Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “GMRES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Iterated Gauss-Seidel GMRES

The GMRES algorithm of Saad and Schultz [SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 7 (1986), pp. 856-869] is an iterative method for approximately solving linear systems Ax = b, with initial guess x0 and residual r0 = b Ax0. The algorithm employs the Arnoldi process to generate the Krylov basis vectors (the columns of Vk ). It is well known that this process can be viewed as a QR factorization of the matrix Bk = [r0, AVk] at each iteration. Despite an O (..epsilon..)..kappa.. (Bk ) loss of orthogonality, for unit roundoff ..epsilon..and condition number ..kappa.. , the modified Gram-Schmidt formulation was shown to be backward stable in the seminal paper by Paige et al. [SIAM J. Matrix Anal.Appl., 28 (2006), pp. 264-284]. We present an iterated Gauss-Seidel formulation of the GMRES algorithm (IGS-GMRES) based on the ideas of Ruhe [Linear Algebra Appl., 52 (1983), pp. 591-601] and Swirydowicz et al. [Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 28 (2020), pp. 1-20]. IGS-GMRES maintains orthogonality to the level O (..epsilon..)..kappa.. (Bk ) or O (..epsilon..), depending on the choice of one or two iterations; for two Gauss-Seidel iterations, the computed Krylov basis vectors remain orthogonal to working accuracy and the smallest singular value of Vk remains close to one. The resulting GMRES method is thus backward stable. We show that IGS-GMRES can be implemented with only a single synchronization point per iteration, making it relevant to large-scale parallel computing environments. We also demonstrate that, unlike MGS-GMRES, in IGS-GMRES the relative Arnoldi residual corresponding to the computed approximate solution no longer stagnates above machine precision even for highly nonnormal systems.

Arnoldi-QR↗
DOE OSTI2022

Optimal size of the block in block GMRES on GPUs: computational model and experiments

The block version of GMRES (BGMRES) is most advantageous over the single right hand side (RHS) counterpart when the cost of communication is high while the cost of floating point operations is not. This is the particular case on modern graphics processing units (GPUs), while it is generally not the case on traditional central processing units (CPUs). Here, in this paper, experiments on both GPUs and CPUs are shown that compare the performance of BGMRES against GMRES as the number of RHS increases, with a particular focus on GPU performance. The experiments indicate that there are many cases in which BGMRES is slower than GMRES on CPUs, but faster on GPUs. Furthermore, when varying the number of RHS on the GPU, there is an optimal number of RHS where BGMRES is clearly most advantageous over GMRES. A computational model for the GPU is developed using hardware specific parameters, providing insight towards how the qualitative behavior of BGMRES changes as the number of RHS increase, and this model also helps explain the phenomena observed in the experiments.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Compressed basis GMRES on high-performance graphics processing units

Krylov methods provide a fast and highly parallel numerical tool for the iterative solution of many large-scale sparse linear systems. To a large extent, the performance of practical realizations of these methods is constrained by the communication bandwidth in current computer architectures, motivating the investigation of sophisticated techniques to avoid, reduce, and/or hide the message-passing costs (in distributed platforms) and the memory accesses (in all architectures). This article leverages Ginkgo’s memory accessor in order to integrate a communication-reduction strategy into the (Krylov) GMRES solver that decouples the storage format (i.e., the data representation in memory) of the orthogonal basis from the arithmetic precision that is employed during the operations with that basis. Given that the execution time of the GMRES solver is largely determined by the memory accesses, the cost of the datatype transforms can be mostly hidden, resulting in the acceleration of the iterative step via a decrease in the volume of bits being retrieved from memory. Together with the special properties of the orthonormal basis (whose elements are all bounded by 1), this paves the road toward the aggressive customization of the storage format, which includes some floating-point as well as fixed-point formats with mild impact on the convergence of the iterative process. We develop a high-performance implementation of the “compressed basis GMRES” solver in the Ginkgo sparse linear algebra library using a large set of test problems from the SuiteSparse Matrix Collection. We demonstrate robustness and performance advantages on a modern NVIDIA V100 graphics processing unit (GPU) of up to 50% over the standard GMRES solver that stores all data in IEEE double-precision.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

High-Performance GMRES Mixed-Precision (HPG-MxP) Benchmark

SAND2024-08539O The High Performance GMRES Mixed-Precision (HPG-MxP) is a benchmark for ranking high-performance supercomputers, allowing use of mixed-precision. Similar to HPCG benchmark, it is designed to profile the computers' capabilities to perform the computational and communication tasks that are commonly found in important classes of real-world applications. At the same time, like HPL-MxP benchmark, it allows the use of mixed-precision arithmetic, while ensuring the double-precision accuracy of the computed solution. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525.

