Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Gaussian basis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Phase retrieval using Gaussian basis functions

A wavefront map of arbitrary aperture can be represented by a sum of Gaussian basis functions. Its performance is compared here to other representation methods such as orthonormal polynomials and Fourier modes. Gaussian basis functions can be applied to phase retrieval of high-frequency wavefront maps. Experiments show good agreement with direct measurements by a wavefront sensor. Finally, optimum measurement conditions are discussed based on the statistics of wavefront properties.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
NASA NTRS1992

High quality Gaussian basis sets for fourth-row atoms

Energy optimized Gaussian basis sets of triple-zeta quality for the atoms Rb-Xe have been derived. Two series of basis sets are developed: (24s 16p 10d) and (26s 16p 10d) sets which were expanded to 13d and 19p functions as the 4d and 5p shells become occupied. For the atoms lighter than Cd, the (24s 16p 10d) sets with triple-zeta valence distributions are higher in energy than the corresponding double-zeta distribution. To ensure a triple-zeta distribution and a global energy minimum, the (26s 16p 10d) sets were derived. Total atomic energies from the largest basis sets are between 198 and 284 (mu)E(sub H) above the numerical Hartree-Fock energies.

Partridge, Harry↗
NASA NTRS1990

Kinetic balance and variational bounds failure in the solution of the Dirac equation in a finite Gaussian basis set

The paper investigates bounds failure in calculations using Gaussian basis sets for the solution of the one-electron Dirac equation for the 2p1/2 state of Hg(79+). It is shown that bounds failure indicates inadequacies in the basis set, both in terms of the exponent range and the number of functions. It is also shown that overrepresentation of the small component space may lead to unphysical results. It is concluded that it is important to use matched large and small component basis sets with an adequate size and exponent range.

Dyall, Kenneth G.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Distributed memory, GPU accelerated Fock construction for hybrid, Gaussian basis density functional theory

With the growing reliance of modern supercomputers on accelerator-based architecture such a graphics processing units (GPUs), the development and optimization of electronic structure methods to exploit these massively parallel resources has become a recent priority. While significant strides have been made in the development GPU accelerated, distributed memory algorithms for many modern electronic structure methods, the primary focus of GPU development for Gaussian basis atomic orbital methods has been for shared memory systems with only a handful of examples pursing massive parallelism. Here in this work, we present a set of distributed memory algorithms for the evaluation of the Coulomb and exact exchange matrices for hybrid Kohn–Sham DFT with Gaussian basis sets via direct density-fitted (DF-J-Engine) and seminumerical (sn-K) methods, respectively. The absolute performance and strong scalability of the developed methods are demonstrated on systems ranging from a few hundred to over one thousand atoms using up to 128 NVIDIA A100 GPUs on the Perlmutter supercomputer.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

Accelerating the convergence of auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo in solids with optimized Gaussian basis sets

We investigate the use of optimized correlation-consistent Gaussian basis sets for the study of insulating solids with auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC). The exponents of the basis set are optimized through the minimization of the second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) energy in a small unit cell of the solid. We compare against other alternative basis sets proposed in the literature, namely, calculations in the Kohn–Sham basis and in the natural orbitals of an MP2 calculation. We find that our optimized basis sets accelerate the convergence of the AFQMC correlation energy compared to a Kohn–Sham basis and offer similar convergence to MP2 natural orbitals at a fraction of the cost needed to generate them. We also suggest the use of an improved, method independent, MP2-based basis set correction that significantly reduces the required basis set sizes needed to converge the correlation energy. With these developments, we study the relative performance of these basis sets in LiH, Si, and MgO and determine that our optimized basis sets yield the most consistent results as a function of volume. Using these optimized basis sets, we systematically converge the AFQMC calculations to the complete basis set and thermodynamic limit and find excellent agreement with experiment for the systems studied. Although we focus on AFQMC, our basis set generation procedure is independent of the subsequent correlated wavefunction method used.

Morales, Miguel A. (ORCID:0000000263893067)↗
DOE OSTI2021

Achieving performance portability in Gaussian basis set density functional theory on accelerator based architectures in NWChemEx

The numerical integration of the exchange–correlation (XC) potential is one of the primary computational bottlenecks in Gaussian basis set Kohn–Sham density functional theory (KS-DFT). To achieve optimal performance and accuracy, care must be taken in this numerical integration to preserve local sparsity as to allow for near linear weak scaling with system size. This leads to an integration scheme with several performance critical kernels which must be hand optimized for each architecture of interest. As the set of available accelerator hardware goes more diverse, a key challenge for developers of KS-DFT software is to maintain performance portability across a wide range of computational architectures. In this article, we examine a modular software design pattern which decouples the implementation details of performance critical kernels from the expression of high-level algorithmic workflows in a device-agnostic language such as C++; thus allowing for developers to target existing and emerging accelerator hardware within a single code base. We consider the efficacy of such a design pattern in the numerical integration of the XC potential by demonstrating its ability to achieve performance portability across a set of accelerator architectures which are representative of those on current and future U.S. Department of Energy Leadership Computing Facilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

