Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Curvilinear Immersed Boundary”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Virtual Flow Solver - Geophysics: A 3D Incompressible Navier-Stokes Solver

Virtual Flow Solver - Geophysics (VFS-Geophysics) is a three-dimensional (3D) incompressible Navier-Stokes solver based on the Curvilinear Immersed Boundary (CURVIB) method. The CURVIB is a sharp interface type of immersed boundary (IB) method that enables the simulation of fluid flows in the presence of geometrically complex moving bodies. The CURVIB method can be applied to wind/MHK turbine simulations and energy applications. VFS-Geophysics is the result of many years of research work by several graduate students, post-docs, and research associates that have been involved in the Computational Hydrodynamics and Biofluids Laboratory directed by Professor Fotis Sotiropoulos. The preparation of the present manual has been supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-EE 0005482).

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Wall-Modeled LES Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using LAVA

A new immersed boundary Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulation (WMLES) formulation is developed to study high-lift aerodynamics on the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model (HL-CRM). A sequence of Cartesian Octree grids with sizes ranging from 100 Million through 2.02 Billion grid points is utilized to systematically assess grid-sensitivity and convergence for the in-tunnel (QinetiQ) configuration of the model, and remarkable agreement between the immersed boundary and the curvilinear body-aligned WMLES formulations is reported on grids with comparable resolutions. In the free-air configuration of the model, consistent predictions between the Curvilinear Overset and the Cartesian Octree formulations are reported for angles of attack up to C(L,max) at a=19.57. However, some differences in the onset of stall are seen between the two methods for a>20°: while the curvilinear WMLES experiences wing-root separation with increasing angle of attack (Topology A), the Cartesian Octree formulation shows a different flow topology characterized by boundary layer weakness on the main element, emanating from the pylon-wing attachment (Topology B). In order to obtain further insight into the two-distinct topologies, carefully designed numerical experiments to isolate effects of the model standoff and the tunnel wall-boundary layers are conducted using the immersed boundary WMLES formulation. The increased incidence angle-of-attack on the inboard portion of the wing due to the standoff is shown to be sufficient for triggering a switch from Topology B to Topology A in Cartesian WMLES. The role of the floor boundary layer is further examined in detail by identification of additional corner-flow vorticity generated by the viscous juncture flow interactions between the floor boundary layer and the standoff leading to formation of a strong coherent and persistent vortex on the belly-side of the fuselage. The intensity of this vortex is shown to increase with the thickness of the floor boundary layer. A further increase in the incidence angle of attack near the leading-edge strake caused by the presence of this belly-side vortex is quantified for two-distinct floor boundary layers. Both of the floor boundary layers considered result in the onset of large scale wing-root separation at a=21.47in non-confined (free-air) configurations.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled LES of a Swept Wing with Leading-Edge Ice Using LAVA Curvilinear, Unstructured, and Cartesian Solvers

Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (LES) of a swept wing with leading-edge ice build up is performed using three mesh paradigms and associated flow solvers and compared to experimental results. The study focuses on an 8.9% scale model of the CRM65 swept wing featuring both high-fidelity and smooth leading-edge ice shapes. The assessment is conducted using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) framework using the three actively supported meshing paradigms in LAVA: structured curvilinear overset, unstructured, andCartesian. For the iced configurations, these paradigms use hybrid body-fitted/source-term immersed-boundary, body-fitted, and ghost-cell immersed-boundary strategies, respectively.The unstructured and Cartesian mesh paradigms are particularly attractive for complex ice shapes as they avoid the manual mesh generation effort associated with the curvilinear approach. For the high-fidelity ice shape, good agreement with the experiment can be obtained with all three strategies; however, the curvilinear method is particularly sensitive to the source-term immersed-boundary timescale and span wise mesh resolution, and the Cartesian implementation is sensitive to the choice of numerical flux. For the smooth ice, larger discrepancies are observed across all methods. However, a mesh refinement study guided by flow visualizations leads to an improved comparison with the experiment that is particularly pronounced for the unstructured mesh paradigm.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Towards Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Immersed Boundary Overset Grid Method

Traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes grid methods applied to aerodynamic shapeoptimization can struggle with the deformation of surface and volume grids at componentintersections, such as at wing-fuselage junctions. To overcome this, we propose an approachwhich utilizes curvilinear overset grids for the discretization of the domain, with the presenceof the body modeled using an immersed boundary method. This approach handles complexgeometries without the need for their explicit integration into the grid. The goal of this approachis to reduce grid generation time and allow for greater geometric freedom for component-basedaerodynamic shape optimization. Two different methods are presented: a source-term-basedand a ghost-node-based immersed boundary method. Flow analyses and adjoint solutionsobtained using the proposed methods show promising comparisons with standard body-fittedgrid methods. Preliminary aerodynamic shape optimization results obtained using one of theimmersed boundary methods are also presented.

TTT↗