Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “HTL biocrude”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

SCALEABLE HYDROTREATING OF HTL BIOCRUDE TO PRODUCE FUEL BLENDSTOCKS

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) offers an attractive route to produce fuel blendstocks from wet wastes. Scaleable hydrotreating data for the conversion of HTL biocrude to fuels is critical to the commercialization of HTL. Herein, we demonstrate pore diffusion limitations for the hydrotreating of HTL biocrudes. We demonstrate scale-able hydrotreating of HTL biocrude to produce a high cetane diesel fuel and demonstrate the hydrotreating limitations.

Biofuel, hydrotreating, HTL biocrude, hydrothermal↗

Extended catalyst lifetime testing for HTL biocrude hydrotreating to produce fuel blendstocks from wet wastes

This paper presents the upgrading of HTL (Hydrothermal Liquefaction) bio oil produced by from various sources such as sewage sludge and food wastes. The HTL oil was hydrotreated over a CoMo/Al2O3 (guardbed) and NiMo/Al2O3 (mainbed) catalysts at WHSV 0.5hr-1, 400°C and 1500 psi. The steady state densities (at 40°C) were 0.79 and 0.81 g/ml for HTL biocrude derived from sewage sludge and food waste, respectively. After 1500 hours of steady state operation, variations in process conditions that affect the hydrotreating performance had been identified in the following order; Pressure>WHSV>Temperature. Pressure had huge impact on the hydrotreating performance. The hydrotreating efficiency was reestablished to base line conditions with minimal deactivation of catalyst at 2000 hours run time.

Hydrothermal Liquefaction, HTL, Hydrotreating, Bio↗

Comparison of the Chemical Composition of Liquids from the Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignocellulosic Materials

Major differences in thermal stability and hydrotreatment behavior of HTL and pyrolysis oils have been reported in the literature. However, little is known about the variations in the chemical composition of these oils that could explain such differences. Two commercial wood pyrolysis oils (Pyrovac and BTG), and their water-soluble (WS) and water-insoluble fractions (WIS) were analyzed and compared with the aqueous (WS WD-57 ) and oily (WIS WS-57 ) fractions obtained from hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of Douglas-fir. The samples were characterized by GC/MS, Karl Fischer titration, carbonyl content, total acid number, elemental composition, calorific value, proximate analysis, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Folin-Ciocalteu (FC), and UV fluorescence. All the fractions were also analyzed by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectroscopy (FT-ICR-MS) and by Electrospray Ionization (EI). The most prevalent class of compounds in the water insoluble phases were phenols derived from lignin. Water-soluble phases contain mostly the oxygenated compounds derived from cellulose and hemicellulose and were richer in carbonyl functional groups. The water content of the resulting aqueous phases were between: 65 (WS BTG ) and 96 (WS Pyrovac ) wt. %. The bio-oil from BTG has higher water content and lower HHV, compared to Pyrovac oil. The GC/MS results of BTG oil show the presence of a more prominent acetic acid peak and higher TAN number than the Pyrovac oil. The GC/MS of Pyrovac oil showed more obvious mono-phenol peaks. The quantification of this family by Folin-Ciocalteu method confirmed higher content of monophenolic compounds compared with the BTG oil. The lower thermal stability of pyrolysis oils compared with HTL biocrudes can be partially explained by the fact that pyrolysis oils (BTG and Pyrovac) contain carbohydrates while HTL biocrude (WIS WD-57 ) doesn’t. Thus, we decided to further investigate the chemical differences between the phenolic rich fractions insoluble in water and the holocellulose derived compounds soluble in water. Even after water extraction, the acid content of the water insoluble fraction from BTG (WISBTG) was higher than the acid content of the water insoluble fraction obtained by HTL (WISWSD-57). Likewise, the acid content of the aqueous phases derived from pyrolysis oils (WS Pyrovac , WS BTG ) was also higher than for the aqueous phase obtained by HTL (WSWSD-57). This result is in part due to the use of bases in the HTL process that neutralizes the acid formed in that process. Moreover, the starting feedstock may also influence the differences between the oils. Although, the UV-Fluorescence spectra, ICR-MS and the EI analyses showed some minor differences in the molecular weight and chemical make-up of the oligomers soluble and insoluble in water from pyrolysis and HTL; the differences observed were not large enough to justify the differences in behavior between these oils reported in the literature. Our results suggest that the differences observed between HTL biocrudes and pyrolysis oils are likely partially due to the presence of holocellulose derived products in the pyrolysis oils and higher acid contents.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Hydrothermal liquefaction of Cyanidioschyzon merolae and Salicornia bigelovii Torr.: The interaction effect on product distribution and chemistry

