Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Fuel Accident Condition Simulator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

FGMS-poster

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) performs post irradiation examination (PIE) of tri-structural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particle fuel to help qualify it for high temperature gas cooled reactors. TRISO fuel compacts are re-irradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD) to generate the short lived fission products needed for fission product release testing. The Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace and newly added Screen Neutron Irradiated Fuel for Failure (SNIFF) furnace heat the compacts in helium to temperatures of up to 2,000°C, prompting fission product release—predominantly gaseous xenon and krypton isotopes and condensable products such as cesium—from failed particles. These released isotopes are transported to a fission gas monitoring system (FGMS 1 or FGMS 3), where they accumulate in cryogenic cold traps and are quantified using high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors. The addition of SNIFF and FGMS 3 increases throughput by enabling simultaneous testing of multiple compacts. Furthermore, automated INL developed software provides continuous, near-real time monitoring of fission product inventories and manages the liquid nitrogen cooling of the traps. These system enhancements improve the efficiency, data quality, and testing capacity of TRISO fuel performance evaluations.

07 - ISOTOPES AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Fission Gas Monitoring System Efficiency Calibration Summary Report

The Fission Gas Monitoring System was designed to work in conjunction with the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator Furnace and is used to measure fission gas releases during post-irradiation fuel heating tests. A high-purity helium sweep gas is swept past the heated fuel sample in the furnace and routed to a fission gas monitoring system, which cryrogenically traps the krypton (Kr) and xenon (Xe) fission gases. As the radioactive species of the trapped gas decays, high-purity germanium detectors monitor the amount of fission gas in each trap. The primary fission product present in this test is 85Kr, which has a 10.76-year half-life. The presence of 85Kr indicates particle defects and iodine release. There is also the potential for re-irradiating the fuel compacts in the Neutron Radiography Reactor in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility basement. With re-irradiation, it is possible to have xenon fission gas present, specifically 133Xe, which has a 5.243-day half-life. Re-irradiation also produces 131I, which is important for design-basis accidents and regulatory licensing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

2025 Intern Poster

The Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) at the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) houses the largest U.S. inert atmosphere hot cell for nuclear material research. Key features include the precision gamma scanning (PGS), Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS), Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD), and the focus of this project, the Metallograph Loading Cell (MET Cell). The MET Cell performs tests on spent nuclear fuel, such as microhardness testing, microscopy, and neutron radiography. However, the MET Cell’s existing pressure and lighting control systems are outdated and inefficient, with inadequate documentation for system changes over time. This project aims to design a new automated control system for the MET Cell, ensuring longevity (minimum ten years), ease of troubleshooting/repair, and integration into the building monitoring system. The design process addressed challenges such as space restrictions, varied voltages within enclosures, sourcing new components, and security limitations. Compliance with NFPA 70, UL508A, MFC Physical Security, and INL Engineering standards was essential. The project involves repurposing an existing PLC to manage lighting and pressure control using digital and analog signals, simplifying wiring, and ensuring thorough documentation for future reference.

42 - ENGINEERING↗

Post-irradiation Heating Tests of As-Irradiated AGR-3/4 TRISO Fuel Compacts

Four post-irradiation heating tests of fuel compacts from the U.S. Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR)-3/4 irradiation experiment were completed. In addition to tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated driver fuel, each compact contained designed-to-fail (DTF) particles with fuel kernels coated only in pyrocarbon so as to simulate exposed kernels. Tests at 1600/1700°C, 1400°C, and 1200°C were performed to measure fission product release as a function of time and temperature. Silver release was highest in the 1200°C test, supporting the observation that silver release rates are highest in the 1100–1300°C range. Compared to tests of AGR-1 compacts with no exposed kernels, the Cs-134 and Kr-85 releases were noticeably higher in AGR-3/4. The exposed kernels’ contributions to Eu and Sr release are inconclusive, due to the difficulty in distinguishing among the combined effects of higher irradiation temperatures in these particular AGR-3/4 compacts, the presence of the DTF particles, and the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) test temperatures. These data can be used to make inferences about fission product retention in exposed kernels as a function of time and temperature.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Efficiency Calibration of FGMS Cold Traps

