Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Firing Room”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Simulation of Deuterium Oxidation in a Room with a Fire

A series of experiments where deuterium was released in trace amounts into a room with a fire were performed at Sandia National Laboratories. This report describes the corresponding effort to model the test series using SIERRA/FUEGO. The objective of this modeling effort was to produce a simulation test matrix that can be utilized to help interpret the corresponding experiments and be used to assess the credibility of using the SIERRA/FUEGO simulations as a surrogate for real tritium reaction data for mock fire and release studies. The simulations assessed multiple configurations of fire size and location and overall found that there was low conversion of deuterium to oxidized deuterium. There are some notable differences between the simulation predictions and the experimental results, such as the simulations generally predicting higher amounts of deuterium conversion compared to the experiment. A strategy to address modeling uncertainties and unknowns is also given in this report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Glovebox Fires Phase 1: Simulations of Open Burner Experiments

Understanding the duration of a fire required to breach a glovebox via glove ports and/or windows within a facility is important in developing mitigation strategies for safety. To facilitate this understanding, both simulation and experiments are utilized. The approach is to first validate the Computation Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), with experimental data collected by New Mexico Tech (NMT) and then perform simulations of full-scale rooms containing gloveboxes to assess numerous scenarios which would otherwise be cost-prohibitive experimentally. This report provides comparison to first-phase experiments involving a fire without a glovebox. A subsequent report will provide comparison to experiments involving a glovebox. The results indicate good agreement with FDS tending to over predict the pre-mixed and diffusion-mode tests by 6% and 10%, respectively.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Green co-solvent-assisted one-pot synthesis of high-performance flexible lignin polyurethane foam

Although lignin is a promising candidate as a source of polyol for producing eco-friendly polyurethane foam (PUF), its direct application has limitations, primarily stemming from the brittleness of the resulting products and poor processibility at high lignin loadings. To address these technical challenges, we introduced an effective co-solvent for the lignin-based polyurethane foams (LPUFs) with up to 80wt% of lignin substitution for petroleum polyols. As a green co-solvent that involves carbon dioxide fixation during its production, propylene carbonate (PC), was blended with lignin and improved the distribution of lignin by decreasing the viscosity, providing a room-temperature reaction. The LPUFs demonstrated a comparable thermal insulation performance (R-values greater than 5 in -1 ) with commercially available PUF with a uniform size of closed-cell structure induced by the reduced viscosity of lignin-based polyol. LPUFs also showed enhanced fire retardancy and moisture resistance compared to the control PUFs, benefiting from lignin’s intrinsic fire-resistant and hydrophobic properties. To mitigate the brittleness issue at high lignin loadings, flexible polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with a high molecular weight (i.e., PEG-1000) were dissolved in PC at room temperature to further improve the mechanical strength of LPUFs. The compressive strength of LPUFs with 80 wt% lignin substitution content was remarkably improved to 226 kPa by the employment of co-solvent and PEG-1000 compared to the control PUF (<140 kPa). Moreover, the flexibility of the LPUFs was successfully controlled by simply adjusting the PEG-400/PEG-1000 ratio. In conclusion, the results of this study provide valuable insights for accelerating and broadening the utilization of lignin in sustainable materials and manufacturing areas.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2024

Summary of Structural Alloy Compatibility in Supercritical CO2 at 450°-800°C

Supercritical CO2 (sCO2) is of interest as a working fluid for several concepts including the direct- fired Allam cycle as a low-emission fossil energy power cycle. Over the past 10 years, laboratory exposures at 300 bar sCO2 have found reasonably good compatibility for Ni-based alloys at <800°C, including an assessment of the sCO2 impact on room temperature mechanical properties after 750°C exposures. However, initial screening tests at 1 and 20 bar CO2 at 900°-1100°C showed poor compatibility for Ni-based alloys. In an open cycle, the introduction of 1%O2 and 0.1- 0.25%H2O impurities at 300 bar increased the reaction rates ≥2X at 750°C. At lower temperatures, steels are susceptible to C ingress and embrittlement. Creep-strength enhanced ferritic steels may be limited to <550°C and conventional stainless steels to <600°C. Two strategies to increase those temperatures are higher Ni and Cr alloying additions and Al- or Cr-rich coatings. Alloy 709 (Fe- 20Cr-25Ni) shows some promising results at 650°C in sCO2 but reaction rates were accelerated with the addition of O2 and H2O impurities. Pack aluminized and chromized Gr.91 (Fe-9Cr-1Mo) and type 316H stainless steel show some promise at 600°-650°C but further coating optimization is needed.

Pint, Bruce↗
DOE OSTI2025

Unveiling the thermite-driven lithium fire ignition in solid-state batteries

Here, this study challenges the assumption of the non-flammability of lithium metal all-solid-state batteries (LiSSBs) and other lithium metal batteries without flammable electrolytes. Through thermodynamic calculations and ex situ experiments, we reveal for the first time the risk of thermite reactions between lithium metal and LiFePO 4 in both charged and discharged states. Reactivity is worsened by excess lithium metal in the cell, reaching final maximum adiabatic temperatures of 2,500°C in the charged state, which is hot enough to boil lithium. The thermite reaction triggers spontaneously at 500°C, with poor surface contact, while increasing surface contact through mixing initiates the reaction at room temperature in an inert environment. Despite its fast kinetics, this reaction is transport limited due to lithium passivation, leading to long burn times and reignition risks. Given the risk of lithium metal contacting the cathode during failure, understanding these reactions is crucial for ensuring the safe deployment of LiSSBs.

LiFePO4↗