Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “HTF”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Characterization of the March 2017 tank 10 surface sample (combination of HTF-10-17-30 AND HTF-10-17-31) and variable depth sample (combination of HTF-10-17-32 and HTF-10-17-33)

Two surface samples (HTF-10-17-30 and HTF-10-17-31) and two variable depth samples (HTF-10-17-32 and HTF-10-17-33) were collected from SRS Tank 10 during March 2017 and submitted to SRNL for characterization. At SRNL, the two surface samples were combined in one container, the two variable depth samples (VDSs) were combined in another container, and then the two composite samples were each characterized by a series of physical, ionic, radiological, and elemental analysis methods. The surface sample composite was characterized primarily for Tank Farm corrosion control purposes, while the VDS composite was characterized primarily for Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) purposes.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Analysis of Tank 30H (HTF-30-18-54, -55), Tank 32H (HTF-32-18-56, -57), and Tank 37H (HTF-37-18-58, -59) Samples for Support of the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H to support the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator system. The six samples from Tanks 30H, 32H, and 37H all contain highly concentrated salt solution s with sodium concentrations ranging from 7.89 M to 15.0 M. The samples from Tank 30H show small differences in the concentrations of the major cations and anions between the surface sample and VDS. The two Tank 32H samples show significant differences in the concentrations of the major anions and cations with the VDS being nearly twice as concentrated as the surface sample. The surface sample and VDS from Tank 37H contain very similar compositions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 30H (HTF-30-18-96, -97), Tank 32H (HTF-32-18-98, -99), and Tank 37H (HTF-37-18-100, -101) Samples for Support of the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H to support the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator system. The six samples from Tanks 30H, 32H, and 37H all contain highly concentrated salt solutions with sodium concentrations ranging from 11.8 M to 15.7 M. The samples from Tank 30H show somewhat higher concentrations of the major cations and anions in the sub-surface sample than the surface sample indicating some stratification within the tank. The two Tank 32H samples show similar concentrations of the major anions and cations between the surface and sub-surface samples. The sub-surface sample from Tank 37H shows higher concentrations for most species than the surface sample indicating some stratification within this tank as well. For all six samples, the sum of the major cations versus the sum of the major anions shows a difference of <10% providing an indication of good data quality. The VDS and surface samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H all show silicon concentrations below 30 mg/L except for the Tank 30H VDS with a concentration of 87 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 30H (HTF-30-19-33, -34), Tank 32H (HTF-32-19-35, -36), and Tank 37H (HTF-37-19-53, -54) Samples for Support of the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H to support the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator system. The six samples from Tanks 30H, 32H, and 37H all contain highly concentrated salt solutions with sodium concentrations ranging from 13.8 M to 16.9 M. Hydroxide is the dominant anion in all of the samples followed by nitrate and nitrite. The preponderance of the analytical determinations (density, anions, cations) on all three tanks show slightly higher concentrations of solute in the sub-surface sample than in the surface sample, indicating some stratification within the tanks. With the exception of the Tank 30H VDS, all of the samples are somewhat more concentrated compared with the compositions of the previous samples. The sum of the major cations versus the sum of the major anions show a difference of <5% for all of the samples indicating good data quality for the non-radioactive analytes in the table. The silicon concentrations measured in the VDS and surface samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H were all below detection.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Analysis of Tank 30H (HTF-30-19-33, -34), Tank 32H (HTF-32-19-35, -36), and Tank 37H (HTF-37- 19-53, -54) Samples for Support of the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H to support the Evaporator Feed Qualification and Corrosion Control Programs for the 3H-Evaporator system. The six samples from Tanks 30H, 32H, and 37H all contain highly concentrated salt solutions with sodium concentrations ranging from 13.8 M to 16.9 M. Hydroxide is the dominant anion in all of the samples followed by nitrate and nitrite. The preponderance of the analytical determinations (density, anions, cations) on all three tanks show slightly higher concentrations of solute in the sub-surface sample than in the surface sample, indicating some stratification within the tanks. With the exception of the Tank 30H VDS, all of the samples are somewhat more concentrated compared with the compositions of the previous samples. The sum of the major cations versus the sum of the major anions show a difference of <5% for all of the samples indicating good data quality for the non-radioactive analytes in the table. The silicon concentrations measured in the VDS and surface samples from Tank 30H, Tank 32H, and Tank 37H were all below detection.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2026

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-26-16, -17), Tank 43H (HTF 43-26-18, -19) and Tank 22 (HTF-22-26-20, -21) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyzed samples from Tank 38H, Tank 43H and Tank 22H to support the Enrichment Control Program (ECP) and Corrosion Control Program (CCP). The results indicate the concentrations of most soluble species in the Tank 38H surface sample are ~ 76% of the concentrations in the previous Tank 38H surface sample. The current Tank 38H subsurface sample is a clear solution with soluble species that are ~ 70% of the concentrations in the previous Tank 38H subsurface. Significant differences in the concentrations of major components between the current Tank 38H surface and subsurface samples indicate stratification of solution species between these two locations within Tank 38H.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2012