This plan describes tests to determine the efficiency calibrations for the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) by the measurements of 85Kr and 133Xe gamma rays. FGMS collects fission product gases released from irradiated Advanced Gas Reactor tristructural-isotropic-coated particle fuel specimens during post-irradiation heating in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace. FGMS is composed of two charcoal-filled, liquid-nitrogen cooled traps that are each monitored by a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. All irradiated Advanced Gas Reactor fuel specimens contain 85Kr (t1/2 = 10.8 year); however, significant short-lived fission products such as 133Xe (t1/2 = 5.2 day) and 131I (t1/2 = 8.0 day) have decayed away by the time they reach the FACS for testing. In order to measure the releases of these short-lived fission products during safety testing in the FACS furnace, a re-irradiation of samples is necessary in the Neutron Radiography Reactor. This requires the FGMS be calibrated for the fission gas 133Xe, in addition to 85Kr. Because any re-irradiated fuel specimen will have both 85Kr and 133Xe present, the collection efficiency from a mixture of krypton and xenon needs to be determined.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Test Plan for the Third Reirradiation Heating Test of Fuel Particles from AGR 2 Compact 5-4-2

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and high-temperature heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles and compacts from the second Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment, AGR 2, are in progress. This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent high-temperature testing of loose fuel particles obtained from AGR 2 Compact 5-4-2. To simulate exposed kernels, four of these particles have been cracked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to produce localized defects that extend through the TRISO layers (outer pyrolytic carbon, silicon carbide [SiC], and inner pyrolytic carbon) while keeping these layers in place and maintaining the shape and integrity of the kernel. To generate short-lived fission products, these particles will be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD) at the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Materials and Fuels Complex prior to heating testing in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace at HFEF. FACS testing will be at 1200°C, and fission products released from the reirradiated particles will be measured. The intention of the test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 days) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 days) in the fuel kernels at high temperatures.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Test Plan for the Second Reirradiation Heating Test of Fuel Particles from AGR 2 Compact 6-4-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and high-temperature heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles and compacts from the second Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment, AGR 2, are in progress. This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent high-temperature testing of loose fuel particles obtained from AGR 2 compact 6-4-1. Four of these particles will have been cracked, gamma counted, and re-irradiated in the Neutron Radiography (NRAD) reactor prior to the heating test. The heating test will involve heating the particles in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace to a peak temperature of approximately 1600°C while collecting fission products released from the particles for post-heating test analysis. The intention of the test is to assess the retention of fission products in the fuel kernel. Reirradiation of the particles will allow a determination of the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 days) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 days) in the kernel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Test Plan for Cyclic Heating of AGR-3/4 Compact 8-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015). The plan for the reirradiation in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD) and subsequent 1200°C heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 8-1 in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace was described previously in (Stempien 2019). One of the main goals of that test was to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. Xe-133 release had ostensibly leveled off after approximately 80 hours. An issue with the condensation plate exchanges forced this test to be stopped after approximately 96 hours. The issue was resolved, and the test was restarted by heating FACS back up to 1200°C. During this reheating phase, an additional release of Xe-133, approximately equal in size to the release during the initial heating to 1200°C, was detected in the fission gas monitoring system (FGMS). To test whether this release is related to temperature transients (i.e. from heating and reheating), this new plan will describe three additional temperature cycles.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

BISON Simulated and Experimental Fission Product Release Comparisons from Reradiated AGR-3/4 Compacts During High Temperature Heating Tests