SciDAC↗
DOE OSTI2026

NCCS High Performance GMRES Mixed Precision

HPG-MxP is a software package that performs a fixed number of multigrid preconditioned (using a Gauss-Seidel smoother) Generalized minimal residual (PGMRES) iterations in order to solve a possibly nonsymmetric large sparse linear system of equations. It is designed to be a benchmark to measure a computer's performance for sparse linear algebra workloads typical in scientific computing while allowing the use of mixed precision methods. The solution is required to have convergence characteristics and accuracy similar to double precision GMRES. It is based on the High Performance Conjugate Gradient Benchmark (HPCG) which restricts all implementations to use only the IEEE double precision format (FP64). The original implementation (https://github.com/hpg-mxp/hpg-mxp) was written by Ichitaro Yamazaki, Jennifer Loe, Christian Glusa, Sivasankaran Rajamanickam, Piotr Luszczek, and Jack Dongarra. Please refer to that repository for documentation on the original implementation. This version is maintained by the National Center for Computational Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is highly scalable and optimized for Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) systems, particularly Frontier.

Kashi, Aditya [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL↗
DOE OSTI2025

Convergence Analysis of the Alternating Anderson–Picard Method for Nonlinear Fixed-Point Problems

Anderson acceleration (AA) has been widely used to solve nonlinear fixed-point problems due to its rapid convergence. This work focuses on a variant of AA in which multiple Picard iterations are performed between each AA step, referred to as the Alternating Anderson–Picard (AAP) method. Furthermore, despite introducing more “slow” Picard iterations, this method has been shown to be efficient and even more robust in both linear and nonlinear cases. However, there is a lack of theoretical analysis for AAP in the nonlinear case. In this paper, we address this gap by establishing the equivalence between AAP and a multisecant-GMRES method that uses GMRES to solve a multisecant linear system at each iteration. From this perspective, we show that AAP “converges” to the Newton-GMRES method. Specifically, as the residual approaches zero, the multisecant matrix, the approximate Jacobian inverse, the search direction, and the optimization gain of AAP converge to their counterparts in the Newton-GMRES method. These connections provide insights for analyzing the asymptotic convergence properties of AAP. Consequently, we show that AAP is locally 𝑞-linear convergent and provide an upper bound for the convergence factor of AAP. To validate the theoretical results, numerical examples are provided.

Anderson acceleration↗
DOE OSTI2023

Scaled ILU Smoothers for Navier-Stokes Pressure Projection

Incomplete LU (ILU) smoothers are effective in the algebraic multigrid (AMG) V-cycle for reducing high-frequency components of the error. However, the requisite direct triangular solves are comparatively slow on GPUs. Previous work has demonstrated the advantages of Jacobi iteration as an alternative to direct solution of these systems. Depending on the threshold and fill-level parameters chosen, the factors can be highly nonnormal and Jacobi is unlikely to converge in a low number of iterations. We demonstrate that row scaling can reduce the departure from normality, allowing us to replace the inherently sequential solve with a rapidly converging Richardson iteration. There are several advantages beyond the lower compute time. Scaling is performed locally for a diagonal block of the global matrix because it is applied directly to the factor. Further, an ILUT Schur complement smoother maintains a constant GMRES iteration count as the number of MPI ranks increases, and thus parallel strong-scaling is improved. Our algorithms have been incorporated into hypre, and we demonstrate improved time to solution for linear systems arising in the Nalu-Wind and PeleLM pressure solvers. For large problem sizes, GMRES+AMG executes at least five times faster when using iterative triangular solves compared with direct solves on massively parallel GPUs.

algebraic multigrid↗
DOE OSTI2022

Low-synch Gram–Schmidt with delayed reorthogonalization for Krylov solvers

The parallel strong-scaling of iterative methods is often determined by the number of global reductions at each iteration. Low-synch Gram-Schmidt algorithms are applied here to the Arnoldi algorithm to reduce the number of global reductions and therefore to improve the parallel strong-scaling of iterative solvers for nonsymmetric matrices such as the GMRES and the Krylov-Schur iterative methods. In the Arnoldi context, the factorization is "left-looking" and processes one column at a time. Among the methods for generating an orthogonal basis for the Arnoldi algorithm, the classical Gram-Schmidt algorithm, with reorthogonalization (CGS2) requires three global reductions per iteration. A new variant of CGS2 that requires only one reduction per iteration is presented and applied to the Arnoldi algorithm. Delayed CGS2 (DCGS2) employs the minimum number of global reductions per iteration (one) for a one-column at-a-time algorithm. The main idea behind the new algorithm is to group global reductions by rearranging the order of operations. DCGS2 must be carefully integrated into an Arnoldi expansion or a GMRES solver. Numerical stability experiments assess robustness for Krylov-Schur eigenvalue computations. Performance experiments on the ORNL Summit supercomputer then establish the superiority of DCGS2 over CGS2.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Combining Sparse Approximate Factorizations with Mixed-precision Iterative Refinement