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) has proven to be a promising technology for processing wet biomass into valuable biofuel intermediates. We investigated the influence of HTL process parameters on the individual and co-liquefaction of Salicornia bigelovii Torr. (SL) and Cyanidioschyzon merolae (CM) biomass and their respective product properties and characteristics. SL and CM biomasses were subjected to HTL conditions of process temperatures (250–350 °C), 10 wt% solid loading, 30 min reaction time, and co-liquefaction ratios (80–20, 50–50, 20–80, CM-SL, respectively). The individual maximum HTL biocrude yields for CM (34.63 wt%) and SL (7.63 wt%) were obtained at 300 °C. In both cases, biocrude oils had a higher carbon and hydrogen content relative to those of the original biomass. The HHV (higher heating value) values for the biocrude samples ranged from 24.2 to 33.12 MJ/kg, which were significantly higher than those of the original biomasses. A positive synergistic effect was observed during the co-liquefaction of two biomasses, where the experimental yield of biocrude oil was higher than the theoretical value. During the co-liquefaction experiments, a maximum biocrude yield of 32.95 wt% was obtained at 300 °C and 80–20 CM-SL biomass mix ratio. Co-liquefaction led to an increase in the energy content of the co-liquefied biocrude oil and a higher energy recovery rate. Finally, the properties of HTL products and biomasses were determined with TGA, CHN elemental analyzer, GC/MS, bomb calorimeter, HACH Spectrophotometer, and ICP OES.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

2023 Business Case Study: Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algal Bloom Biomass

A business case study was developed for the fiscal year (FY) 2023 to explore the technical and economic feasibility of converting lake-harvested algal bloom biomass (ABB) into biofuel via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). The case study includes reporting on the experimental demonstration of converting the algal feedstock to HTL biocrude. Using the experimental data, a preliminary techno-economic assessment (TEA) of a commercial-scale facility was completed to determine the economic feasibility of the process.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Swell Behavior of Elastomers with a Hydrothermal Liquefaction Bio-Crude and a Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil

The compatibility of seventeen elastomer materials with two heavy biofuels (fast pyrolysis bio-oil and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) bio-crude) and diesel was assessed through volume change measurements. The elastomers included two fluorocarbons, six acrylonitrile rubbers (NBRs), and one each of fluorosilicone, neoprene, polyurethane, silicone, epichlorohydrin rubber (ECO), a blend of polyvinyl chloride and NBR (OZO), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), hydrogenated NBR (HNBR) and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM). The specimens were immersed in each test fuel for four weeks at 50°C and then measured for volume change. Afterwards, the specimens were dried, and the volume was remeasured. Ingeneral, the bio-oil produced unacceptable swelling in the fluoroelastomers, ECO, OZO, neoprene, polyurethane, SBR, HNBR, EPDM, silicone and five of the NBRs. In most cases, the HTL bio-crude produced lower (though still unacceptable) swelling than the bio-oil. Materials that showed good compatibility with the HTL biocrude were the fluoroelastomers, OZO, and silicone.