The fuel performance modeling code BISON was used to predict the release of fission products iodine-131 (131I), xenon-133 (133Xe), and krypton-85 (85Kr) from four re-irradiated AGR-3/4 fuel compacts containing tristructural isotropic (TRISO) coated particles during high-temperature isothermal heating tests. The AGR-3/4 fuel compacts were irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) as part of the third and fourth series of planned experiments to support the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Program. They were subsequently stored and re-irradiated in the Neutron Radiography (NRAD) reactor for approximately five days and then stored for another five to eight days before being subjected to isothermal heating tests in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulation (FACS furnace) for 200 to 300 hours at temperatures between 1000°C and 1600°C to evaluate fission product release at elevated temperatures. New nuclide-specific fission product source term models for the three nuclides of interest were developed using the reactor multiphysics code Griffin and implemented into BISON to support this work. The new source term models were incorporated into coupled compact- and particle-scale BISON simulations, which predict spatially- and temporally-resolved radionuclide generation, radioactive decay, transport, and release throughout the entire irradiation history, including the initial ATR irradiation, NRAD re-irradiations, FACS heating tests, and intermediate periods spent in storage. The experimentally measured fission product release from the heating tests were compared to modeling release predictions calculated by BISON to evaluate how well the code compares to experimental results. Overall, the experimental measured and BISON predicted comparative release results varied but generally agreed to within 5 particle equivalents. Comparative release results identified general observations to take into consideration to help refine future models and reduce uncertainties associated with both the measurement results and predictive results. This includes developing new uranium oxycarbide (UCO) specific kernel diffusivities for the three isotopes examined to more accurately reflect the material properties of the fuel form. Deriving new diffusivities will aid in producing a more informed BISON model

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Test Plan for Reirradiation and 1600°C Heating Test of AGR-3/4 Compact 3-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015b). This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 3-1. One of the main goals of this test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. To generate short-lived fission products, the compact will first be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD). Following reirradiation, the compact will be removed from NRAD, gamma scanned on the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS), and then loaded into the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace for heating at 1600°C. Fission gases and condensable fission products released from the compact will be collected in the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) and the FACS condensation plates, respectively. The planned uses of AGR-3/4 compacts (including heating testing and destructive analysis) are discussed in the AGR-3/4 PIE plan (Demkowicz 2017).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Post-irradiation 1600°C Heating Test of AGR-1 UCO Fuel Kernels

Five bare kernels were selected from the U.S. Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) 1 irradiation experiment Compact 5-3-1 to perform post-irradiation safety tests. The safety test involved heating the kernels in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace in the inert atmosphere to a peak temperature of 1600°C and isothermally holding at this temperature for about 47 hours while collecting fission products released. This test was to assess the retention of fission products in bare kernels without the effects of the other TRISO layers (buffer, IPyC, SiC, and OPyC) or the graphitic matrix material. The bare kernels released nearly 100% of cesium and antimony, while they were able to maintain about 30% of europium, 50% of strontium, and the majority of cerium and ruthenium. In addition, about 48% of the calculated inventory of Kr-85 released during the test, indicating that kernels were capable of retaining a considerable fraction of fission gas K-85 during irradiation.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Radial Deconsolidation Leach-Burn-Leach of Five AGR-3/4 TRISO Fuel Compacts after Post-Irradiation Heating Tests

Five AGR-3/4 fuel compacts were previously heated in the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace. Three of these compacts were also reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography (NRAD) reactor before the FACS tests. One of these was heated to 1200°C, two were heated to 1400°C, one was heated to 1600°C, and one was held for a period of time at 1600 and 1700°C. After these FACS tests, the compacts were subjected to destructive post-irradiation examination (PIE) via radial-deconsolidation-leach-burn-leach (RDLBL) at INL. The RDLBL process deconsolidated the compacts in multiple radial steps, followed by a final, single-step axial deconsolidation. The samples generated at each step were analyzed for isotopes of key fission products and actinides. After each deconsolidation step, the compact volume was assessed, and this was used to normalize the measured quantities of nuclides of interest to give volumetric concentrations as a function of radial position within the compact. The total inventories of measured fission products and actinides and the radial concentration profiles were compared with their sibling compacts within the same capsule (similar irradiation conditions) that went through RDLBL in the as-irradiated state. These data will be used to refine the fission product transport models.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Test Plan for Reirradiation and 1200°C Heating Test of AGR-3/4 Compact 8-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015b). This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 8-1. One of the main goals of this test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. To generate short-lived fission products, the compact will first be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD). Following reirradiation, the compact will be removed from NRAD, gamma scanned on the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS), and then loaded into the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace for heating at 1200°C. Fission gases and condensable fission products released from the compact will be collected in the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) and the FACS condensation plates, respectively. The planned uses of AGR-3/4 compacts (including heating testing and destructive analysis) are discussed in the AGR-3/4 PIE plan (Demkowicz 2017). Significant portions of this plan have been completed and additional samples are being used for purposes not captured in that plan.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Test Plan for Reirradiation and 1400°C Heating Test of AGR-3/4 Compact 10-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015b). This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 10-1. One of the main goals of this test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. To generate short-lived fission products, the compact will first be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD). Following reirradiation, the compact will be removed from NRAD, gamma scanned on the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS), and then loaded into the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace for heating at 1400°C. Fission gases and condensable fission products released from the compact will be collected in the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) and the FACS condensation plates, respectively.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Generation IV Benchmarking of TRISO Fuel Performance Models Under Accident Conditions Final Report

