Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Grid forming”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverter Comparison of Droop Response

With the increase in penetration of inverter-based resources (IBRs) in the electrical power system, the ability of these devices to provide grid support to the system has become a necessity. With standards previously developed for the interconnection requirements of grid-following inverters (GFLI) (most commonly photovoltaic inverters), it has been well documented how these inverters “should” respond to changes in voltage and frequency. However, with other IBRs such as grid-forming inverters (GFMIs) (used for energy storage systems, standalone systems, and as uninterruptable power supplies) these requirements are either: not yet documented, or require a more in deep analysis. With the increased interest in microgrids, GFMIs that can be paralleled onto a distribution system have become desired. With the proper control schemes, a GFMI can help maintain grid stability through fast response compared to rotating machines. This paper will present an experimental comparison of commercially available GFMI and GFLI ' responses to voltage and frequency deviation, as well as the GFMI operating as a standalone system and subjected to various changes in loads.

Grid Support, Inverter, Droop Control, Volt-VAR, F↗
DOE OSTI2023

Passivity-Based Control of Grid Forming and Grid Following Converters in Microgrids

With the integration of more and more power electronics devices into the grid, it is not easy to guarantee the stability of the whole system due to the complexity of the control structure of various power converters. In this paper, we consider grid-forming and grid-following converters in one microgrid, in which the grid-forming converters support the voltage and frequency of the microgrid and the grid-following converters inject their maximum power into the microgrid. To handle the stability issue, the passivity principle is applied to guarantee the stability of the whole microgrid. We ensure every grid-following converter satisfies the passivity via the port-controlled Hamiltonian method. In addition, we apply the passivity-based proportional-resonant controller to the grid-forming converter. One of the advantages of the proposed method is that the phase lock loop system is eliminated, which may cause stability issues. Simulation results show that the proposed method can control the microgrid effectively.

Gui, Yonghao (Young)↗
DOE OSTI2021

Power-Sharing between Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters

Power-sharing between the grid-forming and the grid-following inverter in a small microgrid is a challenging task. Specifically, the decentralized droop-based power-sharing is difficult to achieve when the grid-forming inverter regulates the voltage and the frequency. This article proposes controllers for the grid-forming and the grid-following inverters, which ensure proportional power-sharing as well as regulate the voltage and the frequency. Both controllers use active power-frequency and reactive power-voltage droops. Additional secondary loops and secondary forward paths are added to the controller of the grid-forming inverter and the grid-following inverter, respectively, to ensure simultaneous voltage and frequency regulation and power-sharing. The efficacy of the proposed controllers for power-sharing is verified through experiment results in a multi-inverter testbed.

Sadeque, Fahmid↗
DOE OSTI2024

Experimental Characterization Test of a Grid-Forming Inverter for Microgrid Applications

Standardized experimental testing protocols for grid forming (GFM) inverters to ensure expected operation under both normal and contingency conditions do not exist. Such protocols increase the confidence of system owner/operators that an inverter deployed in a proposed system will engage in typical behaviors to ensure interoperability with other units and ancillary equipment (e.g. protection equipment). This paper presents systematic and comprehensive test protocols to evaluate the performance of GFM inverters under the following operational configurations: islanded operation, heterogeneous islanded operation (parallel with a synchronous generator), grid-connected operation, and transition operation. A commercial GFM inverter is used to verify the test protocols and to understand the inverter's performance and functionalities. In particular, required configuration and tuning of the inverter will be explained in the full paper to enrich the testing protocol.

black start↗
DOE OSTI2026

Demonstration of Grid Services Using Mixed Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Technologies at the Wheatridge Renewable Energy Facility (Final Technical Report)

This Final Technical Report summarizes the analytical, modeling, and engineering work performed to evaluate grid-forming (GFM) inverter capabilities within a large hybrid renewable energy facility. The project focused on assessing the ability of advanced inverter-based resources to provide essential reliability services through coordinated operation of grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) technologies. During Budget Period 1, the project developed a comprehensive framework of GFM performance metrics, including angle support, voltage regulation, frequency response, damping behavior, and current-limiting performance. Extensive electromagnetic transient (EMT) studies and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing were conducted to validate GFM behavior under a range of operating conditions, including weak-grid scenarios, voltage disturbances, and multi-resource interactions. The project also established validated modeling approaches, plant-level control integration strategies, commissioning frameworks, and high-speed measurement infrastructure to support future field demonstration. Although the project concluded prior to field demonstration, the results provide a utility-scale foundation for evaluating, modeling, and deploying grid-forming technologies. The methodologies and tools developed contribute to industry understanding of inverter-based resource behavior and support future power system reliability under increasing renewable penetration.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Modeling of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters for Dynamic Simulation of Large-Scale Distribution Systems

