Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Gasification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1980

Coal gasification systems engineering and analysis. Appendix A: Coal gasification catalog

The scope of work in preparing the Coal Gasification Data Catalog included the following subtasks: (1) candidate system subsystem definition, (2) raw materials analysis, (3) market analysis for by-products, (4) alternate products analysis, (5) preliminary integrated facility requirements. Definition of candidate systems/subsystems includes the identity of and alternates for each process unit, raw material requirements, and the cost and design drivers for each process design.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2025

Plastic waste gasification for low-carbon hydrogen production: a comprehensive review

Hydrogen is one of the most important feedstocks for the chemical industry, power production, and the decarbonization of other sectors that rely on natural gas. The production of hydrogen from plastics enables sustainable use of plastic waste and offers significant environmental benefits. Gasification emerges as a promising route for chemical recycling, converting plastic into hydrogen and other valuable chemicals. Although the gasification of plastic waste has recently gained attention, the number of studies regarding low-carbon hydrogen production is still limited. The effective integration of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is essential for achieving low-carbon hydrogen production via gasification, which enables the efficient capture and storage of CO 2 emissions. Incorporating coal waste and biomass into plastic gasification can synergistically enhance reforming reactions for hydrogen production, reduce tar content, and resolve feeding issues caused by plastic stickiness. Based on the previous studies, this paper briefly reviews the mechanisms of plastic gasification including plastic depolymerization, reforming, tar and char formation, and gasification; the discussions on feedstocks and effects of operating conditions on H 2 production including plastic-type, temperature, steam/carbon ratio, equivalence ratio, and catalysts; and the integration of CCUS and alternative recovery processes in plastic gasification for low-carbon hydrogen.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2024

Microwave-Assisted Gasification of Biochar: Effect of Operational Parameters and Biochar Composition on Syngas Production

The utilization of microwave-assisted gasification for biomass/plastic is a promising route toward clean energy production, contributing to a reduction in carbon footprint. This method facilitates the conversion of biomass into syngas with enhanced hydrogen (H2) yield, surpassing conventional heating approaches. However, the gasification of biochar, a byproduct resulting from the initial rapid pyrolysis of biomass, appears as a rate-determining step in biomass gasification. To ensure high conversion efficiency, particularly in pilot or larger scales, the maintenance of high biochar reactivity is essential, which can be achieved by introducing catalysts to minimize biochar formation. Furthermore, given the susceptibility of biochar to microwave heating, gaining a comprehensive understanding of its behavior in the presence of microwave-active catalysts under microwave conditions is crucial to obtain valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms, thereby improving overall biomass gasification efficiency. In the previous study, magnetite (Fe3O4) was selected for microwave-assisted gasification for biomass/plastic due to its dual role as a catalyst and microwave absorber and demonstrated considerably enhanced hydrogen production. Herein, Fe3O4 is rationally modified with metal promoters and their synergistic effect toward biochar gasification performance is investigated. The data shows that metal promoted Fe3O4 shows a higher syngas yield than that of pristine Fe3O4 in biochar.

Mai, Duy Hien↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hydrogen-rich syngas production from the steam co-gasification of low-density polyethylene and coal refuse

Gasification provides a promising pathway for transforming waste materials into valuable products, such as fuels and chemicals. Here, this study investigates the steam co-gasification of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and compressed thickener underflow, representative of coal refuse (CR), in a drop tube reactor. The effects of feed blend ratio (0–100 wt% LDPE) and temperature (800–1000 °C) on syngas composition, tar formation, and process efficiency are examined. The high volatility of LDPE makes it more reactive than CR but also promotes the formation of 2–7 ring aromatic tars. Increasing temperature improves carbon conversion efficiency (CCE), cold gas efficiency (CGE), and syngas yield, although the lower heating value (LHV) of syngas decreases. Hydrogen is the dominant gas product, reaching 59 vol% with the H 2 /CO molar ratio ranging from 2.27 to 4.74. Synergistic effects from alkali and alkali earth metals (AAEMs), particularly K and Ca, in CR ash enhance syngas yield by catalyzing char gasification and tar cracking. Hematite (Fe 2 O 3 ) and ash from sub-bituminous/bituminous coals are explored as tar reforming catalysts. Fe 2 O 3 achieves 100 % tar reforming efficiency, while coal ash, with a lower Fe 2 O 3 content (15 wt%), is less effective at cracking polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, particularly naphthalene. These findings demonstrate the flexibility of co-gasification, allowing precise tuning of syngas characteristics for specific downstream applications. Further optimization of waste-derived catalysts could enhance the economic viability of gasification in waste-to-energy processes.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2025

