Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “HSECoE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Material analysis of metal hydrides for bulk hydrogen storage

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE), 2009–2014, was established to evaluate the viability of material-based hydrogen storage for light duty vehicles. The HSECoE concluded that there were no metal hydrides that simultaneously met the DOE targets for gravimetric and volumetric capacity, and rate of onboard refueling. However, it was noted by the DOE that potential applications existed for stationary hydrogen storage systems. An application of particular interest is using a metal-hydride to store a hydrogen supply for fuel cell backup power to a 5 MWe data center. A generalized numerical model that coupled mass and energy conservation, chemical kinetics and thermodynamics was developed to simulate the discharge process for a given metal-hydride. The model was applied to an interstitial and a complex metal-hydride. In conclusion, it was found that the interstitial metal-hydride, which is discharged by a pressure swing is preferrable in a practical sense to the complex metal-hydride, which requires a temperature swing discharge process.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence Adsorbent (Final Report)

The Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE) team would like to thank the U.S Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office for the funding to embark on such a large endeavor to develop the material and engineering science related to the use of adsorbents as the storage media for automotive applications. In addition, SRNL would like to thank the many partners of the HSECoE including U.S. automotive manufacturers, GM and Ford, potential component and materials suppliers, United Technologies Research Center, Hexagon Lincoln Composites, and BASF, Universities, Oregon State University, University of Michigan, and the University of Québec, Trois Reveres, along with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory and Savannah River National Laboratory. Individual specific contributions can be found in individual final reports submitted to DOE. No attempt is made here to attribute contributions to individual people or organizations, illustrating the cooperative arrangement of the team members.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Hydrogen Storage System Modeling: Public Access, Maintenance, and Enhancements

This presentation summarizes the Fiscal Year 2020 status and accomplishments for the Hydrogen Storage System Modeling project, a collaborative effort to manage, update, and enhance hydrogen storage system models developed under the Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE). The project goal is to provide validated modeling tools that will be used by researchers to evaluate the performance of their new materials in engineered systems relative to the DOE technical targets.

AMR↗

Electrolyte Assisted Hydrogen Storage Reactions (Final Technical Report)

The goal of this project is to address critical deficiencies of hydrogen storage systems design based on hydride materials, as originally identified by the DOE Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE). Baseline hydrogen storage technology presently relies on compressed gas operating at ~700 bar pressure, which imposes huge demands on fuel delivery, fuel storage and system cost. For onboard storage applications, Type IV composite overwrapped pressure vessels and associated balance-of-plant components are necessary to ensure safe and effective fuel delivery. However, such compressed gas technology falls well-short of volumetric targets even at 700 bar, given the density of gaseous molecular hydrogen is only 40 g·H2/l at ambient temperatures. One alternative is to utilize hydride materials which accommodate hydrogen in atomic form. Certain hydrides can attain volumetric densities that exceed the density of liquid H2 (71 g·H2/l) while also offering advantageous thermodynamic properties. However, such material systems presently rely on solid-state diffusion for hydrogen release, which has a very high activation barrier for atom mobility and, thus, requires impractically-high temperatures for operation. The initial focus of our research effort is to employ and demonstrate an electrolyte system to mediate the diffusion of species at lower temperatures relevant to transportation applications, with the goal of establishing the critical factors necessary to obviate the need for high-temperature release of hydrogen. A parallel goal of this exploratory effort is to determine the effectiveness of modest electrochemical potentials in overcoming any endothermic requirements for hydrogen release in a similar electrolyte-promoted scenario.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Engineering Challenges of Solution and Slurry-Phase Chemical Hydrogen Storage Materials for Automotive Fuel Cell Applications

In this work, we present the research findings of the DOE-funded Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence (HSECoE) related to liquid-phase and slurry-phase chemical hydrogen storage media and their potential as future hydrogen storage media for automotive applications. Chemical hydrogen storage media other than neat liquid compositions will prove difficult to meet the DOE system level targets. Solid- and slurry-phase chemical hydrogen storage media requiring off-board regeneration are impractical and highly unlikely to be implemented for automotive applications because of the formidable task of developing solid- or slurry-phase transport systems that are commercially reliable and economical throughout the entire life cycle of the fuel. Additionally, the regeneration cost and efficiency of chemical hydrogen storage media is currently the single most prohibitive barrier to implementing chemical hydrogen storage media. Ideally, neat liquid-phase chemical hydrogen storage media with net-usable gravimetric hydrogen capacities of greater than 7.8 wt% are projected to meet the 2017 DOE system level gravimetric and volumetric targets. The research presented herein is a collection of research findings that do not in and of themselves warrant a dedicated manuscript. However, the collection of results do, in fact, highlight the engineering challenges and short-comings in scaling up and demonstrating fluid-phase ammonia borane and alane compositions that all future materials researchers working in hydrogen storage should be aware of.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