure through mentoring. While not completely successful, the results at the smaller institutions were, none the less, positive. Faculty were engaged in major research and involved their students. Administrations improved their capabilities to handle grants and contracts. Faculty release time was granted, research space was provided and, in some cases, equipment was made available for the research. Some of the faculty at these schools have remained involved in research and/or formed collaborations for new endeavors, demonstrating that the mentoring model can be successful.

Wefel, John P.↗