SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The conceptual design of the FMR including the experimental and numerical verifications will lead to: Cost estimation of the FMR based on the conceptual design results and guidelines of advanced reactor construction. Submittal of the pre-application licensing plan to the NRC for review and feedback.
A safety declaration is a fundamental document assuring the safety of water-development works, their correspondence to safety criteria, the design, and active technical regulations and rules.
This Statement of Work outlines the program machine siting requirements for Building 223 to be installed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).
Work is ongoing to create an instrumented and sampling system for monitoring aluminum clad spent nuclear fuel (ASNF) in dry storage. The anticipated system will be composed of a custom canister assembly and a modular instrument manifold. The conceptual design was first laid out in the Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (SRNL-RP-2019-00225). In this document, we outline the project progress to date, and describe the final system design.
The Power Take-off (PTO) System for Marine Renewable Devices (Project) envisioned the design, manufacture and testing of a generator that would ultimately be suitable for fully flooded seawater operation. This would require a generator design and bearing system capable of operating in the presence of seawater without corrosion. The original generator concept design focused on a switched reluctance electromagnetic design for the generator with the understanding that the switched reluctance design would be more robust and tolerant of a seawater medium. A trade study was conducted to prove that hypothesis, but the results of the study indicated that there was no benefit to adopting a switched reluctance design over a more conventional synchronous permanent magnet design. In addition, the novelty of the switched reluctance design added more technical risk to the Project than was warranted. ORPC’s cost of energy analyses pointed to reliability as being the most critical factor for achieving Project systems performance advancement (SPA) metrics. Consequently, the choice of a permanent magnet (PM) machine design over a potentially less reliable switched reluctance design was necessary to achieve the Project results. As a result, ORPC determined that a PM design was a more appropriate design to achieve the Project goals and ORPC selected a highly qualified PM generator firm for the design, manufacture and factory testing of the generator. The factory acceptance test (FAT) of the generator took place on March 20-22, 2017 and all tests were successfully passed. Developing a design for a driveline as part of the PTO system required a full understanding of the loads and operating conditions expected. Detailed analyses for developing turbine loads and subsequent definition of bearing specifications were performed using various analytical methods. Two candidate bearing designs were proposed as part of the Project. After initial design work had been completed, ORPC designed a representative full-scale driveline to validate the detailed design of the advanced driveline components. Full-scale components were manufactured, instrumented and tested, simulating actual system parameters. This full-scale bearing test was conducted at the University of Maine Advanced Structures and Composites Laboratory. The purpose of this test was to characterize the frictional losses associated with bearings and test the suitability and functionality of some commercially available shaft couplings and expansion bushings in cross-flow turbine drivelines. In parallel with component testing and dynamometer testing of the PTO system, ORPC performed design work to demonstrate how the advanced PTO system will be integrated with all ORPC turbine generator units (TGUs). The work would focus primarily on the TidGen® TGU and assess how the advanced PTO would be integrated into TidGen® 001 or other units, then field-deployed and tested in an open water environment under actual operational conditions. In addition to the benefits provided to the MHK industry in general, and ORPC in particular, the Project provided benefits to the general public, including the following: • Increased general awareness of the potential for generation of electricity from ocean energy resources • Demonstrated continuing advancements in the commercialization of MHK technologies, making them more likely to contribute to the electricity generation supply in America in the coming years • Continued awareness of the local economic benefits from the MHK industry through job creation and local spending • Confirmation of a path to improvements in availability, power-to-weight ratio (PWR) and reduction in levelized cost of energy (LCOE). All Project tasks were completed, and the Project objectives were accomplished. All project milestones and deliverables were met. The designs, methodologies, practices, testing, data, analysis and lessons learned from the Project are a step forward in the development of the U.S. MHK industry and provide a sound basis for ultimate commercialization of ORPC’s power systems. Based on the what was learned and demonstrated during the Project, ORPC has determined that the ORPC power systems have the potential of accelerating the commercialization of tidal and ocean current MHK power systems.
