Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “E-OBS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Can Tracked Great Frigatebirds (Fregata minor) be Used to Measure the Dynamics of the Planetary Boundary Layer Height?

Observing the dynamics of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) will require creative combinations of space-based and in-situ measurements. Animals fitted with biologgers have been used to gather data and parameterize physical models in various settings and may be a useful addition to the suite of space-based measurements that NASA is considering. For example, great frigatebirds (Fregata minor) generally fly below 700m but have been shown to routinely climb up to 2,000 meters during the day, occasionally reaching heights over 4,000 meters. This suggests that they may be tracking boundary layer height dynamics as they soar and glide on air currents with little energetic cost. We show here that the high-altitude climbing heights of great frigatebirds carrying GPS/accelerometer biologgers (e-obs GmbH Bird Solar 15g) at Palmrya Atoll, Pacific Ocean, are consistent with the long-term climatology (2006-2019) of the local planetary boundary layer height, and that these soaring heights can be reliably extracted from the tag data. Additional study is needed to determine how well movement data from tracked birds can constrain PBL height, but this work demonstrates the potential for animal-borne sensors to complement space-based measurements. Biologging data were contributed by the USGS and the Nature Conservancy's Palmyra Bluewater Research (PBR) study and analyzed as part of NASA’s Internet of Animals project.

Planetary Boundary Layer Height↗

Influence of data uncertainty on cold season threshold-based climate indices

Climate indices are used to reduce the complex climate system and its changes to simple measures. The data basis – whether observational data or climate model data – to which the climate indices are applied, is usually subject to uncertainties. For threshold-based climate indices, the data uncertainty influences the threshold value, and, hence, the uncertainty can influence the values for the climate index. What the actual impacts of these uncertainties are on threshold-based climate indices is examined in this paper. The focus is not only on the climate model uncertainty, but also on the observational data uncertainty. The general sensitivity of each of the chosen climate indices to arbitrary changes in the threshold is studied. This shows a higher sensitivity of indices assessing extremes (ice days, heavy precipitation days) to changes in the threshold than indices that integrate a quantity over a given time interval (coldsum, consecutive days). For assessing an ensemble of climate model data with respect to their ability to reproduce the index values for current climate, the reference data uncertainty is applied to the chosen threshold-based climate indices by changing their threshold value by its corresponding uncertainty. It is shown that the climate model uncertainty can be within the range of the reference data uncertainty. When using threshold-based climate indices to assess changes in future climate periods, uncertainties should always be taken into account and ideally corrected in an appropriate way. This is especially important for indices that assess extremes.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