Kass, Michael↗

Hydrothermal liquefaction of wastewater-grown algae to produce synthetic aviation fuel: A combined experimental study and techno-economic assessment

Large-scale algae farms may someday become a consistent source of biomass feedstock for biofuels. Near-term supplies of algal biomass are available at certain water resource recovery facilities as algae cultivation is used as a method for nutrient recovery from specific effluent streams. Algae grown as a service shifts the value to the service rather than its sole use as a feedstock, which could enable the provision of algal biomass at low to no cost to biofuel producers. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) can readily upgrade wet feedstock slurries, such as algae, to produce a carbon-enriched biocrude. The HTL biocrude can be hydrotreated and distilled, producing a variety of distillate fuels, including synthetic aviation fuel (SAF). We present a pathway, showing the experimental production of SAF from wastewater-grown algae via HTL, along with a techno-economic assessment to identify opportunities for process improvements. Critical quality attributes of the SAF, such as density, viscosity, surface tension, and freeze point, were estimated within the expected fuel experience ranges when compared against petroleum jet fuel. The average minimum fuel selling price of fuels from wastewater-grown algae for breakeven economics was $\$9.04$ per gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE). The sale of co-products such as struvite fertilizers and cement additives can add revenue to reduce the net cost. Ultimately, the selling price is influenced by the scale of the HTL processing facility. Adjusting estimations in the process scale, algae yield, and capital cost estimation can lower the price to $\$6.51$/GGE or raise it to $13.07/GGE.

Biofuels↗

Wet Waste Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Biocrude Upgrading to Hydrocarbon Fuels: 2021 State of Technology

Each year the U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) assesses progress in their research and development efforts toward sustainable production of renewable fuels (DOE 2016) through the annual state of technology (SOT) assessment. The SOT assessment evaluates the impact of the year’s research progress on the modeled minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) for selected biofuel conversion pathways and measures the current state of the technology relative to defined goal case projections. Supply chain sustainability analysis to track and guide research toward improved greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, energy usage, water usage and other environmental metrics for the pathway is performed by Argonne National Laboratory (Cai et al. 2018, 2020). Technical and cost targets for a projected goal case set for the year 2022 were previously established for the wet waste hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and biocrude upgrading pathway and summarized in a design report (Snowden-Swan et al. 2017). Process performance advancements made for HTL and biocrude hydrotreating have resulted yearly reductions in the modeled MFSP relative to the initial SOT (2018) (Snowden-Swan et al. 2020, 2021). This report summarizes the research and associated techno-economic analysis (TEA) for the pathway 2021 SOT. Methods and economic assumptions for the nth plant analysis used for the TEA are consistent with the design report (Snowden-Swan et al. 2017), with the exception of updates in the modeled cost year (2016) and income tax rate (21%).

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Process intensification in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) presents a promising pathway for converting wet biomass resources into biofuels, offering significant advantages over conventional methods. However, numerous challenges must be addressed for HTL scale-up, including energy provision for the endothermic process, heat and mass transfer limitations, slurry concentration and pumpability challenges, char and coke formation, and continuous phase separation. This review explores key strategies such as autothermal HTL, which improves process efficiency and reduces external energy requirements by coupling exothermic and endothermic reactions within the same reactor, thereby simplifying reactor design and reducing operational costs. Additionally, multistage HTL processes are highlighted for their ability to optimize biocrude quality and yield by fractionating biomass conversion stages, resulting in higher energy returns on investment and better-quality biocrude. Solvothermal HTL and integration techniques for aqueous phase are also discussed. Furthermore, the HTL patent landscape is discussed to provide insights into current technological advancements. This review aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of process intensification in HTL, highlighting innovative solutions to enhance the efficiency and scalability of the process for sustainable biofuel production.