The standard LU factorization-based solution process for linear systems can be enhanced in speed or accuracy by employing mixed-precision iterative refinement. Most recent work has focused on dense systems. We investigate the potential of mixed-precision iterative refinement to enhance methods for sparse systems based on approximate sparse factorizations. In doing so, we first develop a new error analysis for LU- and GMRES-based iterative refinement under a general model of LU factorization that accounts for the approximation methods typically used by modern sparse solvers, such as low-rank approximations or relaxed pivoting strategies. We then provide a detailed performance analysis of both the execution time and memory consumption of different algorithms, based on a selected set of iterative refinement variants and approximate sparse factorizations. Our performance study uses the multifrontal solver MUMPS, which can exploit block low-rank factorization and static pivoting. We evaluate the performance of the algorithms on large, sparse problems coming from a variety of real-life and industrial applications showing that mixed-precision iterative refinement combined with approximate sparse factorization can lead to considerable reductions of both the time and memory consumption.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Scalable Interior‐Point Gauss–Newton Method for PDE‐Constrained Optimization With Bound Constraints

Here, we present a scalable approach to solve a class of partial differential equation (PDE)‐constrained optimization problems with bound constraints. This approach utilizes a robust full‐space interior‐point (IP)‐Gauss–Newton optimization method. To cope with the poorly‐conditioned IP‐Gauss–Newton saddle‐point linear systems that need to be solved approximately, once per optimization step, we propose two spectrally related preconditioners. These preconditioners leverage the limited informativeness of data in regularized PDE‐constrained optimization problems. A block Gauss–Seidel preconditioner is proposed for the GMRES‐based solution of the IP‐Gauss–Newton linear systems. It is shown, for a large‐class of PDE‐ and bound‐constrained optimization problems, that the spectrum of the block Gauss–Seidel preconditioned IP‐Gauss–Newton matrix is asymptotically independent of discretization and is not impacted by the ill‐conditioning that notoriously plagues interior‐point methods. We exploit symmetry of the IP‐Gauss–Newton linear systems and propose a regularization and log‐barrier Hessian preconditioner for the preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG)‐based solution of the equivalent IP‐Gauss–Newton–Schur complement linear systems. The eigenvalues of the block Gauss–Seidel preconditioned IP‐Gauss–Newton matrix, that are not equal to one, are identical to the eigenvalues of the regularization and log‐barrier Hessian preconditioned Schur complement matrix. The scalability of the approach is demonstrated on two example problems. The numerical solution of these optimization problems is shown to require a discretization independent number of IP‐Gauss–Newton linear solves. Furthermore, the linear systems are solved in a discretization and IP ill‐conditioning independent number of preconditioned Krylov subspace iterations. The parallel scalability of the preconditioner, achieved via algebraic multigrid component solvers when applicable, and the aforementioned algorithmic scalability permits a parallel scalable means to compute solutions of a large class of PDE‐ and bound‐constrained problems.

PDE-constrained optimization↗
DOE OSTI2022

Numerical algorithms for water waves with background flow over obstacles and topography

Abstract We present two accurate and efficient algorithms for solving the incompressible, irrotational Euler equations with a free surface in two dimensions with background flow over a periodic, multiply connected fluid domain that includes stationary obstacles and variable bottom topography. One approach is formulated in terms of the surface velocity potential while the other evolves the vortex sheet strength. Both methods employ layer potentials in the form of periodized Cauchy integrals to compute the normal velocity of the free surface, are compatible with arbitrary parameterizations of the free surface and boundaries, and allow for circulation around each obstacle, which leads to multiple-valued velocity potentials but single-valued stream functions. We prove that the resulting second-kind Fredholm integral equations are invertible, possibly after a physically motivated finite-rank correction. In an angle-arclength setting, we show how to avoid curve reconstruction errors that are incompatible with spatial periodicity. We use the proposed methods to study gravity-capillary waves generated by flow around several elliptical obstacles above a flat or variable bottom boundary. In each case, the free surface eventually self-intersects in a splash singularity or collides with a boundary. We also show how to evaluate the velocity and pressure with spectral accuracy throughout the fluid, including near the free surface and solid boundaries. To assess the accuracy of the time evolution, we monitor energy conservation and the decay of Fourier modes and compare the numerical results of the two methods to each other. We implement several solvers for the discretized linear systems and compare their performance. The fastest approach employs a graphics processing unit (GPU) to construct the matrices and carry out iterations of the generalized minimal residual method (GMRES).

Ambrose, David M.↗