The goal of the 2-year workplan was to see if electron beam (EB) could be used to break down a sub-set of the larger chemical family of per and polyfluoroalkylated substances (PFAS) in an energy efficient and economical manner when compared to conventional water treatment technologies. Year one (Y1) work focused on sample EB treatment work in the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory’s (FNALs) Accelerator Applications Demonstration and Development (A2D2) EB accelerator. While there are reportedly thousands of types of PFAS, for the point of most of the work herein, a small subset was examined, typically perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA). PFOA and PFOS are two of the most well studied PFAS and are studied for baseline evaluations and are considered most useful. The work from Y1 provided information about the optimal operating parameters and additives to use when treating PFOS and PFOA via EB. The data were then used to see where in a water treatment system an EB accelerator would be best suited to treat PFAS. A conventional water treatment technology, GAC, was then compared to e-beam treatment technology with respect to energy and costs for treatment. In year two (Y2), several conventional e-beam accelerator designs, and FNAL’s developmental compact SRF accelerator design, were evaluated for their suitability in PFAS treatment, from an energy efficiency and cost standpoint. Several EB parameters were evaluated and optimized for the removal of PFOA and PFOS from water at normal pressure and temperature, measured as total PFAS removal. Under the optimized test conditions both PFOA showed complete destruction to inorganic fluoride, and PFOS to inorganic fluoride and sulfate, with mass balance. The effect on PFAS removal relative to solution pH, total EB dose, EB dose rate, dissolved oxygen concentration (DO), temperature, and initial PFAS concentration were evaluated. In general, PFOA was easier to destroy than PFOS. Degradation products, typically observed under less-than-optimal EB conditions, provided insight to degradation mechanisms. Products were identified to rule out possible deleterious biproduct formation. The water radiolysis radical reaction kinetics with PFOS and PFOA were not dependent on the initial concentration over 5-orders of magnitude from 2 μg/L to 20 mg/L. This is thought to be because there was an overabundance of the reactive water radiolysis radicals relative to PFAS molecules and largely attributed to aqueous electrons. The reaction rates appeared to be diffusion limited. Testing at higher concentrations (100-200 mg/L) showed a decrease in removal efficiency, suggesting alternative kinetics, possibly second order rates, at higher concentrations. In all, we successfully defined a set of optimal EB parameters to treat PFOA and PFOS at concentrations of 20 mg/L in water with destruction efficiencies near 100%. We further tested the optimized EB parameters with other types of PFAS, including shorter and longer fluorocarbon chain homologs of PFOA and PFOS, and PFAS with alternative functional groups such as sulfonamides. Based on our results EB can be optimized as an effective destructive technology for removing PFAS from water. The conditions optimized for PFOA and PFOS were less effective with ultra-short fluorocarbon compounds like TFMS, PFES, PFPS and PFBS, and likely require re-optimization of parameters to them. In all, it was determined that from a cost and energy efficiency standpoint, EB would be best applied to waste streams with relatively high concentrations of PFOS and PFOA and is not as cost effective as GAC treatment for removing low concentrations of PFAS from water. Higher concentrations of PFAS can be found in the wastewater of conventional treatment processes such as RO and IE and therefore EB may be used to supplement such treatment technologies. Some real-world IE regeneration wash water and RO reject water containing higher concentrations of PFAS and obtained from pilot scale industrial wastewater treatment system at a fluorochemical manufacturing facility, showed that EB could remove PFAS from such types of wastewaters. The IE regenerant wash water appeared to be the most efficient of the two types of wastewaters tested. However, some further optimization of the EB parameters for the specific PFAS types present in those wastewaters may be required. Also, the effects of co-present TOC and mineral salts should be considered during such optimization efforts. From the experimental Y1 results it was seen that the aqueous electron drives degradation of the PFAS. In a hypothetical water treatment skid using EB for PFAS destruction the parameters of the system should be optimized to promote aqueous electron production. Before EB treatment, the PFAS should be preconcentrated when possible, the pH should be raised to pH 10 or higher to enhance aqueous electron production, and the water should be nitrogen purged to remove dissolved oxygen to minimize aqueous electron scavenging. An excel spreadsheet was created that calculates optimal conditions based on inlet PFAS concentration and desired outlet concentration, by optimizing the accelerator power, dose rate, water treatment rate, pH and dissolved oxygen levels to reach the desired endpoint. Given this information on accelerator operating conditions five different EB accelerator systems were compared. One EB system was a continuous-wave, linear superconducting accelerator being designed at Fermilab. Three other EB systems (IMPELA at 5% and 25% duty factor and the ILU-14) were normal conducting pulsed linear accelerators. The fifth system was an IBA Rhodotron which is a normal conducting, circular, continuous-wave accelerator. The accelerator efficiency (% of the incoming power that is used in water treatment) was the dominating factor in accelerator choice. The radio frequency (RF) power supply and the accelerator design (superconducting versus warm technology) drive the accelerator efficiency. The IBA Rhodotron was seen to be the most energy efficient commercially available technology with a wall-plug (total) power efficiency of 43% at 400 kW. The Fermilab design, with a prototype for a different application currently being fabricated, was the most energy efficient at 55% when driven by a Klystron RF power supply and as high as 77% when powered by a magnetron. As the Fermilab design was the most energy efficient by approximately 10-30%, further design work was done on the accelerator and beam delivery system specific to the destruction of PFAS in water. The Fermilab design is unique from industrial accelerators in that is superconducting. Superconducting technology allows for the acceleration of electrons without losses. The accelerator must be cooled to below the point where it is superconducting and is operated around 4 degrees Kelvin. The bulk of the design work for the accelerator is on making the accelerator as energy efficient as possible so that it does not require liquid helium and can be cooled with conduction cooling via cryocoolers. Final design work resulted in an EB accelerator that would operate at minimally 200 kW and 10 MeV. Prototype construction would cost $\$ $7.8 million dollars when driven by a Klystron power supply. A second version of the same accelerator would cost $\$ $5.5 million dollars when driven by a magnetron that is still under development. The commercially available 300 kW IBA Rhodotron cost was estimated at approximately $\$ $9 million. While it is hard to directly compare, an operational GAC system used by 3M for groundwater treatment capital cost (2022 dollars) was estimated to cost $\$ $3.3 million. While the capital expense of the EB accelerator systems was higher than GAC, the accelerator EB treatment would result in destruction of the PFAS and not just sequestration of PFAS to form a new waste stream that requires further treatment or disposal. The operating cost to destroy the PFAS via 400 kw EB system was less than $\$ $1000/kg of PFAS destroyed when treating at a 20 mg/L PFAS concentration, compared to GAC with operating costs that calculated at $\$ $27,530 per kg of PFAS sequestered when treating 100 μg/L PFOA and PFOS combined concentration.