Analyses of HTF-48-12-20/24 (February, 2012) and Archived HTF-E-05-021 Tank 48H Slurry Samples

Personnel characterized a Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) archived sample of Tank 48H slurry (HTF-E-05-021) in addition to the composite of samples HTF-48-12-20 and HTF-48-12-24, which were both retrieved in February 2012. The combined February 2012 sample is referred to as HTF-48-12-20/24 in this report. The results from these analyses are compared with Tank 48H samples analyzed in 2003, 2004, and 2005. This work supports the effort to demonstrate copper-catalyzed peroxide oxidation (CCPO) of organic content in this material. The principal findings with respect to the chemical and physical characteristics of the most recent sample are: (1) The measured potassium tetraphenylborate (KTPB) solid concentration is 1.76 wt %; (2) Titanium was in line with 2004 and 2005 slurry measurements at 897 mg/L, it represents 0.1535 ± 0.0012 wt % monosodium titanate (MST); (3) The measured insoluble solids content was 1.467 wt %; (4) The free hydroxide concentration in the Tank 48H filtrate sample (1.02 ± 0.02 M) is close to the Tank 48H limit (1.0 M); (5) Carbonate reported by total inorganic carbon (TIC, 1.39 ± 0.03 M) is more than double the concentrations measured in past (2003-2005) samples; (6) The soluble potassium content (measured at 286 ± 23 mg/L) in the filtrate is in line with all past measurements; and (7) The measured 137 Cs concentration is 7.81E + 08 ± 3.9E + 07 dpm/mL of slurry (1.33 ± 5% Ci/gallon or 3.18E + 05 ± 5% curies of 137 Cs in the tank) in the slurry which is in agreement with the 2005 report of 3.14E + 05 ± 1.5% curies of 137 Cs in the tank. The filtrate 137 Cs concentration is 2.57E + 07 ± 2.6E + 05 dpm/mL. This result is consistent with previous results. Significant analytical data are summarized in Table 1.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Analysis Of 2h-Evaporator Scale Wall [HTF-13-82] And Pot Bottom [HTF-13-77] Samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is planning to remove a buildup of sodium aluminosilicate scale from the 2H-evaporator pot by loading and soaking the pot with heated 1.5 M nitric acid solution. Sampling and analysis of the scale material has been performed so that uranium and plutonium isotopic analysis can be input into a Nuclear Criticality Safety Assessment (NCSA) for scale removal by chemical cleaning. Historically, since the operation of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), silicon in the DWPF recycle stream combines with aluminum in the typical tank farm supernate to form sodium aluminosilicate scale mineral deposits in the 2Hevaporator pot and gravity drain line. The 2H-evaporator scale samples analyzed by Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) came from the bottom cone sections of the 2H-evaporator pot [Sample HTF-13-77] and the wall 2H-evaporator [sample HTF-13-82]. X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) confirmed that both the 2H-evaporator pot scale and the wall samples consist of nitrated cancrinite (a crystalline sodium aluminosilicate solid) and clarkeite (a uranium oxy-hydroxide mineral). On “as received” basis, the bottom pot section scale sample contained an average of 2.59E+00 ± 1.40E-01 wt % total uranium with a U-235 enrichment of 6.12E-01 ± 1.48E-02 %, while the wall sample contained an average of 4.03E+00 ± 9.79E-01 wt % total uranium with a U-235 enrichment of 6.03E-01% ± 1.66E-02 wt %. The bottom pot section scale sample analyses results for Pu-238, Pu-239, and Pu-241 are 3.16E- 05 ± 5.40E-06 wt %, 3.28E-04 ± 1.45E-05 wt %, and <8.80E-07 wt %, respectively. The evaporator wall scale samples analysis values for Pu-238, Pu-239, and Pu-241 averages 3.74E-05 ± 6.01E-06 wt %, 4.38E-04 ± 5.08E-05 wt %, and <1.38E-06 wt %, respectively. The Pu-241 analyses results, as presented, are upper limit values. These results are provided so that SRR can calculate the equivalent uranium-235 concentrations for the NCSA. Results confirm that the uranium contained in the scale remains depleted with respect to natural uranium. SRNL did not calculate an equivalent U-235 enrichment, which takes into account other fissionable isotopes U-233, Pu-239 and Pu-241. The applicable method for calculation of equivalent U-235 will be determined in the NCSA.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Characterization of the March 2017 Tank 15 Waste Removal Slurry Sample (Combination of Slurry Samples HTF-15-17-28 and HTF-15-17-29)

