Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Flattop”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

High-Fidelity Measurements for Flattop-HEU Benchmark Reevaluation

Flattop was first built in the 1950’s at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Flattop-HEU is composed of a sphere of highly enriched uranium (HEU) surrounded by a thick spherical natural uranium (NU) reflector. The reflector is composed of three parts: a stationary hemisphere and two movable quarter spheres. For fine control of the reactivity of the system, there are three control rods of natural uranium located in voids in the stationary hemisphere. The final components that make Flattop a useful critical assembly are the glory hole and mass adjustment pieces. These pieces can be loaded in various configurations into the glory hole and the core pedestal to control the known worth of the system. The glory hole and mass adjustment pieces are mostly small pieces of HEU with some mass adjustment pieces fabricated from NU. This allows for the irradiation of samples to a specified level. To better document the system, Flattop was evaluated and included in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) handbook. The original benchmark evaluation of Flattop-HEU was written in 1999 based on an experiment completed in the 1960’s. This original evaluation was written to provide a single diameter that defined critical mass; however, as computational capabilities have increased, the focus for benchmark evaluations has shifted to include detailed modelswith all physical dimensions. Thus, as Flattop is a lynchpin in critical experiment work, the benchmark is being reevaluated at current standards. This summary discusses some of the largest known uncertainties from the evaluation and the high-fidelity measurements taken to reduce these uncertainties.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2021

A New Era of Nuclear Criticality Experiments: The First 10 Years of Flattop Operations at NCERC

The Flattop critical assembly was built and operated from 1958 through 2004 at the Pajarito Site (Technical Area-18), home to the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility. Flattop was disassembled in 2005 and refurbished over the course of 3 years. In 2008, Flattop was installed in the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) located in the Device Assembly Facility at the Nevada National Security Site. Startup of Flattop with a uranium core occurred in 2011. This paper details the first 10 years of Flattop operations at NCERC (2011–present).

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2020

PNNL Measurement Results for the 2018 FlatTop Criticality Nuclear Accident Dosimetry Exercise at the Nevada National Security Site (IER-253)

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) participated in the FlatTop exercise IER-253 at the National Nuclear Security Site (NNSS) during the week of May 21, 2018. This report summarizes the measurements of the personal nuclear accident dosimeters (PNAD). Additionally, portable survey instrument readings and measurements of the simulated biological samples are included. The FlatTop exercise (IER-253) tested only PNADs and did not include fixed nuclear accident dosimeters (FNAD). Previous PNAD results obtained in 2016 at the Godiva-IV exercise IER-148 were summarized in PNNL Measurement Results for the 2016 Criticality Accident Dosimetry Exercise at the Nevada National Security Site IER-148 (PNNL-26497). The results clearly indicated that the previous dose conversions were a historical legacy of the Hanford Site and corresponded closer to kerma dose (or first collision dose, and not to Hp(10) dose). The technical basis for PNAD dose was based on the Godiva-IV exercise and documented in A New Dose Calculation Methodology for New PNAD and FNAD Designs at PNNL (PNNL-27023). The configuration of the PNAD was described in these two documents. The FlatTop exercise was the first time PNNL tested this new dose calculation methodology. Results were generally favorable with some results conservatively over reported that fell above the performance criteria. The reported gamma dose results fell non-conservatively low because only the default parameters obtained from the Godiva-IV exercise were used, and because the OSL gamma dosimeter has an energy dependency. The results from the simulated biological samples were also favorable, and in several cases conservatively over reported.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Measurements for Flattop-HEU Benchmark Reevaluation

In June 2022, high-fidelity measurements of the Flattop critical assembly were taken at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) at the Nevada National Security Site by a team from Los Alamos National Laboratory, Figure 1. Flattop-HEU is composed of a sphere of highly enriched uranium (HEU) surrounded by a thick spherical natural uranium (NU) reflector as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. These measurements were taken as part of the reevaluation of the Flattop-HEU benchmark evaluation for the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Program (ICSBEP) Handbook. This reevaluation is being completed to update the benchmark to modern standards with significantly improved fidelity and uncertainty analysis. [1] The measurements address the largest identified uncertainties determined during a preliminary reevaluation in 2015. [2]

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Flattop Benchmark CED-2 (IER-423)

The final design for the Flattop HEU Core Benchmark is presented in this report. Physical measurements will be performed on Flattop components using modern instruments and techniques to define uncertainties necessary to meet contemporary ICSBEP standards. A preliminary re-evaluation of ICSBEP HMF-0028 (Flattop HEU Core) led to the development of IER-423 CED-1, wherein total relative uncertainties in $k_{eff}$ were provided based on a new detailed model. The estimated uncertainty on the total uncertainty is +100%/-0%, given a lack of documented uncertainties on mass, dimensions, and densities of predominantly the natural uranium (NU) and highly enriched uranium (HEU) components.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
NASA NTRS2013

Heat Pipe Powered Stirling Conversion for the Demonstration Using Flattop Fission (DUFF) Test

Design concepts for small Fission Power Systems (FPS) have shown that heat pipe cooled reactors provide a passive, redundant, and lower mass option to transfer heat from the fuel to the power conversion system, as opposed to pumped loop designs typically associated with larger FPS. Although many systems have been conceptually designed and a few making it to electrically heated testing, none have been coupled to a real nuclear reactor. A demonstration test named DUFF Demonstration Using Flattop Fission, was planned by the Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) to use an existing criticality experiment named Flattop to provide the nuclear heat source. A team from the NASA Glenn Research Center designed, built, and tested a heat pipe and power conversion system to couple to Flattop with the end goal of making electrical power. This paper will focus on the design and testing performed in preparation for the DUFF test.