The Generation IV International Forum (GIF) is a co-operative international endeavor of fourteen members organized to carry out the research and development needed to establish the feasibility and performance capabilities of the next generation nuclear energy systems. GIF selected six reactor technologies, amongst which is the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) that is primarily dedicated to the cogeneration of electricity and hydrogen. The technical basis for VHTR is the tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particle fuel, the graphite as the core structure, helium coolant, as well as the dedicated core layout and lower power density to removal decay heat in a natural way. At the heart of safety features of the VHTR concept lie the TRISO fuel particles that are designed to keep their structural integrity and retain fission products at temperatures up to 1600°C. As part as the design and future operation of VHTRs, a key aspect is the accurate prediction of fuel performance under irradiation and accident conditions. Modeling and simulation allow prediction of TRISO fuel behavior when subject to neutron flux and in high temperature accident scenarios. The refinement of the fuel performance models and codes is performed by comparison to in-pile and out-of-pile experimental data that reproduce the expected irradiation conditions in high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs). Historically, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) developed a benchmark dedicated to the validation of predictive methods for fuel and fission product behavior through the Coordinated Research Program CRP-2 (IAEA, 1997). CRP-2 was later updated to cover fuel fabrication, quality assurance, irradiation performance, safety testing, and spent fuel. The scope of the resulting CRP-6 benchmarks focused on HTGR fuel performance and fission product release (IAEA, 2012). Taking advantage of additional TRISO fuel fabrication, irradiation, and safety testing campaigns, GIF launched a Generation IV Benchmarking of TRISO Fuel Performance Models under Accident Conditions in late 2015. This GIF benchmark is a three-year program steered by Idaho National Laboratory (INL, USA). The other participants include the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA, Japan) and the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI, Korea). The objectives of the benchmark are to: follow on the IAEA CRP benchmarks, (2) model fission product release under accident conditions, (3) compare results obtained by the fuel performance modeling codes of the benchmark participants, and (4) compare these code predictions to experimental data. Safety tests chosen for modeling include the first and second experiments of the Advanced Gas Reactor program (AGR-1 and AGR-2) and the High Flux Reactor (HFR) EU1bis experiment. This report presents the results obtained by the three research institutions using their respective fuel performance modeling codes. Comparisons of the corresponding fission product release predictions are made with experimental data from AGR-1, AGR-2, and HFR-EU1bis. The benchmark results show good agreements between all participants but also show a general trend of over-prediction of the experimental release data, which is mainly attributed to the use of over-estimated diffusion coefficients.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

The Fuel Motion Monitoring System at TREAT - Current Status and Future Plans

An important component of the United States Nuclear Fuel Safety Transient Testing Program, the Fuel Motion Monitoring System (FMMS) at Idaho National Laboratory's Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) is fast-neutron hodoscope capable of imaging the location, movement, and relocation of nuclear fuel experiments under simulated transient accident conditions. The FMMS was refurbished in parallel with the TREAT restart program starting in 2014, restoring 96-channels of fast-neutron detection. Since returning to operation in 2017 the FMMS has supported many fuel safety experiments supporting accident tolerant fuel development, light-water reactor safety, space thermal nuclear propulsion fuel development, and advanced reactor research and development. In Phase 2 of the FMMS restoration. work is now under way to expand the FMMS' field-of-view by adding an additional 96 channels of fast neutron detectors to the system's hodoscope, along with an expanded data acquisition system and associated transient timing electronics. An overview of the FMSS system and its fast-neutron detectors will be presented along with examples of current FMMS imaging performance and associated information.