Historically, distribution system planning studies mainly focused on steady state and quasi-steady state analysis, with limited attention paid to dynamic analysis. This paper develops three-phase, electromechanical models for both grid-forming and grid-following inverters, and integrates them into an open source, three-phase distribution network solver, thereby enabling dynamic simulation of large-scale, three-phase unbalanced distribution systems with high penetration of inverter-based DERs. The proposed inverter models are validated against electromagnetic simulation and field test data from the CERTS/AEP microgrid testbed, and simulated in an islanded 5252 node distribution system in the GridLAB-D simulation environment. Simulation verifies the effectiveness of the proposed inverter models for large-scale distribution system analysis. Finally, study results show that compared to traditional grid-following inverters, the high penetration of grid-forming inverters can improve the voltage and frequency stability of islanded distribution systems.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2020

State-Constrained Grid-Forming Inverter Control for Robust Operation of AC Microgrids

The control of grid-forming inverters has become an important problem to achieve high efficiency, reliability, and resilience of the future power grid. The distributed control that utilizes a sparse communication network has been proposed for AC microgrids, in which each DG only has access to the information of a small number of its neighboring DGs, reducing the computational complexity and improving the resiliency to faults and unknown parameters. However, these approaches have not provided a clear analysis of the coupling between active/reactive power injections and the voltage magnitude/frequency or a distributed updating law with a solid theoretical foundation. Additionally, in the existing approaches, tracking the references from the secondary control may violate operational constraints.

Xu, Ying↗
DOE OSTI2020

Region-Based Stability Analysis of Resilient Distribution Systems with Hybrid Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters

In this paper, distribution system stability considering mixed grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) inverters is discussed. A holistic small-signal model of the distribution feeder accommodating both GFM and GFL inverters is derived. In contrast to conventional point-by-point stability analysis, a region-based stability assessment approach is proposed and implemented to evaluate small-signal system stability with both GFM and GFL controls. Furthermore, to enhance the computational efficiency, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) assisted Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) approach is developed to obtain the stability region boundary. Therefore, with the derived stability region, the impact of critical parameters on system stability is intuitively shown, and more importantly, the relationship between the maximum penetration level and the corresponding feasible range of the selected control parameters can be quantified. The proposed approach has been validated using MATLAB/Simulink.

grid-following↗
DOE OSTI2022

Comparative Small-Signal Stability Analysis of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters in Low-Inertia Power Systems: Preprint

Inverter-based resources (IBRs) are gradually replacing conventional fossil energy in modern power systems, which could make the system susceptible due to insufficient inertia, especially when moving towards a 100% inverter-based power grid. Grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) controls are two common inverter control algorithms. However, the corresponding stability issues along with a comparative study on low-inertia power systems should still be investigated. This paper focuses on small-signal stability and conducts a comprehensive analysis of GFM and GFL controls, with emphases on the interactions between synchronous generators and IBRs. The detailed modeling of GFM and GFL inverters, and synchronous generators (SGs) are established. The coupling mechanism of IBRs and SGs is then conducted through participation factor analysis. The impacts of critical parameters on system stability are finally identified. The theoretical analyses are validated through time-domain simulation in MATLAB/Simulink.

grid-following↗
DOE OSTI2026

Performance Evaluation of a Microgrid System with Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Inverters with Diesel Generators: Insights From Hardware Experiments

This paper presents a comprehensive performance evaluation of a microgrid system integrating grid-forming (GFM) inverters, grid-following (GFL) inverters, and a diesel generator, focusing on their interactions and behavior under various dynamic events. The study is conducted using a pure hardware setup comprising two GFM inverters, one GFL inverter, a diesel generator, load banks, a point of common coupling (PCC), and an emulated main grid. The evaluation specifically examines dynamic scenarios, including voltage jumps, phase jumps, rate of change of frequency (ROCOF), synchronization, and islanding operations, which pose critical challenges to system stability. Among all the tests conducted, the overloading and phase jump tests proved to be the most challenging. The capacity of the DC side is crucial for withstanding overloading and grid disturbance tests; otherwise, GFM inverters frequently trip due to DC undervoltage. Throughout all grid disturbance tests, the diesel generator consistently stands out as the most robust and reliable GFM unit in the system. Overall, insights from these hardware experiments shed light on the response characteristics of different generation types during grid disturbances and identify potential stability concerns in such hybrid microgrid systems.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Use of Grid-Forming Medium-Voltage Power Electronics Hub in a Microgrid Setting