Enhancing biomass flowability for entrained flow Gasification: The role of densification and torrefaction

Gasification presents a key strategy in addressing future energy demands while minimizing environmental impact. This has been recognized as a promising method to convert biomass to higher value products such as biofuels or hydrogen. Among gasification technologies, high-temperature and high-pressure reactors, particularly the R-GAS® system, emerge as an advanced option boasting superior conversion efficiency. However, akin to conventional high-temperature and high-pressure gasifiers, R-GAS® necessitates small particle sizes for optimal carbon conversion, a requirement yet to be fully explored for biomass. Hence, this study investigated the effectiveness of combined mechanical and thermal preprocessing techniques in modifying the physicochemical properties of biomass to suit gasification systems. Mechanical techniques including densification and pulverization, alongside thermal techniques such as torrefaction and steam explosion, were examined. The results demonstrate that torrefaction fosters producing of uniform granular material, enhancing flowability and reducing energy requirements for pulverization compared to steam explosion. Notably, torrefied corn stover exhibited lower internal friction angles and effective cohesion (40.09 ± 0.22° and 0.56 ± 0.01 kPa, respectively) compared to steam exploded corn stover (41.87 ± 0.65° and 0.83 ± 0.06 kPa, respectively), indicative of improved flowability. Additionally, pulverization of torrefied corn stover required approximately 16 % less energy than steam exploded corn stover and 91 % less energy than raw corn stover. Furthermore, the torrefaction-induced alterations in particle size, shape, and packing densities emphasize its potential to optimize flow and handling processes for gasification. These findings underline that densification followed by torrefaction effectively addresses biomass variability, leading to more efficient and sustainable energy conversion.

09 - BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Fluidized Bed Gasification For Conversion of Biomass and Waste Materials to Renewable Hydrogen

This project was undertaken in order to study the potential for hydrogen production, at low cost, from mixtures of biomass and municipal solid waste (MSW). This approach allows for the production of hydrogen with a very low fossil carbon burden, while taking advantage of tipping fees (associated with MSW) to improved process economics. The team sourced three primary feedstocks (wood, MSW, and waste plastics) and characterized them comprehensively using established techniques with a long track record in the field of gasification. All three primary feedstocks were highly reactive and lost most of their mass during initial devolatilization. The production of tars, including heavy tars, was quite high, and was most problematic in the case of the MSW and Waste Plastics feedstocks. Little practical difference was identified between the MSW and Waste Plastics materials, and the addition of bed-forming materials (dolomite and brown alumina) to the feedstocks was found to reduce production of tars during devolatilization under thermogravimetric analysis and/or Fischer Assay conditions. A series of four tests in a lab-scale bubbling-fluidized-bed gasifier, at 50 psig of pressure and about 825 C, confirmed these findings. Pellet feedstocks, broken into fragments, were used for these tests, and pellets comprised of 50% MSW and 50% biomass were found to be the best option in terms of fossil carbon burden, economic potential, and gasification characteristics. Tests were then undertaken in a pilot-scale gasifier facility based on the GTI U-Gas fluidized-bed gasification technology. The feedstock handling train of the 20 TPD U-Gas pilot-scale gasifier located in Des Plaines, IL, was operated under simulated gasification conditions, and the 50/50 pellets were found to be very robust and unproblematic. An improved design for the forward end of the feedstock injection screw of the gasifier was developed and installed. The design approach was based on improved passive cooling of the front-most shroud at the end of the screw, since this approach was found in comprehensive modeling studies to be more than sufficient to accomplish the project objectives associated with this phase of the work, while also avoiding thermal gradients that could have caused heat-stress-induced damage to the refractory around the feedstock inlet if an active cooling approach had been applied. Careful technoeconomic analysis (TEA) of two possible 1000 TPD facilities was carried out. The TEA of conversion of MSW with corn stover in one case, and MSW with woody feedstock in the other case, showed that both had the potential to provide hydrogen at about $1/kg (minimum selling price, 2018 dollar basis). Of the two TEA cases, the one that was based on the conversion of wood in the southeastern USA was found to have slightly better economic potential. The other TEA case was based on a real location in Nebraska and called for corn stover feedstock conversion along with MSW. An underserved communities outreach program plan was developed in cooperation with personnel from the Nebraska Public Power District.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2026