The Design Demonstration Experiment for the University of Missouri Research Reactor (DDE-MURR) is intended to facilitate Low Enriched Uranium (LEU) conversion of the MURR by demonstrating the performance and fabrication of the LEU fuel element design through an irradiation test in a 200mm channel at the Belgium Reactor 2 (BR2). Revision 0 of this report was prepared at the end of government fiscal year 2012 when most of the resources for furthering DDE design work were expected to be postponed. Hence, the conceptual design efforts were summarized to provide the status of key objectives, notable results, and provisions for future design work. Revision 1 of this report was prepared at the end of fiscal year 2013 in order to include results from a neutronic study performed by BR2, to incorporate further details that had been achieved in the engineering sketches of the irradiation devices, and to provide an update of the DDE-MURR campaign in relation to program objectives and opportunities for its eventual irradiation. These updates were purposed to bring the DDE-MURR conceptual design to level of maturity similar to that of the other two DDE efforts (DDE-MITR and DDE-NBSR). This report demonstrates that the DDE-MURR design effort is well on the path to producing a suitable irradiation experiment, but also puts forth several recommendations in order to facilitate success of the irradiation campaign.
Further development of the Gen3 Liquid-Pathway project is necessary to address technical engineering challenges with respect to incorporation of a flow control valve and sodium system for the 2.0 MWth Pilot-Scale system. For the Thermal Transport development task 1.3, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) originally set aside $\$$388,425 for the development of a heat trace test bed, however while the team felt that this work is necessary to de-risk a number critical design-related issues the team also has identified items that require more near-term attention. These items largely pertain to the Chloride molten salt values development, with operation up to 720°C, as well as operational mode/system design development as it pertains to the sodium system design, which is currently not included as part of the system design work. The Gen 3 project team requests the ~$\$$388k of funds be used to address these issues, where the previous work requested may be addressed with the 300kWth chloride molten salt loop. These funds would only be spent during the remainder of the Phase 1 budget period, in preparation of final design work for the Phase 2 portion of the project. For the Budget Summary below, please note that the values are burdened values and not raw values, so the actual values going to the entities will be less due to National Laboratory tax costs.
This summer project focused on the design and analysis of a device, denoted the manipulator, that can produce pitch and yaw manipulations to precisely align the pinhole array to the target chamber center within the National Ignition Facility. This manipulation device is limited by many factors and expected to meet strict performance requirements, so rigorous design work was done to ensure a robust concept was formed. This design work included the preliminary analysis ofthree diverse concepts, developing each concept to meet necessary requirements, secondary analysis, creation ofPugh matrix to support final concept choice, and optimization ofthe final choice. To do so, three concepts with diverse driving mechanisms were developed, analyzed, scored and the best performing concept was chosen.
The objective of this project was to complete the specifications and drawings for a variable speed kitchen exhaust system and the boiler heating system which when implemented will improve the heating efficiency of the building. The design work was focused in two key areas: kitchen ventilation and heating for the Ernie Turner Center building (ETC). RSA completed design work and issued a set of 100% drawings. RSA also worked with a cost estimator to put together a detailed cost estimate for the project. The design components are summarized.