46 - INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AN↗

Multi-scale simulation of high burnup UO2 nuclear fuel during loss-of-coolant accident conditions

To improve the economics of commercial nuclear energy generation, U.S. utilities are currently seeking licensing approval to operate UO2 fuel to higher burnups. One significant safety issue that must be addressed to obtain approval is the potential for fine fragmentation/pulverization of the fuel during a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). It has been hypothesized that pulverization is caused by the rapid increase of pressure in fission gas bubbles in the high burnup region of the fuel during a LOCA. To better understand this phenomenon, a novel phase-field model of the fission gas bubble microstructure in UO2 has been developed and implemented in Idaho National Laboratory (INL)'s Marmot application for phase-field simulation of nuclear materials. Simulations of the bubble response to steady-state and transient conditions were conducted, and the results were used to inform a mechanistic model of pulverization in BISON, INL’s fuel performance simulation code.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

MARVEL Reactor Fuel Performance Report (Rev.2)

The Microreactor Applications Research Validation and EvaLuation (MARVEL) project is producing a high temperature liquid metal-cooled nuclear test bed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to ultimately improve the integration of microreactors to end-user applications. This ambitious effort seeks to design, authorize, construct, test, and operate the reactor within five years. In order to construct and operate the MARVEL reactor in a timely manner, the system will utilize materials and component designs which have already been used, qualified, or licensed from previous reactors. The MARVEL reactor will be located at the INL Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility in the north high-bay equipment pit and will use the existing 304 stainless steel-clad U-ZrH1.6 pin-type fuel system developed by General Atomics and purchased from TRIGA International. This fuel has been previously qualified under the United States Department of Energy’s (US DOE) Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR) Program. Even though the regulator of the MARVEL reactor is the US DOE, the standards and overall approach recommended by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is well-defined and utilized here. Following NUREG-1537 regulatory guidance, this report documents the authorization case for the MARVEL fuel system’s application to MARVEL and establishes stable and predictable fuel performance during the most thermophysically unfavorable conditions achievable in the MARVEL reactor. To that end, this report provides a comprehensive survey of the known thermophysical properties, performance, and quantitative relationships associated with the MARVEL reactor fuel element and uses this information to determine its mechanical integrity and risk of reaching unacceptable conditions during the most extreme accident scenarios predicted for the reactor using the most conservative assumptions available. The information contained herein is compiled from a combination of historical reports and peer reviewed scientific publication manuscripts. Known mechanisms under which the fuel is susceptible to failure are highlighted and compared to conditions that could exist in the MARVEL reactor during an unanticipated transient or accident scenario. The two scenarios considered for analysis in this report are (1) an unprotected loss of flow accident and (2) a hypothetical unprotected loss of coolant accident during the loss of flow accident. Preliminary 2D steady-state analyses herein indicate that both fuel-cladding chemical interactions and fuel-cladding mechanical interactions are negligible throughout the fuel’s operational cycle under both normal and high temperature accident scenario conditions. Although higher fidelity 3D time-dependent modeling and simulations are planned, the following may be concluded presently. The MARVEL fuel element maintains its geometric stability and structural integrity during the most extreme accident scenarios predicted for the MARVEL reactor. The hoop stress during the unprotected loss of flow accident reaches about -1.27 MPa; this negative stress indicates that it is compressive rather than tensile. The compressive stress is a result of the NaK pressure on the outside of the fuel element, caused by the restricted thermal expansion of the NaK coolant, exceeding the internal pressures generated inside of the fuel element. The hoop stress generated in the cladding during the unprotected loss of coolant accident reaches a maximum of about approximately 10 MPa, which is nearly an order of magnitude less than the predicted yield strength of the cladding under high-temperature accident scenario conditions. Calculations were compared with results from high performance computational simulations using BISON and are in very close agreement. A conservative MARVEL fuel meat peak temperature limit of 900 °C is recommended presently, which is about 180 °C higher than the peak fuel temperature predicted to occur during the most extreme accident. Based on the known properties and behavior of the MARVEL fuel element, the fuel successfully meets its design and safety requirements under normal and most extreme accident conditions with a large safety margin.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