Tar Formation and Mitigation in Pressurized Biomass and Cofired Gasification

Biomass gasification with CO2 capture has the potential to provide carbon-negative heat, power, and feedstock for sustainable hydrocarbon fuels. In a pressurized gasifier, precombustion solvent systems can capture CO2 with less energy than needed for amine-based postcombustion CO2 capture, and pressurized syngas is generally more suitable for fuel synthesis. Although precombustion capture has been used for many decades in large-scale fossil-based plants, it has not been well-demonstrated in smaller-scale biomass gasification. Precombustion solvents and product streams could be particularly impacted by tar and other organic compounds that tend to form in high concentrations during low-temperature biomass gasification. A pressurized pilot-scale gasifier was used to examine tar formation and fate when using CO2 capture with various blends of biomass and coal. The syngas was fully conditioned to remove particulate matter; capture sulfur; adjust syngas chemistry using water-gas shift; quench out moisture and condensable organics; and capture CO2. Tar concentrations were measured in the raw syngas, the product gas, and in the liquid streams over the course of several weeks. The gasifier was operated both as a high-pressure oxygen-blown system to mimic large-scale centralized gasification and at lower pressures under air-blown conditions to mimic a more likely small-scale system. A second high-temperature stage with oxidant injection was used to crack tars. The overall results showed how gasifier and CO2 capture performance change as fuel is blended between coal to biomass and what the fate of tar is through a precombustion CO2 capture system.

Strege, Josh [University of North Dakota EERC] (OR↗
NASA NTRS1981

Assessment of Advanced Coal Gasification Processes

This report represents a technical assessment of the following advanced coal gasification processes: AVCO High Throughput Gasification (HTG) Process; Bell Single-Stage High Mass Flux (HMF) Process; Cities Service/Rockwell (CS/R) Hydrogasification Process; Exxon Catalytic Coal Gasification (CCG) Process. Each process is evaluated for its potential to produce SNG from a bituminous coal. In addition to identifying the new technology these processes represent, key similarities/differences, strengths/weaknesses, and potential improvements to each process are identified. The AVCO HTG and the Bell HMF gasifiers share similarities with respect to: short residence time (SRT), high throughput rate, slagging and syngas as the initial raw product gas. The CS/R Hydrogasifier is also SRT but is non-slagging and produces a raw gas high in methane content. The Exxon CCG gasifier is a long residence time, catalytic, fluidbed reactor producing all of the raw product methane in the gasifier. The report makes the following assessments: 1) while each process has significant potential as coal gasifiers, the CS/R and Exxon processes are better suited for SNG production; 2) the Exxon process is the closest to a commercial level for near-term SNG production; and 3) the SRT processes require significant development including scale-up and turndown demonstration, char processing and/or utilization demonstration, and reactor control and safety features development.

coal gasification↗
DOE OSTI2024

Co-gasification of Plastic, Coal Waste and Biomass for Hydrogen Rich Syngas Production

Plastic waste has increasingly become one of the most pressing environmental issues. To mitigate plastic emissions, extraordinary efforts are needed for plastic waste recycling and management. This study investigates the co-gasification of plastic, coal refuse, and biomass into hydrogen-rich syngas through steam gasification. The study focuses on the correlations between process parameters and feedstock composition. Coal refuse and biomass are used as co-feedstocks for gasification, aiming to improve the handling of plastic waste and investigating their synergistic effects on product distribution.

Bashir, Muhammad↗
NASA NTRS1978

Considerations on coal gasification

Commercial processes for the gasification of coal with oxygen are discussed. The Koppers-Totzek process for the gasification of coal dust entrained in a stream of gasifying agents is described in particular detail. The outlook for future applications of coal gasification is presented.

Franzen, J. E.↗
NASA NTRS1978

The Texaco coal gasification process for manufacture of medium BTU gas

The development of the Texaco coal gasification process is discussed with particular emphasis on its close relationship to the fully commercialized Texaco synthesis gas generation process for residual oil gasification. The end uses of the product gas are covered, with special attention to electric power generation via combined cycle technology. Control of SO2, NOx, and particulate emissions in the power generating mode is also covered. The application of this technology in a proposed Texaco-Southern California Edison demonstration project is mentioned. Investment information released for a 1000-megawatt advanced combined cycle gasification facility, is also reviewed.

