Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Electrostatic deflectors”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Chapter Six - Derivation, cross-validation, and comparison of analytic formulas for electrostatic deflector aberrations

Here, we derived first and second order analytic aberration formulas in the horizontal transverse plane for an electrostatic deflector specified by the reference orbit radius, the central angle spanning the deflector, and its inhomogeneity coefficients. The derivation was performed using an iterative order-by-order perturbation method in a Frenet–Serret beamline coordinate system. We produced a C program edabrt for calculation of the first and second order aberrations using the formulas that we derived. The electrostatic deflector aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) disagree with COSY INFINITY and the aberration formulas that we derived here, and they also deviate from the first and second order symplecticity conditions. The reason for this discrepancy is that the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) consider only motion in the main field of the deflector and do not properly account for fringe field effects, in particular the necessarily occurring change of kinetic energy due to the change in potential. The code GIOS uses electrostatic aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) and exhibits the same discrepancy. We performed a comparison of first and second order electrostatic deflector aberrations for (1) the analytic formulas derived in this work, (2) differential-algebraic (DA) numerical integration of the equations of motion using the code COSY INFINITY, (3) the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965), (4) aberrations computed using the code GIOS, and (5) the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) adjusted to account for the occurring change in potential. An electrostatic spherical deflector and an electrostatic cylindrical deflector were used as test cases for this comparison. There is excellent agreement between methods (1), (2), and (5), and these three methods satisfy the first and second order symplecticity conditions.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Analysis and fringe field scaling of a legacy set of electrostatic deflector aberration formulas [Chapter Seven]

In this work we performed an analysis of the derivation of first and second order analytic aberration formulas by Wollnik (1965) for the case of electrostatic deflectors in the horizontal plane. We found that these aberration formulas are valid for the main field of the deflector; however, they do not account for any fringe field effects. To address this issue, we modified the aberration formulas from Wollnik (1965) for a hard edge fringe field by scaling the particle inclinations at the entrance and exit edges of the deflector. These modified aberration formulas fully agree with electrostatic aberration formulas derived by Valetov and Berz (2020), as well as with differential-algebraic (DA) calculations of electrostatic deflector aberrations using the code COSY INFINITY.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Development of deflector mode for spin-resolved time-of-flight photoemission spectroscopy

Spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (“spin-ARPES”) is a powerful technique for probing the spin degree-of-freedom in materials with nontrivial topology, magnetism, and strong correlations. Spin-ARPES faces severe experimental challenges compared to conventional ARPES attributed to the dramatically lower efficiency of its detection mechanism, making it crucial for instrumentation developments that improve the overall performance of the technique. Here in this paper, we demonstrate the functionality of our spin-ARPES setup based on time-of-flight spectroscopy and introduce our recent development of an electrostatic deflector mode to map out spin-resolved band structures without sample rotation. We demonstrate the functionality by presenting the spin-resolved spectra of the topological insulator Bi2Te3 and describe in detail the spectrum calibrations based on numerical simulations. By implementing the deflector mode, we minimize the need for sample rotation during measurements, hence improving the overall efficiency of experiments on small or inhomogeneous samples.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Controlled molecule injector for cold, dense, and pure molecular beams at the European x-ray free-electron laser

A permanently available molecular-beam injection setup for controlled molecules (COMO) was installed and commissioned at the small quantum systems (SQS) instrument at the European x-ray free-electron laser (EuXFEL). A b-type electrostatic deflector allows for pure state-, size-, and isomer-selected samples of polar molecules and clusters. The source provides a rotationally cold (T ≈ 1 K) and dense (ρ ≈ 10 8 cm −3 ) molecular beam with pulse durations up to 100 µs generated by a new version of the Even-Lavie valve. Here, a performance overview of the COMO setup is presented along with characterization experiments performed both with an optical laser at the Center for Free-Electron-Laser Science and with x rays at EuXFEL under burst-mode operation. COMO was designed to be attached to different instruments at the EuXFEL, in particular, the SQS and single particles, clusters, and biomolecules (SPB) instruments. This advanced controlled-molecules injection setup enables x-ray free-electron laser studies using highly defined samples with soft and hard x-ray FEL radiation for applications ranging from atomic, molecular, and cluster physics to elementary processes in chemistry and biology.

He, Lanhai↗

Fusion of 12 C+ 24 Mg far below the barrier: Evidence for the hindrance effect

Background: The phenomenon of fusion hindrance may have important consequences on the nuclear processes occurring in astrophysical scenarios, if it is a general behavior of heavy-ion fusion at extreme subbarrier energies, including reactions involving lighter systems, e.g., reactions in the carbon and oxygen burning stages of heavy stars. The hindrance is generally identified by the observation of a maximum of the S-factor vs energy. Whether there is an S-factor maximum at very low energies for systems with a positive fusion Q value is an experimentally challenging question. Purpose: Our aim has been to search for evidence of fusion hindrance in 12 C+ 24 Mg which is a medium-light m system with positive Q value for fusion, besides the heavier cases where hindrance is recognized to be a general phenomenon. 12 C+ 24 Mg is very close to the 16 O + 16 O and 12 C + 12 C systems that are important for the late evolution of heavy stars. Methods: The experiment has been performed in inverse kinematics using the 24 Mg beam from the XTU Tandem accelerator of LNL in the energy range 26-52 MeV with an intensity of 4-8 pnA. The targets were 12 C evaporations 50 mu g/cm 2 thick, isotopically enriched to 99.9%. The fusion-evaporation residues were detected at small angles by a E-Delta E-ToF detector telescope following an electrostatic beam deflector. Results: Previous measurements of fusion cross section for 12 C+ 24 Mg were limited to above-barrier energies. In the present experiment the excitation function has been extended down to similar or equal to 15 mu b and it appears that the S factor develops a clear maximum vs energy, indicating the presence of hindrance. This is the first convincing evidence of an S factor maximum in a medium-light system with a positive fusion Q value. These results have been fitted following a recently suggested method and a detailed analysis within the coupled-channels model that has been performed using a Woods-Saxon potential and including the ground state rotational band of 24 Mg. The coupled-channels calculations give a good account of the data near and above the barrier but overpredict the cross sections at very low energies. Conclusions: The hindrance phenomenon is clearly observed in 12 C+ 24 Mg, and its energy threshold is in reasonable agreement with the systematics observed for several medium-light systems. The fusion cross sections at the hindrance threshold show that the highest value (sigma(s) = 1.6 mb) is indeed found for this system. Therefore it may even be possible to extend the measurements further down in energy to better establish the position of the S-factor maximum.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