Two March 2017 Tank 15 slurry samples (HTF-15-17-28 and HTF-15-17-29) were collected during the second bulk waste removal campaign and submitted to SRNL for characterization. At SRNL, the two samples were combined and then characterized by a series of physical, elemental, radiological, and ionic analysis methods. Sludge settling as a function of time was also quantified. The characterization results reported in this document are consistent with expectations based upon waste type, process knowledge, comparisons between alternate analysis techniques, and comparisons with the characterization results obtained for the November 2016 Tank 15 slurry sample (the sample collected during the first bulk waste removal campaign).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Analysis Of 2H-Evaporator Scale Wall [HTF-13-82] And Pot Bottom [HTF-13-77] Samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is planning to remove a buildup of sodium aluminosilicate scale from the 2H-evaporator pot by loading and soaking the pot with heated 1.5 M nitric acid solution. Sampling and analysis of the scale material has been performed so that uranium and plutonium isotopic analysis can be input into a Nuclear Criticality Safety Assessment (NCSA) for scale removal by chemical cleaning. Historically, since the operation of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), silicon in the DWPF recycle stream combines with aluminum in the typical tank farm supernate to form sodium aluminosilicate scale mineral deposits in the 2H-evaporator pot and gravity drain line.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Analysis Of Tank 38H (HTF-38-14-6, 7) And Tank 43H (HTF-43-14-8, 9) Samples For Support Of The Enrichment Control And Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL performed analysis on Tanks 38H and 43H surface and subsurface supernate samples to support ECP and CCP. The U-235 mass divided by the total U mass ranged from 0.0059 to 0.0060. Uranium concentration ranged from 53.1 mg/L in the Tank 43H surface sample to the 85.1 mg/L in the Tank 38H subsurface sample. The U-235/U and uranium concentration are in line with the prior 2H-Evaporator System ECP samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-14-150, 151) and Tank 43H (HTF- 43-14-152, 53) Surface and Subsurface Supernatant Samples in Support of Enrichment Control, Corrosion Control and Sodium Aluminosilicate Formation Potential Programs

This report provides the results of analyses on Tanks 38H and 43H surface and subsurface supernatant liquid samples in support of the Enrichment Control Program (ECP), the Corrosion Control Program and Sodium Aluminosilicate Formation Potential in the Evaporator.

2H evaporator system↗
DOE OSTI2015

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-15-119, 127) Surface, Subsurface and Tank 43H (HTF-43-15-116, 117 and 118) Surface, Feed Pump Suction and Jet Suction Subsurface Supernatant Samples in Support of Enrichment, Corrosion Control and Salt Batch Planning Programs

Compositional feed limits have been established to ensure that a nuclear criticality event for the 2H and 3H Evaporators is not possible. The Enrichment Control Program (ECP) requires feed sampling to determine the equivalent enriched uranium content prior to transfer of waste other than recycle transfers (requires sampling to determine the equivalent enriched uranium at two locations in Tanks 38H and 43H every 26 weeks) The Corrosion Control Program (CCP) establishes concentration and temperature limits for key constituents and periodic sampling and analysis to confirm that waste supernate is within these limits. This report provides the results of analyses on Tanks 38H and 43H surface and subsurface supernatant liquid samples in support of the ECP, the CCP, and the Salt Batch 10 Planning Program.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-16-26, 27) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-16-28, 29) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

Savannah River National Laboratory analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support Enrichment Control Program and Corrosion Control Program. The total uranium in the Tank 38H samples ranged from 20.5 to 34.0 mg/L while the Tank 43H samples ranged from 47.6 to 50.6 mg/L. The U-235 percentage ranged from 0.62% to 0.64% over the four samples. The total uranium and percent U-235 results appear consistent with previous Tank 38H and Tank 43H uranium measurements. The Tank 38H plutonium results show a large difference between the surface and sub-surface sample concentrations and a somewhat higher concentration than previous sub-surface samples. The two Tank 43H samples show similar plutonium concentrations and are within the range of values measured on previous samples. The plutonium results may be biased high due to the presence of plutonium contamination in the blank samples from the cell sample preparations. The four samples analyzed show silicon concentrations ranging from 47.9 to 105 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Tank 38H (HTF-38-16-80, 81) and Tank 43H (HTF-43-16-82, 83) Samples for Support of the Enrichment Control and Corrosion Control Programs

SRNL analyzed samples from Tank 38H and Tank 43H to support ECP and CCP. The total uranium in the Tank 38H surface sample was 57.6 mg/L, while the sub-surface sample was 106 mg/L. The Tank 43H samples ranged from 50.0 to 51.9 mg/L total uranium. The U-235 percentage was consistent for all four samples at 0.62%. The total uranium and percent U-235 results appear consistent with recent Tank 38H and Tank 43H uranium measurements. The Tank 38H plutonium results show a large difference between the surface and sub-surface sample concentrations and somewhat higher concentrations than previous samples. The Pu-238 concentration is more than forty times higher in the Tank 38H sub-surface sample than the surface sample. The surface and sub-surface Tank 43H samples contain similar plutonium concentrations and are within the range of values measured on previous samples. The four samples analyzed show silicon concentrations somewhat higher than the previous sample with values ranging from 104 to 213 mg/L.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