Schlinger, W. G.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Coal gasification systems engineering and analysis. Volume 1: Executive summary

Feasibility analyses and systems engineering studies for a 20,000 tons per day medium Btu (MBG) coal gasification plant to be built by TVA in Northern Alabama were conducted. Major objectives were as follows: (1) provide design and cost data to support the selection of a gasifier technology and other major plant design parameters, (2) provide design and cost data to support alternate product evaluation, (3) prepare a technology development plan to address areas of high technical risk, and (4) develop schedules, PERT charts, and a work breakdown structure to aid in preliminary project planning. Volume one contains a summary of gasification system characterizations. Five gasification technologies were selected for evaluation: Koppers-Totzek, Texaco, Lurgi Dry Ash, Slagging Lurgi, and Babcock and Wilcox. A summary of the trade studies and cost sensitivity analysis is included.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1981

Conceptual design study of a coal gasification combined-cycle powerplant for industrial cogeneration

A conceptual design study was conducted to assess technical feasibility, environmental characteristics, and economics of coal gasification. The feasibility of a coal gasification combined cycle cogeneration powerplant was examined in response to energy needs and to national policy aimed at decreasing dependence on oil and natural gas. The powerplant provides the steam heating and baseload electrical requirements while serving as a prototype for industrial cogeneration and a modular building block for utility applications. The following topics are discussed: (1) screening of candidate gasification, sulfur removal and power conversion components; (2) definition of a reference system; (3) quantification of plant emissions and waste streams; (4) estimates of capital and operating costs; and (5) a procurement and construction schedule. It is concluded that the proposed powerplant is technically feasible and environmentally superior.

Bloomfield, H. S.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Assessment of advanced coal gasification processes

A technical assessment of the following advanced coal gasification processes is presented: high throughput gasification (HTG) process; single stage high mass flux (HMF) processes; (CS/R) hydrogasification process; and the catalytic coal gasification (CCG) process. Each process is evaluated for its potential to produce synthetic natural gas from a bituminous coal. Key similarities, differences, strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements to each process are identified. The HTG and the HMF gasifiers share similarities with respect to: short residence time (SRT), high throughput rate, slagging, and syngas as the initial raw product gas. The CS/R hydrogasifier is also SRT, but is nonslagging and produces a raw gas high in methane content. The CCG gasifier is a long residence time, catalytic, fluidbed reactor producing all of the raw product methane in the gasifier.

Mccarthy, J.↗
DOE OSTI2025

Microwave-Assisted Catalytic Gasification of Various Biomass with Mixed Plastic Wastes for H2-Rich Syngas Production

Co-gasification of plastics mixture with biomass has shown synergistic effects in Microwave (MW) reactor resulting in higher H2-rich syngas yield and reduced char/tar. This study investigates a microwave-assisted catalytic gasification of variable feedstock such as various biomass blended with mixed plastics waste using Fe-based catalyst to produce H2 rich syngas as a primary product.

catalysis, biomass gasification↗
DOE OSTI2024

Distributed Sensors for Waste Plastics Gasification and Clean Hydrogen Productions

This project developed distributed fiber sensors for plastics gasification reactor for clean hydrogen production. These sensors can be directly inserted into gasification reactors to perform real-time, in-situ hydrogen and temperature profile measurements with 5-cm spatial resolution across the entire reactor chamber. Our research team will use this new sensor capability to study how feedstock mixtures, feedstock preparations, and air/steam flows impact feedstock consumption, hydrogen production, and harmful chemical production emissions.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2026

Final Report: Process Intensification of Hydrogen Production through Sorption-Enhanced Gasification of Biomass

The University of Utah, in partnership with Idaho National Laboratory (INL), evaluated Sorption-Enhanced Gasification (SEG) as a transformative pathway for producing hydrogen with the potential for negative CO 2 emissions. SEG integrates gasification, water-gas shift, and in-situ carbon capture within a dual fluidized bed reactor to enable efficient clean hydrogen production. Key challenges related to biomass variability and process complexity were addressed through feedstock engineering, reaction optimization, and process validation. A co-pelletized biomass–limestone feedstock was developed to simplify feeding and introduction of makeup limestone. Kinetic and sorbent studies identified optimal operating conditions and confirmed the suitability of low-cost limestone, while catalysts were developed to reduce tar formation. Reactor modeling and techno-economic analysis indicated that SEG can achieve competitive hydrogen production costs, particularly when combined with carbon incentives, supporting its potential for scale-up and carbon-negative operation.

08 HYDROGEN↗