On the Finite Nuclear Effect and Gaussian Basis Sets for Four-Component Dirac Hartree-Fock Calculations

In this perspective we describe an overview of Dirac Hartree-Fock theory, which is the foundation of relativistic quantum chemistry methods vital in the molecular modeling of heavy element chemistry and physics. A special emphasis was placed upon the physical connection between the finite nuclear model and the kinetic-balance condition between the large and small components. Additionally, we review the consequences of basis set choices for Dirac Hartree-Fock calculations in the restricted kinetic balance formalism, and show that the basis set limit does not have a hard lower bound due to the nature of the Hamiltonian, referred to in the literature as prolapse. Standard Gaussian basis set contraction schemes can break down in Dirac Hartree-Fock calculations, and special care must be taken for the description of core orbitals near the nucleus. The phenomena described in this perspective are vital for theoreticians and practitioners to understand when selecting a basis set for heavy element quantum chemical calculations using Dirac Hartree-Fock theory.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2023

Accurate Hellmann–Feynman forces from density functional calculations with augmented Gaussian basis sets

The Hellmann–Feynman (HF) theorem provides a way to compute forces directly from the electron density, enabling efficient force calculations for large systems through machine learning (ML) models for the electron density. The main issue holding back the general acceptance of the HF approach for atom-centered basis sets is the well-known Pulay force which, if naively discarded, typically constitutes an error upward of 10 eV/Å in forces. In this work, we demonstrate that if a suitably augmented Gaussian basis set is used for density functional calculations, the Pulay force can be suppressed, and HF forces can be computed as accurately as analytical forces with state-of-the-art basis sets, allowing geometry optimization and molecular dynamics to be reliably performed with HF forces. Our results pave a clear path forward for the accurate and efficient simulation of large systems using ML densities and the HF theorem.

Pathak, Shivesh (ORCID:0000000172798195)↗
NASA NTRS1989

General contraction of Gaussian basis sets. Part 2: Atomic natural orbitals and the calculation of atomic and molecular properties

A recently proposed scheme for using natural orbitals from atomic configuration interaction (CI) wave functions as a basis set for linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) calculations is extended for the calculation of molecular properties. For one-electron properties like multipole moments, which are determined largely by the outermost regions of the molecular wave function, it is necessary to increase the flexibility of the basis in these regions. This is most easily done by uncontracting the outmost Gaussian primitives, and/or by adding diffuse primitives. A similar approach can be employed for the calculation of polarizabilities. Properties which are not dominated by the long-range part of the wave function, such as spectroscopic constants or electric field gradients at the nucleus, can generally be treated satisfactorily with the original atomic natural orbital (ANO) sets.

Almloef, Jan↗
NASA NTRS1990

General contraction of Gaussian basis sets. II - Atomic natural orbitals and the calculation of atomic and molecular properties

A recently proposed scheme for using natural orbitals from atomic configuration interaction wave functions as a basis set for linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) calculations is extended for the calculation of molecular properties. For one-electron properties like multipole moments, which are determined largely by the outermost regions of the molecular wave function, it is necessary to increase the flexibility of the basis in these regions. This is most easily done by uncontracting the outermost Gaussian primitives, and/or by adding diffuse primitives. A similar approach can be employed for the calculation of polarizabilities. Properties which are not dominated by the long-range part of the wave function, such as spectroscopic constants or electric field gradients at the nucleus, can generally be treated satisfactorily with the original atomic natural orbital sets.

Almlof, Jan↗
NASA NTRS1992

On the performance of large Gaussian basis sets for the computation of total atomization energies

The total atomization energies of a number of molecules have been computed using an augmented coupled-cluster method and (5s4p3d2f1g) and 4s3p2d1f) atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets, as well as the correlation consistent valence triple zeta plus polarization (cc-pVTZ) correlation consistent valence quadrupole zeta plus polarization (cc-pVQZ) basis sets. The performance of ANO and correlation consistent basis sets is comparable throughout, although the latter can result in significant CPU time savings. Whereas the inclusion of g functions has significant effects on the computed Sigma D(e) values, chemical accuracy is still not reached for molecules involving multiple bonds. A Gaussian-1 (G) type correction lowers the error, but not much beyond the accuracy of the G1 model itself. Using separate corrections for sigma bonds, pi bonds, and valence pairs brings down the mean absolute error to less than 1 kcal/mol for the spdf basis sets, and about 0.5 kcal/mol for the spdfg basis sets. Some conclusions on the success of the Gaussian-1 and Gaussian-2 models are drawn.

