Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Electrostatic voltmeter”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Voltage mapping and local defects identification in solar cells using non-contact method

Electroluminescence, infrared imaging, and current–voltage curve techniques are used to detect and map underperforming cells in a photovoltaic module or the modules in a photovoltaic string. In this work, we present a non-contact electrostatic voltmeter technique to detect and map the underperforming spots in a cell and the cells in a module. This non-contact technique directly maps the charged surface voltage (671mV) of the superstrate glass, and it had an 11-mV difference with the voltmeter values (660mV). Another data set of voltage values obtained by electroluminescence images conversion into a voltage map showed a difference of 7mV with the non-contact voltmeter values. Further, the direct voltage values obtained at various good and poor-performing spots of the cells using this technique are 3.69V and 3.79V and are validated using the voltage values obtained in electroluminescence analysis and the difference in voltage obtained by the two techniques is determined to be less than 2%. In this work, we combine the strengths of two complementary techniques of the electrostatic voltmeter (strength: quantitative) and electroluminescence (strength: spatial mapping) to obtain a quantitative spatial mapping of defects. Furthermore, this work is extendable to detect the poor-performing modules in solar PV power plants.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Use of non-contact voltmeter to quantify potential induced degradation in CdTe modules

Potential induced degradation (PID) is a significant reliability issue for photovoltaic modules in the field. Conventionally, to detect the PID-affected modules, all the modules in a string are individually disconnected and measured using I-V (current–voltage) tracers. It is extremely time-consuming, expensive and unsafe (if the module connectors are field aged) approach. In our approach, we aim detecting the PID-affected modules quickly, inexpensively and safely without disconnecting individual modules in the string. In this study, contactless electrostatic voltmeter’s (ESV) strength was explored to detect the PID-affected cadmium telluride (CdTe) modules in a string. These contactless measurements on high-voltage PV strings could make this technique unique and preferable to detect PID-affected modules in a string compared to the I-V curve method. In this work, a CdTe module was stressed for PID using the Aluminum (Al) foil method in a walk-in environmental chamber, which resulted in a reduction of module's peak current (I max ), peak voltage (Vmax), and fill factor (FF), and hence power (Pmax). Outdoor light I-V, EL, and ESV measurements were performed pre- and post-PID to determine the effectiveness of the non-contact ESV technique. Further, the ESV technique successfully detected the change in V max , and hence Pmax, compared to the pre-and post-PID conditions. A difference of less than 2% was observed in the results of the non-contact and non-interruptive method compared to the conventionally used interruptive voltmeter or I-V tracer method. This technique and the test results demonstrate a significant promise to identify poor-performing modules in PV string without disconnection of individual modules in the string.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