This special issue of Nuclear Technology contains full-length, peer-reviewed papers describing the design work leading up to and the results of the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY) test. KRUSTY was the centerpiece of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Kilopower Project to design, build, and test a space nuclear reactor. This test was the first such test since the end of the Space Nuclear Auxiliary Power (SNAP) project at the end of the 1960s. In this issue, the introduction paper presents the goals of the Kilopower Project and the potential missions this reactor concept could serve in NASA. Kilopower was intended to serve both human exploration needs on planetary surfaces as well as science needs for deep-space exploration. The design work for the experiment by Poston and the power conversion development by Gibson present the pre-work required to perform the eventual KRUSTY test. A paper on regulatory analysis follows, to show the path used to gain approval of the proposed experiment. Then, the early zero-power critical experiments are presented by Sanchez and Grove. These experiments were essential data used to enhance model predictions prior to the high-temperature test. Next, Poston presents the three experiments (warm criticals) that increase the temperature in an incremental fashion prior to the final experiment. These experiments were used to achieve final regulatory approval of the final high-temperature experiment. The last paper by Poston presents the results of the steady-state and transient testing of the reactor at full power and at the design temperature. These results show that the reactor design and as-built experiment met all of the requirements that NASA had developed for the system. Any experiment of this magnitude was accomplished only because of the hard work and dedication of a large number of people at multiple institutions, including the NASA Glenn Research Center, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Y-12 National Security Site, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Nevada National Security Site prime contractor (formerly National Security Technologies and now the Mission Support and Test Services). The project was jointly funded by the Space Technology Mission Directorate at NASA and the Criticality Safety Program at the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). A special thanks to Jerry McKamy and Angela Chambers at the NNSA and Lee Mason and Don Palac at NASA for their support and guidance. For the authors and multitude of staff that performed this work, the passion for space nuclear reactors was the key to making this experiment a reality.
To increase production capabilities of actinium-227, Oak Ridge National Laboratory is improving existing hot cell facilities in building 3047 where the feedstock is handled and processed. Current processing operations in hot cell D will be moved to the adjacent hot cell C after the addition of two new custom work tables. These work tables will enable additional production capacity which will help ORNL meet current commitments to the sponsor.
The old diagnostic neutral beam injector first operated at the University of Texas at Austin is ready for rejoining the joint Texas experimental tokamak (J-TEXT). A new set of high voltage power supplies has been equipped and there is no limitation for beam modulation or beam pulse duration henceforth. Based on the spectra of fully striped impurity ions induced by the diagnostic beam the design work for toroidal charge exchange recombination spectroscopy (CXRS) system is presented. The 529 nm carbon VI (n = 8 − 7 transition) line seems to be the best choice for ion temperature and plasma rotation measurements and the considered hardware is listed. The design work of the toroidal CXRS system is guided by essential simulation of expected spectral results under the J-TEXT tokamak operation conditions.
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) is the primary plutonium science and manufacturing facility in the United States supporting multiple national security programs. It is responsible for completing a high variety of small-batch manufacturing tasks requiring the handling and precision machining of Special Nuclear Materials (SNM). Given the myriad of tasks that must be completed in a limited workspace, LANL intends to utilize flexible, multi-use robotic work-cells capable of completing a variety of mission critical tasks in a single glovebox with no re-tooling needed between batch jobs. This approach would allow LANL more flexibility in its production schedule and to meet its future production and research objectives. In this paper, we present a system that integrates multiple sensors and other manufacturing peripherals into existing glovebox infrastructure. Currently, a technician can place an object in the work area where vision sensors and supervisory software identify the object and its pose and automatically determine which manufacturing task to complete. Pose uncertainty is addressed in real-time by the task planner, eliminating the need for fixtures. Grasps are validated using pressure sensors, payload sensors, and grasp quality metrics to ensure that objects are not dropped or damaged during manipulation. The robot, sensors, and peripherals are controlled using open-source software built utilizing ROS (Robot Operating System), which minimizes redevelopment and allows for re-use and extensibility. Established capabilities support vision, collision-free path planning, and more, minimizing development time. For this effort, particular attention was given to the integration of general peripheral devices (drill, chuck, etc.), which is critical to efficiently utilizing ROS in manufacturing environments. This integration is achieved with an in-development framework that allows for quick integration of peripherals, including I/O devices and motors. Contact tasks utilize the Generalized Contact Control Framework (GCCF) previously developed at UT Austin. GCCF allows application developers to easily define multiple contact control tasks for a single robot. This paper summarizes the key software components necessary to develop the multi-use work-cell including existing ROS components. UT-developed software for grasp validation, peripheral integration, and contact control is presented in more depth. Finally the glovebox system is demonstrated completing a set of tasks with no fixturing necessary. Primary tasks include surface preparation/ablation, drilling, press-fitting, and sorting, as well as supporting material transfer and inspection tasks. The glovebox work-cell reduces cost, operator dose, ergonomic issues, and time loss due to material transfer between gloveboxes that only support one task. If multiple glovebox work-cells are in use, they have the potential to eliminate bottlenecks and scale production capabilities beyond current limits. (authors)
Abstract not provided.
Abstract Not Provided
Abstract Not Provided
Abstract not provided.