Martin, J. M. L.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Crystal Diffraction Prediction and Partiality estimation using Gaussian basis functions

A small dataset with good data quality, useful as a benchmark. There exists a two-fold indexing ambiguity, so when processing with CrystFEL you will need to do: ambigator -o disambiguated.stream -y m-3 -w m-3m -j 72 ambiguous.stream Please check the README file for more information about the dataset. ----- Begin unit cell ----- CrystFEL unit cell file version 1.0 lattice_type = cubic centering = I a = 103.40 A b = 103.40 A c = 103.40 A al = 90.00 deg be = 90.00 deg ga = 90.00 deg ; Please note: this is the target unit cell. ; The actual unit cells produced by indexing depend on many other factors. ----- End unit cell -----

Cydia pomonella granulovirus hull protein↗
DOE OSTI2020

Tensor Basis Gaussian Process Models of Hyperelastic Materials

In this study, we develop Gaussian process regression (GPR) models of isotropic hyperelastic material behavior. First, we consider the direct approach of modeling the components of the Cauchy stress tensor as a function of the components of the Finger stretch tensor in a Gaussian process. We then consider an improvement on this approach that embeds rotational invariance of the stress-stretch constitutive relation in the GPR representation. This approach requires fewer training examples and achieves higher accuracy while maintaining invariance to rotations exactly. Finally, we consider an approach that recovers the strain-energy density function and derives the stress tensor from this potential. Although the error of this model for predicting the stress tensor is higher, the strain-energy density is recovered with high accuracy from limited training data. The approaches presented here are examples of physics-informed machine learning. They go beyond purely data-driven approaches by embedding the physical system constraints directly into the Gaussian process representation of materials models.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
NASA NTRS1990

Polyatomic molecular Dirac-Hartree-Fock calculations with Gaussian basis sets

Numerical methods have been used successfully in atomic Dirac-Hartree-Fock (DHF) calculations for many years. Some DHF calculations using numerical methods have been done on diatomic molecules, but while these serve a useful purpose for calibration, the computational effort in extending this approach to polyatomic molecules is prohibitive. An alternative more in line with traditional quantum chemistry is to use an analytical basis set expansion of the wave function. This approach fell into disrepute in the early 1980's due to problems with variational collapse and intruder states, but has recently been put on firm theoretical foundations. In particular, the problems of variational collapse are well understood, and prescriptions for avoiding the most serious failures have been developed. Consequently, it is now possible to develop reliable molecular programs using basis set methods. This paper describes such a program and reports results of test calculations to demonstrate the convergence and stability of the method.

Dyall, Kenneth G.↗
NASA NTRS1995

The FEM-R-Matrix Approach: Use of Mixed Finite Element and Gaussian Basis Sets for Electron Molecule Collisions

For the calculation of electron molecule collision cross sections R-matrix methods automatically take advantage of the division of configuration space into an inner region (I) bounded by radius tau b, where the scattered electron is within the molecular charge cloud and the system is described by an correlated Configuration Interaction (CI) treatment in close analogy to bound state calculations, and an outer region (II) where the scattered electron moves in the long-range multipole potential of the target and efficient analytic methods can be used for solving the asymptotic Schroedinger equation plus boundary conditions.

Thuemmel, Helmar T.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Molecular NMR shieldings, J -couplings, and magnetizabilities from numeric atom-centered orbital based density-functional calculations

This paper reports and benchmarks a new implementation of nuclear magnetic resonance shieldings, magnetizabilities, and J-couplings for molecules within semilocal density functional theory, based on numeric atom-centered orbital (NAO) basis sets. NAO basis sets are attractive for the calculation of these nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) parameters because NAOs provide accurate atomic orbital representations especially near the nucleus, enabling high-quality results at modest computational cost. Moreover, NAOs are readily adaptable for linear scaling methods, enabling efficient calculations of large systems. Here, the paper has five main parts: (1) It reviews the formalism of density functional calculations of NMR parameters in one comprehensive text to make the mathematical background available in a self-contained way. (2) The paper quantifies the attainable precision of NAO basis sets for shieldings in comparison to specialized Gaussian basis sets, showing similar performance for similar basis set size. (3) The paper quantifies the precision of calculated magnetizabilities, where the NAO basis sets appear to outperform several established Gaussian basis sets of similar size. (4) The paper quantifies the precision of computed J-couplings, for which a group of customized NAO basis sets achieves precision of ~Hz for smaller basis set sizes than some established Gaussian basis sets. (5) The paper demonstrates that the implementation is applicable to systems beyond 1000 atoms in size.

74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS↗