This paper presents the application of a new design of a multiport, modular, medium-voltage power electronics hub (M3PE-HUB) in a microgrid setting. The M3PE-HUB system was modeled in a digital real-time simulator (DRTS) and integrated into the Banshee microgrid test system. This paper presents the preliminary DRTS simulation-based results of the M3PE-HUB system connected in a test microgrid system. Verification and validation of the M3PE-HUB architecture and controls in the test microgrid setting are the primary contributions of this work. The results of the operation during the islanding and resynchronization process indicate the feasibility of the proposed architecture in a microgrid setting. This paper also presents results for a system reconfiguration use case where the M3PE-HUB was used to reconfigure the system under a fault condition.

grid forming↗
DOE OSTI2022

Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application

This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.

grid-forming↗
DOE OSTI2023

Operation and Control of a Back to Back Modular Multilevel Converter System for Grid Forming Application with Advanced Grid Support Functionalities

The main focus of this paper is to investigate the possibility of using modular multilevel converter based back-to-back system for grid forming applications. A decentralized hierarchical control architecture with a modified local controller based on nonlinear techniques for grid forming application have been investigated. Grid functionalities based on IEEE 1547-2018 for grid forming converters have been utilized. The local controllers ensure distortion free balanced sinusoidal output voltage on the grid forming side with unbalanced or nonlinear loading condition. The grid following side ensures unity power factor currents under unbalanced grid voltage condition. The dc bus voltage control ensures oscillation free voltage under balanced conditions and control of the average voltage under unbalanced condition. Efficacy of the overall system is verified by modeling the system in MATLAB/Simulink and PLECS domain and the most important case studies are presented.

advanced grid support functionalities↗
DOE OSTI2021

A Novel State-Constrained Primary Control for Grid-Forming Inverters

The problem of operating an AC microgrid with purely inverter-based generating units is considered, and a novel vector control for the constrained grid-forming (GFM) inverters is proposed. The design aims to achieve the primary control objectives of the GFM inverters: voltage establishment, synchronization, and voltage/frequency regulation. It is novel that the proposed control also ensures all operational variables constrained both real-time and for all the time except for low voltage during the period of grid forming. The constraints include frequency, output AC voltage, input DC power, and active/reactive power injections to the grid. Here, in this paper, outcomes of a detailed simulation are presented to demonstrated that the above design objectives are met and that the overall performance is superior due to its unique ability of simultaneously controlling the whole vectors of the inverter state and output.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
DOE OSTI2021

Integrated Synchronization Control of Grid-Forming Inverters for Smooth Microgrid Transition

This paper develops an integrated synchronization control technique for a grid-forming inverter operating within a microgrid that can improve the microgrid's transients during microgrid transition operation. This integrated synchronization control includes the disconnection synchronization control and the reconnection synchronization control. The simulation results show that the developed synchronization control works effectively to smooth the angle change of the grid-forming inverter during microgrid transition operation. Thus, the microgrid's transients are significantly improved compared to the case without synchronization control.

control↗
DOE OSTI2022

Decentralized Distribution System Restoration with Grid-Forming/Following Inverter-Based Resources

The high penetration of distributed energy resources (DERs) in active distribution systems has posed challenges to the centralized distribution system restoration (DSR) strategies in current practice. On the other hand, the advancement in smart inverter technologies enables the bottom-up restoration capability. This paper is motivated to develop a 3-layered hierarchical framework for decentralized DSR, based on the grid-forming (GFM) and grid-following (GFL) grid-edge inverters. The first layer presents the tertiary control, which determines the load pickup schedule and generation dispatch of DERs, using the alternating direction method of the multipliers algorithm. The second layer consists of two control functions: GFM control, which regulates voltage and frequency, establishing a stable grid for GFL inverters to follow; and GFL control, which regulates the real and reactive power. In the third layer, the primary control is proposed to regulate the inverter voltage and current, which is developed based on the virtual oscillator control (VOC). Furthermore, the developed framework is tested in the modified IEEE 13-node test feeder. Two scenarios of grid-connected and islanded operating modes are designed, and simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of decentralized DSR strategies for controlling grid-edge inverters to enhance the distribution system resilience.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