Fission↗
DOE OSTI2024

Flattop-HEU Benchmark Reevaluation Summary

The Flattop critical assembly was first constructed in the 1950’s at Los Alamos National Laboratory as a follow-on to the Topsy experiment. Flattop is composed of a sphere of special nuclear material (SNM) surrounded by a thick spherical reflector made of natural uranium (NU). Two SNM cores currently exist: a highly-enriched-uranium (HEU) core and a plutonium core. The reflector is composed of three parts: a stationary hemisphere and two movable quarter spheres. For fine reactivity control, there are three control rods of NU that are inserted into the stationary hemisphere from underneath the assembly. The final components that allow for reactivity adjustment are the glory hole pieces, mass adjustment buttons, and hemispherical caps. These pieces can be loaded in various configurations to change the available reactivity loaded in the system.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Fabrication and Characterization of Plutonium Targets for Irradiation in the Flattop Critical Assembly

In FY16, Pu targets were fabricated in support of the Nuclear Physics: Cumulative Fission Product Yields (Fission R-values) task of the F2016 venture project; these targets are suitable for irradiation in the Flattop critical assembly at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). This report documents an overview of the target design, preparation of the Pu metal materials by removing the oxide layer and appropriate sizing for the target holders, target fabrication including filling an inner aluminum cup with the Pu material and the sealing of an outer stainless steel capsule, target assay using gamma spectroscopy, and the He leak testing of the final targets. Four targets were fabricated with two containing 99% 239 Pu metal and two containing 93% 239 Pu metal. Additional samples of each material were set aside for mass spectrometric analysis at PNNL and Los Alamos National Laboratory.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Flattop Critical Assembly [Slides]

Objectives: Gain a working knowledge of the design of the Flattop critical assembly; Gain a working knowledge of how changes in reflector location can affect the criticality of a system; and, Understand the concept of temperature-dependent reactivity feedback.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Flattop Free-Run [Slides]

Objectives: Awareness of the Flattop critical assembly design and intent; Obtain a working knowledge of how changes in reflector geometry can affect the criticality of a system; and, Observe the effects of temperature-dependent reactivity feedback.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Novel subnanosecond rise, flattop, 100 kV high voltage pulse generator (ASAP-LDRD-22-0122)

We looked to build a new type of 100 kV pulse generator that we hope will avoid many of the problems seen with other commercially available pulse generators. We looked to exploit recent improvements in both lasers and solid-state pulse charge units along with an alternative triggering layout to build something new. For the pulse charging unit, we collaborated with Texas Tech to leverage their knowledge and expertise in pulse transformers and solid-state switching. The final result of the LDRD looks promising. Texas Tech was able to build a pulse charge unit that meets our specifications regarding output, and we were able to integrate it with a switch and a laser to create a device that meets the goals of the LDRD. There is still much work to do to advance the design further and improve reliability, but the proto-type design satisfies the goals we set for this LDRD.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Pile Oscillator Evaluation for Flattop [Poster]

Useful method for high-precision measurements of integral cross section in various samples. The availability of benchmark-quality effective delayed neutron fraction (ßeff) values for nuclear data and code validation remains limited.

MCNP↗
DOE OSTI2026

Preliminary Activation Wire Analysis for the POKER Experiment Flattop Irradiation

Activation foils, or in this case wires, are commonly deployed to critical experiments at the Na tional Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) to provide additional neutron diagnostics and provide additional energy-dependent responses to tie back to neutronic and/or multi-physics simulations.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

Generating Models of the Flattop Critical Assembly for Benchmark Experiments with Python

Los Alamos National Laboratory has been performing nuclear criticality experiments since 1946 at the Pajarito site, starting the Los Alamos Critical Experiments Facility in 1948. A transition period occurred between 2004 and 2011 as operations moved to the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC), where criticality experiments are now performed. Criticality experiments are essential for determination and verification of nuclear data used in calculations and modeling—such as radiation transport codes—throughout the industry, enhancing nuclear criticality safety. In addition to nuclear data validation and benchmarking, the remotely operated critical assemblies at NCERC are used for a variety of experiments and training classes supporting criticality safety.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2023

The onset distribution of rotating m , n = 2 , 1 tearing modes and its consequences on the stability of high-confinement-mode plasmas in DIII-D

Abstract Analysis of a multi-scenario database of over 13 000 DIII-D H-mode discharges shows that the m , n = 2 , 1 magnetic islands are dominantly pressure gradient driven, stochastically triggered non-linear instabilities at all edge safety factor ( q 95 ) values. The instability onset time closely follows the exponential distribution in intermediate and high q 95 scenarios and is characterized by near constant onset rate ( λ ), in accordance with Poisson-point processes. This implies that the plasmas are operated in marginally stable conditions, characterized by a small threshold for instability growth and variations in the trigger amplitude and/or the stabilizing mechanisms with temporally uniform random distribution in this database. While the majority of the tearing modes occur in the first current-profile relaxation time of the β N flattop, constant λ throughout the β N flattop shows that the tearing onset is insensitive to the evolution of the equilibrium current profile. In low q 95 scenarios, where a large fraction of the plasmas are operated at low torque, λ increases over the course of the β N flattop, showing that these plasmas evolve toward more unstable conditions. The onset rate rapidly increases with β N , while it does not show a clear dependence on the current gradient at the mode rational surface. Overall, these observations support that the majority of the analyzed 2,1 tearing modes are non-linear, neoclassically driven instabilities and classical stability does not play a dominant role in their onset.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