Biocrude oil↗

Microalgae Conversion to Biofuels and Biochemical via Sequential Hydrothermal Liquefaction (SEQHTL) and Bioprocessing: 2020 State of Technology

A preliminary techno-economic analysis (TEA) was developed for the fiscal year 2020 state of technology (SOT) assessment to evaluate the benefits and risks for a large-scale microalga hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) system based on most recent testing results. The focus of the study is directed toward the conversion system, which consists of five processes: two-stage sequential HTL (SEQHTL), biocrude upgrading to final fuels, bioprocessing for co-product generation, hydrogen generation, and steam cycle. In this system, algae biomass with corn stover supplement during the lower algae productivity seasons (winter, fall, and spring) to match the maximum algae seasonal production rate in summer is employed to maintain a constant plant capacity in all the seasons. Algae only (summer season) or algae/corn stover blended feedstock (other seasons) are sent to a two-stage SEQHTL process. In stage I, the carbohydrates in the feedstock are extracted and separated from the residual solid. The residual solid from stage I is further converted to biocrude in the SEQHTL stage II step. The biocrude is upgraded to final fuel products in an upgrading process. The extract stream from HTL stage I is sent to the bioprocessing section for co-product generation via fermentation of carbohydrate. Lactic acid (LA) is assumed to be the co-product based on current bioprocessing testing results.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Harvesting Energy from Wastewater by Converting Sewage

This project aims were to develop and demonstrate a scalable, integrated process to convert sewage sludge into renewable natural gas (RNG), enabling wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to become net energy producers. The system proposal integrates autothermal hydrothermal liquefaction (AT-HTL), supercritical salt precipitation (SCSP), and hydrothermal gasification (HTG), collectively forming the Supercritical Sludge-to-Gas (SC-S2G) platform. Initially, batch hydrothermal liquefaction reactions were used to screen sewage sludge using AT-HTL (later termed RI-HTL) conversion to biocrude, aqueous and char phases compared to hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). Significant improvement in biocrude yield using peroxide addition at O:C ratio of 0.05 and under conditions of 300°C for 10 minutes gave 57% biocrude yield and 85% fluid carbon yield (biocrude plus aqueous), while minimizing the loss of carbon to char solids (~7%). Hence, RI-HTL was shown to be effective for conversion of real sewage sludge. The corrosion of the alloy reactor tubes or vessels is an important factor when developing a process that includes an oxidant and a chemically complex feed like sewage sludge. We investigated the corrosion rates on metal alloys at 350°C for 240 hours. Corrosion rates of 0.21 and 0.26 mpy for 304L and 316L stainless steel were measured respectively. The corrosion information obtained in this investigation was utilized by PNNL for design, materials sourcing and construction of the pilot scale continuous flow system.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Algae/Wood Blends Hydrothermal Liquefaction and Upgrading: 2019 State of Technology

The fiscal year (FY) 2019 State of Technology (SOT) Assessment for a microalgae and woody biomass blend feedstock hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and biocrude upgrading system has been completed and reported here. This study is a preliminary economic analysis for this system. Inputs from the 2019 NREL open pond algae cultivation model provided microalgae seasonal flowrates and dewatered algae feedstock price. These inputs have been coupled with modeled experimental data from PNNL for algae/wood blends processed via HTL to assess the cost impacts. The TEA results demonstrated a 28% reduction in the conversion cost only from $1.22/gge in 2018 to $0.88/gge in 2019.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Desalting biocrude for improved downstream processing toward marine fuel application

Hydrothermal liquefaction of wet wastes (e.g., food waste and sewage sludge) offers a promising avenue for producing biocrude, but the resulting product is often contaminated with metals and water, impacting the biocrude upgrading steps to produce final fuel (e.g., jet and diesel). Here this study investigates the use of aqueous solutions of formic acid for desalting biocrudes and improving their quality. The results show that this approach significantly reduces both metal and water content, enabling mild hydrotreatment with reduced hydrogen consumption to further enhance the biocrude's quality. A preliminary technoeconomic analysis based on these experimental results shows that even without optimization, this washing process can yield biocrude with a minimum selling price of $1.87/GGE. Overall, our study demonstrates the potential for using dilute formic acid aqueous solutions to improve the quality of biocrudes, which can lead to more efficient and cost-effective conversion into biofuels.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge – effect of four reagents on relevant parameters related to biocrude and $\mathrm{PFAS}$

Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) can convert wet biomass into crude-like oil and has potential to degrade pollutants during the thermal depolymerization process. To avoid negative environmental impacts from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sewage sludge after its final disposal, we comprehensively evaluated catalytic destruction of PFAS in sludge through HTL. Here the results showed that adding red mud to HTL was beneficial for the biocrude yield and significantly increased the carbon conversion efficiency and energy recovery of the hydrothermal process. HTL at 300 °C for 2 h degraded > 96% of spiked perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The mass of spiked perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and pre-existing perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), however, increased in the HTL product streams. The remaining PFAS after HTL mainly stayed in the biocrude phase. Our findings indicated that HTL under the studied condition was not able to degrade all PFAS existed in sewage sludge. Although adding red mud could improve the HTL performance with respect to biocrude, this reagent did not improve the removal of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs). As a matter of fact, the hydrothermal process amended with the selected reagents resulted in increased mass of PFBS, PFHxA, and PFHpA in the HTL products due to degradation of PFAA precursors. Thus, other treatment approaches for PFAS removal from sewage sludge need to be identified to prevent possible contamination of environments receiving PFAS-containing sludge.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

TAILORED BIOBLENDSTOCKS WITH LOW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO OPTIMIZE MCCI ENGINES

The overall objective of the project is to develop and demonstrate a microalgae bio-blendstock with greater than 60% greenhouse gas reduction potential relative to petroleum diesel, that can reduce sooting propensity, increase cetane number and improve engine thermal efficiency relative to a baseline diesel engine operating on conventional fuel. Specific objectives include: (1) development of a new framework for both LCA and TEA that explicitly considers temporal variation in productivity and the frequency of crop loss; (2) determination of how fuel compounds that can be produced from the algal biomass can be ‘bio-tailored’ based on the species composition and biological production process, and subsequent processing via HTL to biocrude, and upgrading of the biocrude; (3) execution of a feedback loop (algae production  biocrude refining  combustion optimization  feedback to refining stage), for optimization of fuels for MCCI combustion; (4) optimization of MCCI combustion and emissions performance, accounting first for the biological processes that dictate the chemical composition of biocrude oil, and second for the subsequent chemical processes that comprise mixing controlled compression ignition combustion; (6) simulation of MCCI engine combustion processes to demonstrate the incorporation of relevant fuel chemistry that captures the specific impacts of optimized algal fuels.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Tailored Bioblendstocks with Low Environmental Impact to Optimize MCCI Engines

The overall objective of the project is to develop and demonstrate a microalgae bio-blendstock with greater than 60% greenhouse gas reduction potential relative to petroleum diesel, that can reduce sooting propensity, increase cetane number and improve engine thermal efficiency relative to a baseline diesel engine operating on conventional fuel. Specific objectives include: (1) development of a new framework for both LCA and TEA that explicitly considers temporal variation in productivity and the frequency of crop loss; (2) determination of how fuel compounds that can be produced from the algal biomass can be ‘bio-tailored’ based on the species composition and biological production process, and subsequent processing via HTL to biocrude, and upgrading of the biocrude; (3) execution of a feedback loop (algae production  biocrude refining  combustion optimization  feedback to refining stage), for optimization of fuels for MCCI combustion; (4) optimization of MCCI combustion and emissions performance, accounting first for the biological processes that dictate the chemical composition of biocrude oil, and second for the subsequent chemical processes that comprise mixing controlled compression ignition combustion; (6) simulation of MCCI engine combustion processes to demonstrate the incorporation of relevant fuel chemistry that captures the specific impacts of optimized algal fuels.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